OPTIMISM IN TEACHING[2]

Although the month is March and not November, it is never unseasonable

to count up the blessings for which it is well to be thankful. In fact,

from the standpoint of education, the spring is perhaps the appropriate

time to perform this very pleasant function. As if still further to

emphasize the fact that education, like civilization, is an artificial

thing, we have reversed the operations of Mother Nature: we sow our seed

in the fall and cultivate our crops during the winter and reap our

harvests in the spring. I may be pardoned, therefore, for making the

theme of my discussion a brief review of the elements of growth and

victory for which the educator of to-day may justly be grateful, with,

perhaps, a few suggestions of what the next few years may reasonably be

expected to bring forth.

And this course is all the more necessary because, I believe, the

teaching profession is unduly prone to pessimism. One might think at

first glance that the contrary would be true. We are surrounded on every

side by youth. Youth is the material with which we constantly deal.

Youth is buoyant, hopeful, exuberant; and yet, with this material

constantly surrounding us, we frequently find the task wearisome and

apparently hopeless. The reason is not far to seek. Youth is not only

buoyant, it is unsophisticated, it is inexperienced, in many important

particulars it is crude. Some of its tastes must necessarily, in our

judgment, hark back to the primitive, to the barbaric. Ours is

continually the task to civilize, to sophisticate, to refine this raw

material. But, unfortunately for us, the effort that we put forth does

not always bring results that we can see and weigh and measure. The

hopefulness of our material is overshadowed not infrequently by its

crudeness. We take each generation as it comes to us. We strive to lift

it to the plane that civilized society has reached. We do our best and

pass it on, mindful of the many inadequacies, perhaps of the many

failures, in our work. We turn to the new generation that takes its

place. We hope for better materials, but we find no improvement.

And so you and I reflect in our occasional moments of pessimism that

generic situation which inheres in the very work that we do. The

constantly accelerated progress of civilization lays constantly

increasing burdens upon us. In some way or another we must accomplish

the task. In some way or another we must lift the child to the level of

society, and, as society is reaching a continually higher and higher

level, so the distance through which the child must be raised is ever

increased. We would like to think that all this progress in the race

would come to mean that we should be able to take the child at a higher

level; but you who deal with children know from experience the principle

for which the biologist Weismann stands sponsor--the principle, namely,

that acquired characteristics are not inherited; that whatever changes

may be wrought during life in the brains and nerves and muscles of the

present generation cannot be passed on to its successor save through the

same laborious process of acquisition and training; that, however far

the civilization of the race may progress, education, whose duty it is

to conserve and transmit this civilization, must always begin with the

"same old child."

This, I take it, is the deep-lying cause of the schoolmaster's

pessimism. In our work we are constantly struggling against that same

inertia which held the race in bondage for how many millenniums only the

evolutionist can approximate a guess,--that inertia of the primitive,

untutored mind which we to-day know as the mind of childhood, but which,

for thousands of generations, was the only kind of a mind that man

possessed. This inertia has been conquered at various times in the

course of recorded history,--in Egypt and China and India, in Chaldea

and Assyria, in Greece and Rome,--conquered only again to reassert

itself and drive man back into barbarism. Now we of the Western world

have conquered it, let us hope, for all time; for we of the Western

world have discovered an effective method of holding it in abeyance, and

this method is universal public education.

Let Germany close her public schools, and in two generations she will

lapse back into the semi-darkness of medievalism; let her close both her

public schools and her universities, and three generations will fetch

her face to face with the Dark Ages; let her destroy her libraries and

break into ruin all of her works of art, all of her existing triumphs of

technical knowledge and skill, from which a few, self-tutored, might

glean the wisdom that is every one's to-day, and Germany will soon

become the home of a savage race, as it was in the days of Tacitus and

Cæsar. Let Italy close her public schools, and Italy will become the

same discordant jumble of petty states that it was a century ago,--again

to await, this time perhaps for centuries or millenniums, another

Garibaldi and Victor Emmanuel to work her regeneration. Let Japan close

her public schools, and Japan in two generations will be a barbaric

kingdom of the Shoguns, shorn of every vestige of power and

prestige,--the easy victim of the machinations of Western diplomats. Let

our country cease in its work of education, and these United States must

needs pass through the reverse stages of their growth until another race

of savages shall roam through the unbroken forest, now and then to reach

the shores of ocean and gaze through the centuries, eastward, to catch

a glimpse of the new Columbus. Like the moving pictures of the

kinetoscope when the reels are reversed, is the picture that imagination

can unroll if we grant the possibility of a lapse from civilization to

savagery.

