THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE EAST-JORDAN CONQUESTS.

Desert dwellers take little account of the lapse of time. It is

not strange that the data regarding the duration of the sojourn in

the wilderness are late and exceedingly vague. The number forty in

the Bible is the concrete Hebrew equivalent of many. Ordinarily

the forty years represent a generation. A period of about forty

years accords well with the facts of contemporary Egyptian

chronology. If the Hebrews fled from Egypt about 1200, during the

period of anarchy following the breakdown of the nineteenth

Egyptian dynasty, they could not have entered Palestine much before

the middle of the twelfth century, for Ramses III of the Twentieth

Dynasty succeeded in re-establishing and maintaining his authority

in Southern Palestine until his death about 1167 B.C.

The account of the spies, preserved according to some writers in

variant versions by each of the great groups of Hebrew narratives,

indicates that the Hebrews attempted but failed to enter Canaan

from the south. For tribesmen like the Israelites, chafing under

their harsh environment and recalling the prosperity of the land of

Egypt, Palestine with its green hills and fertile fields was an

irresistible lodestone luring them on to the conquest. The reasons

why they failed to enter Canaan from the south are suggested in the

narrative of the spies and confirmed by a study of the historical

geographical situation. The Canaanite cities of Southern Palestine

were built largely with the view to protecting their inhabitants

from the ever-lurking nomad invaders. On the other hand the

Hebrews had none of the equipment needed to conquer walled cities.

More than that the barren hills of the South Country did not

furnish the base of supplies necessary to maintain a protracted

siege. The early Hebrew narratives imply that certain nomadic

tribes, as, for example, the Calebites, the Kenizzites and the

Jerahmeelites, independently gained a foothold on the southern

borders of Canaan and ultimately assimilated with the Hebrew tribe

of Judah when the latter entered Palestine. The earliest Hebrew

accounts, however, as well as the logic of the situation indicate

that the great body of the Israelites, whose ancestors had been in

the land of Egypt, entered Palestine from the east. Throughout all

its history the east-Jordan land has witnessed the constant

transition of Arab tribes from the nomadic life of the desert to

the more settled civilization, of agricultural Palestine. Here on

the eastern heights that overlook the Jordan valley and the land of

Canaan the traveller still finds the Arab tents and flocks of the

nomads beside the plowed fields of the village-dwellers. On the

rolling plains of northern Moab and southern Gilead there are few

commanding heights or natural fortresses. The important towns,

like Dibon and Heshbon, lay on slightly rising hills. The

character of the ruins to-day does not indicate that they were ever

surrounded by formidable walls. Whether the Hebrews conquered them

by open attack or by strategy, as in the case of the town of Ai, is

not stated. It is certain, however, that here they first gained a

permanent foothold in agricultural Palestine. From the conquered

they here learned their initial lessons in the arts of agriculture

and became acquainted with that more advanced Canaanite

civilization which they later absorbed. Coming fresh from the

desert, where only the fittest survived, their numbers rapidly

increased in this quieter and more favorable environment. Soon to

the constant pressure of the desert population on the east was

added that of over-population, so that necessity, as well as

ambition, impelled them to cross the Jordan to seek homes among the

hills to the west.

Twelve Studies on the Making of a Nation: The Beginnings of Israel's History · 第 164 / 182 题