The Government appear to have made several {13} grave mistak

Produced by Al Haines

AUSTRALASIAN DEMOCRACY

BY

HENRY DE R. WALKER

LONDON

T. FISHER UNWIN

PATERNOSTER SQUARE

MDCCCXCVII

[_All Rights reserved._]

{vii}

PREFACE

The following pages have been written from the point of view of the

year 1896, the greater part of which I spent in Australia. During the

earlier months of the present year I was in New Zealand, but I was

unable to continue my survey of general Australasian affairs.

A result of the limitation that I was compelled to impose upon myself

will be observed in the apparent antiquity of the chapter dealing with

Australian Federation; but this is not so great as might have been

anticipated, the new Federal Convention having drafted a Bill which is

based, to a large extent, upon that of 1891. For purposes of

comparison I have, with the kind permission of the London agents of the

Melbourne _Argus_, included an article in which that newspaper has

summarised the provisions of the new Federal Constitution Bill.

I have also included a brief account of a visit to the Coolgardie

goldfields which, though alien in purpose from the remaining chapters,

may not be without interest as a record of personal impressions {viii}

of a Province which has but recently felt the effects of a budding

prosperity.

It has been suggested to me that I should attempt to discuss

Australasian problems with reference to their applicability to Great

Britain; but I have preferred to leave this task, of which the

importance cannot be overstated, to persons of greater experience, and

to confine myself to a record of Australasian action and to a

comparison of the points of similarity or the reverse between the

several Provinces. It will be seen, however, that, in some cases, as

when dealing, for instance, with the results of payment of members and

with the powers and privileges of Australasian Upper Houses, I have

noted differences of conditions which must render deductions by analogy

a matter of extreme difficulty.

The terms "Liberal" and "Conservative" are used to denote,

respectively, the more and the less advanced parties in Australasian

politics, and must not be taken to imply differences in opinion similar

to those prevailing in Great Britain.

In conclusion, I would only say that my studies would have been

impossible in the absence of kindly communicativeness on the part of

politicians of all shades of opinion; and, on the social side, that I

retain warm feelings of gratitude towards the committees of clubs and

numerous acquaintances who extended to me the cordial hospitality of

kinship.

H. DE R. WALKER.

23, CORK STREET, W.,

_July 25, 1897_.

{ix}

CONTENTS

I.

_LIBERALISM AND LABOUR IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA._

PAGE

Contrast between Western Australia and the Eastern

Provinces--The Constitution of South Australia--The alliance

between Liberalism and Labour--Joint action in the face of

financial depression: Village Settlements, Progressive

Taxation, the direct encouragement of production--The

advocacy of an Elective Executive--The State and

Religious Instruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

II.

_DEMOCRACY AND ITS SAFEGUARDS IN NEW SOUTH WALES._

The necessity for safeguards against financial extravagance

and political pressure--The Crown Lands Act--The

appointment of independent Railway Commissioners--The

Standing Committee on Public Works--The Public Service

Board--The unemployed, their numbers and treatment--The

democratisation of the constitution--The Labour

Party, its history, successes and aspirations . . . . . . . . 34

{x}

III.

_PROBLEMS OF QUEENSLAND._

The agitation of Central and Northern Queensland for

separation from the South--The "Kanaka" traffic--White and

coloured labour on the plantations--The Sugar Works

Guarantee Act--The irregularity of employment in the

sugar and pastoral industries--The conditions and opinions

of the shearers--Assistance to dairymen and producers

of frozen meat--The Labour Party, its history and

prospects--Criticisms of the Government--The principles of

State action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

IV.

_THE LAND POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND._

Differences of conditions between Australia and New

Zealand--The Public Works policy--Taxation on land--The

Land Act of 1892--The Land for Settlements Acts--The

Government Advances to Settlers Acts--The encouragement of

settlement--The co-operative construction of Public

Works--The unemployed--Continuity of policy . . . . . . . . . 82

V.

_CHARACTERISTICS OF VICTORIAN LEGISLATION._

Comparisons between the Australasian Upper Houses--Conflicts

between the two Houses in Victoria--The proposed obviation

of deadlocks--The utility of the Legislative Council--The

antagonism between Town and Country--The Factory Acts, their

justification and provisions--State Socialism: Railways,

Irrigation Works, the encouragement of Mining, Subsidies

and Bonuses, State advances to Settlers--The Unemployed and

the Leongatha Labour Colony . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

{xi}

VI.

_THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA._

Constitutional history--The relations of Church and

State--Natural impediments to development--The construction

of railways--The scarcity of water--the promotion of

the mining and other industries--The absence of parties

in Parliament . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156

VII.

