CHAPTER XXIII.

CASES OF CONSCIENCE, AND DIRECTIONS AGAINST BACKBITING, SLANDERING,

AND EVIL SPEAKING.

_Tit. 1. Cases of Conscience about Backbiting and Evil-speaking._

_Quest._ I. May I not speak evil of that which is evil? and call

every one truly as he is?

_Answ._ You must not speak a known falsehood of any man under

pretence of charity or speaking well. But you are not to speak all the

evil of every man which is true: as opening the faults of the king or

your parents, though never so truly, is a sin against the fifth

commandment, "Honour thy father and mother:" so if you do it without a

call, you sin against your neighbour's honour, and many other ways

offend.

_Quest._ II. Is it not sinful silence, and a consenting to or

countenancing of the sins of others, to say nothing against them, as

tender of their honour?

_Answ._ It is sinful to be silent when you have a call to speak:

if you forbear to admonish the offender in love between him and you,

when you have opportunity and just cause, it is sinful to be silent

then. But to silence backbiting is no sin. If you must be guilty of

every man's sin that you talk not against behind his back, your whole

discourse must be nothing but backbiting.

_Quest._ III. May I not speak that which honest, religious,

credible persons do report?

_Answ._ Not without both sufficient evidence and a sufficient

call. You must not judge of the action by the person, but of the

person by the action. Nor must you imitate any man in evil-doing. If a

good man abuse you, are you willing that all men follow him and abuse

you more?

_Quest._ IV. May I believe the bad report of an honest, credible

person?

_Answ._ You must first consider whether you may hear it, or

meddle with it: for if it be a case that you have nothing to do with,

you may not set your judgment to it, either to believe it, or to

disbelieve it. And if it be a thing that you are called to judge of,

yet every honest man's word is not presently to be believed: you must

first know whether it be a thing that he saw, or is certain of

himself, or a thing which he only taketh upon report; and what his

evidence and proof is; and whether he be not engaged by interest,

passion, or any difference of opinion; or be not engaged in some

contrary faction, where the interest of a party or cause is his

temptation; or whether he be not used to rash reports and uncharitable

speeches; and what concurrence of testimonies there is, and what is

said on the other side; especially what the person accused saith in

his own defence. If it be so heinous a crime in public judgment, to

pass sentence before both parties are heard, and to condemn a man

before he speak for himself; it cannot be justifiable in private

judgment. Would you be willing yourselves that all should be believed

of you, which is spoken by any honest man? And how uncertain are we of

other men's honesty, that we should on that account think ill of

others!

_Quest._ V. May I not speak evil of them that are enemies to God, to

religion and godliness, and are open persecutors of it; or are enemies

to the king or church?

_Answ._ You may on all meet occasions speak evil of the sin; and

of the persons when you have a just call; but not at your own

pleasure.

_Quest._ VI. What if it be one whose honour and credit countenanceth

an ill cause, and his dishonour would disable him to do hurt?

_Answ._ You may not belie the devil, nor wrong the worst man that

is, though under pretence of doing good; God needeth not malice, nor

calumnies, nor injustice to his glory: it is an ill cause that cannot

be maintained without such means as these. And when the matter is

true, you must have a call to speak it, and you must speak it justly,

without unrighteous aggravations, or hiding the better part, which

should make the case and person better understood. There is a time and

due manner, in which that man's crimes and just dishonour may be

published, whose false reputation injureth the truth. But yet I must

say, that a great deal of villany and slander is committed upon this

plausible pretence; and that there is scarce a more common cloak for

the most inhuman lies and calumnies.

_Quest._ VII. May I not lawfully make a true narration of such

matters of fact, as are criminal and dishonourable to offenders? Else

no man may write a true history to posterity of men's crimes.

_Answ._ When you have a just call to do it, you may; but not at

your own pleasure. Historians may take much more liberty to speak the

truth of the dead, than you may of the living: though no untruth must

be spoken of either: yet the honour of princes and magistrates while

they are alive is needful to their government, and therefore must be

maintained, ofttimes by the concealment of their faults: and so

proportionably the honour of other men is needful to a life of love,

and peace, and just society; but when they are dead, they are not

subjects capable of a right to any such honour as must be maintained

by such silencing of the truth, to the injury of posterity: and

posterity hath usually a right to historical truth, that good examples

may draw them to imitation, and bad examples may warn them to take

heed of sin. God will have the name of the wicked to rot; and the

faults of a Noah, Lot, David, Solomon, Peter, &c. shall be recorded.