And so when we take the broader view, we quickly see that, in spite of

our pessimism, we are doing something in the world. We are part of that

machine which civilization has invented and is slowly perfecting to

preserve itself. We may be a very small part, but, so long as the

responsibility for a single child rests upon us, we are not an

unimportant part. Society must reckon with you and me perhaps in an

infinitesimal degree, but it must reckon with the institution which we

represent as it reckons with no other institution that it has reared to

subserve its needs.

In a certain sense these statements are platitudes. We have repeated

them over and over again until the words have lost their tremendous

significance. And it behooves us now and again to revive the old

substance in a new form,--to come afresh to a self-consciousness of our

function. It is not good for any man to hold a debased and inferior

opinion of himself or of his work, and in the field of schoolcraft it is

easy to fall into this self-depreciating habit of thought. We cannot

hope that the general public will ever come to view our work in the true

perspective that I have very briefly outlined. It would probably not be

wise to promulgate publicly so pronounced an affirmation of our

function and of our worth. The popular mind must think in concrete

details rather than in comprehensive principles, when the subject of

thought is a specialized vocation. You and I have crude ideas, no doubt,

of the lawyer's function, of the physician's function, of the

clergyman's function. Not less crude are their ideas of our function.

Even when they patronize us by saying that our work is the noblest that

any man or woman would engage in, they have but a vague and shadowy

perception of its real significance. I doubt not that, with the majority

of those who thus pat us verbally upon the back, the words that they use

are words only. They do not envy us our privileges,--unless it is our

summer vacations,--nor do they encourage their sons to enter service in

our craft. The popular mind--the nontechnical mind,--must work in the

concrete;--it must have visible evidences of power and influence before

it pays homage to a man or to an institution.

Throughout the German empire the traveler is brought constantly face to

face with the memorials that have been erected by a grateful people to

the genius of the Iron Chancellor. Bismarck richly deserves the tribute

that is paid to his memory, but a man to be honored in this way must

exert a tangible and an obvious influence.

And yet, in a broader sense, the preëminence of Germany is due in far

greater measure to two men whose names are not so frequently to be

found inscribed upon towers and monuments. In the very midst of the

havoc and devastation wrought by the Napoleon wars,--at the very moment

when the German people seemed hopelessly crushed and defeated,--an

intellect more penetrating than that of Bismarck grasped the logic of

the situation. With the inspiration that comes with true insight, the

philosopher Fichte issued his famous Addresses to the German people.

With clear-cut argument couched in white-hot words, he drove home the

great principle that lies at the basis of United Germany and upon the

results of which Bismarck and Von Moltke and the first Emperor erected

the splendid structure that to-day commands the admiration of the world.

Fichte told the German people that their only hope lay in universal,

public education. And the kingdom of Prussia--impoverished, bankrupt,

war-ridden, and war-devastated--heard the plea. A great scheme that

comprehended such an education was already at hand. It had fallen almost

stillborn from the only kind of a mind that could have produced it,--a

mind that was suffused with an overwhelming love for humanity and

incomparably rich with the practical experiences of a primary

schoolmaster. It had fallen from the mind of Pestalozzi, the Swiss

reformer, who thus stands with Fichte as one of the vital factors in the

development of Germany's educational supremacy.

The people's schools of Prussia, imbued with the enthusiasm of Fichte

and Pestalozzi,[3] gave to Germany the tremendous advantage that enabled

it so easily to overcome its hereditary foe, when, two generations

later, the Franco-Prussian War was fought; for the _Volksschule_ gave to

Germany something that no other nation of that time possessed; namely,

an educated proletariat, an intelligent common people. Bismarck knew

this when he laid his cunning plans for the unification of German states

that was to crown the brilliant series of victories beginning at Sedan

and ending within the walls of Paris. William of Prussia knew it when,

in the royal palace at Versailles, he accepted the crown that made him

the first Emperor of United Germany. Von Moltke knew it when, at the

capitulation of Paris, he was asked to whom the credit of the victory

was due, and he replied, in the frank simplicity of the true soldier and

the true hero, "The schoolmaster did it."