_DISCURSIVE NOTES ON TASMANIA._

The restriction of the immigration of coloured races--Betting

and lotteries--The adoption of a modification of Hare's

System of Voting--Conflicts between the two Houses of

Parliament--Finance and Taxation--Land Grant Railways . . . . 170

VIII.

_FEMALE SUFFRAGE_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184

IX.

_THE EVOLUTION OF A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT_ . . . . . . . . . . . . 212

X.

_SALIENT FEATURES OF THE AUSTRALASIAN DEMOCRACY._

Indirect effects of the discovery of gold--Causes of the

financial crisis--The origin and extent of State

Socialism--The thriftiness of the working classes--Labour

Representation in Parliament--Parliamentary Government--Direct

Taxation--Conciliation and Arbitration in Industrial

disputes--Protection and its corollaries--The feeling

towards Great Britain--General conclusions . . . . . . . . . . 244

XI.

_A VISIT TO THE COOLGARDIE GOLDFIELDS IN MARCH, 1896_ . . . . . 303

INDEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317

{1}

I

_LIBERALISM AND LABOUR IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA_

Contrast between Western Australia and the Eastern Provinces--The

Constitution of South Australia--The alliance between Liberalism and

Labour--Joint action in the face of financial depression: Village

Settlements, Progressive Taxation, the direct encouragement of

production--The advocacy of an Elective Executive--The State and

Religious Instruction.

The traveller who visited Western Australia in 1896 saw a country which

was enjoying, owing to its goldfields, a phenomenally rapid

development, with all its attendant advantages of a large increase in

population, an expanding revenue, and abundance of employment. As he

passed to the Eastern Provinces he found himself in the midst of

communities which had been shaken to their foundations by the fall in

the value of their staple products and the collapse of many banking

institutions, and were putting forth strenuous efforts to restore the

equilibrium between revenue and expenditure and to make a fresh start

upon the path of prosperity. These efforts, varying in detail in

different Provinces, have included the imposition {2} of additional

taxation, provision for the unemployed, and, in some cases, direct

encouragement of production. The policy pursued by South Australia is

of particular interest as her Constitution gives the freest play to

democratic influences.

The House of Assembly is elected on the basis of adult suffrage; the

Upper House or Legislative Council by adults possessing a property

qualification consisting of a freehold of the clear annual value of

L50, a registered leasehold of L20, with three years to run or the

right of purchase, or the occupation of a dwelling-house of the clear

annual value of L25. No property qualification is required in

candidates for election to either House, and the Members of both Houses

are paid at the rate of L200 per annum. Adults, upon reaching the age

of twenty-one in the case of the Assembly or possessing the requisite

qualification in the case of the Council, can claim to be placed upon

the electoral roll and are entitled to vote upon the expiration of six

months after registration; upon removal to another constituency, the

vote can immediately be transferred. Plural voting is forbidden under

heavy penalties, and all the elections, except that for the Northern

Territory, take place upon the same day.

These conditions have enabled the democratic element to obtain a

preponderating voice in both Houses, by a majority of one in the

Council and by a considerable majority in the Assembly. During {3} the

last three years the Government has been in the hands of the Liberals

under the Hon. C. C. Kingston, who has included in his cabinet two

former Premiers in the persons of the Treasurer, the Hon. F. W. Holder,

and the Minister of Education and Agriculture, the Hon. Dr. Cockburn.

