CHAPTER VII

DOORWAYS AND PORCHES

Invariably one associates a house with its front entrance, for the

doorway is the dominant feature of the facade, the keynote so to speak.

Truly utilitarian in purpose, and so lending itself more logically to

elaboration for the sake of decorative effect, the doorway became the

principal single feature of a Colonial exterior. When designed in

complete accord with the house it lends distinction and charm to the

building as a whole.

Like men, doorways have character and individuality. Indeed, in their

individuality they reflect the character of those who built them. They

symbolize the house as a whole and usually the mien of its occupants;

they create the first impressions which the guest has of his host, and

foretell more or less accurately the sort of welcome to be expected.

The houses of Philadelphia and vicinity, perhaps more than those of any

other American city, possess the charm of architectural merit combined

with historic interest. To appreciate more fully the important part

played by Philadelphians in early American affairs, we study their

houses and home life, and as the primary index to the domestic

architecture of the vicinity we direct our attention to the doorways and

porches.

Like the houses, the doorways range in architectural pretension from the

unaffected simplicity of Wyck to the stately elaboration of Cliveden and

Mount Pleasant, and possess distinctive characteristics not seen

elsewhere. Wealth made Philadelphia the most fashionable American city

of the time, with all the attendant rivalries and jealousies of such a

condition. Desiring to put the best foot foremost, elaboration of the

doorway provided a ready means to display the self-esteem, affluence and

social position of the owner. Naturally the Quaker severity of former

years was reflected in many of these outward manifestations of home

life, and it is a study of absorbing interest to note the proportions

and resulting spirit, so unlike New England doorways, which the local

builders gave to their adaptations from the same Renaissance motives.

Summed up in a sentence, the high, narrow doorways of Philadelphia, for

the most part without the welcoming side lights of New England, speak

truly of Quaker severity and the exclusiveness of the old aristocratic

families.

[Illustration: PLATE XLIV.--Window and Shutters, Free Quakers' Meeting

House, Fifth and Arch Streets; Second Story Window, Free Quakers'

Meeting House.]

[Illustration: PLATE XLV.--Detail of Windows, Combes Alley; Window and

Shutters, Cliveden; Window, Bartram House.]

As to the doors themselves, four distinct types were common throughout

the Colonial period. Single and double doors were equally popular,

high, narrow double doors being favored for the more pretentious

houses, although instances are not lacking of single doors in the

mansions of Colonial times. With very few exceptions molded and raised

panels with broad bevels were used in all, and it is according to the

arrangement of these panels that the different types of doors are best

classified.

One of the earliest and simplest was the six-panel single door with

three stiles of about equal width, top and frieze rail about the same,

bottom rail somewhat wider and lock rail about double the width of the

frieze rail. The upper pair of panels were not quite high enough to be

square, while the middle and lower pairs were oblong in shape, the

middle one being higher than the lower. Rarely this relation was

reversed, and the lower pair was higher than the middle pair, the door

at Number 6504 Germantown Avenue being an example. As found in the

farmhouses of Germantown and thereabouts, notably Wyck, Glen Fern, the

Green Tree Inn and the Johnson and Billmeyer houses, these six-panel

doors were split horizontally through the lock rail, dividing them into

an upper and lower part. This arrangement made it possible to open the

upper part for ventilation while keeping the lower part closed to

prevent stray animals and fowls from entering the house. Numerous

examples of undivided six-panel doors are shown by accompanying

illustrations and referred to in detail in succeeding paragraphs. Of

these the door of Grumblethorpe is unique in having a double stile in

the middle, giving almost the appearance of double doors.

Three-panel double doors, such as those of Mount Pleasant, Solitude and

Port Royal House, were less common than any of the four principal types

mentioned, and were little used except for a few decades after the

middle of the eighteenth century. Like six-panel single doors, the upper

panel was often almost square, and the middle oblong panel higher than

the bottom one of the same shape. At Mount Pleasant the middle and lower

panels were of the same size.

Eight-panel single doors were employed extensively throughout the

eighteenth century, and this is one of the most picturesque and

distinctive of Philadelphia types. For the most part the panels were

arranged as shown by the doors of the Perot-Morris, Powel and Wharton

houses with a pair of small and large panels in alternation. Other

notable instances are to be seen at Loudoun, Chalkley Hall and the

Blackwell house. The top or first and third pairs were about half as

high as their width, while the second and fourth pairs were oblong and

usually of the same size, their height about one and one-half times

their width. The door at Upsala is a rare instance of the fourth pair of

panels lower than the second, whereas that at Number 301 South Seventh

Street shows this type with molded flat panels. As is well shown by the

door of the Perot-Morris house, the fourth rail was the broad lock rail,

and as in those days the latch was often separate, it was frequently

placed on the rail above, and hence often referred to as the latch rail.

Another less common type of eight-panel single door is shown in

accompanying illustrations by doors at Number 4908 Germantown Avenue,

Number 39 Fisher's Lane, Wayne Junction and Number 224 South Eighth

Street. The panel arrangement consisted of three pairs of nearly square

panels above the lock rail and one pair twice as high below. Of the

doors mentioned, that at Wayne Junction is unique in its flat molded

panels.

