OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_BY MR. PUNCH'S STAFF OF LEARNED CLERKS_.)

I think I prefer Mr. WELLS'S recent essay in the Newest Theology to

this too concrete illustration of _The Soul of a Bishop_ (CASSELL).

It's not that I object to the irreverence of stripping a poor tired

bishop of cassock and gaiters, pursuing him to a sleepless bed and

cinematographing all his physical twistings and turnings, his moral

misgivings, his torturing doubts. I owe too much to Mr. WELLS'

irreverences to mind that sort of thing; and I must say that, for a

man who can't have had very much to do with the episcopacy in his

busy life, he does manage to give a confoundedly plausible atmosphere

to the whole setting. There are two letters from an older bishop to

_Dr. Scrope_, the one, yieldingly tolerant, to dissuade him from

resignation, the other, written after the accomplished fact, with

touches of exquisitely restrained yet palpable malice, which strike

me as masterly projections. Mr. WELLS also contrives a wonderful

impressiveness in certain passages of the bishop's three visions. But

I can't, even after careful re-reading, see the point of making the

bishop's enlightenment depend upon a mysterious drug. This has an

effect of impishness. There is nothing in _Dr. Scrope's_ development

that might not have taken place without this fantastic assistance....

I suppose the general suggestion of this rather wayward and hasty but

conspicuously sincere book is, that if only an occasional bishop would

secede it would make it easier for the plain man to listen to the

rest. And there may be something in this.

To those who are in love with Mr. W.J. LOCKE'S incurable romanticism

or who have a taste for heroines that "stiffen in a sudden stroke

of passion looking for the instant electrically beautiful," let me

commend _The Red Planet_ (LANE). As a matter of fact _Betty_, the

heroine, is quite a dear, and the narrator, _Major Meredyth_, a maimed

hero of the Boer War, who looks at this one from the tragic angle of

an invalid chair, is, apart from a habit of petulant and not very

profound grousing at Governments in _The Daily Rail_ manner, a sport

who thoroughly deserves the reward of poor widowed _Betty's_ hand

on the last page but one. Perhaps he does not show a very ready

understanding of the phenomenon of physical cowardice in the case of a

brother-officer, though later he makes amends. But I take it that it

was Mr. LOCKE'S idea to present a very ordinary decent sort with the

common man's prejudices and frank distrust of subtleties. A sinister

mystery of love, death and blackmail runs, a turbid undercurrent,

through the story. The publisher's pathetic apology for the drab grey

paper on which, in the interests of War Economy, the book is printed,

makes one wonder how the other publishers who still issue books in

black and white manage to live.

* * * * *

Of the literary reputations that the War has, so to speak, dug in, I

suppose none to be more firmly consolidated than that of Mr. PATRICK

MACGILL. The newest of his several battle-books is _The Brown

Brethren_ (JENKINS), a title derived from the campaigning colour

that has amended a popular quotation till it should now read "the

thin brown line of heroes." I can hardly tell you anything about

Mr. MACGILL'S new book that you have not probably read or said for

yourself of the previous volumes. For my own part, if the War is to

be written about at all (a question concerning which I preserve an

open mind), I say let it be, as here, the real thing, and the hotter

and stronger the better. There is rough humour in these sketches of

soldier types, and just enough story to thread them together; but it

is the fighting that counts. Certain chapters, for example that about

_Benner's_ struggle with the Hun sniper, seem to leave one bruised and

breathless as from personal conflict. Mr. MACGILL writes about war as

he knows it, horribly, in a way that carries conviction like a charge

of bayonets, and with an entire disregard of the sensibilities of the

stay-at-home reader. For all which reasons _The Brown Brethren_ and

their French friends are assured of the success that they certainly

deserve. Here's wishing them the best of it!

