THE RIM OF FINER ISSUES

I

There seemed to be a fitting dispensation in the marriage of Arthur

Vibert and Ellenora Bishop. She was a plain looking girl of

twenty-four--even her enemies admitted her plainness--but she had

brains; and the absence of money was more than compensated by her love

for literature. It had been settled by her friends that she would do

wonderful things when she had her way. Therefore her union with Arthur

Vibert was voted "singularly auspicious." He had just returned from

Germany after winning much notice by his talent for composition. What

could be more natural than the marriage of these two gifted persons?

Miss Bishop had published some things--rhapsodic prose-poems, weak in

syntax but strong in the quality miscalled imagination. Her pen name was

George Bishop: following the example of the three Georges so dear to the

believer in sexless literature--George Sand, George Eliot and George

Egerton. She greatly admired the latter.

Ellenora was a large young woman of more brawn than tissue; she had

style and decision, though little amiability. Ugly she was; yet, after

the bloom of her ugliness wore off, you admired perforce the full

iron-colored eyes alive with power, and wondered why nature in dowering

her with a big brain had not made for her a more refined mouth. The

upper part of her face was often illuminated; the lower narrowly escaped

coarseness; and a head of rusty red hair gave a total impression of

strenuous brilliancy, of keen abiding vitality. A self-willed New York

girl who had never undergone the chastening influence of discipline or

rigorously ordered study--she averred that it would attenuate the

individuality of her style; avowedly despising the classics, she was a

modern of moderns in her tastes.

She had nerves rather than heart, but did not approve of revealing her

vagaries in diary form. Adoring Guy de Maupassant, she heartily disliked

Marie Bashkirtseff. The Frenchman's almost Greek-like fashion of

regarding life in profile, his etching of its silver-tipped angles, made

an irresistible appeal to her; and she vainly endeavored to catch his

crisp, restrained style, his masterly sense of form. In the secrecy of

her study she read Ouida and asked herself why this woman had not gone

farther, and won first honors in the race. Her favorite heroines were

Ibsen's Nora, Rebecca and Hedda. Then, bitten by the emancipation craze,

she was fast developing into one of the "shrieking sisterhood" when

Arthur Vibert came from Berlin.

A Frenchman has said that the moment a woman occupies her thoughts with

a man, art ceases for her. The night Ellenora Bishop met the young

pianist in my atelier, I saw that she was interested. Arthur came to me

with letters from several German critics. I liked the slender, blue-eyed

young fellow who was not a day over twenty-one. His was a true American

type tempered by Continental culture. Oval-faced, fair-haired, of a

rather dreamy disposition and with a certain austerity of manner, he was

the fastidious puritan--a puritan expanded by artistic influences.

Strangely enough he had temperament, and set to music Heine and

Verlaine. A genuine talent, I felt assured, and congratulated myself on

my new discovery; I was fond of finding lions, and my Sunday evenings

were seldom without some specimen that roared, if somewhat gently, yet

audibly enough, for my visitors. When Arthur Vibert was introduced to

Ellenora Bishop, I recognized the immediate impact of the girl's brusque

personality upon his sensitized nature.

She was a devoted admirer of Wagner, and that was bond enough to set

reverberating other chords of sympathy in the pair. I do not assert in

cold blood that the girl deliberately set herself to charm the

boyish-looking composer, but there was certainly a basking allurement

in her gaze when her eyes brushed his. With her complicated personality

he could not cope--that was only too evident; and so I watched the

little comedy with considerable interest, and not without misgiving.

Arthur fell in love without hesitation, and though Ellenora felt

desperately superior to him--you saw that--she could not escape the

bright, immediate response of his face. The implicated interest of her

bearing--though she never lost her head--his unconcealed adoration, soon

brought the affair to the altar--or rather to a civil ceremony, for the

bride was an agnostic, priding herself on her abstention from

established religious forms.

Her clear, rather dry nature had always been a source of study to me.

What could she have in common with the romantic and decidedly shy youth?

She was older, more experienced--plain girls have experiences as well as

favored ones--and she was not fond of matrimony with poverty as an

obbligato. Arthur had prospects of pupils, his compositions sold at a

respectable rate, but the couple had little money to spare;

nevertheless, people argued their marriage a capital idea--from such a

union of rich talents surely something must result. Look at the

Brownings, the Shelleys, the Schumanns, not to mention George Eliot and

her man Lewes!

They were married. I was best man, and realized what a menstruum is

music--what curious trafficking it causes, what opposites it

intertwines. And the overture being finished the real curtain arose, as

it does on all who mate....

