EDMUND WALLER

(1606-1687)

27. The | Workes | Of | Edmond VValler | Eſquire, | [Four lines]

Imprimatur | Na. Brent. Decem. 30. 1644. | London, | Printed for

Thomas Walkley | 1645.

The "Workes" of this poet "nursed in parliaments" consist of

poems and speeches. The book was probably issued early in the

year, having, as we see from the title-page, been licensed

in December, 1644. There are copies identical in every other

respect, that show a block of printer's ornament instead

of the "Imprimatur," and still others with quite a new

title-page, which reads: _Poems,| &c. | Written By | Mr. Ed.

Waller | of Beckonſfield, Eſquire; lately a | Member of

the Honourable | House of Commons. | All the Lyrick Poems in

this Booke | were ſet by Mr. Henry Lavves Gent. | of the

Kings Chappell, and one of his | Majeſties Private Muſick.

| Printed and Publiſhed according to Order. | London, |

Printed by T. W. for Humphrey Moſley, at the | Princes Armes

in Pauls Church- | yard._ 1645.

New poems have been added to this last issue, and "The Table"

of contents has been inserted between the poems and speeches.

There is also an Epistle "To my Lady," and "An advertiſement

to the Reader" wherein we read:

"This parcell of exquiſit poems, have paſſ'd up and

downe through many hands amongſt perſons of the beſt

quallity, in looſe imperfect Manuſcripts, and there

is lately obtruded to the world an adulterate Copy,

surruptitiouſly and illegally imprinted, to the derogation

of the Author, and the abuſe of the Buyer. But in this

booke they apeare in their pure originalls and true genuine

colours."

We may with reasonableness see in the first variation a

publisher's trick to make his book appear to have had a quick

sale; while the second might indicate a transfer of the unsold

sheets from Walkley to Moseley, who for some reason, perhaps

an agreement arrived at with the poet, considered himself to

be the authorized publisher.

Later in the same year, Moseley issued a reprint, which

omitted the Speeches, and a new edition in octavo with a

title-page which now reads:

_Poems, &c. | Written By | Mr. Ed. Waller | [Three lines] And

Printed by a Copy of | his own hand-writing. | [Four lines]

Printed and Publiſhed according to Order. | London, |

Printed by J. N. for Hu. Moſley, at the Princes | Armes in

Pauls Church-yard, | 1645_.

The volume has been entirely reprinted.

The Speeches appear again, but the rest of the contents remain

as before. Mr. Beverly Chew, in an article on "The First

Edition of Waller's Poems," says: "It is this edition that

is generally called the 'first authorized edition,' but it

is quite evident that all of the editions of this year stand

about on the same level so far as the author is concerned."

Not until the edition of 1664 do we read on the title-page,

"Never till now Corrected and Published with the approbation

of the Author."

Octavo.

COLLATION: _Title, one leaf, B-H, in eights_.

FRANCIS BEAUMONT

(1584-1616)

AND

JOHN FLETCHER

(1579-1625)

28. Comedies | And | Tragedies | Written by | Francis Beaumont | And

| Iohn Fletcher | Gentlemen. | Never printed before, | And now

publiſhed by the Authours | Originall Copies. | [Quotation] London,

| Printed for Humphrey Robinſon, at the three Pidgeons, and for |

Humphrey Moſeley at the Princes Armes in S^t Pauls | Church-yard.

1647.

These two dramatists, between whom "there was a wonderfull

consimility of phancy," and who shared everything in common,

were inseparably connected in their writings. No collected

edition of their plays appeared before this posthumous one,

which is dedicated to Philip, Earl of Pembroke, by ten

actors, and is introduced to the reader by James Shirley, the

dramatist, who speaks of the volume as "without flattery the

greatest Monument of the Scene that Time and Humanity

have produced." This, too, notwithstanding the fact that

Shakespeare's _Works_ had appeared twenty-four years before.