The Ministerialists have had the support of the Labour Party, which has

been very successful with its candidates and now holds the balance of

power. It was formed towards the close of the year 1890, after the

failure of the maritime strike, in response to the feeling of the

Trades Unions and other labour organisations that their objects would

be obtained most easily by securing the direct representation of labour

in Parliament. They were influenced also by the rejection by the

Assembly of Dr. Cockburn's proposals for progressive taxation in spite

of promises made by a majority of the members before their election. A

political programme was, accordingly, drawn up, which is the accepted

creed of the Labour representatives, who number six in the Council of

twenty-four and twelve in the Assembly of fifty-four members. It has

successively been modified, as measures previously advocated have been

passed into law, and contains the following principal items: The

cessation of the alienation of Crown Lands by the substitution of some

system of leasing; the remission of the duties on articles not grown or

produced in the Colony, any resulting deficiency in the revenue to be

made up by increasing the tax on {4} land values; redistribution of

seats on the basis of population; the encouragement of local industries

by the extension of the State Export Department, so that producers may

be able to obtain the full benefit of foreign markets; and Federation

on a democratic basis. The Labour Party are opposed most strongly to

the admission of coloured races and to assisted immigration, on the

ground that the former would lower the status of the Australian

workman, and the latter cause the supply of labour to exceed the demand

and bring misery and destitution upon the poor. The relations of the

Labour and Liberal members, which have been most cordial, are based

upon mutual interdependence. The Liberals rely upon the support of the

Labour members; the latter are not strong enough to take office, nor, I

understand, do they wish to do so, and must support the Liberals in

order to be able to mould the legislation to the shape that they

desire. A prominent member of the Labour Party has thus summarised the

position: "The hardest work in connection with some of the measures has

been done by Liberals who, though not members of the Party, are

generally found working in connection with that body. But it must be

conceded that most of the planks which have been carried owe their

early success to the fact of their adoption on the programme of the

United Labour Party, and the persistent advocacy and solid votes of its

members." The policy of the Party has created a great {5} amount of

bitterness in the country, their successful advocacy of progressive

taxation on incomes and land values and of other democratic measures

having led them to be charged with being inimical to capital as such;

but the Speaker of the Assembly, who is a Conservative, has stated in a

recent speech that, "in speaking of the Labour Party, he wishes to do

so with the greatest respect. They are a power in the House, and no

Government could have retained office in the last Parliament without

their support. The Labour representatives were picked men, clever in

debate, unremitting in attention to their duties, and a credit to the

districts they represented." The leader of the Party is Mr. J. A.

McPherson, a native of Aberdeen, who migrated to Adelaide in 1882 and

engaged in the printing trade. He identified himself with Trades Union

affairs, was elected unanimously in 1890 to be Secretary of the Trades

and Labour Council, and still holds that position. He entered the

Assembly at a bye-election in 1892, and is regarded as one of the

ablest and most energetic members of the Labour Party. Mr. McPherson

has a popular supporter in Mr. E. L. Batchelor, the colleague of the

Premier in the representation of West Adelaide, who has risen from

subordinate employment on the Government railways to be, at the age of

thirty, President of the Railway Association and Secretary of the

Party. Mr. Batchelor is a man of broad views and a keen student, and

has brought {6} forward a Bill for the institution of the initiative

and referendum, which he considers to be suited to the small population

of South Australia. The Party are fortunate in their leading men and

show no signs of cleavage, their only serious difference of opinion

having been in regard to the qualifications of Labour candidates. As

long as solidarity can be maintained and the present leaders remain in

the ascendant, no fear need be felt that they will subordinate the

interests of the community to those of their own class, though they

would be the first to admit that their main object is to protect the

working man and to improve his position.

The principal measures of the present Administration, such as the

Taxation Acts and the establishment of the Village Settlements and of

the Produce Export Department, may be said to be the joint product of

the Liberal and Labour Parties, and may be regarded as an example of

the policy pursued by a pure democracy in the face of financial

depression, dislocation of trade, and widespread scarcity of employment.

The object of the Act of 1893 which authorised the formation of Village

Settlements was to prevent men of small means, who found difficulty in

obtaining employment, from leaving the country by affording them the

opportunity of settling upon the land and working it co-operatively

with the assistance of advances from the State. Its main provisions

were, that any twenty or more persons {7} might form an association for

the purpose of taking up a grant of land not exceeding 160 acres per

head; that the work should be done under the direction of trustees

appointed by members of the association from among their number, who

should manage the affairs of the village upon principles of

co-operation and equitable division; and that the Commissioner of Crown

Lands might advance to any such association out of funds provided by

Parliament, an amount not exceeding the sum of L50 for each villager

and not exceeding one-half the cost of the improvements upon the land.

The advances were to be repaid in ten equal annual instalments, with

interest computed at 5 per cent. per annum on the moneys for the time

being remaining unpaid; but the first of such instalments was not to be

payable until after the expiration of three years from the date of the

advance. The formation of settlements on a purely communistic basis

was rendered possible by Section 78 of the Act, which states that "the

rules" (of an association) "may require payment to a common fund or

otherwise as may be determined of all or any part of the earnings of

the villagers whether earned within the village or elsewhere." Twelve

associations were formed, mostly on the banks of the Murray, between

the months of February and August, 1894, but not, with a single

exception, on the lines intended by the Government. The extreme

scarcity of employment and great poverty at Adelaide and in the

neighbourhood in the early part of that year led them to form {8} the

remainder of persons who were almost entirely destitute. They were

necessarily assisted at the start, but did not afterwards receive

advances until the Government Inspector had certified that they were

justified by the improvements made upon the land. The action of the

Government was illegal throughout, as the Act stated expressly that the

advances should be made out of funds provided by Parliament, and no

funds had been voted for the purpose, but it may be condoned on the

ground of the extreme urgency of the crisis. At the expiration of a

year the limit had been reached in most cases, and further advances

were indispensable to prevent the immediate collapse of the majority of

the settlements. The Commissioner of Crown Lands, accordingly,

introduced a Bill in which he asked for authority to increase the

advances, under the same conditions, to L100 per head, and for further

powers of control over the settlements. The Bill, which was hotly

opposed, was not passed till a Select Committee had been appointed to

inquire on the spot into the conditions and financial prospects of the

settlements and had reported in its favour.

