PREFACE

These lectures have been so maimed and mutilated by orthodox malice;

have been made to appear so halt, crutched and decrepit by those who

mistake the pleasures of calumny for the duties of religion, that in

simple justice to myself I concluded to publish them.

Most of the clergy are, or seem to be, utterly incapable of discussing

anything in a fair and catholic spirit. They appeal, not to reason,

but to prejudice; not to facts, but to passages of Scripture. They can

conceive of no goodness, of no spiritual exaltation beyond the horizon

of their creed. Whoever differs with them upon what they are pleased

to call "fundamental truths," is, in their opinion, a base and infamous

man. To re-enact the tragedies of the sixteenth century, they lack only

the power. Bigotry in all ages has been the same. Christianity simply

transferred the brutality of the Colosseum to the Inquisition. For the

murderous combat of the gladiators, the saints substituted the _auto de

fe_. What has been called religion is, after all, but the organization

of the wild beast in man. The perfumed blossom of arrogance is heaven.

Hell is the consummation of revenge.

The chief business of the clergy has always been to destroy the joy of

life, and multiply and magnify the terrors and tortures of death and

perdition. They have polluted the heart and paralyzed the brain; and

upon the ignorant altars of the Past and the Dead, they have endeavored

to sacrifice the Present and the Living.

Nothing can exceed the mendacity of the religious press. I have had some

little experience with political editors, and am forced to say, that

until I read the religious papers, I did not know what malicious and

slimy falsehoods could be constructed from ordinary words. The ingenuity

with which the real and apparent meaning can be tortured out of

language, is simply amazing. The average religious editor is intolerant

and insolent; he knows nothing of affairs; he has the envy of failure,

the malice of impotence, and always accounts for the brave and generous

actions of unbelievers, by low, base and unworthy motives.

By this time, even the clergy should know that the intellect of the

nineteenth century needs no guardian. They should cease to regard

themselves as shepherds defending flocks of weak, silly and fearful

sheep from the claws and teeth of ravening wolves. By this time they

should know that the religion of the ignorant and brutal Past no

longer satisfies the heart and brain; that the miracles have become

contemptible; that the "evidences" have ceased to convince; that the

spirit of investigation cannot be stopped nor stayed; that the church

is losing her power; that the young are holding in a kind of tender

contempt the sacred follies of the old; that the pulpit and pews no

longer represent the culture and morality of the world, and that the

brand of intellectual inferiority is upon the orthodox brain.

Men should be liberated from the aristocracy of the air. Every chain

of superstition should be broken. The rights of men and women should

be equal and sacred--marriage should be a perfect partnership--children

should be governed by kindness,--every family should be a

republic--every fireside a democracy.

It seems almost impossible for religious people to really grasp the idea

of intellectual freedom. They seem to think that man is responsible for

his honest thoughts; that unbelief is a crime; that investigation is

sinful; that credulity is a virtue, and that reason is a dangerous

guide. They cannot divest themselves of the idea that in the realm of

thought there must be government--authority and obedience--laws and

penalties--rewards and punishments, and that somewhere in the universe

there is a penitentiary for the soul.

In the republic of mind, _one_ is a majority. There, all are monarchs,

and all are equals. The tyranny of a majority even is unknown. Each one

is crowned, sceptered and throned. Upon every brow is the tiara, and

around every form is the imperial purple. Only those are good citizens

who express their honest thoughts, and those who persecute for opinion's

sake, are the only traitors. There, nothing is considered infamous

except an appeal to brute force, and nothing sacred but love, liberty,

and joy. The church contemplates this republic with a sneer. From the

teeth of hatred she draws back the lips of scorn. She is filled with the

spite and spleen born of intellectual weakness. Once she was egotistic;

now she is envious.

Once she wore upon her hollow breast false gems, supposing them to be

real. They have been shown to be false, but she wears them still. She

has the malice of the caught, the hatred of the exposed.

We are told to investigate the Bible for ourselves, and at the same time

informed that if we come to the conclusion that it is not the inspired

word of God, we will most assuredly be damned. Under such circumstances,

if we believe this, investigation is impossible. Whoever is held

responsible for his conclusions cannot weigh the evidence with impartial

scales. Fear stands at the balance, and gives to falsehood the weight of

its trembling hand.

I oppose the church because she is the enemy of liberty; because her

dogmas are infamous and cruel; because she humiliates and degrades

woman; because she teaches the doctrines of eternal torment and the

natural depravity of man; because she insists upon the absurd, the

impossible, and the senseless; because she resorts to falsehood and

slander; because she is arrogant and revengeful; because she allows men

to sin on a credit; because she discourages self-reliance, and laughs

at good works; because she believes in vicarious virtue and vicarious

vice--vicarious punishment and vicarious reward; because she regards

repentance of more importance than restitution, and because she

sacrifices the world we have to one we know not of.

The free and generous, the tender and affectionate, will understand me.

Those who have escaped from the grated cells of a creed will appreciate

my motives. The sad and suffering wives, the trembling and loving

children will thank me: This is enough.

Robert G. Ingersoll.

Washington, D. C.,

April 13, 1878.

The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Vol. 01 (of 12) Dresden Edition—Lectures · 第 35 / 61 题