This edition appears to have been due to Moseley's enterprise.

He tells us in a frank address called "The Stationer to the

Readers":

"'T were vaine to mention the Chargeableneſſe of this

VVork; for thoſe who own'd the Manuſcripts, too well

knew their value to make a cheap eſtimate of any of theſe

Pieces, and though another joyn'd with me in the Purchaſe

and Printing, yet the _Care & Pains_ were wholly mine...."

Commenting upon the fact stated on the title-page that the

plays had not been printed before, he says: "You have here a

New Booke; I can ſpeake it clearely; for of all this large

Uolume of Comedies and Tragedies, not one, till now, was ever

printed before...." "And as here's nothing but what is genuine

and Theirs, ſo you will find here are no Omiſſions; you

have not onely All I could get, but all that you muſt ever

expect. For (beſides thoſe which were formerly printed)

there is not any Piece written by theſe Authours, either

Joyntly or Severally, but what are now publiſhed to the

VVorld in this Volume. One only Play I muſt except (for

I meane to deale openly) 'tis a Comedy called the

_VVilde-gooſe-Chase_, which hath beene long lost...."

Nothing which throws light upon the history of printing at

this time is more interesting than the Postscript added at the

end of the commendatory verses by Waller, Lovelace, Herrick,

Ben Jonson and others, and immediately after a poem by Moseley

himself ending, "If this Booke faile, 'tis time to quit the

Trade."...

"... After the _Comedies_ and _Tragedies_ were wrought off,

we were forced (for expedition) to ſend the _Gentlemens_

Verſes to ſeverall Printers, which was the occaſion of

their different Character; but the _Worke_ it ſelfe is one

continued Letter, which (though very legible) is none of

the biggeſt, becauſe (as much as poſſible) we would

leſſen the Bulke of the Volume."

This matter of size seems to have been the cause of no little

solicitude and care. Speaking of adding more plays to the

volume, he says:

"And indeed it would have rendred the Booke ſo Voluminous,

that _Ladies_ and _Gentlewomen_ would have found it ſcarce

manageable, who in Workes of this nature muſt firſt be

remembred."

There are thirty-six plays in the collection: as the stationer

tells us in the preface to the reader quoted above, all those

previously printed in quarto are included, except the _Wild

Goose Chase_, which had been lost. It is added at the end of

the volume with a separate title-page dated 1652.

The following epigram by Sir Aston Cockain, addressed to the

publishers, the two Humphreys, is not without interest in this

connection as showing that the difficulties arising from the

joint authorship were early sources of perplexity:

"In the large book of Plays you late did print

(In Beaumonts and in Fletchers name) why in't

Did you not juſtice? give to each his due?

For Beaumont (of thoſe many) writ in few:

And Maſſinger in other few; the Main

Being ſole Iſſues of ſweet Fletchers brain.

But how come I (you ask) ſo much to know?

Fletchers chief boſome-friend inform'd me ſo.

... ... ... ... ...

For Beaumont's works, & Fletchers ſhould come forth

With all the right belonging to their worth."

Moseley, in his address as stationer, says of the portrait of

Fletcher by William Marshall, which bears the inscriptions,

"Poetarum Ingeniosissimus Ioannes Fletcherus Anglus Episcopi

Lond: Fili." "Obijt 1625 Ætat 49": "This figure of Mr.

Fletcher was cut by ſeveral Originall Pieces, which his

friends lent me; but withall they tell me, that his unimitable

Soule did ſhine through his countenance in ſuch _Ayre_ and

_Spirit_, that the Painters confeſſed it, was not eaſie

to expreſſe him." The nine lines of verse beneath the

portrait are by Sir John Birkenhead. The portrait is found

in two states, distinguishable by the size of the letters in

Birkenhead's name. Although he was very ambitious to get a

portrait of Master Beaumont, his search proved unavailing.

There are a few woodcut head-bands, varied with others made of

type metal, in the front part of the book, but the last part

is severely plain.