And yet Bismarck and Von Moltke and the Emperor are the heroes of

Germany, and if Fichte and Pestalozzi are not forgotten, at least their

memories are not cherished as are the memories of the more tangible and

obvious heroes. Instinct lies deeply embedded in human nature and it is

instinctive to think in the concrete. And so I repeat that we cannot

expect the general public to share in the respect and veneration which

you and I feel for our calling, for you and I are technicians in

education, and we can see the process as a comprehensive whole. But our

fellow men and women have their own interests and their own departments

of technical knowledge and skill; they see the schoolhouse and the

pupils' desks and the books and other various material symbols of our

work,--they see these things and call them education; just as we see a

freight train thundering across the viaduct or a steamer swinging out in

the lake and call these things commerce. In both cases, the nontechnical

mind associates the word with something concrete and tangible; in both

cases, the technical mind associates the same word with an abstract

process, comprehending a movement of vast proportions.

To compress such a movement--whether it be commerce or government or

education--in a single conception requires a multitude of experiences

involving actual adjustments with the materials involved; involving

constant reflection upon hidden meanings, painful investigations into

hidden causes, and mastery of a vast body of specialized knowledge which

it takes years of study to digest and assimilate.

It is not every stevedore upon the docks, nor every stoker upon the

steamers, nor every brakeman upon the railroads, who comprehends what

commerce really means. It is not every banker's clerk who knows the

meaning of business. It is not every petty holder of public office who

knows what government really means. But this, at least, is true: in

proportion as the worker knows the meaning of the work that he does,--in

proportion as he sees it in its largest relations to society and to

life,--his work is no longer the drudgery of routine toil. It becomes

instead an intelligent process directed toward a definite goal. It has

acquired that touch of artistry which, so far as human testimony goes,

is the only pure and uncontaminated source of human happiness.

And the chief blessing for which you and I should be thankful to-day is

that this larger view of our calling has been vouchsafed to us as it has

been vouchsafed no former generation of teachers. Education as the

conventional prerogative of the rich,--as the garment which separated

the higher from the lower classes of society,--this could scarcely be

looked upon as a fascinating and uplifting ideal from which to derive

hope and inspiration in the day's work; and yet this was the commonly

accepted function of education for thousands of years, and the teachers

who did the actual work of instruction could not but reflect in their

attitude and bearing the servile character of the task that they

performed. Education to fit the child to earn a better living, to

command a higher wage,--this myopic view of the function of the school

could do but little to make the work of teaching anything but drudgery;

and yet it is this narrow and materialistic view that has dominated our

educational system to within a comparatively few years.

So silently and yet so insistently have our craft ideals been

transformed in the last two decades that you and I are scarcely aware

that our point of view has been changed and that we are looking upon our

work from a much higher point of vantage and in a light entirely new.

And yet this is the change that has been wrought. That education, in its

widest meaning, is the sole conservator and transmitter of civilization

to successive generations found expression as far back as Aristotle and

Plato, and has been vaguely voiced at intervals down through the

centuries; but its complete establishment came only as an indirect issue

of the great scientific discoveries of the nineteenth century, and its

application to the problems of practical schoolcraft and its

dissemination through the rank and file of teachers awaited the dawn of

the twentieth century. To-day we see expressions and indications of the

new outlook upon every hand, in the greatly increased professional zeal

that animates the teacher's calling; in the widespread movement among

all civilized countries to raise the standards of teachers, to eliminate

those candidates for service who have not subjected themselves to the

discipline of special preparation; in the increased endowments and

appropriations for schools and seminaries that prepare teachers; and,

perhaps most strikingly at the present moment, in that concerted

movement to organize into institutions of formal education, all of those

branches of training which have, for years, been left to the chance

operation of economic needs working through the crude and unorganized

though often effective apprentice system. The contemporary fervor for

industrial education is only one expression of this new view that, in

the last analysis, the school must stand sponsor for the conservation

and transmission of every valuable item of experience, every usable fact

or principle, every tiniest perfected bit of technical skill, every

significant ideal or prejudice, that the race has acquired at the cost

of so much struggle and suffering and effort.

I repeat that this new vantage point from which to gain a comprehensive

view of our calling has been attained only as an indirect result of the

scientific investigations of the nineteenth century. We are wont to

study the history of education from the work and writings of a few great

reformers, and it is true that much that is valuable in our present

educational system can be understood and appreciated only when viewed in

the perspective of such sources. Aristotle and Quintilian, Abelard and

St. Thomas Aquinas, Sturm and Philip Melanchthon, Comenius, Pestalozzi,

Rousseau, Herbart, and Froebel still live in the schools of to-day.