Yet nothing unprofitable to posterity may be recorded of the dead,

though it be true; nor the faults of men unnecessarily divulged; much

less may the dead be slandered or abused.

_Quest._ VIII. What if it be one that hath been oft admonished in

vain? May not the faults of such a one be mentioned behind his back?

_Answ._ I confess such a one (the case being proved, and he being

notoriously impenitent) hath made a much greater forfeiture of his

honour than other men; and no man can save that man's honour who will

cast it away himself. But yet it is not every one that committeth a

sin after admonition, who is here to be understood; but such as are

impenitent in some mortal or ruling sin: for some may sin oft in a

small and controverted point, for want of ability to discern the

truth; and some may live in daily infirmities, (as the best men do,)

which they condemn themselves for, and desire to be delivered from.

And even the most impenitent man's sins must not be meddled with by

every one at his pleasure, but only when you have just cause.

_Quest._ IX. What if it be one whom I cannot speak to face to

face?

_Answ._ You must let him alone, till you have just cause to speak

of him.

_Quest._ X. When hath a man a just cause and call to open

another's faults?

_Answ._ Negatively: 1. Not to fill up the time with other idle

chat, or table talk. 2. Not to second any man, how good soever, who

backbiteth others; no, though he pretend to do it to make the sin more

odious, or to exercise godly sorrow for other men's sin. 3. Not

whenever interest, passion, faction, or company seemeth to require it.

But, affirmatively, 1. When we may speak it to his face in love and

privacy, in due manner and circumstances, as is most hopeful to

conduce to his amendment. 2. When, after due admonition, we take two

or three, and after that tell the church (in a case that requireth

it). 3. When we have a sufficient cause to accuse him to the

magistrate. 4. When the magistrate or the pastors of the church,

reprove or punish him. 5. When it is necessary to the preservation of

another: as if I see my friend in danger of marrying with a wicked

person, or taking a false servant, or trading and bargaining with one

that is like to over-reach him, or going among cheaters, or going to

hear or converse with a dangerous heretic or seducer; I must open the

faults of those that they are in danger of, so far as their safety and

my charity require. 6. When it is any treason or conspiracy against

the king or commonwealth; where my concealment may be an injury to the

king, or damage or danger to the kingdom. 7. When the person himself

doth, by his self-justification, force me to it. 8. When his

reputation is so built upon the injury of others, and slanders of the

just, that the justifying of him is the condemning of the innocent, we

may then indirectly condemn him, by vindicating the just; as if it be

in a case of contention between two, if we cannot justify the right

without dishonour to the injurious, there is no remedy but he must

bear his blame. 9. When a man's notorious wickedness hath set him up

as a spectacle of warning and lamentation, so that his crimes cannot

be hid, and he hath forfeited his reputation, we must give others

warning by his fall: as an excommunicate person, or malefactor at the

gallows, &c. 10. When we have just occasion to make a bare narrative

of some public matters of fact; as of the sentence of a judge, or

punishment of offenders, &c. 11. When the crime is so heinous, as that

all good persons are obliged to join to make it odious, as Phinehas

was to execute judgment. As in cases of open rebellion, treason,

blasphemy, atheism, idolatry, murders, perjury, cruelty; such as the

French massacre, the Irish far greater massacre, the murdering of

kings, the powder-plot, the burning of London, &c. Crimes notorious

should not go about in the mouths or ears of men, but with just

detestation. 12. When any person's false reputation is a seducement to

men's souls, and made by himself or others the instruments of God's

dishonour, and the injury of church or state, or others, though we may

do no unjust thing to blast his reputation, we may tell the truth so

far as justice, or mercy, or piety requireth it.

_Quest._ XI. What if I hear daubers applauding wicked men, and

speaking well of them, and extenuating their crimes, and praising them

for evil doing?

_Answ._ You must on all just occasions speak evil of sin; but

when that is enough, you need not meddle with the sinner; no, not

though other men applaud him, and you know it be false; for you are

not bound to contradict every falsehood which you hear. But if in any

of the twelve forementioned cases you have a call to do it, (as for

the preservation of the hearers from a snare thereby; as if men

commend a traitor or a wicked man to draw another to like his way,)

in such cases you may contradict the false report.