Folio. The first collected edition.

COLLATION: _Portrait; A, four leaves; a-c, in fours; d-g, in

twos; B-L2, in fours; Aa-Ss, in fours; Aaa-Xxx, in fours;

4A-4I, in fours; 5A-5X, in fours; 6A-6K, in fours; 6L, six leaves;

7A-7G, in fours; 8A-8C, in fours; *Dddddddd, two leaves;

8D-8F, in fours._

ROBERT HERRICK

(1591-1674)

29. Hesperides: | Or, | The Works | Both | Humane & Divine | Of |

Robert Herrick Eſq. [Quotation, Printer's mark] London, | Printed

for John Williams, and Francis Eglesfield, | and are to be ſold at

the Crown and Marygold | in Saint Pauls Church-yard. 1648.

A volume entitled "The seuerall Poems written by Master Robert

Herrick" was entered by Master Crooke for license April 29,

1640, but was not published. The _Hesperides_ was the first

work of the poet to be printed, except some occasional

contributions to collections of poems. It is dedicated in

a metrical epistle to the most illustrious and most hopeful

Charles, Prince of Wales, afterward Charles II.

The book is divided into two parts, the second having a

separate title-page which reads: _His | Noble Numbers: | Or,

| His Pious Pieces, | Wherein (amongſt other things) |

he ſings the Birth of his Christ: | and ſighs for his

Saviours ſuffe- | ring on the Croſſe.| [Quotation]

London. | Printed for John Williams, and Francis Eglesfield,

1647. |_

This part was not issued, as far as is known, except with the

Hesperides to which the author evidently intended it to be

affixed, if we may judge by the lines toward the end of the

first part: "Part of the work remains; one part is past."

The year of publication had seen Herrick dispossessed of his

living at Dean Prior by the predominant Puritan party, and

it has been suggested that he was glad to take this means

of gaining an income. His use of the form, "Robert Herrick,

Esquire," was, it is thought, a wise move on the part of

the publishers, since a book by the "Reverend," or "Robert

Herrick, Vicker" would have been less likely to meet with

favor.

Neither Williams nor Eglesfield was a bookseller of

importance, and the printer is entirely unknown. He may

have withheld his name for fear of the judgment suggested by

Herrick at the head of his column of Errata:

"For theſe Tranſgreſsions which thou here doſt ſee,

Condemne the Printer, Reader, and not me;

Who gave him forth good Grain, though he miſtook

The Seed; ſo ſow'd theſe Tares throughout my Book."

Copies vary in the imprint, some reading _London, Printed for

John Williams and Francis Eglesfield, and are to be ſold

by Tho. Hunt, Bookſeller in Exon, 1648_; and several

differences of spelling, capitalization and punctuation also

occur. These variations have given rise to a discussion that

aims to determine the sequence of issues; but thus far it

serves only to prove that constant editorial tinkering took

place at the press-side.

William Marshall, whose prolific graver (Strutt says he

used only that tool) produced portraits, frontispieces,

title-pages, and other decorations of a certain charm, even

if dry and cramped in style, had in Herrick a subject of more

than usual difficulty. As if conscious of his shortcomings

he attempts to make atonement by the emblematic flattery

of Pegasus winging his flight from Parnassus, the Spring of

Helicon, loves and flowers, which he adds to lines signed _I.

H. C._ and _W. M._

Octavo.

COLLATION: _Four leaves (without signatures): B-Z and Aa-Cc, in

eights, Aa-Ee, in eights._

JEREMY TAYLOR

(1613-1667)

30. The Rule | And | Exercises | Of | Holy Living. | [Eleven lines]

London, | Printed for Francis Aſh, Book- | Seller in Worceſter. |

MDCL. [Colophon] London, | Printed by R. Norton. | MDCL.