A corresponding panel arrangement of double doors is to be seen at The

Highlands. Usually, however, four-panel double doors took the alternate

small and large panel arrangement and were virtually halves of the more

common type of eight-panel single door. Such doors at Stenton, Cliveden

and the Morris house are illustrated in detail, and similar ones gave

entrance to Hope Lodge, Woodford and Vernon. The Woodford doors are

interesting for their glazed quatrefoil openings in the top pair of

panels, the Vernon doors for a handsome brass knocker on the second

panel of each one.

For the most part Philadelphia doorways were deeply recessed in

connection with stone construction because of the great thickness of

the walls. Paneled jambs were let into the reveals of the opening, and

whatever the panel arrangement of the door, a corresponding arrangement

was followed in paneling the jambs and the soffit of the arch or flat

lintel above. Such a distinctive and pleasing feature did this become

that it was widely adapted to brick construction, the outward projection

of pilasters and engaged columns, often both, supporting pediments and

entablatures which had the effect of increasing the depth of brick

walls.

The simplest type of Philadelphia doorway is that common to the ledge

and "brick" stone farmhouses of Germantown, of which the doorway of the

Johnson house is perhaps the best example. These houses usually had a

penthouse roof along the second-floor level, and as in this instance a

pediment springing from this roof usually formed a hood above the

doorway. Although this doorway with its molded casings, four-paned

horizontal transom and single door with six molded and raised panels is

of the most modest character, its simple lines and good proportions

present an effect of picturesque charm. The door is divided horizontally

into two parts, after the Dutch manner, like many farmhouse doors of the

neighborhood. The position of the drop handle replacing the usual knob

indicates the size of the great rim lock within, and the graceful design

of the brass knocker is justly one of the most popular to-day. The

seats flanking the entrance are unique and unlike any others in

Philadelphia, although those between the two doors of the Billmeyer

house near by are similar.

[Illustration: PLATE XLVI.--Window, Stenton; Window and Shutters, 128

Race Street.]

[Illustration: PLATE XLVII.--Dormer, Witherill House, 130 North Front

Street; Dormer, 6105 Germantown Avenue, Germantown; Foreshortened

Window, Morris House; Dormer, Stenton; Window and Shutters, Witherill

House; Window and Blinds, 6105 Germantown Avenue.]

Substantially the same sort of doorway without the seats is to be seen

at the old Green Tree Inn, Number 6019 Germantown Avenue, Germantown,

erected in 1748. Here, however, the effect is slightly enriched by a

nicely hand-tooled ovolo molding in the cornice of the penthouse roof

that is repeated with an elliptical fan design in the pediment of the

hood.

Another type of Philadelphia doorway only a little more elaborate than

the foregoing is well illustrated at Number 114 League Street and Number

5933 Germantown Avenue. Above the architrave casing across the lintel of

these deeply recessed doorways a frieze and pediment form an effective

doorhead. The pedimental League Street doorhead is supported by

hand-carved consoles at opposite ends, that of the Germantown Avenue

doorhead by fluted pilasters. An oval shell pattern adorns the frieze of

the former, while a denticulated molding enriches the latter. As

contrasted with the plain cased frame of the former, the latter has

paneled jambs and soffit, the spacing corresponding with that of the

door. Both doors are of the popular six-panel type with nicely molded

and raised panels, and both doorheads are elaborated by short, broader

sections of the vertical casings near the top. In refinement of detail

and proportion, and in precision of workmanship the Germantown Avenue

doorway surpasses that on League Street.

But the characteristic type of pedimental door trim in Philadelphia

takes a different form. About the middle of the eighteenth century the

plain horizontal transom above outside doors was generally replaced by

the more graceful semicircular fanlight, the glass area of which was

divided by sash bars or leaded lines into numerous radiating patterns of

more or less grace and beauty. By omitting the entablature of the common

horizontal doorhead and breaking the base of the pediment, the round

arch of the fanlight was made to fit very nicely within the sloping

sides of the pediment, the keystone of the arched casing occupying the

upper angle beneath the peak of the gable. Pilasters or engaged columns

support the pediment, their upper molded portion above the necking being

carried across the horizontal lintel of the door frame. From the

capitals up to the short cornice returns, replacing the usual base of

the pediment, the spirit of the entablature is retained by pilaster

projections molded after the manner of cornice, frieze and architrave.

Excellent doorways such as this with fluted pilaster casings, single

doors with six molded and raised panels of familiar arrangement and

paneled jambs and soffit to correspond are to be seen at Number 5011

Germantown Avenue, Germantown, and Number 247 Pine Street. The former

is of considerable breadth, as Philadelphia doorways go, and the

fanlight is of rather too intricate pattern and heavy scale. The latter

is exceptionally narrow, with pilasters in accord and a fanlight of

chaste simplicity. Like many others the door itself is dark painted and

in striking contrast to the other white wood trim. One notices at once

the strange placing of the knob at the top rather than in the middle of

the lock rail, and the footscraper in a separate block of marble in the

sidewalk at one side of the marble steps, the inference being that one

should scrupulously wipe his feet before approaching the door.

