CHAPTER XXV

RETURN TO JOURNALISM

Miss Spartali and I were married in the Spring of 1871, and in justice

to her I came to the hazardous decision to make my home in England,

and there to devote myself to general literature and correspondence

with America. As my financial condition at that moment, thanks to the

various contributions to it, was better than it had ever been before,

I had the courage needed to face the great change in my life. I

brought with me from Lowell a letter to Leslie Stephen, whose

friendship has ever since been one of the pleasantest things in my

English life. Mrs. Stephen, the elder daughter of Thackeray, was to us

an angel of goodness, and never since has the grateful recognition of

her loving hospitality in thought and deed diminished in my mind. Our

debt to her was a debt of the heart, and those are never paid. Her

sister, later Mrs. Ritchie, added much to the obligations of our early

life in London, and still remains our friend. Mr. Stephen gave me an

introduction to the "Pall Mall Gazette," then under the charge of

Greenwood, and I contributed in incidental ways to its columns; and

with contributions to "Scribner's" and other magazines it seemed that

we might forgather, and we decided to bring the children out.

An article on the Cretan insurrection, printed while I was still in

the island, had led the way to an acquaintance with Froude, in whose

magazine it appeared, and I had been put on the staff of the "Daily

News," which had printed a contribution on the Greek question as a

leading article; so that, on the whole, the venture did not seem

too rash for a man who never looked far ahead for good fortune. My

friendship with Froude lasted as long as he lived. He was a warm and

sincere friend, always ready with word or deed to help one who needed

it, and one of the men for whom I retain the warmest feeling of all I

knew at this epoch of my life. In New York I had made an arrangement

with Dr. Holland to hold the literary agency for "The Century" (then

"Scribner's") for England, and on returning to London we took a small

furnished house at Notting Hill Way, where our daughter Effie was

born. In the following spring we moved out to Clapham Common, to be

near the parents of my wife, and in the comparative quiet of that then

delightful neighborhood we gave our experiment full scope. The life as

a literary life was ideal, but as a practical thing it failed. Here

I had the pleasure of extending hospitality to Emerson on his way to

Egypt, and Lowell on the way to Madrid. To make the acquaintance of

Lowell we had Professor and Mrs. Max Müller to meet him at dinner, and

Tom Taylor was of the company, he living as a near neighbor.

But Russie's condition was a shadow over my life, growing deeper every

day. Though he had been discharged from Boston as incurable, we put

him under the care of one of the best of English surgeons, and one of

the kindest-hearted men I have ever known, the late Mr. John Marshall,

one of the warm and constant friends I had made through my relations

with Rossetti, of whom Marshall was a strong admirer. Though his

charges were modified to fit our estate, they aggregated, with all his

moderation, to a sum which I could ill support; but to save, or even

prolong Russie's life, I would have made any sacrifice. He was then

not far from nine, and, though crippled by his disease, with his once

beautiful face haggard with pain and no longer recognizable by those

who had known him in his infancy, he was to me still the same,--a dear

and loving child, the companion of my fortunes at their worst; and his

devotion to me was the chief thing of his life. I had carried him in

my arms at every change of vehicle in all the journeys from Athens

to Boston and from Boston to London again, and to him I was all the

world; to me he was like a nursling to its mother, the first thought

of every day, an ever-present care, and his long struggle with death

was an inseparable sadness in my existence. I remarked to Lowell one

day that I feared he would die, and Lowell replied, "I should be

afraid he would not die." The seeming cruelty of the expression struck

me like a sentence of death, and momentarily chilled my feeling

towards Lowell; but the incident made me understand some things in

life as I could not have otherwise understood them, enabling me to

take a larger view of our individual sorrows. There is no doubt that

to Russie's sufferings and death I owe a large part of my experience

of the spiritual life, and especially a comprehension of the secret of

the mother's heart, so rarely understood by one of the other sex.