The remarkably well-designed title-page engraved by Robert

Vaughan, which precedes the printed title, bears the imprint,

_London printed for R: Royſton | in Ivye lane_. 1650. and

some copies have the following imprint on the title-page:

_London, | Printed for Richard Royſton at the | Angel in

Ivie-Lane. | MDCL._ Royston was the royal bookseller, and

publisher of _Eikon Basilike_, which ran through fifty

editions in the single year 1649. Taylor's work was also a

popular venture, and reached a fourteenth edition in 1686.

This edition contains "Prayers for our Rulers," which recalls

the fact that these were stirring times when the book was

published. Charles had been beheaded in January of the

previous year, and Cromwell won his victory at Worcester,

where Ash had his shop, in the year following. It was not

without some worldly wisdom of living, then, that our author

used the above heading, and later, when times were changed,

altered it so as to make it read, "For the King."

Duodecimo.

COLLATION: _Frontispiece; ¶, twelve leaves; A-S4, in twelves._

IZAAK WALTON

(1593-1683)

31. The | Compleat Angler | [Six lines, Quotation.] London, Printed

by T. Maxey for Rich. Marriot, in | S. Dunſtans Church-yard

Fleetſtreet, 1653.

In the _Perfect Diurnall_, as well as in other broad-sheets,

the following advertisement appeared from Monday, May 9, to

Monday, May 16, 1653:

"The Compleat Angler or the Contemplative Man's Recreation,

being a Diſcourſe of Fish and Fishing, not unworthy the

peruſal of moſt Anglers, of 18 pence price. Written by

Iz. Wa. Alſo the known Play of the Spaniſh Gipſee, never

till now publiſhed. Both printed for Richard Marriot, to

be ſold at his ſhop in St. Dunſtans Church-yard, Fleet

Street." Walton could hardly have expected his work to be

anonymous when his very distinctive initials appeared so

plainly in the advertisement. And even though they are not

printed on the title-page of the book, they are signed to the

dedication to his most honoured friend, Mr. John Offley of

Madeley Manor, and at the end of the address "To the Reader of

this Discourse: but eſpecially To the honeſt Angler."

The name was added to the title in the fifth or 1676 edition,

called _The Universal Angler._

Contemplative men did indeed find the work not unworthy their

perusal, and Marriot, who seems to have been fortunate in the

books he published, alone issued five editions during the life

of the author. Between then and now we may count no less than

one hundred and thirty different imprints. At Sotheby's, in

1895, a copy of this eighteen-pence book sold for four hundred

and fifteen pounds, an earnest of its rarity and of the

eagerness with which it is sought.

Concerning the engraved cartouche with the first part of the

title, on the title-page, and the six illustrations of fish

engraved in the text, the author says "To the Reader of this

Discourse": "And let me adde this, that he that likes not the

diſcourſe ſhould like the pictures of the _Trout_ and

other fiſh, which I may commend, becauſe they concern not

myſelf." No name is given to show whose work they may be;

they are sometimes ascribed to Pierre Lombart, a Frenchman

resident in London, and employed by book-publishers to

illustrate their books. But on the other hand we must

not forget that Vaughan and Faithorne were both making

illustrations for books at this time. There is reason for

calling attention to the belief, formerly current, that the

engravings were done on plates of silver, a notion which, as

Thomas Westwood remarks, is sufficiently disproved by their

repeated use in no less than five editions of _The Compleat

Angler_, and the same number of Venable's _Experienc'd

Angler_.

Henry Lawes, the musician, and the author of several works,

wrote the music to "The Anglers' Song For two Voyces,

Treble and Baſſe," which occupies pages 216 and 217.

The right-hand page is printed upside down for the greater

convenience of the singers, who could thus stand facing one

another. Lawes used a similar arrangement in his _Select Ayres

and Dialogues_, published the same year as the _Angler_.

Octavo.

COLLATION: _A-R3, in eights._

SAMUEL BUTLER

(1612-1680)

32. Hudibras. | The First Part, | Written in the time of the late

Wars. | [Device] London, | Printed by J. G. for Richard Marriot, under

Saint | Dunstan's Church in Fleetſtreet. 1663.