Similar to these, but showing better proportion and greater refinement

of detail, is the entrance to the Morris house, one of the best known

doorways in Philadelphia and notable as one of the relatively few

pedimental doorways of this type having the high four-panel double

doors. The pediment framing the simple but very graceful fanlight is

enriched by cornice moldings, hand-tooled to fine scale, the soffit of

the corona being fluted, the bed-molding reeded and the dentil course

being a familiar Grecian fret. Flutings also adorn the short architraves

each side of the fanlight, and the abacus of the pilaster columns which

is carried across a supplementary lintel in front of the lintel proper,

the latter being several inches to the rear because of the deeply

recessed arrangement of the door. The detail combines Doric and Ionic

inspiration. An attractive knocker, simple brass knob and exceptionally

large key plate indicating the great rim lock within, lend a quaint

charm to a doorway distinctly pleasing in its entirety.

Two excellent doorways of this general type having paneled instead of

fluted pilaster casings may be seen at Number 6504 Germantown Avenue,

Germantown, and Number 701 South Seventh Street. The former is broad and

has a six-panel door much like that at Number 5011 Germantown Avenue,

but the fanlight is of simpler pattern and withal more pleasing. A

fine-scale dentil course lends interest to the pedimental cornice, while

the frieze portions of the entablature section of the pilasters are

elaborated by flutings and drillings, the latter suggestive of a

festoon. A knocker of slender grace is the best feature of the hardware.

The South Seventh Street entrance, higher and narrower, presents another

example of the dark-painted door rendered the more interesting by reason

of its eight-panel arrangement, the spacing being that usually employed

for double doors. The wood trim, molded but nowhere carved, commends

itself for effective simplicity. Two marble steps, the upper one very

deep, with an attractive iron rail on the buttresses at each side,

complete a doorway picture that is typically Philadelphian.

[Illustration: PLATE XLVIII.--Shutter Fastener, Cliveden; Shutter

Fastener, Wyck; Shutter Fastener, Perot-Morris House; Shutter Fastener,

6043 Germantown Avenue.]

[Illustration: PLATE XLIX.--Detail of Round Headed Window, Congress

Hall; Detail of Round Headed Window, Christ Church.]

Surpassing both of the foregoing, however, is the doorway at Number 709

Spruce Street. Indeed, it is among the best of its type in the city. It

has the simple excellence in detail of the South Seventh Street doorway,

with better proportion, less height of pediment and greater apparent

breadth, owing to the six-panel arrangement of the door and the fact

that it is white like the wood trim about it. The only carved molding is

the Grecian fret of the dentil course in the pedimental cornice. Here

again another favorite knocker pattern greets the eye.

Engaged round columns, usually smooth and standing in front of wide

pilasters, were often pleasing features of these pedimental doorways. In

such instances the projection was so great that the entablature sections

above the columns were square, and the soffit of the corona in the

pediment was paneled. Two notable instances may be cited at Number 5200

Germantown Avenue, Germantown, and Number 4927 Frankford Avenue. Both

have the familiar six-panel doors with corresponding paneled jambs and

arch soffit, attractively simple fanlights and much fine-scale hand

carving in the pedimental cornice and architrave casing of the keyed

arch. The former displays better taste. Effective use is made of a

reeded ovolo, and the fascia of the architrave bears a pleasing

hand-tooled band of vertical flutes with a festooned flat fillet

running through it. The most distinctive feature, however, is the double

denticulated molding of the pedimental cornice with prominent drilled

holes in each dentil alternately at top and bottom.

Although representing a high degree of the wood-carvers' art, the other

doorway is rather over-ornate in its detail. The reeded ovolo is again

prominent, and the fascia of the architrave of the arch bears a familiar

decorative motive consisting of groups of five flutes in alternation

with a conventionalized flower. The dentil course of the pedimental

cornice takes the form of a peculiar reeded H pattern which is repeated

in much finer scale on the edge of the corona, the abacus of the

capitals and its continuation across the lintel of the door. Least

pleasing of all is the fluting of the frieze portion of the entablature

sections with three sets of drillings suggestive of festoons.

Another admirable type of doorway, of which there are many examples in

Philadelphia, frames the high, round-headed arch of the doorway with

tall, slender engaged columns supporting a massive entablature above the

semicircular fanlight over the door. Almost without exception the

entablature is some variation of the Ionic order with denticulated

bed-mold in the cornice, plain flat frieze and molded architrave, the

latter sometimes enriched by incised decorative bands. The columns are

Doric and smooth. They stand in front of more widely spaced pilasters,

which are virtually a broadening of the casings of the door frame, and

which support a second entablature back of the first and somewhat wider.

The two combined form a doorhead with projection almost equal to a hood,

but the effect is far more stately.