_Quest._ XII. Are we bound to reprove every backbiter, in this

age when honest people are grown to make little conscience of it, but

think it their duty to divulge men's faults?

_Answ._ Most of all, that you may stop the stream of this common

sin, ordinarily whenever we can do it without doing greater hurt, we

should rebuke the tongue that reporteth evil of other men causelessly

behind their backs; for our silence is their encouragement in sin.

_Tit. 2. Directions against Backbiting, Slandering, and Evil

Speaking._

_Direct._ I. Maintain the life of brotherly love. Love your

neighbour as yourself.

_Direct._ II. Watch narrowly lest interest or passion should

prevail upon you. For where these prevail, the tongue is set on fire

of hell, and will set on fire the course of nature, James ii.

Selfishness and passion will not only prompt you to speak evil, but

also to justify it, and think you do well; yea, and to be angry with

those that will not hearken to you and believe you.

_Direct._ III. Especially involve not yourselves in any faction,

religious or secular. I do not mean that you should not imitate the

best, and hold most intimate communion with them; but that you abhor

unlawful divisions and sidings; and when error, or uncharitableness,

or carnal interest hath broken the church into pieces where you live,

and one is of Paul, and another of Apollos, and another of Cephas, one

of this party, and another of that, take heed of espousing the

interest of any party, as it stands cross to the interest of the

whole. It would have been hardly credible, if sad experience had not

proved it, how commonly and heinously almost every sect of christians

do sin in this point against each other! and how far the interest of

their sect, which they account the interest of Christ, will prevail

with multitudes even of zealous people, to belie, calumniate,

backbite, and reproach those that are against their opinion and their

party! yea, how easily will they proceed beyond reproaches, to bloody

persecutions! He that thinketh he doth God service by killing Christ

or his disciples, will think that he doth him service by calling him a

deceiver, and one that hath a devil, a blasphemer, and an enemy to

Cæsar, and calling his disciples pestilent fellows and movers of

sedition among the people, and accounting them as the filth and

offscouring of the world. That zeal which murdered and destroyed many

hundred thousand of the Waldenses and Albigenses, and thirty thousand

or forty thousand in one French massacre, and two hundred thousand in

one Irish massacre, and which kindled the Maryan bonfires in England,

made the powder mine, and burnt the city of London, and keepeth up the

Inquisition, I say, that zeal will certainly think it a service to the

church, (that is, their sect,) to write the most odious lies and

slanders of Luther, Zuinglius, Calvin, Beza, and any such excellent

servants of the Lord. So full of horrid, impudent lies are the

writings of (not one but) many sects against those that were their

chief opposers, that I still admonish all posterity, to see good

evidence for it, before they believe the hard sayings of any factious

historian or divine, against those that are against his party. It is

only men of eminent conscience, and candour, and veracity, and

impartiality, who are to be believed in their bad report of others,

except where notoriety or very good evidence doth command belief above

their own authority and veracity. A siding factious zeal, which is

hotter for any sect or party, than for the common christianity and

catholic church, is always a railing, a lying, and a slandering zeal,

and is notably described, James iii. as "earthly, sensual, and

devilish," causing "envy, strife, and confusion, and every evil work."

_Direct._ IV. Observe well the commonness of this sin of

backbiting, that it may make you the more afraid of falling into that

which so few do escape. I will not say, among high and low, rich and

poor, court and country, how common is this sin; but among men

professing the greatest zeal and strictness in religion, how few make

conscience of it! Mark in all companies that you come into, how common

it is to take liberty to say what they think of all men; yea, to

report what they hear, though they dare not say that they believe it!

And how commonly the relating of other men's faults, and telling what

this man or that man is, or did, or said, is part of the chat to waste

the hour in! And if it be but true, they think they sin not: nay, nor

if they did but hear that it is true. For my part I must profess, that

my conscience having brought me to a custom of rebuking such

backbiters, I am ordinarily censured for it, either as one that loveth

contradiction, or one that defendeth sin and wickedness, by taking

part with wicked men; all because I would stop the course of this

common vice of evil speaking and backbiting where men have no call.

