CHAPTER VIII

PRAISE AND BLAME IN MUSIC

Music is unique among esthetic appeals in that it demands immediate

response in the form of praise or blame. The orator demands immediate

response; but his appeal is to reasoning, not to feeling. The painter,

sculptor, and poet demand esthetic response, but this response is

delayed and does not keep the artist on the tip of his nerves to receive

it. The musical appeal is all the more emotional because it is not only

an appeal for personal recognition but for the aggrandizement of the

noble art. The musician at all ages and all stages of advancement can

perform for his own pleasure in isolation, but even here the demand for

praise or blame on the spur of the moment is emphatic and essential.

It is, of course, fully recognized that at his best the musical

performer is not conscious of making a direct appeal for approval by

others. His objective is rather that of self-expression and experiment

in the execution of an artistic skill. He is often aware of a negative

attitude in his audience, and he may take an attitude of aloofness or

superiority toward the audience, recognizing its incompetence. Yet back

of it all, there may be even a distant hope of approval in a coming

generation or the critical judgment of the select few; but the attitude

of the immediate audience or the public toward his performance plays

heavily upon his unanalyzed feelings and moods.

The bases for musical praise and blame are notoriously inadequate, be

they meaningless approval, empty flattery, or censorious criticism. A

general attitude of spontaneous approval without knowing or giving

reasons among listeners in general is praiseworthy as an expression of

good will; but for serious purposes we must question the competence of

the listener for the response manifested. The fault may lie in the

listener's ignorance of the art of music, his incompetence in

recognizing elements of merit, his failure to credit the performer in

relation to natural ability or purpose. Praise or blame may also carry

or miscarry in so far as it may wisely serve to motivate or discourage

the performer on the specific issues involved in the performance. With

the sudden popularizing of music, the incoming tendency is to associate

music with the beginning of a scientific approach to the understanding

of the music and the musician. This situation is changing at a

gratifying rate for the good of music. It is worth while to consider in

some detail the factors in this progress.

VANTAGE GROUNDS

_Artistic insight._ The extraordinarily rapid introduction of real music

education in the grades and in the high school and college curricula,

and even in graduate study, is changing the attitude of the listener by

increasing his competence. Children and youth now hear more good music

and hear it presented in such a way as to increase their understanding

of it. At the college level music is presented as an academic subject,

with primary emphasis upon the art of hearing music together with some

knowledge of history and content of music. The training of high-school

teachers of music has changed radically in a generation from the mere

development of proficiency with an instrument or voice to a deeper

insight into the nature of the art, its history, and its roles. At many

levels well-developed courses in music appreciation have acquired a

permanent status and have proved a good foundation for further

penetration into the art of the appreciation of music. This implanting

of points of view and development of esthetic attitudes in the academic

instruction in the schools is hastened to fruitage by the popularizing

of music for the masses through radio and phonograph as well as through

the penetrating of the skills acquired in school into the home and

social institutions. The popularizing of good music, where public

entertainment in the parks and other public places is of good musical

quality and furnished free or at popular prices, is a great help in

developing a critical attitude even among those in other respects quite

uneducated. Therefore, we may say with great satisfaction that training

in the art of hearing music has come upon the educational horizon in

America in a very promising way.

_The scientific attitude._ We are constantly impressed with the analogy

between scientific insight into the nature of music and the

corresponding insight in other sciences, such as botany or astronomy. A

child starts out with an inborn capacity and urge for the love of

flowers; but as a student of flowers he soon encounters many marvelous

revelations. On the one hand his horizon is broadened by acquaintance

with larger and larger classes and varieties. He learns to see

relationships to habitat. He learns to trace scientifically the laws of

their evolution, the methods of artificial breeding and development of

new plants, and even the beauty in their usefulness. On the other hand,

he turns to his microscope and discovers not only the external parts

visible to the naked eye but the internal structures, their modes of

evolution and development, even down to the discovery of the mechanisms

of heredity through the genes, which are so small that we know them only

by inference from what the microscope reveals. The natural history of

music is analogous to that of such a material science.

This scientific insight into the structure and function of music goes

hand in hand with the development of the artistic insight into the

nature of the esthetic values from the point of view of the art of

music. Thus the student of music is now furnished the facilities for

increasing his power of appreciation of music and a critical awarding of

praise or blame from two complementary points of view: a study of the

art and a study of the science of music.

_Terminology._ The mere matter of terminology here plays a very

important role, as is now being demonstrated so successfully in the

recent developments in the field of psychology of music and acoustics.

Take, for example, the concept of tone quality. Until a few years ago

there was probably not a single adequate statement of the nature of tone

quality in the entire literature on music; and yet this is the most

important element in music. In the past the listener and the student

have generally approached the subject in an attitude of acceptance or

rejection of the unanalyzed impression, but often with no more

competence than that with which the ignorant shepherd appraises the

grandeur and meaning of the heavens above on a starlit night. The

teacher, as a rule, said "This is beautiful," or "This is ugly," without

being able to give the reasons why, for want of a tangible terminology.