Such a doorway in its simplest form, with columns tapering considerably

toward the top, in accordance with a prevalent local custom of the time,

is to be seen on the Powel house, Number 244 South Third Street. The

sash divisions of the fanlight are unique, suggesting both Gothic

tracery and the lotus flower. The single, high eight-panel door recalls

many having a similar arrangement of molded and raised panels, but

differs from most of them in that the lock rail is about double the

width of the two rails above.

Narrower, with more slender columns, and thus seemingly higher, is the

doorway of the Wharton house, Number 336 Spruce Street. While the

entablature is generally similar, the moldings adhere less closely to

the classic order, and the same is true of the exceptionally slender

columns. An enriched ovolo suggesting a quarter section of a cylinder

and two disks in alternation lends added refinement to the paneled jambs

and the architrave casing of the arch with its hand-carved keystone. The

fanlight is of simple but pleasing pattern, and the eight-panel door is

of characteristic design.

At Number 301 South Seventh Street the doorway itself strongly resembles

that of the Powel house, except that it is higher, narrower and rather

lighter in scale. However, the wing flights of stone steps on the

sidewalk leading to a broad landing before the door and the handsome

wrought-iron rail lend individuality and rare charm to this notable

example of a familiar type.

The doorway of Grumblethorpe, Number 5621 Germantown Avenue, Germantown,

differs little in general appearance, if considerably in detail, from

that of the Powel house. One notices first how deeply recessed it is

because of the thickness of the stone walls. With the projecting

entablature it affords almost as much shelter as a porch. The single

door next attracts attention. Of six-panel and familiar arrangement, it

differs from most of this sort in having a double stile in the middle,

the effect simulating double doors. A simple, hand-tooled ovolo

ornaments the jambs and architrave casings of the keyed arch. It is also

repeated above the double denticulated member of the cornice, the latter

enriched by a hole drilled in each dentil alternately above and below.

Daintiness and simplicity characterize the fanlight pattern set in lead

lines.

The doorway at Number 6105 Germantown Avenue, Germantown, may be

regarded as one of the best of the more ornate examples of this type.

[Illustration: PLATE L.--Fenestration, Chancel End, St. Peter's

Church.]

[Illustration: PLATE LI.--Details of Round Headed Windows, Christ

Church.]

It has fluted columns, an intricately hand-tooled dentil course in the

cornice, richly incised architraves and carved ovolo moldings. The

denticulated molding has fluted dentils with horizontal connecting

members forming a sort of continuous H pattern. An incised band of

dainty grace adorns the architrave of the entablature. It consists of

groups of five vertical flutes in alternation with drillings forming

upward and downward arcs or double festoons. The architrave of the arch

and lintel has a slightly different incised pattern. There are the same

fluted groups with oval ornaments composed of drillings between. The

door itself is of the regulation six-panel arrangement.

Few doorways in the Corinthian order are to be found in what may

properly be termed the Colonial architecture of Philadelphia, for this

order was little used by American builders until early in the nineteenth

century. The doorway of Doctor Denton's house in Germantown instances

its employment in a somewhat original manner. The entablature follows

the classic order closely, except for the tiny consoles of the dentil

course and the incised decoration of the upper fascia of the architrave,

consisting of a band of elongated hexagons which is repeated across the

lintel of the door and the imposts of the arch. A Latin quotation,

"Procuc este profans", meaning "Be far from here that which is unholy",

is carved in the architrave casing over the fanlight. The columns are

fluted, but have the Doric rather than the usual Corinthian capitals.

Double blind doors such as are a feature of this entrance were the

predecessor of the modern screen door. Arbor vitae trees in square wooden

tubs on the broad top step each side of the doorway complete a formal

treatment of dignity and attractiveness.

Rarely occurred a doorway having a complete entablature above a fanlight

surmounted by a pediment. The east and west entrances of Mount Pleasant

offer two splendid examples, massive and dignified. While much alike in

several respects, they differ sufficiently in detail to afford an

interesting comparison. In size and general arrangement in their double

three-panel doors and smooth columns, they greatly resemble each other.

Although not pure, the doorway of the west or river front is essentially

Tuscan and of the utmost simplicity. Its chief distinction lies in the

rustication of the casings, jambs and soffit, simulating stonework, and

the heavy fanlight sash with its openings combining the keystone and

arch in outline. The doorway of the east front, which is the entrance

from the drive, is Doric and has the customary triglyphs, mutules and

guttae. There is the same rustication of casings and jambs up to the

height of the doors, but molded spandrils occupy the spaces each side of

the round arch with its wide ornate keystone. Exceptionally broad

tapering and fluted mullions lend distinction to the heavy fanlight

sash with its round-ended openings. Neither of these doorways has the

double projection of those previously described. The background

pilasters are omitted, and the engaged columns stand directly against

the stone masonry. A beautiful Palladian window in the second-story wall

above each doorway forms a closely related feature, the two being

virtually parts of the same effect.