The report, which was dated November 14, 1895, and the evidence upon

which it was based, gave a complete picture of the disadvantages under

which the settlers laboured and of the drawbacks of the system of

distribution. The land selected for the villages was such, it was

pointed out, that it could not be cultivated except under irrigation.

This had {9} necessitated the erection of a costly pumping plant, which

the settlers had difficulty in purchasing, as they could offer no

security for payment. When the plant was finally obtained, it was

found, in some cases, to be unsuitable; in others it could not be

properly worked in the absence of a capable engineer. The settlers,

brought together at haphazard by destitution and not by their knowledge

of agricultural pursuits, had wasted much time and labour through

ignorance, incapacity, and insufficiency of proper tools. They had

lacked a strong controlling hand to direct their operations, and had

disobeyed the trustees whom they had themselves appointed; and as the

trustees had little power discipline had been nonexistent, and

quarrels, at several settlements, of continual occurrence. Order had

been restored with difficulty, as the only punishment was expulsion,

upon a decision of the trustees ratified by a vote of the villagers,

and many villagers had voted against expulsion from the fear that they

in their turn might be subjected to a similar penalty. The

arrangements for the distribution of rations also had caused

considerable dissatisfaction and led to disagreement between single and

married men, as the former felt that the latter received a share of the

stores out of proportion to the work they had done. The general system

was, that rations were issued on a sliding scale, according as a man

was single or had a large or small family, and was to that extent

purely communistic.

{10}

The difficulties encountered by the settlers had been such as would

have discouraged most men, but, in spite of them, the total number had

only fallen in eighteen months from 598 to 440, and the majority of

witnesses expressed themselves satisfied with their lot. They admitted

the necessity of further advances, but pleaded that they had a heavy

burden to bear in the cost of machinery, and that their labour,

especially in the planting of fruit trees, could not yield an immediate

return. The financial position was thus summarised:--The Government

had advanced L26,000, the unpaid accounts amounted to about L11,000,

and the improvements were valued by the Commissioner of Crown Lands at

L41,000.

During 1896 the further advances had been expended, but the settlements

had not become self-supporting, and the increased burden of debt and

uncertainty as to the future had caused many of the settlers to become

disheartened and others to leave in despair. On the other hand, the

appointment of an expert to exercise the additional powers conferred

upon the Commissioner and to give advice to the settlers, had led to

the diminution of quarrels and disagreements among them and to a better

direction of their work. In view of these facts the Government decided

to close four of the settlements which had been formed upon land

unsuitable to the purpose, owing to the poorness of the soil or the

absence of facilities for profitable irrigation. It has been {11}

estimated that the remainder have sufficient irrigable land to maintain

a population of about three hundred families, and that they require an

average of about L25 per settler to make them self-supporting. A few

enthusiasts alone believe that any portion of the principal of the

loans will ever be repaid; but the Government will have no cause to

complain if they receive regular interest on the money. Some

difficulty is likely to arise in the disposal of the produce. There is

a considerable market for vegetables on the river, but it will soon be

overtaken by the supply. The settlers will probably devote most of

their land to fruit growing and dairying, and will be able to take

advantage of the Export Department.

