Chapter III

MUSIC BETWEEN THE AGES OF SIX AND TEN

The question "_When_ should music education begin?" is now coming to be

"_How_ should music education begin?"; because we now recognize that

music should play a large role in the first five years of child life.

Soon after six the child enters school. Here the principles of

educational psychology, now so effectively applied to other primary and

elementary school subjects, have revolutionized the presentation of

music. This has of course been favored by the recognition of music on

the level of the three R's. Music has come to function in the school not

only as something to be learned but primarily as something to be lived.

Primary teachers are, or will be, trained specifically for this subject.

The old conflict between enthusiasts for rote singing, on the one hand,

and for technical sight reading, on the other, is vanishing. The

approach to music is following new avenues involving diversified action,

creative imagination and thinking in music, recognition of individual

differences, freedom for individual expression of musical feeling,

opportunity for sampling various avenues of choice in expression, the

association of music with play, dance, and dramatic action, opportunity

for hearing music at the child's level, avoidance of the fostering of a

narrow precocity, and recognition that there is music everywhere--in

speech, in play, in nature.

Parents who now aim to provide private lessons for formal training in

some aspect of music must lay their plans in the light of all these

facts which have come into view so strikingly in the school. They must

understand and evaluate the significance of this movement in the school,

the new status of music, the new role of private instruction in music,

and the availability of a private teacher who can dovetail with these

new facilities and responsibilities. In the hope of giving some helpful

suggestions in regard to this planning, I wish to present some

psychological considerations which are, at the present time,

reconstructing the theory and practice of private lessons in music at

this age.

_A broadened conception of music._ In Chapter II I pointed out that

children coming out of a favorable music situation in the home, the

preschool, the kindergarten, and other school and playground activities

have attained rather astonishing achievement. Let me repeat, for

emphasis:

"During the first six years there should be no formal musical

instruction; but by the end of that period, the musical child should

have gradually acquired a sense of appreciation for musical sounds,

pleasure in self-expression in musical intonations, confidence in

his ability to compose a tune, some proficiency in singing and good

speech, and some degree of satisfaction in free playing with an

instrument."

This achievement now accomplished in many preschool communities presents

a challenge to the primary teacher and the supervisor of music in the

public schools. And, where pupils come without such preparation or

background, they must begin from scratch and offer a substitute for it

in more concentrated form.

Private lessons should be built upon this background and designed to

carry this type of program forward during the next four years with

progressive enrichment of opportunities on the basis of talent thus

revealed and with these types of activity as a goal in the beginnings of

formal training.

This point of view turns a large part of the job of the private music

teacher over to the primary school where it is favorably developed;

because only in the group activity and in the avocational attitude with

the avocational atmosphere under technically qualified teachers can this

program of musical education find its best fruitage for children in

general. The private teacher is falling from her high pedestal of the

power to cast the child's musical mind in the pattern of her own image

within a limited musical skill at this age. On the other hand, the ideal

of the school situation which I have pictured will play happily into her

hands by furnishing a background for a systematic study of voice or a

particular instrument.

In this procedure, the child's interest may well concentrate around a

single instrument. Furthermore, we are just awakening to the fact that

voice development should begin in this period. New techniques for the

development of a beautiful voice are coming in, and are adapted to this

age. They should play an important role in this orientation period, and

the child's interest may concentrate around this, as well as around an

instrument, especially through the association of artistic forms of

speech with song.