But my unfailing facility for getting into hot water was not to find

an exception in London. As agent for "Scribner's" I had to secure

contributions from English authors, not so easy then as now. Amongst

other items I was instructed to secure a story from a certain author,

and I contracted with her for the proof sheets of her next novel,

about to be published in England in the--Magazine, the price to be

paid for the advance proofs being £500, if I remember rightly. There

was then no international copyright with America, but a courtesy right

between publishers, with a general understanding amongst the trade

that the works of an author once published by a house should be

considered as belonging by prescription to it. On the announcement by

"Scribner's" of the coming publication of this author's novel, the

firm who had published her prior works announced that they would not

respect the agreement with the author, but would pirate the story.

As the result of the quarrel, "Scribner's" resigned the story to its

rival on payment to the lady of the sum agreed on. But now appeared an

utterly unsuspected state of things: the--Magazine had already sold

the proof sheets of the story to a third American house, and an exposé

of the situation showed that English publishers had been in the

practice of selling the advance proofs of their most popular works of

fiction to the American houses, and recouping the half of the price

paid the authors.

On the heels of this discovery by the public, there happened one of

the periodical outbreaks of English journalism against the "American"

system of literary piracy, and simultaneously the visit of a committee

of the American publishers deputed by the government of the United

States to study out an arrangement for a treaty of international

copyright on the basis of equality of right and privileges in both

countries of the authors of both countries, but with no recognition

of publishers' rights or privileges. The English government, taking

advice from a committee of authors and publishers, in which the

interest of the publishers was dominant, declined the offer of the

American form of treaty, insisting on the protection of publishers'

rights, and the negotiations fell through, with great increase of the

outcry in the English press. Being in communication with Mr. William

H. Appleton, the head of the American committee, and in possession of

the facts of the case as regarded the courtesy right, I wrote to the

English papers, putting the American view of the matter, and the

facts, dwelling on the hitherto unknown point that the depredations on

the authors' interests were committed by the English publisher, who

sold to the American the wares the latter was accused of stealing,

whereas the fact was that he bought and paid equally for the right of

publication, while the English publisher continued to reprint American

books without the least regard for analogous transatlantic rights.

The consequences to me were variously disastrous. In the first place

I was deluged with applications from authors of still unestablished

transatlantic reputation to secure for them offers from "Scribner's"

for the advance sheets of their books. In the second I was treated to

a torrent of abuse as "the friend of piracy" ("Daily News" leading

article), and for some days not a single London paper would print a

word of reply or explanation from me. The "Echo" was the first to

do me the justice of printing a defense, and it was followed by the

"Times," which printed my letter and one from Mr. Appleton; but of the

authors who, having a transatlantic reputation, had profited by the

"courtesy right," only Mr. Trollope came forward to sustain me with

the statement that he had received more from the Harpers--his American

publishers--than from his English publishers. The author whose novel

had been the occasion of the original trouble, grateful for what I had

done in her case, declared that the English authors ought to make me a

testimonial (or perhaps it was a monument she suggested), but from no

other source did I receive a word of thanks. And the third consequence

was that the "Pall Mall Gazette" dropped me "like a hot potato." As

my monthly cheques had reached the sum of ten pounds, and were slowly

increasing, the inroad on my income arising from my crusade against

publishing abuses was a serious item in my outlook.

As misfortunes never come alone, this was followed by my supersession,

as literary agent of "Scribner's," by Mr. Gosse, who had been making a

visit to New York. It was in curious coincidence with these disasters

that I addressed (with a letter of introduction from Madame Bodichon,

who always was the kindest of friends to me) a distinguished lady

member of the staff of an evening paper, with a request to help me to

get work on it, and was told distinctly that she did not favor the

entry of foreigners on the staff, as English writers had too much

competition amongst themselves, and "the crumbs from the table" should

be reserved for them, so that while I had opened the door for English

writers in my native land, to the disadvantage of myself and my

compatriots, I was to be excluded from the English market as a

foreigner. My old friend the editor of the "Daily News," had, during

my absence in America, been appointed to the "Gazette," and the new

Pharaoh "knew not Joseph." And so we decided to throw up the sponge

and go back to America, though even there the new influx of English

competitors (for which I was in part responsible) had made our chance

less brilliant. My father-in-law offered us, if we withdrew from our

decision, to settle £400 a year on my wife. With this aid we felt

that we might carry through; and to her the change from English life,

surrounded by old friends and an artistic atmosphere, to the strange

and comparatively cruder surroundings of America, was to be avoided at

any possible price, and I had no right to hesitate.