And I must thankfully profess, that among all other sins in the world,

the sins of selfishness, pride, and backbiting, I have been most

brought to hate and fear, by the observation of the commonness of

them, even in persons seeming godly: nothing hath fixed an

apprehension of their odiousness so deeply in me, nor engaged my heart

against them above all other sins so much, as this lamentable

experience of their prevalence in the world, among the more religious,

and not only in the profane.

_Direct._ V. Take not the honesty of the person, as a sufficient

cause to hear or believe a bad report of others. It is lamentable to

hear how far men, otherwise honest, do too often here offend. Suspect

evil speakers, and be not over-credulous of them. Charity thinketh not

evil, nor easily and hastily believeth it. Liars are more used to evil

speaking, than men of truth and credit are. It is no wrong to the

best, that you believe him not when he backbiteth without good

evidence.

_Direct._ VI. Rebuke backbiters, and encourage them not by

hearkening to their tales. Prov. xxv. 23, "The north wind driveth away

rain, so doth an angry countenance a backbiting tongue." It may be

they think themselves religious persons, and will take it for an

injury to be driven away with an angry countenance: but God himself,

who loveth his servants better than we, is more offended at their sin;

and that which offendeth him, must offend us. We must not hurt their

souls, and displease God, by drawing upon us the guilt of their sins,

for fear of displeasing them. Tell them how God doth hate backbiting,

and advise them if they know any hurt by others, to go to them

privately, and tell them of it in a way that tendeth to their

repentance.

_Direct._ VII. Use to make mention of the good which is in

others; (except it be unseasonable, and will seem to be a promoting of

their sin): God's gifts in every man deserve commendations; and we

have allowance to mention men's virtues oftener than to mention their

vices. Indeed when a bad man is praised in order to the disparagement

of the good, or to honour some wicked cause or action against truth

and godliness, we must not concur in such malicious praises; but

otherwise we must commend that which is truly commendable in all. And

this custom will have a double benefit against backbiting: it will

use your own tongues to a contrary course, and it will rebuke the evil

tongues of others, and be an example to them of more charitable

language.

_Direct._ VIII. Understand yourselves, and speak often to others,

of the sinfulness of evil-speaking and backbiting. Show them the

scriptures which condemn it, and the intrinsical malignity which is in

it: as here followeth.

_Direct._ IX. Make conscience of just reproof and exhorting

sinners to their faces. Go tell them of it privately and lovingly, and

it will have better effects, and bring you more comfort, and cure the

sin of backbiting.

_Tit. 3. The Evil of Backbiting and Evil-speaking._

1. It is forbidden of God among the heinous, damning sins, and made

the character of a notorious wicked person, and the avoiding of it is

made the mark of such as are accepted of God and shall be saved: Rom.

i. 29, 30, it is made the mark of a reprobate mind, and joined with

murder, and hating God, viz. "full of envy, debate, deceit, malignity,

whisperers, backbiters." Psal. xv. 2, 3, "Lord, who shall abide in thy

tabernacle? who shall dwell in thy holy hill? He that backbiteth not

with his tongue, nor doeth evil to his neighbour, nor taketh up a

reproach against his neighbour." And when Paul describeth those whom

he must sharply rebuke and censure, he just describeth the factious

sort of christians of our times. 2 Cor. xii. 20, "For I fear lest when

I come, I shall not find you such as I would, and that I shall be

found unto you such as ye would not: lest there be debates, envyings,

wraths, strifes, backbitings, whisperings, swellings, tumults." Eph.

iv. 31, "Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and

evil-speaking be put away from you, with all malice, and be kind one

to another, and tender-hearted--."

2. It is a sin which gratifieth Satan, and serveth his malice against

our neighbour. He is malicious against all, and speaking evil, and

doing hurt, are the works which are suitable to his malignity! And

should a christian make his tongue the instrument of the accuser of

the brethren, to do his work against each other?

3. It signifieth want of christian love. For love speaketh not evil,

nor openeth men's faults without a cause, but covereth infirmities;

much less will it lie and slander others, and carry about uncertain

reports against them. It is not to do as you would be done by: and how

essential love is to true christianity, Christ himself hath often told

us.