* * * * *

In _The Sentence of the Court_ (WARD, LOCK) Mr. FRED M. WHITE

contrives effectively to entangle our interest in one of those webs of

facile intrigue from which the reader escapes only at the last line of

the last page, muttering at he lays the volume down and observes with

concern that it is 2.30 A.M., "What rot!" The title of the story is

misleading. There is no Court, and nobody is sentenced, though the

eminent specialist of Harley Street who essays the _rôle_ of villain

richly deserves to be. However, as he is left a bankrupt, discredited

in his practice and detached from the heroine whom he had sworn to

appropriate, it would perhaps be straining a point to cavil at his

remaining at large. The idea upon which the story is based, and which

enables the author to clothe his characters and their actions with

bewildering mystery, is essentially good and, I believe, new, though

far be it from me to do either Mr. WHITE or the reader the disservice

of saying what it is. Suffice that we are introduced to some quite

charming people, as well as two extremely unpleasant ones, and if the

web of mystery is held together in places by a somewhat generous share

of obtuseness on the part of the persons concerned it is not for us to

complain, since we become aware of the defect only after the affair is

over.

* * * * *

Apart from the greater complaint that I do not like her subject, which

probably is entirely my own fault, I have nothing but praise for Mrs.

STANLEY WRENCH'S latest volume, _Beat_ (DUCKWORTH), except as regards

her amazing fondness for drooping the corners of her characters'

mouths, generally either "wistfully" or "sullenly." It only made one

annoyed when _Beatrix's_ unpleasant sisters developed the trick,

but when poor little _Beat_ herself was affected that way, in spite

of the magnificent courage with which she faced the burden of

deputy-motherhood, it made one miserable as well. The task she had

undertaken was a prodigious one, for the sisters she had to rear

were, you must understand, vexed with sex instincts of the type of

the modern novel, and so in a large measure she failed, even though

she sacrificed strength, happiness and even her own love-story in

the effort to keep them straight. The tale is set out with every

circumstance of sordid misery, in which the spiritual beauty of

the heroine is meant to shine, and undeniably does shine with

real strength and purity. The successive deaths of the mother and

step-mother, the shabby London lodgings, the fall of _Veronica_, the

selfishness of _Beat's_ boy-friend, and the loathsome trade of her

lover--these, and more horrors and lapses beside, are all taxed for

the general effect in so able and vivid a fashion that the authoress

succeeds to admiration in making her readers nearly as uncomfortable

as her characters, long before the climax is reached. The end comes

rather less wretchedly than could have been expected, but even so

surely this is genius partly run to seed. The greatest tragedies are

not written in these minor keys. _Beat_, woman and heroine, is so

admirable that one fain would know her apart from all this unredeemed

welter of sex and selfishness.

* * * * *

I confess I should have thought that the fictional possibilities

of being as like as two peas to Royalty were fairly exhausted. But

apparently Mr. EDGAR JEPSON does not share this view; and it is only

fair to admit that in _The Professional Prince_ (HUTCHINSON) he has

contrived to give a novel twist to the already well laboured theme.

_Prince Richard_ (precise nationality unstated) was so bored with

the common round of his exalted duties that, hearing of a convenient

double, he engages him, at four hundred a year and pickings, to

represent him at dull functions, and incidentally to pay the requisite

attentions to the young woman, reported by photograph as depressingly

plain, whom political considerations have marked as the _Prince's

fiancée_. When later one of the characters points out to His Highness

that this conduct showed some lapse from the finer ideals of taste, I

am bound to say that I could find no words of contradiction. However

the originality arrives when _John Stuart_, the deputy, instead of

falling in love with the bride-elect in Ruritanian fashion, develops

a marked liking for the prosaic side of his job, and insists upon

lecturing his supposed relations upon the political crisis of the

moment. Capital fun this. When the _fiancée_ in her turn proved wholly

different from the photograph I permitted myself to hope that we

were in for a double masquerade--but this was to expect too much.

Still, Mr. JEPSON has handled his wildly-preposterous plot with

great verve; and even if the central situation is one that has been

often encountered before, this only proves again that HOPE springs

eternal.... But I wish he had avoided the War.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Manager of Automatic Dreadnought Pianofortissimo

Company (enthusiastically to Literary Gentleman who has written a

moving appeal to the public in favour of the Company's goods)._ "MY

DEAR SIR, THIS IS MAGNIFICENT. IT ALMOST MAKES ME DECIDE TO BUY ONE

OF THE THINGS FOR MYSELF."]

* * * * *

"WHERE MY CARAVAN HAS RESTED."

"Wanted, modern Detached Villa Residence, inside tram

lines."--_Northern Whig_.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 153, October 3, 1917 · 第 51 / 51 题