The great Exhibition of Vienna, in 1873, found the New York "Tribune"

unprovided in time for its correspondence, and the European manager,

my friend G.W. Smalley, proposed to me to go out for the paper. There

were three months still to the opening, but the preparation of the

groundwork of a continuous correspondence, on an occasion to which the

American public attached much importance, was a matter of gravity, and

the time was not too long. The editor had neglected the matter,

owing to considerations which deluded him, and I was just in time to

forestall the worst effects of a scandal which made its noise in its

day. The chief commissioner, General Van Buren, had had associated

with him, through influences which need not be cited, several

under-commissioners who were Jews, formerly of Vienna, and of course

obnoxious to the society, official and polite, of the Austrian

capital, and who were exercising a most unfortunate influence on the

prospects of the American exhibitors. In addition to this, they had

entered into a system of trading in concessions for their personal

advantage, the competition being very keen, especially in the

department of American drinks, and their dealings with the competitors

had excited great indignation in certain quarters. One of the

disappointed applicants, whose concession had been unjustly annulled

in favor of a higher bidder, came to me for advice. I at once

instituted a rigorous though secret inquiry, and collected a body

of evidence of corrupt practices, which I laid before the American

minister, Mr. Jay, with a demand that it should be communicated to

the government. Mr. Jay at first declined to take cognizance of the

matter, and accused me of doing what I did with political partisan

bias, Van Buren being a prominent politician. I assured him that I did

not even know to which party Van Buren belonged; but, what probably

moved him more was my assurance that the affair was not going to be

whitewashed, that if it was not corrected quietly I was determined to

make a public exposure, and that whoever tried to whitewash it would

need a whitewashing himself, whereupon he decided to take, under oath,

the evidence I had laid before him and send it to Washington, which he

did.

The result was a cable dismissal of the entire commission and the

nomination in their places of several American gentlemen who had come

to Vienna to witness the opening of the Exhibition, amongst whom were

two of my warmest personal friends. They immediately offered me the

official position of secretary to the commission, which I declined.

Having enlisted on the "Tribune," and considering myself held "for the

war," I could not desert, though the inducement was very strong, for

I should not only have been better paid than by the "Tribune," but

should have been practically director of the Exhibition, so far as the

American department was concerned. The exposure of the old commission

which I sent the "Tribune" was printed reluctantly, for Van Buren was

a personal friend of the editor-in-chief; but as I had taken the

pains to make the substance of it common property so far as the other

correspondents were concerned, it could not be suppressed.

For the opening ceremony there was great rivalry amongst the leading

papers of New York, and the "Herald" made very expensive arrangements

to cable a full account; and, beside its European manager, John

Russell Young, and its telegraphic manager, Mr. Sauer, it had Edmund

Yates and a well-known European lady novelist to make up the report.