4. It is a sin which directly serveth to destroy the hearers' love,

and consequently to destroy their souls. If the backbiter understood

himself, he would confess that it is his very end to cause you to hate

(or abate your love to) him whom he speaketh evil of. He that speaketh

good of a man, representeth him amiable; for amiableness and goodness

are all one. And he that speaketh evil of a man representeth him

hateful or unlovely; for hatefulness, unloveliness, and evil are all

one. And as it is not the natural way of winning love, to entreat and

beg it, and say, I pray you love this person, or that thing; but to

open the goodness of the thing or person, which will command love: so

is it not the natural way to stir up hatred, by entreating men to hate

this man or that; but to tell how bad they are, which will command

hatred in them that do believe it. Therefore to speak evil of another,

is more than to say to the hearers, I pray you hate this man, or abate

your love to him. And that the killing of love is the killing or

destroying of men's souls, the apostle John doth frequently declare.

5. And it tendeth also to destroy the love, and consequently the soul

of him that you speak evil of. For when it cometh to his hearing, (as

one way or other it may do,) what evil you have reported of him behind

his back, it tendeth to make him hate you, and so to make him worse.

6. It is a great make-bate and peace-breaker wherever it is practised.

It tendeth to set people together by the ears. When it is told that

such a one spake evil of you in such a place, there are then

heart-burnings, and rehearsals, and sidings, and such ensuing malice

as the devil intended by this design.

7. They that use to speak evil of others behind their backs, it is ten

to one will speak falsehoods of them when they do not know it. Fame is

too ordinarily a liar, and they shall be liars who will be its

messengers. How know you whether the thing that you report is true? Is

it only because a credible person spake it? But how did that person

know it to be true? Might he not take it upon trust as well as you?

And might he not take a person to be credible that is not? And how

commonly doth faction, or interest, or passion, or credulity, make

that person incredible in one thing, who is credible in others, where

he hath no such temptation! If you know it not to be true, or have not

sufficient evidence to prove it, you are guilty of lying and

slandering interpretatively, though it should prove true; because it

might have been a lie for aught you knew.

8. It is gross injustice to talk of a man's faults, before you have

heard him speak for himself. I know it is usual with such to say, O we

have heard it from such as we are certain will not lie. But he is a

foolish and unrighteous judge, that will be peremptory upon hearing

one party only speak, and knoweth not how ordinary it is for a man

when he speaketh for himself, to blow away the most confident and

plausible accusations, and make the case appear to be quite another

thing. You know not what another man hath to say till you have heard

him.

9. Backbiting teacheth others to backbite. Your example inviteth them

to do the like: and sins which are common, are easily swallowed, and

hardly repented of: men think that the commonness justifieth or

extenuateth the fault.

10. It encourageth ungodly men to the odious sin of backbiting and

slandering the most religious, righteous person. It is ordinary with

the devil's family to make Christ's faithfullest servants their table

talk, and the objects of their reproach and scorn, and the song of

drunkards? What abundance of lies go current among such malignant

persons, against the most innocent, which would all be ashamed, if

they had first admitted them to speak for themselves. And such

slanders and lies are the devil's common means to keep ungodly men

from the love of godliness, and so from repentance and salvation. And

backbiting professors of religion encourage men to this; for with what

measure they mete, it shall be measured to them again. And they that

are themselves evil spoken of, will think that they are warranted to

requite the backbiters with the like.

11. It is a sin which commonly excludeth true, profitable reproof and

exhortation. They that speak most behind men's backs, do usually say

least to the sinner's face, in any way which tendeth to his salvation.

They will not go lovingly to him in private, and set home his sin upon

his conscience, and exhort him to repentance; but any thing shall

serve as a sufficient excuse against this duty; that they may make the

sin of backbiting serve instead of it: and all is out of carnal

self-saving; they fear men will be offended if they speak to their

faces, and therefore they will whisper against them behind their

backs.

12. It is at the least, but idle talk and a misspending of your time:

what the better are the hearers for hearing of other men's misdoings?

And you know that it no whit profiteth the person of whom you speak. A

skilful, friendly admonition might do him good! But to neglect this,

and talk of his faults unprofitably, behind his back, is but to

aggravate the sin of your uncharitableness, as being not contented to

refuse your help to a man in sin, but you must also injure him and do

him hurt.

A Christian Directory, Part 4: Christian Politics · 第 25 / 38 章