Oftener, where an entablature supported by engaged columns was

surmounted by a pediment, the fanlight over the door was omitted. Of the

several instances in Philadelphia, the best known is undoubtedly the

classic doorway of Cliveden, about which the Battle of Germantown raged

most fiercely. The damage done by cannon balls to the stone steps may

still be plainly seen. This doorway is one of the finest specimens of

pure mutulary Doric in America, very stately and somewhat severe. Every

detail is well-nigh perfect, and the proportions could hardly be better.

A similar arrangement of the high, narrow, four-panel double doors is

found elsewhere in Philadelphia, while the blinds used instead of screen

doors recall those of Doctor Denton's house, although divided by two

rails respectively toward the top and bottom into three sections, the

middle section being the largest. Two small drop handles with pendant

rings comprise the entire visible complement of hardware on the doors.

As compared with the east entrance of Mount Pleasant, the Cliveden

detail is richer in the paneled soffits of the corona and the paneled

metopes in alternation with the triglyphs of the frieze. One notices

also that it is not deeply recessed according to the prevailing custom

in the case of stone houses.

Another doorway of this general character and having double doors is the

entrance to Solitude. Conventionally Ionic in detail, with smooth

columns and voluted capitals, it pleases the eye but lacks the

impressiveness of the doorway at Cliveden. The three-panel double doors

are narrower, and this fact is emphasized by the deep recess with

paneled jambs. There is but one broad step, which also serves as the

threshold.

The doorway of the Perot-Morris house, deeply recessed because of the

thick stone walls, presents at its best another variation of this

sturdiest of Philadelphia types with a single, eight-panel, dark-painted

door and a very broad top stone step before it. Virtually a pure Tuscan

adaptation, it differs in a few particulars from others of similar

character, notably in the pronounced tapering of the columns toward the

top and the recessing of the entablature above the door to form pilaster

projections above the columns. In other words, the recessed entablature

of this doorhead replaces the fanlight of another type already referred

to and of which the doorways at Number 5200 Germantown Avenue and

Number 4927 Frankford Avenue are examples. The brass knob, the heavy

iron latch and fastenings inside are the ones Washington, Jefferson,

Hamilton, Knox and Randolph handled in passing in and out during

Washington's occupancy.

[Illustration: PLATE LII.--Chancel Window, Christ Church; Palladian

Window and Doorway, Independence Hall.]

[Illustration: PLATE LIII.--Palladian Window, The Woodlands.]

Above the pediment is to be plainly seen the picturesque, cast-iron,

hand-in-hand fire mark about a foot high, consisting of four clasped

hands crossed in the unbreakable grasp of "My Lady Goes to London" of

childhood days. This ancient design, to be seen on the Morris, Betsy

Ross and numerous other houses, was that of the oldest fire insurance

company in the United States, organized in 1752 under Franklin's

leadership. This and other designs, such as the green tree, eagle, hand

fire engine and hose and hydrant still remain on many old Philadelphia

buildings, indicating in earlier years which company held the policy.

For a long time it was the custom to place these emblems on all insured

houses, the principal reason for doing so being that certain volunteer

fire companies were financed or assisted by certain insurance companies

and consequently made special efforts to save burning houses insured by

the company concerned.

Porches were the exception rather than the rule in the early

architecture of Philadelphia. Only a few old Colonial houses now

remaining have them, and for the most part they are entrances to

countryseats in the present suburbs rather than to residences in the

city proper. The Highlands and Hope Lodge have such porches to which

reference has already been made in connection with the houses

themselves. Of scant architectural merit, the porch at Hope Lodge may

possibly be of more recent origin than the house. Except for the narrow

double doors the entrance to The Highlands is strongly reminiscent of

New England doorways and porches. Both have hipped roofs so low as to be

almost flat.

A splendid example of the gable roof or pedimental porch more typical of

Philadelphia architecture is that at Upsala. Although displaying free

use of the orders, it is regarded as one of the best in America. On a

square stone platform reached by three broad stone steps, slender,

fluted Doric columns, with engaged columns each side of the doorway,

support a roof in the form of a pediment of generally Ionic character,

the architrave and cornice being notable for fine-scale hand tooling. It

will be noticed that the motive of the cornice with its jig-sawed

modillions, rope molding and enriched dentil course suggests Ionic

influence; that of the architrave, with its groups of five vertical

flutings in alternation with an incised conventionalized flower, Doric.

The same entablature is carried about the inside of the roof, projecting

over the doorway to form a much favored Philadelphia doorhead supported

by flanking engaged columns. The doorway itself is distinctly of

Philadelphia type, high, relatively narrow, and deeply recessed, with

the soffit of the arch and the cheeks of the jambs beautifully paneled

and a handsome semicircular fanlight above the single eight-panel door

but with no side lights. The effect of the keystone and imposts, also

the enrichment of the semicircular architrave casings are

characteristic. The paneling of the door consists of pairs of small and

large panels in alternation, the upper pair of large panels being

noticeably higher than the lower pair.