Their genius speaks to us through the organization of subject-matter,

through the art of questioning, through the developmental methods of

teaching, through the use of pictures, through objective instruction,

and in a thousand other forms. But this dominant ideal of education to

which I have referred and which is so rapidly transforming our outlook

and vitalizing our organization and inspiring us to new efforts, is not

to be drawn from these sources. The new histories of education must

account for this new ideal, and to do this they must turn to the masters

in science who made the middle part of the nineteenth century the period

of the most profound changes that the history of human thought

records.[4]

With the illuminating principle of evolution came a new and generously

rich conception of human growth and development. The panorama of

evolution carried man back far beyond the limits of recorded human

history and indicated an origin as lowly as the succeeding uplift has

been sublime. The old depressing and fatalistic notion that the human

race was on the downward path, and that the march of civilization must

sooner or later end in a cul-de-sac (a view which found frequent

expression in the French writers of the eighteenth century and which

dominated the skepticism of the dark hours preceding the

Revolution)--this fatalistic view met its death-blow in the principle of

evolution. A vista of hope entirely undreamed of stretched out before

the race. If the tremendous leverage of the untold millenniums of brute

and savage ancestry could be overcome, even in slight measure, by a few

short centuries of intelligence and reason, what might not happen in a

few more centuries of constantly increasing light? In short, the

principle of evolution supplied the perspective that was necessary to an

adequate evaluation of human progress.

But this inspiriting outlook which was perhaps the most comprehensive

result of Darwin's work had indirect consequences that were vitally

significant to education. It is with mental and not with physical

development that education is primarily concerned, and yet mental

development is now known to depend fundamentally upon physical forces.

The same decade that witnessed the publication of the _Origin of

Species_ also witnessed the birth of another great book, little known

except to the specialist, and yet destined to achieve immortality. This

book is the _Elements of Psychophysics_, the work of the German

scientist Fechner. The intimate relation between mental life and

physical and physiological forces was here first clearly demonstrated,

and the way was open for a science of psychology which should cast aside

the old and threadbare raiment of mystery and speculation and

metaphysic, and stand forth naked and unashamed.

But all this was only preparatory to the epoch-making discoveries that

have had so much to do with our present attitude toward education. The

Darwinian hypothesis led to violent controversy, not only between the

opponents and supporters of the theory, but also among the various camps

of the evolutionists themselves. Among these controversies was that

which concerned itself with the inheritance of acquired characteristics,

and the outcome of that conflict has a direct significance to present

educational theory. The principle, now almost conclusively

established,[5] that the characteristics acquired by an organism during

its lifetime are not transmitted by physical heredity to its offspring,

must certainly stand as the basic principle of education; for everything

that we identify as human as contrasted with that which is brutal must

look to education for its preservation and support. It has been stated

by competent authorities that, during the past ten thousand years, there

has been no significant change in man's physical constitution. This

simply means that Nature finished her work as far as man is concerned

far beyond the remotest period that human history records; that, for all

that we can say to-day, there must have existed in the very distant past

human beings who were just as well adapted by nature to the lives that

we are leading as we are to-day adapted; that what they lacked and what

we possess is simply a mass of traditions, of habits, of ideals, and

prejudices which have been slowly accumulated through the ages and which

are passed on from generation to generation by imitation and instruction

and training and discipline; and that the child of to-day, left to his

own devices and operated upon in no way by the products of

civilization, would develop into a savage undistinguishable in all

significant qualities from other savages.

The possibilities that follow from such a conception are almost

overwhelming even at first glance, and yet the theory is borne out by

adequate experiments. The transformation of the Japanese people through

two generations of education in Western civilization is a complete

upsetting of the old theory that as far as race is concerned, there is

anything significantly important in blood, and confirms the view that

all that is racially significant depends upon the influences that

surround the young of the race during the formative years. The complete

assimilation of foreign ingredients into our own national stock through

the instrumentality of the public school is another demonstration that

the factors which form the significant characteristics in the lower

animals possess but a minimum of significance to man,--that color, race,

stature, and even brain weight and the shape of the cranium, have very

little to do with human worth or human efficiency save in extremely

abnormal cases.

And so we have at last a fundamental principle with which to illumine

the field of our work and from which to derive not only light but

inspiration. Unite this with John Fiske's penetrating induction that the

possibilities of progress through education are correlated directly with

the length of the period of growth or immaturity,--that is, that the

races having the longest growth before maturity are capable of the

highest degree of civilization,--and we have a pair of principles the

influence of which we see reflected all about us in the great activity

for education and especially in the increased sense of pride and

responsibility and respect for his calling that is animating the modern

teacher.