The "Tribune" sent to my assistance an old friend, Bayard Taylor,

and one of the staff from New York, E.V. Smalley. The "Herald" was

prepared for practically unlimited expenditure on the occasion; the

"Tribune" simply ordered me to telegraph 6000 words to Smalley at

London, leaving the question of cabling open. Young thought me a rival

to be held in poor account, and was careless. All the "Herald" staff

took their places in the Exhibition building for the ceremony of

opening by the Emperor, which was no doubt spectacular; but, as the

doors were to be closed until the ceremony was over, and the Emperor

rose to make the tour of the Exhibition, no one could get at the

telegraph till all was complete. I stayed outside and sacrificed the

spectacle. I had found who was to be the telegraph inspector for the

day, and I went to him with an offer to hire a wire for the day. This

was impossible, he said, as there was to be but one wire for all the

foreign press. I put my case to him as that of a beginner in the

service, to whom a success was of great importance for the future, and

asked to be allowed to declare 6000 words to follow continuously; but

this too, he said, was against the regulations. But I secured his

sympathy, and he finally promised me that if I got first on the wire,

and my message came without interruption, one section being laid

before the operator before the other was finished, they should go on

without interruption, as one message; but, if one minute lapsed and

another message came in the interval, I must take my turn with the

others.

As Taylor was an old hand, and wrote a most legible script, and style

_currente calamo_, I told him to write what he could as the ceremony

went on, and, the moment the doors were opened, to consign what he

had written to a messenger whom I had hired for the day,--an American

clerk of one of the exhibitors under some little obligation to me, a

sharp Yankee, for whose use I had hired a cab, with the fastest horse

I could find, to run back and forth between the Exhibition and the

telegraph. Taylor was then to finish his account of the opening

ceremonies and bring it or send it by the messenger to me at the

telegraph office, the messenger waiting or returning for the first

installment of Smalley's account of the imperial inspection, which

he was to follow closely. After this he was to continue to write the

incidents of the opening; and when the whole approximated to the 6000

words needed, he was to come himself to the telegraph. I, meanwhile,

went into the streets and devoted myself to picking up incidents of

the procession, the deportment of the population, and the weather; and

when I supposed that the opening of the doors was about to take place

I went to the telegraph office and deposited 1200 words. Long before

these could be sent, Taylor's first installment came, and then Taylor

himself with the second. Young, seeing my staff always present, and

thinking me asleep, took his time.

When Taylor's second part had been deposited and paid for, I saw

coming down the street in a furiously driven carriage Mr. Sauer, with

the first part of his message. I slipped out at a back door and was

not seen, and Sauer returned for the continuation of his telegram.

When Smalley's first dispatch had been put on, I saw Sauer coming

again with his second. Then I sat tight and saw that the message had

been written in columns of words on large paper, so that the counting

should be rapid. It made a huge packet, and he deposited it with

evident satisfaction and turned to go out, when he saw Archibald

Forbes, who was writing his telegram to the "Daily News" at the table

in the office, and turned to speak to him. When leaving him he caught

sight of me in the corner, and started as if he had been hit by a

bullet, then made as if he had not seen me and was going out, but

reconsidered and came to speak to me. "Well, what have you done?"

he said. I replied that I had put about 5000 words on, and was only

waiting for the odds and ends from Smalley. He flushed with surprise

and vexation, and began to curse the telegraph officials "who never

kept their engagements," and went off in a towering rage. My 6000

words went on before a single word of the message to the "Herald"

could go.

Mr. Young had ordered for that evening a magnificent dinner for his

staff, to which mine was invited to celebrate his unquestioned feat.

While waiting for the dinner to come on, he took me apart and asked

confidentially what we had really done. I told him, and he asked if we

cabled, to which I replied that as to that I knew nothing, that I had

wired G.W. Smalley in London, but what he had done I could not say.

"Well," said he, "if you have cabled you have beaten us, and if you

have not cabled you may have beaten us," and then he went on to say

that if I would drop the "Tribune" and come over to the "Herald" he

would give me a good post and good pay. "No," I replied, "I have taken

service with the 'Tribune' for the campaign, and I cannot desert

them." (My recompense was a curt dismissal from the "Tribune" as soon

as the urgent work of the reporting of the opening was done.) Mr.

Whitelaw Reid's nerve had failed him when it came to the question of

the expense of cabling, and the 6000 words had gone by steamer from

Queenstown. I had given the "Tribune" the best beat it had ever had

except the Sedan report, if the editor had had the courage to profit

by it. The "Herald" received 150 words of its report in time for the

press the next morning, and had to make up its page of dispatches

from matter sent by post in advance and by expansion of the 150 words

received. Edmund Yates, in his autobiography, tells a story of the

affair which is in every important detail untrue, and he probably knew

nothing of it except what Young had admitted, and that was certainly

very little, for Young was a very reticent man, and not likely to tell

his defeat even to his staff.