Of far more modest character is the porch of the old Henry house, Number

4908 Germantown Avenue, long occupied by Doctor W. S. Ambler. It is much

smaller, extremely simple in its detail and of generally less pleasing

proportions. Two slender, smooth columns and corresponding pilasters on

the wall of the house support a pediment rather too flat for good

appearance. Except for the Ionic capitals, the detail is rather

nondescript as to its order. The round-arched, deeply recessed doorway

has the usual paneled jambs and soffit, but the reeded casings and

square impost blocks are of the sort that came into vogue about the

beginning of the nineteenth century. The single door with its eight

molded and raised panels is of that type, having three pairs of small

panels of uniform size above a single pair of high panels, the lock rail

being more than double the width of the rails above and wider than the

bottom rail. Unlike the usual fanlight, this one is patterned after a

much used Palladian window with sash bar divisions suggested by Gothic

tracery.

At Number 39 Fisher's Lane, Wayne Junction, in connection with a doorway

much like the above, is an elliptical porch much like those of Salem,

Massachusetts, although devoid of their excellent proportion and nicety

of detail. Both the porch platform and steps are of wood, but the

slender, smooth columns supporting the roof, which takes the form of an

entablature, stand on high stone bases. Only simple moldings have been

employed, and the detail can hardly be said to belong to any particular

order of architecture. The door itself is unusual in having molded flat

rather than raised panels, while the fanlight is of more conventional

pattern than that of the Henry house.

Side lights and elliptical fanlights, so characteristic of New England

doorways, are as rare as porches in the Colonial architecture of

Philadelphia. The entrance of The Highlands is thus unique in combining

the three. The doorway at Number 224 South Eighth Street has the New

England spirit in its breadth and general proportion; in the beauty of

its leaded side lights and fanlight, but the broad stone steps on the

sidewalk and the iron rails are typically Philadelphian. So, too, is the

paneling of the wide single door. The ornate woodwork of the frame

and casings, however, especially the frieze across the lintel, with its

oval and elliptical fluted designs elaborately hand-tooled, suggests the

Dutch influence of New York and New Jersey. The iron rails of the steps

present an interesting instance of the adaptation of Gothic tracery,

arches and quatrefoils.

[Illustration: PLATE LIV.--Great Hall and Staircase, Stenton.]

[Illustration: PLATE LV.--Hall and Staircase, Whitby Hall; Detail of

Staircase, Whitby Hall.]

The front doorway at Stenton may be regarded as the earliest instance of

side lights in Philadelphia, and one of the earliest in America. The

width of the brick piers or munions is such, however, that there are

virtually two high narrow windows rather than side lights in the

commonly accepted sense of the term. Indeed, they are treated as such,

being divided into upper and lower sashes like those of the other

windows, only narrower. Neither door nor windows have casings, the

molded frames being let into the reveals of the brickwork and the

openings, as in most early Colonial structures, having relieving arches

with brick cores. A six-paned, horizontal toplight above the doors

corresponds in scale with the windows. This simple entrance, with its

high, narrow, four-panel doors having neither knob or latch, is reached

from a brick-paved walk about the house by three semicircular stone

steps, such as were common in England at the time, the various nicely

hewn pieces being fastened securely together with iron bands. Severity

is written in every line, yet there is a picturesque charm about this

quaint doorway that attracts all who see it. In this the warmth and

texture of the brickwork play a large part, but much is also due to the

flanking slender trellises supporting vines which have spread over the

brickwork above in the most fascinating manner.

Toward the beginning of the nineteenth century and for a few decades

thereafter, under the influence of the Greek revival, a new type of

round-arched doorway was developed in Philadelphia,--broader, simpler,

heavier in treatment than most of the foregoing. There were no

ornamental casings, the only woodwork being the heavy frame let into the

reveals of the brick wall. Above a horizontal lintel treated after the

manner of an architrave the semicircular fanlight was set in highly

ornamental lead lines forming a decorative geometrical pattern. Double

doors were the rule, most of them four-panel with a small and large

panel in alternation like many earlier doors, but the panels were molded

and sunken rather than raised. In a few instances there was a single

vertical panel to each door, sometimes round-topped as on the doors of

the Randolph house, Number 321 South Fourth Street.

The most distinctive of these doorways is that at the southeast corner

of Eighth and Spruce streets, where elliptical winding flights lead to a

landing before the door. The ironwork is undoubtedly among the most

graceful and best preserved in the city. This low, broad entrance

resembles Southern doorways rather than the Philadelphia type, although

there are a few others of similar character near by. The wide, flat

casings and single-panel doors seem severe indeed by comparison with

most of the earlier doorways with their greater flexibility of line.

Generally similar, the doorway of the old Shippen mansion, Number 1109

Walnut Street, with its straight flight of stone steps unadorned in any

way, is less attractive except in the paneling of the doors. It lacks

the grace of the winding stairs and the charm of the iron balustrade so

much admired in the former. The fanlight pattern, good as it is, fails

to make as strong an appeal as that of the other doorway.