I did not see much of the Viberts that winter. I cared not at all for

society and they had moved to Harlem; so I lost two stars of my studio

receptions. But I occasionally heard they were getting on famously.

Arthur was composing a piano concerto, and Ellenora engaged upon a

novel--a novel, I was told, that would lay bare to its rotten roots the

social fabric; and knowing the girl's inherent fund of bitter cleverness

I awaited the new-born polemic with gentle impatience. I hoped, however,

like the foolish inexperienced old bachelor I am, that her feminine

asperity would be tempered by the suavities of married life.

One afternoon late in March Arthur Vibert dropped in as I was putting

the finishing touches on my portrait of Mrs. Beacon. He looked weary and

his eyes were heavily circled.

"Hello, my boy! and how is your wife, and how is that wonderful concerto

we've all been hearing about?"

He shrugged his shoulders and asked for a cigarette.

"Shall I play you some bits of it?" he queried in a gloomy way. I was

all eagerness, and presently he was absently preluding at my piano.

There was little vigor in his touch, and I recalled his rambling wits by

crying, "The concerto, let's have it!"

Arthur pulled himself together and began. He was very modern in musical

matters and I liked the dynamic power of his opening. The first subject

was more massive than musical and was built on the architectonics of

Liszt and Tschaïkowsky. There was blood in the idea, plenty of nervous

fibre, and I dropped my brushes and palette as the unfolding of the work

began with a logical severity and a sense of form unusual in so young a

mind.

This first movement interested me; I almost conjured up the rich

instrumentation and when it ended I was warm in my congratulations.

Arthur moodily wiped his brow and looked indifferent.

"And now for the second movement. My boy, you always had a marked gift

for the lyrical. Give us your romanza--the romanza, I should say, born

of your good lady!"

He answered me shortly: "There is no romance, I've substituted for it a

scherzo. You know that's what Saint-Saëns and all the fellows are doing

nowadays, Scharwenka too."

I fancied that there was a shade of eager anxiety in his explanation,

but I said nothing and listened.

The scherzo--or what is called the scherzo since Beethoven and

Schumann--was too heavy, inelastic in its tread, to dispel the

blue-devils. It was conspicuous for its absence of upspringing delicacy,

light, arch merriment. It was the sad, bitter joking of a man upon whose

soul life has graven pain and remorse, and before the trio was reached I

found myself watching the young composer's face. I knew that, like all

modern music students, he had absorbed in Germany some of that

scholastic pessimism we encounter in the Brahms music, but I had hoped

that a mere fashion of the day would not poison the springs of this

fresh personality.

Yet here I was confronted with a painful confession that life had

brought the lad more than its quantum of spiritual and physical

hardship; he was telling me all this in his music, for his was too

subjective a talent to ape the artificial, grand, objective manner.

Without waiting for comment he plunged into his last movement which

proved to be a series of ingenious variations--a prolonged

passacaglia--in which the grace and dexterity of his melodic invention,

contrapuntal skill and symmetrical sense were gratifyingly present.

I was in no flattering vein when I told him he had made a big jump in

his work.

"But, Arthur, why so much in the Brahms manner? Has your wife turned

your love of Shelley to Browning worship?" I jestingly concluded.

"My wife, if she wishes, can turn Shelley into slush," he answered

bitterly. This shocked me. I felt like putting questions, but how could

I? Had I not been one of the many who advised the fellow to marry

Ellenora Bishop? Had we not all fancied that in her strength was his

security, his hope for future artistic triumphs?

He went on as his fingers snatched at fugitive harmonic experimentings:

"It's not all right up town. I wish that you would run up some night.

You've not seen Ellenora for months, and perhaps you could induce her to

put the brake on." I was puzzled. Putting the brake on a woman is always

a risky experiment, especially if she happens to be wedded. Besides,

what did he mean?

"I mean," he replied to my tentative look of inquiry, "that Ellenora is

going down-hill with her artistic theories of literature, and I mean

that she has made our house a devilish unpleasant place to live in."

I hastily promised to call in a few days, and after seeing him to the

door, and bidding him cheer up, I returned to the portrait of Mrs.

Beacon, and felt savage at the noisiness of color and monotony of tonal

values in the picture.

"Good Lord, why will artists marry?" I irritably asked of my subject in

the frame. Her sleek Knickerbocker smile further angered me, and I went

to my club and drank coffee until long after midnight.

Melomaniacs · 第 47 / 103 题