_The analysis of talent._ Music educators are coming now to a

recognition of the principle that musical education, public and private,

should be given in proportion to the possession of natural talent and in

the direction for which the most favorable indication is found on the

ground of specific talents. Such talents reveal themselves through the

daily activities of the schoolroom, where the alert teacher understands

their significance and directs them wisely. There are certain basic

abilities which are favorable to a musical life. Some of these can be

measured accurately with the _Seashore Measures of Musical Talents_ in a

revised edition now available through the RCA Victor agencies. They are

concerned with the senses of pitch, loudness, time, timbre, and rhythm,

together with tonal memory. These may be given individually to children

between the ages of six and ten if administered with good judgment and

the child is not required to write the answers. However, if the teacher

is trained in the musical analysis of talent and the critical

observation of children's behavior, inceptive achievement, and interests

in the musical situation, it is possible to proceed without instruments,

since the teacher will know what to listen for and will be competent to

observe with sufficient accuracy for the purpose in hand. After the

fourth grade, "measures of talents" may be given either as individual or

as group tests. They may furnish a key to the most natural development

of musical type; such as, the tonal, the dynamic, the temporal, or the

balanced types, on the basis of degree of responsiveness to each of

these factors as well as on other specific adaptations for voice or

instrument. The teacher who has such concrete facts in hand will observe

and plan the child's development more critically. Every private teacher

should have a conception of the significance of individual differences

in talent, and might well utilize measurements of this kind in the

studio. The progressive private teacher should also be able to serve

parents in an advisory capacity on such matters.

It is not necessary that the teacher should be an expert in testing; but

it is essential that she should understand the nature of musical talents

and have the sort of insight into child life which has been developed so

splendidly in recent scientific studies of child behavior, especially

with reference to the recognition of natural abilities, the early

fostering of these, the devising of effective motivation, the awarding

of praise and blame, and the setting up of standards of achievement

recognizable by the child. It is, furthermore, reasonable to demand that

the teacher herself should present a good voice in song and speech, have

some proficiency and ingenuity in the manipulation of simple

instruments, and feel deeply the love of music.

_Group instruction._ The old-fashioned piano lesson was at fault in

various respects. First, time was taken to tell the pupils,

individually, the elements of musical notation; second, the main

function seemed to be to make the pupil "get" his lesson; and third, the

child was expected to acquire a love of music through the technical

approach. These things are now changing. The pupil now coming from the

respectable primary school already has acquired the elements of sight

reading, both from ear to eye and eye to ear. Any new element in

notation can certainly be picked up incidentally as needed, without

waste of time. The position of the teacher as a taskmaster is also

disappearing. True, that eliminates many a pupil, but probably without

much loss to the musical life of the community. The child comes to the

private teacher already motivated with a feeling and urge for music.

Musical achievement is no longer counted in terms of the number of

lessons taken.

The function of the teacher is far more to motivate than to teach. The

thing that counts is how long and faithfully the pupil works to acquire

the proficiency which can only come through practice. What can be taught

in one lesson should suffice for several times as much practice as is

ordinarily expected. Better than having the teacher crack the whip for

many periods would be to give the time available for lessons to the

pupil for practice and use more remunerative rewards, even a percentage

of the teacher's fee, to encourage self-help in a larger assignment

through adequate practice.

One of the significant advancements in private instruction for children

of this age lies in the direction of class or group instruction. No

effort is made to force all children into the same cast. Small groups

are formed on the pattern of chamber music, taking children of matched

abilities and interests and using music progressively adapted to their

level. Many forms of class instruction have failed on the ground of the

teacher's inability to use informal procedures in some form of project

method. Duets, trios, quartets, all in the competitive and play mood,

can accomplish great things, even with the youngest children. Few

private teachers have awakened to a realization of the fine

possibilities in that approach. This method is especially adapted to

primary instruction in private music schools in which there are enough

pupils to make competitive promotions from group to group. Most of the

musical information and the motivated drill can be accomplished through

the group. The recognition of this principle may lead to the development

of extracurricular and private organizations under an inspiring teacher

or group of teachers for private instruction.

_Formal lessons delayed._ The principal point I wish to stress is that

musical education should not begin with formal lessons on one

instrument. Except in the case of rarely-gifted children, such

specialized instruction should come naturally after the general musical

interests have been awakened and the natural abilities have been

revealed. Technical private lessons for children in general should

therefore be begun considerably later than has been customary. In this

there is a threefold saving: First, except in rare cases, rigid

technique of instruction can be responded to much more economically

after the age of eight or ten than before. A ten-year-old will acquire

more than twice as much in a single lesson as a six-year-old. This will

apply even to the much "touted" necessity for early finger development.

Second, during this period the child should have the freedom to try

himself out spontaneously with diversified encouragement in the

development of specific interests; and third, it will take the aspect of

drudgery away from the music lesson. To these may be added the fact that

this liberal procedure helps to give the child a feeling that he is

living music rather than learning it. It involves the play attitude in

the acquisition of an art. The attitude of feeling the necessity for

hard work, which is a very real necessity in music, can best be

cultivated formally after the age of eight or ten.