And what will be the result of this new point of view? First and

foremost, an increased general respect for the work. Until a profession

respects itself, it cannot very well ask for the world's respect, and

until it can respect itself on the basis of scientific principles

indubitably established, its respect for itself will be little more than

the irritating self-esteem of the goody-goody order which is so often

associated with our craft.

With our own respect for our calling, based upon this incontrovertible

principle, will come, sooner or later, increased compensation for the

work and increased prestige in the community. I repeat that these things

can only come after we have established a true craft spirit. If we are

ashamed of our calling, if we regret openly and publicly that we are not

lawyers or physicians or dentists or bricklayers or farmers or anything

rather than teachers, the public will have little respect for the

teacher's calling. As long as we criticize each other before laymen and

make light of each other's honest efforts, the public will question our

professional standing on the ground that we have no organized code of

professional ethics,--a prerequisite for any profession.

I started out to tell you something that we ought to be thankful

for,--something that ought to counteract in a measure the inevitable

tendencies toward pessimism and discouragement. The hopeful thing about

our present status is that we have an established principle upon which

to work. A writer in a recent periodical stoutly maintained that

education was in the position just now that medicine was in during the

Middle Ages. The statement is hardly fair, either to medicine or to

education. If one were to attempt a parallel, one might say that

education stands to-day where medicine stood about the middle of the

nineteenth century. The analogy might be more closely drawn by comparing

our present conception of education with the conception of medicine just

prior to the application of the experimental method to a solution of its

problems. Education has still a long road to travel before it reaches

the point of development that medicine has to-day attained. It has still

to develop principles that are comparable to the doctrine of lymph

therapy or to that latest triumph of investigation in the field of

medicine,--the theory of opsonins,--which almost makes one believe that

in a few years violent accident and old age will be the only sources of

death in the human race.

Education, we admit, has a long road to travel before it reaches so

advanced a point of development. But there is no immediate cause for

pessimism or despair. We need especially, now that the purpose of

education is adequately defined, an adequate doctrine of educational

values and a rich and vital infusion of the spirit of experimental

science. For efficiency in the work of instruction and training, we need

to know the influence of different types of experience in controlling

human conduct,--we need to know just what degree of efficiency is

exerted by our arithmetic and literature, our geography and history, our

drawing and manual training, our Latin and Greek, our ethics and

psychology. It is the lack of definite ideas and criteria in these

fields that constitutes the greatest single source of waste in our

educational system to-day.

And yet even here the outlook is extremely hopeful. The new movement

toward industrial education is placing greater and greater emphasis upon

those subjects of instruction and those types of methods whose

efficiency can be tested and determined in an accurate fashion. The

intimate relation between the classroom, on the one hand, and the

machine shop, the experimental farm, the hospital ward and operating

room, and the practice school, on the other hand, indicates a source of

accurate knowledge with regard to the way in which our teachings really

affect the conduct and adjustment of our pupils that cannot fail within

a short time to serve as the basis for some illuminating principle of

educational values. This, I believe, will be the next great step in the

development of our profession.

There has been no intention in what I have said to minimize the

disadvantages and discouragements under which we are to-day doing our

work. My only plea is for the hopeful and optimistic outlook which, I

maintain, is richly justified by the progress that has already been made

and by the virile character of the forces that are operating in the

present situation.

On the whole, I can see no reason why I should not encourage young men

to enter the service of schoolcraft. I cannot say to them that they will

attain to great wealth, but I can safely promise them that, if they give

to the work of preparation the same attention and time that they would

give to their education and training for medicine or law or engineering,

their services will be in large demand and their rewards not to be

sneered at. Their incomes will not enable them to compete with the

captains of industry, but they will permit as full an enjoyment of the

comforts of life as it is good for any young man to command. But the

ambitious teacher must pay the price to reap these rewards,--the price

of time and energy and labor,--the price that he would have to pay for

success in any other human calling. What I cannot promise him in

education is the opportunity for wide popular adulation, but this, after

all, is a matter of taste. Some men crave it and they should go into

those vocations that will give it to them. Others are better satisfied

with the discriminating recognition and praise of their own

fellow-craftsmen.

Craftsmanship in Teaching · 第 25 / 66 题