At the northeast corner of Third and Pine streets is to be found a very

narrow doorway of this character, its double doors paneled like those of

the Shippen mansion and its graceful fanlight pattern more like that of

the doorway at Eighth and Spruce streets, though differing considerably

in detail. Like many others in Philadelphia this doorway is reached by

four stone steps leading to a square stone platform, the entire

construction being on the brick-paved sidewalk. The simple, slender rail

of wrought iron, its chief decoration a repeated spiral, is the best

feature.

Philadelphia, perhaps more than any other American city, is famous for

the profusion and beauty of its ironwork, wrought and cast. For the

most part it took the form of stair rails or balustrades, fences and

foot scrapers, and many are the doorways of little or no architectural

merit which are rendered beautiful by the accompanying ironwork. On the

other hand, accompanying illustrations already discussed show the rare

beauty of architecturally notable doorways enriched by the addition of

good ironwork.

Fences were the exception rather than the rule in Colonial times,

although rarely employed along the front of a house to prevent passers

from accidentally stepping into areaways in the sidewalk in front of

basement windows. The danger of such a catastrophe was remote, however,

for Philadelphia sidewalks were very broad in order to make room for the

customary stoop before the doorway and the frequent rolling way or

basement entrance. These sidewalk obstructions being the rule, people

formed the habit of walking near the curb, and accidents were thus

avoided. It was not until late in the nineteenth century, when basement

entrances with an open stairway along the front of the house began to be

provided, that fences came into vogue, except in the suburbs, where a

small front yard was sometimes surrounded by an iron fence.

[Illustration: PLATE LVI.--Hall and Staircase, Mount Pleasant; Second

Floor Hall Archway and Palladian Window, Mount Pleasant.]

[Illustration: PLATE LVII.--Hall and Staircase, Cliveden; Staircase

Detail, Cliveden.]

Stoops divide themselves into four principal classes, of which the

first, consisting only of a single broad stone step before the doorway,

perhaps hardly warrants the term. As at Grumblethorpe and the Morris

house, these broad stone steps often had no ironwork other than a foot

scraper set in one end or in the sidewalk near by. Again, as at the

entrance to the Wistar house, there were iron handrails or balustrades

at both sides. Less common, though by no means infrequent, were the

stoops of this sort with a single handrail at one side.

These handrails or balustrades, replacing the stone parapets so common

in other American cities, are patterned after the cathedral grilles and

screens of the Middle Ages and consist of both Gothic and Classic detail

utilized with ingenuity and good taste. Most of the earlier designs are

hand wrought. Later, cast iron came into use, and much of the most

interesting ironwork combines the two. The balustrade at the Wistar

house just referred to is a typical example of excellent cast-iron work,

the design consisting of a diaper pattern of Gothic tracery with

harmonious decorative bands above and below.

The Germantown farmhouse presents another variant of this first and

simplest type of stoop with a hooded penthouse roof above and quaint

side seats flanking the doorway. As at the Johnson house, the broad

stone step was sometimes flush with the sidewalk pavement.

The second type of stoop consists of a broad stone step or platform

before the door with a straight flight of stone steps leading up to it.

Cliveden, Mount Pleasant and Doctor Denton's house are notable

instances of such stoops without handrails of any sort. The Powel house

stoop of this type has one of the simplest wrought-iron rails in the

city, while that of the house at Number 224 South Eighth Street, with

its effective Gothic detail, combines wrought and cast iron. Two very

effective wrought-iron handrails for stoops of this type, depending

almost entirely upon scroll work at the top and bottom for their

elaboration, are to be seen at Number 130 Race Street and Number 216

South Ninth Street, the handsome scroll pattern of the latter being the

same as at the southeast corner of Seventh and Spruce streets, already

referred to, and the former being given a distinctive touch by two large

balls used as newels. Sometimes, as at Number 701 South Seventh Street,

there was only one step between the platform of the stoop and the

sidewalk, when its appearance was essentially the same as a stoop of the

first type such as that of the Wistar house.

The third type of stoop has the same broad platform before the door, but

the flight of steps is along the front of the house at one side rather

than directly in front. While these were oftener straight, as in the

case of the doorway at the northeast corner of Third and Pine streets,

already referred to, they were frequently curved, as at Number 316 South

Third Street. Both have a wrought-iron rail with the same scroll

pattern of effective simplicity, a pattern much favored in modern

adaptation. Another stoop of this type at Number 272 South American

Street is high enough to permit a basement entrance beneath the

platform. The ironwork is beautifully hand-wrought in the Florentine

manner, its elaborate scroll pattern beneath an evolute spiral band

combining round ball spindles with flat bent fillets, and the curved

newel treatment at each side adding materially to the grace of the

whole.