The settlers should have a better chance of success in the future, as

loafers are gradually being weeded out, and the process is to be

continued until the settlers shall have been reduced to such as have

shown an honest desire to make homes for themselves and their families

upon the land. This course has been rendered possible by the large

exodus of working men to Western Australia, which has reduced the

pressure upon the local labour market. The Government desire to

approximate all the settlements to the level of Murtho, which alone was

formed of persons who had considerable means of their own. The

settlers, about twenty in number, put an average of L60 each into the

venture and left good situations out of enthusiasm for the principles

of co-operation. They are intelligent, well-educated {12} men and

women who are bound to put forward every effort to be successful, as

otherwise they will be in a worse position than at the start. They

work all the land upon the method of joint cultivation on the ground

that, as different forms of produce are grown, it is of importance to

be able to concentrate the greater portion of the labour at any point

where it may be required, and, under the influence of communistic

ideas, give to all an equal share of the results of their united

efforts. This system would have seemed, from the constitution of human

nature, to be doomed to failure; but an amount of work has been done in

planting and clearing which testifies to continuous and sustained

labour, disagreements have been rare, and the settlers, in conversation

with me, expressed themselves as contented with their lot and confident

of eventual success. They do not regard themselves as recipients of

charity, as they have received advances on the same conditions as

holders of Working Men's blocks; on the contrary, they regard

themselves as pioneers of a new movement, and desire, not only to make

homes for themselves and their families, but to prove that land can be

worked successfully on a co-operative, almost a communistic, basis. If

the Murtho settlers succeed, they will do so by the continued exercise

of mutual forbearance and from the impulse of a common enthusiasm.

The Government appear to have made several {13} grave mistakes of

omission and commission in the formation of the settlements. They

should have caused a survey of the Murray lands to be made before the

selection of the sites, and they should have realised that men, united

only by their destitution, required control and direction, and, as the

majority were ignorant of agricultural pursuits, constant

superintendence of their work. The system of joint cultivation also

was entirely unsuited to the class of men who formed the bulk of the

settlers. It is true that the Act authorised neither preliminary

surveys nor the appointment of superintendents, and stated expressly

that the associations were to be co-operative; but if the urgency of

the crisis may be taken to have justified the Government in making

advances without the sanction of Parliament, it would also have

justified such further illegalities as would have benefited the

settlers and safeguarded the interests of the tax-payers.

A certain amount of co-operation was inevitable if the settlements were

to be formed upon land which could only be cultivated under irrigation,

in the erection of the pumping plant and the use of water. It would

also be advisable in the purchase of seeds, trees and vines, the

disposal of produce and the common ownership of horses and implements

of husbandry. But the land might have been cut up into blocks, in

order to enable each settler to obtain the full benefit of his

exertions {14} subject to payment for the services rendered to him by

the association.

The Government are to be congratulated, however faulty their methods

may have been, upon their attempt to enable the unemployed to make

homes for themselves upon the land, a great improvement upon the policy

of their predecessors, who wasted thousands of pounds upon unnecessary

relief works. They have undoubtedly raised the moral tone of the

settlers, who make a good impression upon the visitor through their

intelligence and sobriety and the happy appearance of their children,

and one cannot but regret that, owing to the absence of direction, much

of their labour has been absolutely valueless. The cynic will say that

the men have every reason to be contented as they are living entirely

upon advances and can rid themselves of all responsibility for the

loans by leaving the settlements; but he forgets that they have

qualified for these advances by hard work and that they never see a

shilling that they can call their own.

The whole question must be looked at from the point of view of the

Australian, who would be horrified at our system, under which indigence

is assumed to be the result of idleness and improvidence and relief is

offered under the most degrading conditions, and expects his Government

to do something to relieve the misery caused by scarcity of employment.

In South Australia, where adult suffrage and payment of the members of

both {15} Houses have made the working classes masters of the

situation, they can compel the Ministry to pay attention to their

wishes. A step in the right direction, was taken when Village

Settlements were substituted for temporary relief works; but any future

scheme, while affording to men the opportunity of regaining a position

of independence, should compel them to prove their worthiness by their

own individual exertions.

The wide application by the Australasian Provinces of the principle of

State action renders them especially liable to violent fluctuations of

prosperity and adversity. As young countries they have borrowed

largely for purposes of development, and have constructed expensive

public works which have greatly increased the demand for labour.

During the recent years of depression the Government have been obliged

to discontinue their operations, and have offered less employment at a

time when the labour market was already overstocked owing to the

contraction of private enterprise. Similarly in the case of revenue:

the receipts from the railways, which are almost universally owned by

the State, vary proportionately with the returns from taxation, which

depend in their turn largely upon the condition of trade. They have

fallen in South Australia from L1,229,598 in 1891-2 to L967,656 in

1894-5, with the result that when the community has been least able,

owing to the diminished returns from other resources of revenue, to

bear additional {16} taxation, further taxes have necessarily been

imposed to meet the interest upon the loans out of the proceeds of

which the railways have been constructed. The Kingston Government,

which took office in 1893, had to face a deficit of L200,000, and

immediately set to work to restore order in the finances. This they

attempted to do by retrenchment, reducing the expenditure by L100,000

per annum, and by the imposition of fresh taxation. Succession Duties,

a tax on the unimproved value of land and an income tax had already

been imposed, a distinction being made in the latter case, between

incomes derived from property and incomes resulting from personal

exertion; but the present Government were the first to introduce the

progressive principle into the taxes on incomes and land values. This

legislation has encountered, as might be expected, the strongest

opposition from the richer members of the community, who protest that a

feeling of insecurity is produced and capital driven out of the

country, but it may be noted that South Australia in 1895 raised money

at 3 per cent. upon exceptionally favourable terms. The Government

were compelled to obtain further funds, and showed their desire to

equalise the incidence of the additional taxes by lowering, in spite of

the opposition of the Labour Party, the exemption from income tax from

L200 to L125 and by increasing the duty on beer, spirits, and other

articles of ordinary consumption. Income tax is {17} at present at the

rate of 4-1/2d. in the pound up to L800, and of 6d. in the pound above

L800 of taxable amount resulting from personal exertions, and at the

rate of 9d. and 1s. in the pound, respectively, on incomes from

property. Incomes between L125 and L425 enjoy exemption on L125 of the

amount. Taxpayers are required, under penalty of prosecution for

perjury for a false declaration, to furnish annually a statement of all

forms of income that they have enjoyed during the past year, except in

respect of any share or interest in a registered company; in this case

the tax, at the rate of a shilling in the pound, is deducted by an

officer of the company before payment of the dividends to shareholders.

The higher rate is not paid on either form of income unless it,

separately, exceeds L800. The tax on the unimproved value of land is

1/2d. in the pound up to, and 1d. above, the capital value of L5,000, and

is increased by 20 per cent. in the case of absentee owners. A general

assessment of all the lands in the Colony is made triennially, each

person's property in each district or township being treated

separately. The assessments are then sorted alphabetically, in order

to discover the total holding of each individual which is the basis

upon which the higher or lower rate of taxation is imposed. Little

objection is taken to the manner in which the value of the land is

assessed; in the majority of cases the owner and the official of the

Government are able to agree as {18} to a fair valuation, and, should

they fail to do so, an appeal against the valuation may be made to the

Taxation Department, and, if an arrangement be not arrived at, to a

Court of Law. The assessment of 1894 led to a large number of appeals,

as the assessors had not realised the enormous fall in value of

agricultural and pastoral land, but all, with a single exception, were

met to the satisfaction of the appellant by concessions voluntarily

made by the Department. Their attention is turned mainly to urban

land, because it is subject to the greatest increase in unimproved

value and returns the larger portion of the receipts derived from this

source. An incidental advantage of the tax lies in the fact that land

held by speculators for a rise in value contributes to the revenue

equally with that on which buildings have been erected. The tax is

recognised by most people as equitable in principle, but its

progressive character has brought upon the Ministry the bitterest

animosity of the landed class, who maintain that it has caused land to

be given up and to become unsaleable, not so much because the present

burden is intolerable but because it is merely the thin end of the

wedge. They point to the programme of the Labour Party in which it is

stated that the duty should be taken off certain articles of ordinary

consumption, the deficiency (which, according to an official estimate,

would be L310,000 a year) to be made up by increasing the tax on land

values, and argue that as the Labour Party hold the {19} Government

under their thumb, they will be able to enforce compliance with their

wishes. It is difficult for a stranger to judge to what extent

possessors of capital have actually been deterred from investing it in

land, especially as several important factors have led concurrently to

a depreciation in its value, such as the fall in the prices of wheat

and wool, the failure of banks which were interested, directly or

indirectly, in large tracts of country, and bad legislation, passed

some ten years ago, under which the runs were cut up into blocks too

small for the successful prosecution of the pastoral industry. The

Government can point to Pastoral Acts which are admitted to be steps in

the right direction, and challenge their opponents to show in what way

they could have raised the L20,000 yielded by the additional Land Tax

with less burden to the community. The Absentee Tax lacks similar

justification, as it only brings in L3,600 a year. It is defended by

the Premier on the ground that the absentee, as regards his property,

has the full protection of the administration of the laws, and should

contribute to the expenditure necessary for the maintenance of the

State; and that he does not do so to the extent of those who live in

South Australia and contribute daily to the revenue by means of the

Customs in all they eat and drink and practically all they put on. On

the other hand it is contended that it is of supreme importance to

attract capital to the Colony and that this principle is recognised

{20} in the case of public loans and Treasury bonds, on which no income

tax is charged, and should also be taken into consideration with

reference to private investments in land. Succession Duty is levied

upon a graduated scale, ranging from 1-1/2 per cent. for L500 to 10 per

cent. for L200,000 and upwards in the case of a widow, widower,

ancestor or descendant of the deceased, and from 1 per cent. for any

amount under L200 to 10 per cent. for L20,000 and upwards where the

property is inherited by a person in any degree of collateral

consanguinity. If the heir is a stranger in blood he pays 10 per cent.

whatever be the value of the property. In order to promote the

diffusion of wealth the rate of the tax is based upon the amount

inherited, not upon the total value of the estate.