_A sympathetic listener._ Although circumstances may alter cases,

facility in piano playing might well be regarded as a foundation work in

the approach to other instruments. The child's preference for a

particular instrument is generally childish and will change in the

normal course of development. An analysis of case histories would make

an interesting study on this point. The development of skills in a

particular instrument should always be accompanied by opportunities for

sharing the pleasure in this skill with other children and the presence

of a sympathetic listener in the teacher and the parents. What the child

of the primary-school age needs is more a sympathetic and critical

listener than a task-driver. This type of approach will discredit the

now so prevalent artificial ways of symbolizing music by attempting to

force the teacher's affected and stilted imagery upon the child's

musical mind, which may run naturally in much more effective channels.

It is a notable fact that the great musicians who emerged as very

precocious made their early and distinctive progress far more through

freedom for self-expression than through instruction from the masters.

In brief, the private lesson to the child should pattern, at the child's

age level, after the procedure followed in adult instruction in music at

its best; namely, that of sympathetic and inspiring criticism and

guidance rather than the dealing out of predigested pellets of

interpretation and technique. The general attitude to be cultivated in

the child should therefore be freedom for self-expression rather than

mere willingness to absorb set tasks. In this attitude the problem of

scales, exercises, and calisthenic techniques will come in the natural

course of events without being forced.

_Music lovers vs. virtuosi._ One of the first essential steps in

training at this level is to educate the mother to the notion that only

in very rare cases will the child become a virtuoso or a professional

musician, and that she has no right to pose as an exhibitioner. The

normal child is richly endowed with powers for diversified development.

By too early emphasis upon a "gift" it is possible to produce

monstrosities and pathological temperament. True, a gifted child

beginning, for example, by taking lessons at five and being effectively

motivated, may produce extraordinary results before ten, but generally

at the expense of a normal development of the child as a person. An

ill-guided enthusiast can make of the bright normal child a mathematical

freak or a contortionist before the age of ten; but who wants that for

the welfare of the child? It is a form of human sacrifice. The time for

intensive specialization should normally come after the age of ten.

Parents and teachers should shun the development of precocity as they

shun disease. Indeed, in ninety cases out of a hundred, excessive

precocity is a form of disease, a distortion of the normal personality.

The goal in musical education in this period should be to recognize

individual differences, natural capacities, and native interests and

urges in their natural stages for the development of a well-rounded

personality. We have long since abandoned the notion that every girl

should play the piano. What we need to learn now is that we should not

allow the musically-gifted child to die with all the music in him, and

that the musically gifted should not be exploited. The middle ground is

that all children who have musical ability should learn to love music

and live it naturally, each according to his ability.

THOUGHT REVIEW

General Principles

(1) Music should function early in the life of the child.

(2) The primary grades should constitute a period of orientation.

(3) By the end of this period talent should have been discovered and

analyzed.

(4) Voice training should be given a permanent place in all the grades

for both boys and girls.

(5) Music is a skill which should be learned and lived rather than be

taught.

(6) Wise motivation should replace much teaching.

(7) Nomenclature, sight reading, and musical information should be

taught in classes, not by individual instruction.

(8) The principle of rivalry should be encouraged.

(9) For most children formal music lessons may be begun most

effectively about the age of ten.

(10) Forced precocity and exhibitionism should be discouraged.

Questions to Consider

(1) Why is development of the love of music the principal objective at

this age?

(2) What voice training, aside from rote singing and speech, should be

offered in the grades?

(3) Should the piano be favored as the first instrument?

(4) Is it possible to have a primary-grade "orchestra"?

(5) What is the function of achievement tests in music at this age?

(6) What factors have been most effective in putting love of music

into the public schools?

(7) How can progress in music be enhanced by children's opportunities

for performing among themselves?

(8) Should any children be excused from participation in musical

instruction offered in the primary grades?

Discuss These Situations

(1) Here is a gifted young woman, well trained in music and in

psychological and educational methods, zealously devoted to her

art, who desires to establish a career as a private music teacher

for children. Characterize her procedure in contrast to the

procedure of her professional forbears.

(2) Here is a young man or woman, similarly gifted, and well

trained and critical. What pitfalls of prevalent tendencies in

public-school music of today should he or she avoid?

Why We Love Music · 第 3 / 8 章