Bennett was too fickle and whimsical an employer to suit me, and I had

no disposition to expose myself to his whims. With Young I was always

on the best terms, and he was disposed to employ me when a momentary

service was required, but I had had one experience with his chief,

which was sufficient. He had offered me the London agency of the

"Herald" at a time when any constant occupation would have been

acceptable, and we had come to terms, when suddenly he was taken with

the notion that Edmund Yates, in addition to the service to the paper,

would be of use to him in social ways, and he dropped me and appointed

Yates, to drop him a little later, paying him a year's salary to break

the contract.

One bit of work I did for the "Herald" which I remember with much

pleasure. It was the reporting of Beaconsfield's Aylesbury speech, not

a stenographic report, for that they had from the English press, but a

letter on the occasion as a demonstration. I went to Aylesbury, and,

as Beaconsfield was to speak twice,--once at the farmers' ordinary and

then at the assembly rooms,--I dined at the ordinary; and as all the

places in the assembly rooms had been taken before the dinner was

over, I had to employ some assurance to hear the principal speech. As

soon as the company rose from the table, I pushed through to where

Beaconsfield was standing, and, presenting my card as correspondent of

the New York "Herald," asked him to be kind enough to put me in the

way of hearing him, explaining why I had lost my chance through

remaining to hear him at the dinner. He turned to one of the young men

who were with him, remarking that my card would take me anywhere, and

said, "See that Mr. Stillman has a place near me," and to me, "Keep

close to me," which I did, and took a seat on the edge of the

platform, at his feet; and I certainly never heard a more effective

speech. The lordly, triumphant manner with which he bantered Gladstone

for his dealings in the Straits of Malacca, the demonstrative

confidence with which he took victory for granted, and the magnetism

of his personal bearing, made an impression on me quite unique in my

experience of men. Gracious is the only word which I can apply to his

manner to those around him, and it had a fascination over them which

I could perfectly understand, and I could easily comprehend that

he should have a surrounding of devotees. The serene, absolute

self-confidence he evidently felt was of a nature to inspire a

corresponding confidence in his followers. It was an interesting

display of the power of a magnetic nature, and gave me a higher idea

of the man than all his writings had given or could give. For his

intellectual powers and their printed results I never had a high

opinion, but his was one of the most interesting and remarkable

personalities I ever encountered.

As Russie continued to hold his own against his terrible disease, Mr.

Marshall thought that the operation of resecting the leg at the hip

might save his life, and though such a maimed existence as his would

then be was but a doubtful boon, the boy eagerly caught at the chance

of life; and, to recruit strength for the operation, I decided to take

him, by Marshall's advice, to America, and give him a summer in the

woods, camping out. I took him to the Maine woods instead of my old

haunts of the Adirondacks, because the rail served to the verge of

the wilderness, and we had, on Moosehead Lake, the resource of a good

hotel to take refuge in if matters went ill. They did go ill, and I

found that life was too low in him to give the woodland air and the

influence of the pine-trees power to help him. Hope left me, and we

turned homeward again, sailing from Boston direct to London. It was

in late December, and we had a terrific voyage, and one of the

hairbreadth escapes of which I have had so many. In the height of the

gale Russie and I were standing in the companion-way, watching the

storm, for the boy loved the sea dearly and enjoyed the heaviest

weather, when the captain called to me to say that we were not

safe there and had better go below. Only a few minutes later an

exceptionally heavy sea broke over the deck, took five boats out

of the davits or crushed them, carried away in splinters the

companion-way in which we had been standing, and swept the decks, the

chief officer being saved only by being lashed to the railing of the

bridge, and the fall of the mass of water on the deck breaking several

of the deck beams. We had to lie to for the rest of the gale. We

landed at Gravesend just before Christmas, Russie being in much worse

condition than when we left England. Up to that time I had clung

to hope, for to lose the boy was like tearing my soul in two. Mr.

