CHAPTER IV

CONTINUED EXISTENCE

DIFFICULTY OF BELIEF IN CONTINUED EXISTENCE

"Sit down before fact as a little child, be prepared to

give up every preconceived notion, follow humbly wherever

and to whatsoever abysses Nature leads."--HUXLEY.

People often feel a notable difficulty in believing in the reality

of continued existence. Very likely it is difficult to believe or

to realise existence in what is sometimes called "the next world";

but then, when we come to think of it, it is difficult to believe in

existence in this world too; it is difficult to believe in existence

at all. The whole problem of existence is a puzzling one. It could

by no means have been predicated _a priori_. The whole thing is a

question of experience; that is, of evidence. We know by experience

that things actually do exist; though how they came into being, and

what they are all for, and what consequences they have, is more

than we can tell. We have no reason for asserting that the kind we

are familiar with is the only kind of existence possible, unless

we choose to assert it on the ground that we have no experience of

any other. But that is becoming just the question at issue: have we

any evidence, either direct or indirect, for any other existence

than this? If we have, it is futile to cite in opposition to it the

difficulty of believing in the reality of such an existence; we

surely ought to be guided by facts.

At this stage in the history of the human race few facts of science

are better established and more widely appreciated than the main

facts of Astronomy: a general acquaintance with the sizes and

distances, and the enormous number, of the solar systems distributed

throughout space is prevalent. Yet to the imaginative human mind the

facts, if really grasped, are overwhelming and incredible.

The sun a million times bigger than the earth; Arcturus a hundred

times bigger than the sun, and so distant that light has taken two

centuries to come, though travelling at a rate able to carry it to

New York and back in less than the twentieth part of a second,--facts

like these are commonplaces of the nursery; but even as bare facts

they are appalling.

That the earth is a speck invisible from any one of the stars, that

we are on a world which is but one among an innumerable multitude of

others, ought to make us realise the utter triviality of any view of

existence based upon familiarity with street and train and office,

ought to give us some sense of proportion between everyday experience

and ultimate reality. Even the portentous struggle in which Europe is

engaged--

"What is it all but a trouble of ants in the gleam of a

million million of suns?"

Yet, for true interpretation, the infinite worth and vital importance

of each individual human soul must be apprehended too. And that

is another momentous fact, which, so far from restricting the

potentialities of existence, by implication still further enlarges

them. The multiplicity, the many-sidedness, the magnificence, of

material existence does not dwarf the human soul; far otherwise: it

illumines and expands the stage upon which the human drama is being

played, and ought to make us ready to perceive how far greater still

may be the possibilities--nay, the actualities--before it, in its

infinite unending progress.

That we know little about such possibilities as yet, proves

nothing;--for mark how easy it would have been to be ignorant of the

existence of all the visible worlds and myriad modes of being in

space. Not until the business of the day is over, and our great star

has eclipsed itself behind the earth, not until the serener period of

night, does the grandeur of the material universe force itself upon

our attention. And, even then, let there be but a slight permanent

thickening of our atmosphere, and we should have had no revelation

of any world other than our own. Under those conditions--so barely

escaped from--how wretchedly meagre and limited would have been our

conception of the Universe! Aye, and, unless we foolishly imagine

that our circumstances are such as to have already given us a clue to

every kind of possible existence, I venture to say that "wretchedly

meagre and limited" must be a true description of our conception of

the Universe, even now,--even of the conception of those who have

permitted themselves, with least hesitation, to follow whithersoever

facts lead.

If there be any group of scientific or historical or literary

students who advocate what they think to be a sensible, but what

I regard as a purblind, view of existence, based upon already

systematised knowledge and on unfounded and restricting speculation

as to probable boundaries and limitations of existence,--if such

students take their own horizon to be the measure of all things,--the

fact is to be deplored. Such workers, however admirable their

industry and detailed achievements, represent a school of thought

against the fruits of which we of the Allied Nations are in arms.

Nevertheless speculation of this illegitimate and negative kind is

not unknown among us. It originates partly in admiration for the

successful labours of a bygone generation in clearing away a quantity

of clinging parasitic growth which was obscuring the fair fabric of

ascertained truth, and partly in an innate iconoclastic enthusiasm.

The success which has attended Darwinian and other hypotheses has

had a tendency to lead men--not indeed men of Darwinian calibre, but

smaller and less conscientious men--in science as well as in history

and theology, to an over-eager confidence in probable conjecture

and inadequate attention to facts of experience. It has even been

said--I quote from a writer in the volume _Darwin and Modern

Science_, published in connexion with a Darwin jubilee celebration at

Cambridge--that "the age of materialism was the least matter-of-fact

age conceivable, and the age of science the age which showed least of

the patient temper of enquiry." I would not go so far as this myself,

the statement savours of exaggeration, but there is a regrettable

tendency in surviving materialistic quarters for combatants to

entrench themselves in dogma and preconceived opinion, to regard

these vulnerable shelters as sufficient protection against observed

and recorded facts, and even to employ them as strongholds from which

alien observation-posts can be shattered and overthrown.

Raymond; or, Life and Death With examples of the evidence for survival of memory and affection after death. · 第 4 / 17 章