Although "written in the time of the late Wars," _Hudibras_

was not licensed to be printed until November 11, 1662, two

years after the reëstablishment of the monarchy, when a satire

on Puritanism could no longer give offense to the ruling

party. On the contrary, the satisfaction which it gave to

the King and court had much to do with the great success it

achieved. Butler himself records the royal favor:

"He never ate, nor drank, nor slept,

But 'Hudibras' still near him kept;

Nor would he go to church or so,

But 'Hudibras' must with him go."

Marriot, the successful publisher of Walton's _Angler_

and some of Donne's books, issued the first part in three

different forms, large octavo, like our copy, small octavo,

and duodecimo; the last two sizes being sold for a lower price

than the former, to meet the popular demand for the work.

Besides these there is another edition, in three issues of the

same date, which has no name of printer or publisher in

the imprint, although, like Marriot's copies, it bears the

license, "Imprimatur. Jo: Berkenhead, Novemb. 11, 1662." If

it were not for this imprimatur, the following notice, which

appeared in the _Public Intelligencer_ for December 23, 1662,

would make it seem certain that the nameless edition was

really spurious:

"There is stolen abroad a most false imperfect copy of a

poem called _Hudibras_, without name either of printer or

bookseller, as fit for so lame and spurious an impression. The

true and perfect edition printed by the author's original, is

sold by Richard Marriot under St. Dunstan's church in Fleet

Street; that other nameless is a cheat, and will not abuse

the buyer as well as the author, whose poem deserves to have

fallen into better hands." But the presence of the regular

license brings us to the very probable theory that Marriot may

have issued both editions; the first without his name because

he was unwilling to allow it to appear until the fortune of

the book seemed certain.

Singularly enough, Marriot did not issue _The Second Part. By

the Authour of the Firſt_, which came out the next year in

two sizes, octavo and small octavo, _Printed by T. R. for John

Martyn, and James Alleſtry, at the Bell in St. Pauls Church

Yard_. Ten years later we find the volume being issued by

Martyn and also by Herringman.

_The Third and laſt_ | _Part_. | _Written by the Author_ |

_Of The | First and Second Parts_. | _London_, | _Printed for

Simon Miller, at the Sign of the Star_ | _at the Weſt End of

St. Pauls, 1678._ was only published in one size, the octavo.

We get an idea of the great interest the book created, when,

after a lapse of so many years, this last part ran into a

second edition in a twelvemonth.*

Mr. Pepys is our authority for the cost of the spurious book.

He says, in his Diary on Christmas Day, 1662: "Hither come Mr.

Battersby; and we falling into a discourse of a new book of

drollery in verse, called Hudebras, I would needs go find it

out, and met with it at the Temple: it cost 2s. 6d. But when

I came to read it, it is so silly an abuse of the Presbyter

Knight going to the warrs, that I am ashamed of it; and by and

by, meeting at Mr. Townsend's at dinner, I sold it to him for

18d." He afterward tried to read the second part, so we learn

from his notes dated November 28, 1663; but which issue he

used we shall never know. He says:

"... To Paul's Church Yarde, and there looked upon the second

part of Hudibras, which I buy not, but borrow to read, to

see if he be as good as the first, which the world do cry so

mightily up, though it hath not a good liking in me...."

Octavo.

COLLATION: _Title; A-R, in eights_.

* It should be noted that some copies of the

volume have the record of the license and some have none.

JOHN MILTON

(1608-1674)

33. Paradiſe loft. | A | Poem | Written in | Ten Books | By John

Milton. | Licenſed and Entred according | to Order. | London |

Printed, and are to be ſold by Peter Parker | under Creed

Church neer Aldgate; And by | Robert Boulter at the Turks Head in

Biſhopſgate-ſtreet; | And Matthias Walker, under St. Dunſtons

Church | in Fleet-ſtreet, 1667.

