FOREWORD

Let us reason together. What proof have we that the people of one race

are better or to be considered with favor above those of another?

It is true there was a time when the word “stranger” or its equivalent

in other languages than the English had the same meaning as enemy.

Each savage tribe, the early ancestors of all civilized peoples, for

want of knowledge and experience, considered all other tribes enemies,

and even as civilization grew and boundaries began to be established

an imaginary line made enemies of those dwelling on opposite sides

of rivers and channels. With more reason, seas came to be recognized

as territorial limitations, and it has required centuries to break

down notions of enmity and antagonism between dwellers of different

localities. Indeed, it can hardly be contended that this spirit of

enmity and antagonism has been overcome, when we see not only peoples

of different countries, but those of a common citizenship harboring

animosities sometimes approaching the malignant, and giving expression

both in speech and action to their hatred for those who differ from

them in race or color or creed.

Victor Rubin in the following pages deals with this question of racial

and religious antagonism in a fascinating but most effective manner.

Perhaps no one will be able to speak more impressively of Mr. Rubin’s

book “TAR AND FEATHERS” and at the same time give an intimation of its

contents than has the great scholar and traveler, Israel Zangwill:

“Mr. Victor Rubin, with the courage of youth, faces in his

first novel the full blast of the actual. What Mr. C. E.

Montague’s fine book, Disenchantment, expresses for the

British soldier, Mr. Rubin’s Tar and Feathers expresses for

the American. All America--of all creeds and races--went

to the great war as one man, as depicted in Tar and

Feathers. The young Southerner, Hamilton, has actually

been dragged from death on the battlefield by a negro and

brought back to life and health by a Jewish surgeon. Yet

the cannon have scarcely cooled before the old racial and

religious prejudices reassert themselves. They resurge

even in Hamilton, who cannot bear to touch the colored

hand of his saviour. It is his struggle with them, and his

final mastery over them, that constitutes the theme of

Mr. Rubin’s novel. When Hamilton goes back to his narrow

Southern home, he even under the pressure of the milieu

becomes a paid agent of the Ku Klux Klan with its crusade

against Catholics, Jews and Negroes.” (Mr. Rubin prudently

calls it the “Trick, Track Tribe.”)

That the book possesses a broad appeal is indicated by many other

commendations of able readers as expressed in scores of periodicals, a

few of which we quote:

“A cogent, common-sense appeal for liberality of view,

for a realization that all humanity is intrinsically

similar, that the great teachers of mankind all breathed

love and unity ... a book which any man concerned with

the interesting presentment of truth would do well to

read.”--William R. Langfeld in the _Philadelphia Sunday

Record_.

“Mr. Rubin has succeeded in analyzing the psychological

effects of the war upon those who participated in it

as few writers have done. He has depicted the ethical

and moral metamorphosis with commendable accuracy and

understanding.”--_Boston Transcript._

“Tar and Feathers is noteworthy in that it protests

vigorously against prejudice of every variety and exposes

the narrowness and the danger of organizations making

for racial antagonism. The author writes with sincerity

and conviction and is worth heeding if only for the

vehemence with which he attacks the forces of snobbery and

prejudice.”--_New York Evening Post._

“While the armistice bells are ringing and a war-ridden

people all over the world are shaking themselves loose from

the habits of four long years, the novel opens in a crowded

ward of the American hospital, Rue de Saint Jacques, Paris.

Robert Hamilton, a rich and cultured American from Georgia;

McCall from Chicago, in civilian life a reporter on the

Times (incidentally of the Catholic faith); Dr. Levin, the

great American surgeon, and Williams, a negro graduate of

Harvard, are here introduced. Of course, there is also

Meadows, the nurse--Dorothy Meadows, who played around with

the social service crowd at Madison, and graduated there

some time “before the war.” Back in Georgia is Margaret,

a typical “home girl” in Corinth. These are the leading

characters out of whose reactions Mr. Rubin has evolved a

presentable story upon which to drape his theories.

“The scene shifts back to Corinth, where young Hamilton,

is at once entangled in the affairs of the Ku Klux Klan,

tho he doesn’t know in the least what it’s all about. Sent

on a mission of propaganda to Chicago, Hamilton renews his

friendship with McCall and Levin. The story of the part

they play is a sermon to be hugged to the hearts of all 100

per cent Americans. Then, of course, there is Dorothy ...

while back in Corinth is Margaret ... staying at home.

“Mr. Rubin makes adroit use of the Chicago race riots of

1919 and otherwise molds his men and his times into a tale

which moves with rapidity and vigor.”--Margaret Evans in

the _Chicago Evening Post_.

For ourselves, we have read nothing on the perennial subject of

intolerance so much to the point and so well calculated to allay

prejudice and make for good citizenship as “TAR AND FEATHERS.”

Tar and feathers · 第 8 / 45 题