Marshall no longer held out a hope, but said if he had known the

strength of the boy's constitution he would have operated when he

first saw him, which was what Russie then begged for and had always

looked forward to. Through five years he had resisted the pain of that

most painful disease, hoping always, always reading, almost always

cheerful.

Our lease expiring, I decided to leave London, and Mr. Spartali

offered us a cottage on one of his estates in the Isle of Wight, where

the children, Russie especially, might have sweet English air. Marie

being engaged in finishing her pictures for the spring exhibition, I

went down alone with the children, stopping at an inn at Sandown till

the furniture was in the cottage. While so waiting Russie was taken

with the first convulsion peculiar to his malady, and then I realized

that Death had come, and, unwilling to face him in the semi-publicity

of an inn, I took the boy in my arms to the railway, and from the

station nearest to the cottage bore him thither.

I tried to prepare him for the impending death, by showing him that it

was the end of pain, but his horror of it was inextinguishable, and he

cried in agony, "Oh, no, no! Papa, I wish to live as long as you do;"

and, though his faculties were fortunately failing, he beckoned me to

lay my head by his on the pallet I had prepared for him on the floor,

and offered me a last feeble caress and showed his pleasure in having

me by him. He had loved me above all things on earth, even more than

his loving mother, and to be with me had always been his dearest

delight, and now we met Death alone, he and I, and I could only

remember David's cry, "Absalom, my son!" I watched the fading life,

the diminishing breath in the midnight silence of the solitary house,

and almost desired Death to hasten, for the final struggle had begun,

and the suspense was torture to me. And when the last long breath was

drawn, and the limp, deserted body was all that was left to me of my

thirteen years of passionate devotion, my pride and hope, and the

nursing care of so many years, I walked out into the midnight and left

my boy to Death. The long tension was over, and I could give way to

tears.

It was only a child's death, a common thing, almost as common as

family existence, but it gave a new color to my life, establishing

forever a sympathy with the common grief, and a community of sorrow

with all bereft fathers and mothers, in the premature dissipation of

the hopes of their future, and the lapse of a dear companionship into

the eternal void. This is the human brotherhood of sorrow, sacred,

ennobling, sanctifying where it abides, the deepest lesson of the

school of life. My feet have wandered far, and my thoughts still

further from the places and beliefs of my childhood; but whatever and

wherever I may be, this grief at times catches me and holds me in a

pause of dumb tears, and every similar bereavement I witness renews

the sympathetic grief. I have never been able to find a consolation

for that loss, for it carried with it the future and its best dreams.

When his mother died, I thought that any death were easier to bear

than the sudden and terrible tragedy of that; but in the devastated

youth and the lingering pain of Russie's leaving, I found that

"not all the preaching since Adam

Has made Death other than Death."

We buried him quietly in the churchyard at Arreton, the kind rector

not asking for a baptismal certificate, for he knew that I was not

a churchman, and Russie had never been baptized. In these things we

follow prejudices. Mine were Baptist; his mother was an advanced

Unitarian, and had been born in the Brook Farm community, of which her

father was a member, so that we had no sympathy with paedobaptism,

while the terrible effect of my own religious education forbade me to

encumber the boy's mind with religious dogmas, and from the beginning

I had forbidden any one in the house to teach him the name of God

until he was old enough to understand what "God" meant; but one day

during his illness I found him, when he should have been sleeping,

weeping bitterly, and to my inquiry as to the cause of his trouble,

he replied, "Do you think, Papa, that, if I went to sleep saying my

prayers, God would be satisfied if I finished them after I woke?" That

terrible hereditary conscience could not be laid, and perhaps the boy

was fortunate in his early death.

The Autobiography of a Journalist, Volume II · 第 6 / 21 章