The teaching and development of tone quality therefore has wallowed in a

slough of despond. Recent researches in the field of musical acoustics

are ushering in a new era. The structure of tone quality has been

dissected, and its parts have been adequately described and defined.

This is leading to an improved musical language. The same is true for

other musical concepts. Thus, through the systematic development of

musical terminology, there will gradually develop a scientific

classification of the various aspects of the musical medium which is

essential not only for the learning of music but also for the awarding

of praise and blame.

_Musical talent._ With this development of a knowledge of the nature of

music, the scientific student of music has turned to the analysis of the

nature of the musical mind attempting to assign specific roles to

musical heredity and musical training and environment. Hazy concepts of

the gift of music have been subjected to scientific analysis,

experiment, and measurement. From this, it is being demonstrated that it

is impossible to award praise or blame without taking a reasonable

account of the innate fortes and faults of the performer which determine

in large part the direction and limits of achievement or failure. The

recognition of this fact, of course, plays its fundamental role in the

early encouragement or discouragement of the inceptive musician, in the

recognition of the purpose of his education, and in the motivation

through training.

PARTIES CONCERNED

_The pupil._ Modern education has revealed the importance of a

student-centered and student-originated learning process as opposed to

the traditional and institutional direction of development of the

individual. The question of self-praise and self-blame, satisfaction or

dissatisfaction on the part of the child or youth, is of course of first

importance both in the initial stages of orientation and throughout the

course of specialization and achievement. Instead of imposing

regimentation, the home, the school and the private teachers tactfully

aim to assist the child in the discovery of his natural interests,

resources and promises which aid him in the building of his personal

convictions. But emphasis is laid upon the principle of

self-determination in the light of progressively available reasonable

facilities for self-appraisal. This refers both to the appreciation of

music and to the development of musical skills. This principle of

self-determination has frequently run amuck in the hands of progressive

educators, capital _P_. But it is a fundamental and permanent principle

for the development of personality and motivation in specific pursuits.

The child will soon discover that in order to pursue his interests and

satisfy himself in performance he may have to work hard, conform to

requirements, be patient, and make sacrifices; but his first goal is to

feel satisfaction in what he is getting and in the worth-whileness of

the pursuit.

For these things he will find an analogy in any form of play, physical

or mental, into which he enters in a wholehearted way. This feeling of

self-approbation comes easily in the musically talented where the urge

for music is clearly manifested; but with moderate talent this attitude

of self-reliance needs cultivation. And in the assumed absence of

talent, there is need of assistance in the real verification of this

absence. The greatest danger lies in the intrusion of prejudice and

social pressures. This principle of self-determination is of most

importance in those fields which are to be pursued primarily as a source

of self-expression and pleasure in the pursuit as distinguished from the

pursuits which are essential for the earning of bread and butter and the

maintaining of social status.

_The teacher._ The recognition of this principle of self-determination

and the sustained will to achieve has revolutionized the art of

teaching, or we may say better, has laid the beginnings for an art of

teaching. One of the greatest obstacles the teacher encounters is the

traditional social demand, and often the recognized objective in the

profession, to make everybody musical. Finding that there is no adequate

natural interest and no marks of gratifying achievement are developing,

the teacher settles down to the sledge-hammer method of forced

development. We must therefore bespeak for the live music teacher the

right to refuse to make gold out of iron. The private teacher's fee and

the tuition of the school are, of course, the temptations of the devil

to face the situation with complacence. The constituency granting

lenience in this respect has the right to expect that, in turn, the

teacher understands and has exercised the effective means of

self-discovery, self-orientation, self-determination, and

self-motivation on the part of those who are on the border line. In this

art, the profession has made but little progress so far. The

constituency also has the right to impose the obligation upon the

teacher to respect the individuality of the gifted and to give all types

of freedom to the pupil commensurate with his natural line and degree of

successful achievement in developing appreciation for various types of

music.

In breaking with the traditional routines of musical drill, the teacher

must first of all give up the attempt to cast the musical mind of the

child in the mold of his or her own pattern. This principle has acquired

its greatest significance in dealing with the highly gifted, where it is

clearly substantiated by the musical history of precocious children. The

public must acquire tolerance for the principle of giving musical

facilities to child and youth in proportion to this self-determination

and demonstrated ability to achieve. The great musician and the musical

virtuoso are not fostered by educational or social conformance but

primarily by the enjoyment of the principle of free determination and

development of divergent personality.