In the relief of the unemployed and the imposition of additional

taxation, the Ministry, while choosing their methods, have dealt with

problems which they were bound to face; but they have not confined

themselves to the negative task of coping with existing difficulties.

They have realised that greater commercial activity would permanently

benefit the revenue and add to the demand for labour, and that, in a

country like South Australia, it could only be secured by a wider and

more varied cultivation of the soil, and have, with the hearty support

of the Labour Party, seized every opportunity to encourage production

and develop the export trade. Farmers already had the advantage of an

Agricultural Bureau at Adelaide, {21} with local branches, which

periodically disseminated information, and of an Agricultural College

to which they could send their sons, at a small annual charge, or

gratuitously if they could obtain a scholarship; but they were

hindered, when the fall in the value of cereals compelled them to turn

their attention to subsidiary industries, by the absence of facilities

for obtaining a market for subsidiary products. The limited demand in

the Colony for butter, fruit, and wine offered insufficient inducement

to farmers and small cultivators. Previous to 1893, the total export

of butter did not exceed the value of L1,200, but in that year and in

1894 a bonus was offered by the Government, with the result that butter

of the value of L110,000 has since been shipped. They also formed a

Produce Export Department through which producers can ship their goods

to London, entered into a contract with the Peninsular and Oriental and

Orient Steamship Companies for cheap rates of carriage, and established

in London a Wine and Produce Depot to receive the goods and sell them

on the most favourable terms. A receiving depot has since been

established at Port Adelaide and refrigerating machinery and chambers

have been erected, which enable the Department to receive sheep and

send them as frozen meat to England. Butter, wine, frozen meat, and

fruit have been sent to London through the Department, and in some

cases prices have been realised which far surpassed those which could

have been obtained in {22} the local market. The scheme is not yet

self-supporting, as, though the charges cover the expenses, the

salaries of the additional officials required in the Ministry, and an

annual sum of some L3,500 for the maintenance of the Depot in London,

fall upon the revenue of the country; but this expenditure is more than

repaid by the impetus undoubtedly given to trade which would not

otherwise have been afforded owing to the absence of private

enterprise. The Ministry have undertaken a work in which individuals

would have had little chance of success, and have enabled small

consignors to ship their produce at wholesale rates. Their object also

has been, in the words of the Minister of Agriculture (Dr. Cockburn),

"to afford a guarantee of quality. All goods consigned to the Depot

are examined previous to shipment. If found to be in good condition

and properly packed, they are sent forward to the London manager with a

certificate to that effect. By this system of inspection a barrier is

erected against the export of inferior goods which have an injurious

effect on the reputation of South Australian produce." This latter

point is of great importance and applies equally as regards the injury

that might be done by one Province to another, as the British consumer

regards Australian produce generically, and does not distinguish

between the output of different Provinces. Dr. Cockburn called a

conference in 1896, which was attended by representatives from New

South {23} Wales, Victoria, and Queensland, to consider how far joint

action might be taken to secure uniformity of output. The presence of

a representative from Victoria enhanced the practical character of the

deliberations, as that Province has been the pioneer in the movement

and conducts its operations on a very extensive scale. It was decided

that the respective Parliaments should be invited to legislate in the

direction of uniform inspection of frozen meat, dairy produce, wine and

fruit, the adoption as far as possible of a federal brand which would

be a guarantee of high quality and the joint exhibition of Australian

produce at some leading agricultural show in England. The conference

is regarded as a promising sign of the willingness of the Australian

Provinces to act together in matters of common concern. The

institution of the Produce Export Department is favourably viewed by

the press of South Australia and by the bulk of the community, but,

while it is admitted that the initiative of the State has been

successful, the hope is expressed that, when the trade has been firmly

established, the scope of State action will be reduced and private

enterprise be allowed to step in. Such an attitude shows the prevalent

distrust of State action; in order that it may not be perpetuated, the

middleman is to be invited to absorb a portion of the profits which at

present are gained by the producer.

The present Ministry have also legislated on the {24} subject of

workmen's liens, to protect the wage-earner against an insolvent or

dishonest employer; they have passed a Conciliation Act, to facilitate

the settlement of industrial disputes, and have established a State

Bank to provide for advances to farmers and other producers and to

local authorities. These measures were warmly supported by the Labour

members, who tried, unsuccessfully, to enlarge the scope of the State

Bank by making it a Bank of Issue.