Milton began his great epic in 1658, and is said to have

finished it in 1663. It was licensed after some delay,

occasioned by the hesitation of the deputy of the Archbishop

of Canterbury over the lines:

"As when the Sun, new ris'n

Looks through the Horizontal Misty Air

Shorn of his Beams, or from behind the Moon

In dim Eclips, disastrous twilight sheds

On half the Nations, and with fear of change

Perplexes Monarchs."

He may, as Professor Masson has pointed out, have had

difficulty in finding a publisher able and willing to venture

upon the printing of a work by one "whose attacks on the

Church and defenses of the execution of Charles I. were still

fresh in the memory of all, and some of whose pamphlets had

been publicly burnt by the hangman after the Restoration."

Few probably of those whose shops had centered around Paul's

Churchyard, the very heart of the book-trade, could have done

so, for they were, if not ruined, certainly inconvenienced

by the loss of their stock and shops in the Great Fire of the

year before. It is small wonder that Simmons, to whom, through

some agency or other, the poet did come, drove a hard bargain

when the agreement for the copyright was entered into,

April 27, 1667. The original of this agreement came into the

possession of the Tonsons, the proprietors of the copyright,

and was finally presented to the British Museum by Samuel

Rogers, who acquired it from Pickering the publisher. "Milton

was to receive 5 l. down, and 5 l. more upon the sale of each

of the first three editions. The editions were to be accounted

as ended when thirteen hundred copies of each were sold 'to

particular reading customers,' and were not to exceed fifteen

hundred copies apiece. Milton received the second 5 l. in

April, 1669, that is 15 l. in all. His widow in 1680 settled

all claims upon Simmons for 8 l. and Simmons became proprietor

of the copyright, then understood to be perpetuated."

The book made its appearance at an unfortunate time. London

had barely recovered from the Plague of 1665 (during which

eighty printers had died, wherein is seen another reason for

the difficulty in finding a publisher), and the great district

devastated by the Fire was still only partly rebuilt. It was

not surprising that the 1200 copies which are thought to have

made the first edition did not have a brisk sale; these were

not exhausted for at least eighteen months, and a second

impression was not put out for four years.

The copies of the first printing may be divided into several

classes, according to the title-pages they bear. These all

differ from one another in several more or less important

particulars, but the text of the work is identical in all

cases, except for a few typographical errors. Two titles,

supposed to be the earliest, were _Licenſed and Entred

according | to Order_, and have the imprint:

_London | Printed, and are to be ſold by Peter Parker |

under Creed Church neer Aldgate; And by | Robert Boulter at

the Turks Head in Biſhopſgate-ſtreet; | And Matthias

Walker, under St. Dunſtons Church | in Fleet-ſtreet,

1667._

On these the poem is seen to be by "John Milton," and the only

difference between them lies in the type used for Milton's

name, one being of a smaller size than the other. A third

title-page, having a similar imprint but dated 1668, has

"The Author J. M." A fourth has "The Author John Milton," the

license has given place to a group of _fleurs-de-lis_, and the

imprint reads:

_London, | Printed by S. Simmons, and to be ſold by S.

Thomſon at | the Biſhopſ-Head in Duck-lane, H. Mortlack,

at the | White Hart in Weſtminſter Hall, M. Walker under

| St. Dunſtans Church in Fleet-ſtreet, and R. Boulter at |

the Turks-Head in Biſhopſgate ſtreet, 1668._

Two new title-pages were used in 1669, differing only in the

type. The imprint reads:

_London, | Printed by S. Simmons, and are to be ſold by | T.

Helder at the Angel in Little Brittain. | 1669._

Beside these there are others. Early bibliographers claimed

that eight or even nine variations existed, but later

investigation has failed to verify more than six.

Bibliographic Notes on One Hundred Books Famous in English Literature · 第 5 / 15 段