SECTION IX.

STAMP NO. VIII.—FOUND AT SOUTHWELL.

An anonymous correspondent, C. D., sent to the _Gentleman’s Magazine_,

in 1772, a sketch and notice of what, no doubt, is a Roman

medicine-stamp, but both the sketch given of it and the description are

excessively meagre. The correspondent dates his letter from Southwell,

in Nottinghamshire. He says, “The inscribed stone was found lately by

casting up the ground, in the neighbourhood of Littleborough in this

county. The stone is oblong, about two inches long, and one broad. It

contains inscriptions on the edges or rim of the two ends, and on one of

its oblong sides, but not on the other.”

“It is,” says the correspondent, “supposed to be a Tessera or kind of

tally, such being, as we are told, a little flat square piece of stone,

and having a particular inscription, and was used in the Roman armies,

by being on certain occasions delivered to each of the soldiers, to

distinguish them from the enemy, and also in setting their nightly

guard, by being given from one centurion to another, quite through the

army, till it returned to the tribune who first delivered it. Upon the

receipt of this, the guard was set immediately. But,” he continues, “as

the inscription on the above drawing cannot be made out to satisfaction,

many of you will be glad to know whether it has been such a Tessera as

is above supposed; or what else it may have been, or also an explanation

of its legend, by some of your antiquarian correspondents.”

The inscription on one of the long sides of the stone appears to be the

name of the proprietor of the stamp; but the published copy of it

presents such irregular lettering, as to defy any certain deciphering of

what the name is. (See Plate III., No. VIII.) On the other two sides the

inscriptions are as follow:—

1. B. DIASORICV.

2. STATVS.

These two words evidently are misspellings, either on the original

stamp, or (what is equally probable) in its published copy, for the

Collyria termed _Diapsoricum_ and _Stactum_. But I have already, in

reference to previous inscriptions, discussed the signification of these

two terms at such length as not to require to revert to them. (See under

Stamps No. IV. and No. VIII.)

[Illustration: ROMAN MEDICINE STAMPS.]

The initial B, as it stands in the first line, seems to defy all kinds

of conjecture in regard to its signification. In this, as in one or two

other instances, the only hope of obtaining a true reading of the legend

is in the re-discovery of the stamp itself.

Archæological Essays, Vol. 2 · 第 9 / 14 章