At the General Election in 1896 the Liberals, who were again

successful, advocated certain measures of social reform; continued

economy of administration; the extension of the functions of the Export

Department; Federation on a democratic basis, and the election of

Ministries by Parliament, a proposal which has excited singularly

little interest, in spite of the complete change that it would effect

in the methods of government. The justification for it must be sought

in the local conditions of the Province, which has never taken kindly

to the system of government by party.

The tariff question, which has caused a clear line of division in New

South Wales, has been settled decisively in favour of protection, and

no distinct issue has taken its place at the recent elections. In

Adelaide and the neighbourhood the contest may be said to have been

fought in some sense between capital and labour, though among the

supporters of the Ministry are many men of considerable means; {25} or

between individualism and socialism, but that all are socialists to the

extent of believing in State ownership of railways and State control of

waterworks and water conservation, while the majority are favourably

disposed to the Export Department, and the average man has no definite

ideas on the subject, but views each proposed extension of State action

according to his opinion of its possible effect upon himself. The

success of the Liberals was remarkable, as the South Australians are a

fickle people, and usually overthrow the party that is in power; but it

is suggested that the female vote, which has been given for the first

time, may have been recorded largely in favour of those who had passed

the Adult Suffrage Act. However that may be, the Kingston Government

are by no means sure of an extension of three years, as the ties of

party allegiance are slight except in the case of the Labour members,

and the struggles in the Assembly may resolve themselves, as in the

past, into contests between individual aspirants for office. The

tendency of the last Parliament was in the direction of a clearer line

of cleavage, but this was due to the cleverness of the present Premier,

who included in the Cabinet his two strongest opponents whose

opposition had been the more bitter that it was not founded upon

differences of political opinion. Until that time South Australia had

had forty-one Ministries in thirty-seven years, a constant change of

the responsible heads of public departments {26} which greatly impaired

their efficiency and prevented continuity of administration. The

absence of a stable majority in the Assembly gave the opportunity, and

ambition and love of power the impetus, to continual struggles for

office which were wholly unallied with any baser motives, as Australian

statesmen have obtained an honourable pre-eminence for their rectitude

of character.

The intentions of the Government in regard to the substitution of an

elective executive, which have not yet been definitely formulated, may

be gathered from a speech made by Dr. Cockburn, the principal advocate

of the change, in which he proposed that Ministers, who would continue,

as at present, to be Members of Parliament, should be elected by ballot

by the Assembly at the commencement of each session; that they should

appoint one of their number to be their leader, but should be

responsible individually to Parliament for their respective

departments; and that their corporate responsibility should be limited

to matters affecting the Province as a whole, such as finance or its

relations with other countries. The Governor's prerogative of

dissolution would remain unaffected, but as the House would be brought

into closer touch with the people, dissolutions would be unnecessary

and undesirable. Dr. Cockburn claimed that his proposal was in

accordance with the natural evolution of Parliamentary Government, and

contended that, the area of selection being enlarged, the {27} best men

would be chosen as Ministers from the whole House and the best man for

each office. Ministers would not be called upon to justify proceedings

of their colleagues which in their hearts they condemned, and private

members would be able to exercise greater independence, as they would

not be called upon to sacrifice their convictions to maintain their

friends in office, and, being allowed greater freedom on questions of

legislation, would introduce many bills of an important character.

Intrigue, which was an essential of Party government, would become

disreputable when resorted to for purposes of personal advancement.

The objection that certain members would not work together if chosen to

form an administration was met by the fact that men sat in amity on the

Treasury benches who previously had denounced one another to the utmost

of their power. The distinctive feature of the proposal, therefore, is

the indirect election of Ministers. The people elect the

representatives, who, in turn, are to elect certain of their number to

form the Executive. The first criticism that suggests itself is, that

it is difficult to believe in the rapid elimination of party feeling,

and that it is probable, granted the existence of intrigues among

aspirants for office under the present system, that they would be

increased tenfold when such persons sought to ingratiate themselves,

not only with prospective Premiers, but with a majority of the members

of the Assembly. Again, {28} while it is impossible to foresee all the

results of the change, it may be anticipated that some obvious

advantages would be counterbalanced by incoherence of policy and

haphazard legislation, but that a class of men might be induced to come

forward as candidates who are deterred by their horror of continual

party strife. Dr. Cockburn stated that no amendment would be required

in the Constitution Act, as, after the election of the Ministers, their

names would be submitted in the ordinary way to the Governor. The

present Ministry also favour the biennial retirement of half the

members of the Assembly, in order to secure continuity in its

composition, and the institution of the referendum.

Australasian Democracy · 第 1 / 20 段