_The critic._ The music critic unfortunately, as a rule, is a newspaper

man and must conform to the pressure methods of efficiency in writing

down. This newspaper ability has often been the basis for the

unfortunate selection of musical critics. On the other hand, the

thoroughly competent musical critic, if he were to ply his art as a

technician, would find but small outlet for publication and a negligible

constituency of readers. He would face, most discouragingly, the fact

that many of the performers on the stage do not have critical knowledge

of what they are doing and are not interested or even capable of reading

the highly technical and critical analysis of their performance. So we

must be tolerant with the musical critic.

If music were a simple thing or had a specific goal, such as the

development of a logical proposition, the task of the critic would be

easier. But, as it is, he is dealing with a highly fluid and chaotic

state of affairs when he is supposed to aid the common reader in

assigning praise or blame to the performance. One of the most striking

faults of the work of the musical critic is his lack of words--lack of

concepts which are discriminating and logically definable. We tolerate

his splashing of his personal likes or dislikes as if he were competent

to boil down our feelings of the situation into a fair assaying of

praise or blame of the performance. One difficulty lies in the demand

for writing in smart and emotional style. Among critics there are rare

individuals who have a fine artistic insight and a balanced esthetic

judgment in regard to what is good or bad in music. But we seldom see

their names in the musical-review columns.

Phonophotographic recordings reveal art principles which had not been

discovered in the musical world through hearing, and yet functioned very

largely. They enable the critic to use scientific language in the

description of achievement and assign praise or blame on the basis of

identifiable and describable grounds. We can now photograph the sound

waves of a performance at any distance from the source of sound and

convert this into an analyzable performance score. As a whole, this

principle cannot be available to the musical critic who must render an

immediate opinion. But we have a right to expect that he should have a

scientific knowledge of the types of facts which are revealed in such

objective records. He is living in a new musical era in which the

qualifications for the critic are as new as they are for the artistic

and scientific orientation of teacher and performer.

_The public._ I can recall the time when the possession of a piano and

piano lessons for the darling girl represented almost the sole ambition

of the mothers in our state aside from the spontaneous and untutored

self-expression in song. The public demand has changed. Instruments have

changed. Methods of teaching have changed. Understanding of the art has

increased. Cosmopolitan tastes have spread. Knowledge of the science of

music has become aligned with knowledge in other sciences. The public

rapidly learns to demand all these things and take the right for

granted. The ambition of the mother, the objective of the teacher, and

the expression of the youth of fifty years ago are coming to be

historical curiosities. The art of music in America is coming to a

wholesome fruitage and is becoming associated with present-day academic

learning. For the first time in history it reaches out into the remotest

corners of the land and many of the technical aspects of the art and new

concepts of the musical medium are fast becoming common-sense knowledge

and therefore add in the just awarding of praise or blame.

THOUGHT REVIEW

Principles

(1) Music is designed to give pleasure when heard, and therefore calls

for immediate affective response.

(2) Capacity for esthetic response varies with natural talent and

training, both artistic and scientific.

(3) It is important to know "where to laugh and when to laugh."

(4) For scientific description of likes or dislikes we need a

discriminating terminology.

(5) As every scientific discovery and invention gradually becomes

common-sense knowledge when popularly known, so artistic judgment

tends to crystallize into common-sense feeling.

(6) Musical criticism may be chastized and chastened into balanced and

critical judgment, relatively free from emotional explosions.

(7) The spontaneous and natural smile or frown is often more

eloquently telling or cutting than words.

Consider These Questions

(1) Is the conventional response to music affectedly temperamental?

(2) Why is listening intently to a major musical performance more

exhausting than listening to an equally engrossing lecture on

"International Relations?"

(3) Was the English visitor right when he said, "You have no art,

because whatever you have you display"?

(4) Does insight into the nature and structure of the thing beautiful

tend to lessen or to strengthen the artistic appeal?

Discuss This Situation

(1) During the last twenty years in a Midwestern city of 30,000 people

music has "come to town." Curricular and extracurricular music in

the schools has been tenfold what it was during the foregoing

twenty years. Music clubs and other musical activities have

greatly increased. The community often takes as strong an interest

in local, district, state, and national contests in music as

ordinarily attaches to football. Discuss the effect of this upon

(a) the musical, (b) the social, (c) the recreational and (d) the

educational life of the community. Evaluate the change in interest

and capacity for assigning fair praise and blame to music.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcriber's Note

Where hyphenation occurs on a line break, the decision to

retain or remove is based on occurrences elsewhere in the

text.

The errors deemed most likely to be the printer's have been

corrected, and are noted here. The references are to the

page and line in the original text.

8.2 Play is essentially social and find[s] its added

highest

21.13 The old conflict be[t]ween enthusiasts for added

rote singing

38.11 has, of course, been unparall[el]ed in the added

history of the world.

39.48 generally has a[n] hereditary basis in removed

66.30 for example, in the present "Novac[h]ord" added

71.23 flexibil[i]ty of tone quality is even more added

desirable.

Why We Love Music · 第 8 / 8 章