The fourth type of stoop has double or wing flights each side of the

platform before the door. The doorway at Number 301 South Seventh

Street, already referred to, is the most notable instance of straight

flights in Philadelphia, while that at the southeast corner of Eighth

and Spruce streets occupies the same position in respect to curved

flights. The wrought ironwork of the latter is superb. Rich in effect,

yet essentially simple in design, it has grace in every line, is not too

ornate and displays splendid workmanship. Again a spiral design is

conspicuous in the stair balustrades, and the curved newel treatment

recalls that of the foregoing stoop. The balustrade of the platform

consists of a simple diaper pattern of intersecting arcs with the

familiar evolute band above and below. The wing flight was a convenient

arrangement for double houses, as instanced by the old Billmeyer house

in Germantown, with its exceedingly plain iron handrail and straight

spindles. Of more interest is the balustrade at Number 207 La Grange

Alley with its evolute spiral band and slender ball spindles beneath.

During the nineteenth century more attention was given to newels in

ironwork, and elaborate square posts combining cast and wrought pieces

were constructed, such as that at Fourth and Liberty streets. In the

accompanying balustrade are to be seen motives much employed in the

other examples here illustrated. Scroll work is conspicuous, as are

rosettes, but a touch of individuality is given by a Grecian band

instead of the more common evolute spiral above the diaper pattern. The

pineapple, emblem of hospitality, was attractive in cast iron and as

utilized at Number 1107 Walnut Street provided a distinctive newel.

[Illustration: PLATE LVIII.--Detail of Staircase Balustrade and Newel,

Upsala; Staircase Balustrade, Roxborough.]

[Illustration: PLATE LIX.--Staircase Detail, Upsala; Staircase

Balustrade, Gowen House, Mount Airy.]

The roads on the outskirts of all Colonial cities were very bad, and

many of the less important streets of Philadelphia had neither pavements

nor sidewalks. After rains shoes were bemired in walking, and as rubbers

were then unknown it was necessary to remove the mud from the shoes

before entering a house. Foot scrapers on the doorstep or at the foot of

the front steps were a necessity and became ornamental adjuncts of the

doorways of early Colonial homes. For the most part of wrought iron,

some of the later ones were cast in molds, that at Wyck being a

particularly interesting example. It consists of two grotesque

griffins back to back, their wings joined tip to tip forming the scraper

edge, and the whole being mounted in a large tray with turned-up edges.

This scraper can thus be moved about as desired, and the tray catches

the scrapings, which can be emptied occasionally without sweeping the

entire doorstep.

Some of the earlier and simpler scrapers, such as that at Third and

Spruce streets, consisted merely of two upright standards with a

sharp-edged horizontal bar between them to provide the scraper proper.

This horizontal part was made quite broad to take care of anticipated

wear, which in this particular instance has been great during the

intervening years.

Similar to this, except for the well-wrought tops of the standards and

the curved supplementary supports, is the scraper of the Dirck Keyser

doorway, Number 6205 Germantown Avenue, Germantown. Regarded as a whole

this design suggests nothing so much as the back and arms of an early

English armchair.

On the same page with these is shown another strange Philadelphia

scraper. Apart from its outline it has no decoration, and what the

origin of the design may be it is difficult to determine. To a degree,

however, it resembles two crude, ancient battle-axes, the handles

forming the scraper bar.

A favorite design consisted of a sort of inverted oxbow with the curved

part at the top and the scraper bar taking some ornamental pattern

across the bottom from side to side. At the top, both outside and inside

the bow, and sometimes down the sides, spiral ornaments were applied in

the Florentine manner. Accompanying illustrations show two scrapers of

this type at Number 320 South Third Street and another one elsewhere on

the same street. The use of a little urn-shaped ornament at the top of

the latter scraper is most effective.

At Number 239 Pine Street is seen a scraper employing two large spirals

themselves as supports for the scraper bar. The turn of the spiral is

here outward as contrasted with the inward turn of the scrapers at

Upsala.

A scraper of quaint simplicity standing on one central standard at

Vernon, Germantown, suggests the heart as its motive, although having

outward as well as inward curling spirals at the top.

Another clever device of Philadelphia ironworkers was to make the foot

scraper a part of the iron stair rail. Usually in such a scheme it was

also made part of the newel treatment on the lower step of the stoop,

but at Seventh and Locust streets, for example, it stands on the second

step beside and above the ornate round newel with its surmounting

pineapple. Here, as in the case of the simpler handrail in South Seventh

Street, one of the iron spindles of the rail is split about a foot from

the bottom, and the two halves bent respectively to the right and left

until they meet the next spindle on each side, the scraper bar of

ornamental outline being fastened across from one to the other of these

spindles below. The principal charm of the South Seventh Street rail

lies in its extreme simplicity, the twisted section of the spindles near

the bottom being a clever expedient. The pleasing effect of the design

at Seventh and Locust streets is largely due to appropriate use of the

evolute spiral band. Only a little more ornate than the South Seventh

Street stair rail is that in South Fourth Street. A special spiral

design above the foot scraper, however, virtually becomes a newel in

this instance. The same is true of another much more elaborate stair

rail at Seventh and Locust streets with its attractive diaper pattern

between an upper and lower Grecian band, the whole grille being

supported by a graceful three-point bracket.

The Colonial Architecture of Philadelphia · 第 7 / 12 章