A REPLY TO TEXTS QUOTED IN DEFENSE OF THE DOCTRINES OF MEN

The first is Luke x, 16, where Christ says, "He that heareth you,

heareth Me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth Me." [Luke 10:16] He

spoke similar words in Matthew x, 40 [Matt. 10:40], and in John xiii,

20 [John 13:20]. Here, they claim, Christ demands of us that we accept

their man-made laws.

[Sidenote: The Command of Christ]

I reply: That is not true. For immediately before speaking these

words, Christ says, "Go and say, the kingdom of God is at hand."

[Matt. 10:7, Luke 10:9] With these words Christ stops the mouths of

all the teachers of the doctrines of men, and commands the apostles

what they are to teach, and Himself puts the words in their mouth,

saying that they shall preach the kingdom of God. Now he who does not

preach the kingdom of God is not sent by Christ, and him these words

do not concern. Much rather do these words demand of us that we hear

not the doctrines of men. Now to preach of the kingdom of God is

nothing else than to preach the Gospel, in which the faith of Christ

is taught, by which alone God dwells and rules in us. But the

doctrines of men do not preach about faith, but about eating,

clothing, times, places, persons and about purely external things

which do not profit the soul.

[Sidenote: The Perversion of the Text]

Behold how honestly the pious shepherds and faithful teachers have

dealt with the poor common people. This text, "Who hears you, hears

me," they have in a masterly fashion torn out of its context and have

terrified us with it, until they have made us subject to themselves.

But what precedes, "Preach the kingdom of God," they have taken good

care not to mention, and have bravely leaped over it, that they might

by no means be compelled to preach nothing but the Gospel. The noble,

and most excellent teachers! We ought to thank them for it!

In Mark, the last chapter, we read that He sent out the disciples to

preach. Let us hear what command He gives them, and how He sets a

limit to their teaching and bridles their tongues, saying, "Go ye into

all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature. He that

believeth, shall be saved," etc., Mark xvi, 15 [Mark 16:15]. He does

not say, Go and preach what you will, or what you think to be good;

but He puts His own word into their mouth, and bids them preach the

Gospel.

In Matthew, the last chapter, He says, "Go and make disciples of all

nations, baptise them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of

the Holy Ghost; and teach them to observe all things which I have

commanded you." Here, again. He does not say, Teach them to observe

what you devise, but what I have commanded you. Therefore the pope and

his bishops and teachers must be wolves and the apostles of the devil;

it cannot be otherwise, for they teach not the commands of Christ, but

their own words. So also in Matthew xxv, 15, in the parable of the

three servants, the Lord points out that the householder bade the

servants trade not with their own property, but with his, and gave the

first five talents, the second two and the third one. [Matt. 25:15]

Our second text is Matthew xxiii, 2 f., where the Lord says, "The

scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. All therefore whatsoever

they bid you observe, that observe and do."

Here, here, they say, we have authority to teach what we think to be

right.

[Sidenote: Moses' Seat]

I answer: If that is what Christ means, then we are in a sorry plight.

Every pope might then create more new laws, until the world could no

longer contain all the laws. But they quote this text as they quote

the first. What do the words "sit in Moses' seat" mean? Let us ask,

what did Moses teach? And if he still sat in his seat today, what

would he teach? Beyond a doubt, nothing but what he taught of old,

namely, the commandments and the word of God. He never yet spoke the

doctrines of men, but what God commanded him to speak, as almost every

chapter of his shows. It follows, then, that he who teaches something

else than Moses teaches, does not sit in Moses' seat. For the Lord

calls it Moses' seat, because from it the doctrines of Moses should be

read and taught. The same meaning is contained in the words which

follow, in which the Lord says, "But do not ye after their works, for

they say, and do not; for they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be

borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not

move them with one of their fingers." [Matt. 23:3 f.]

See, here He reproves their works, because they add many laws to the

doctrines of Moses and lay them on the people, but themselves do not

touch them. And afterward He says, in verse 13, "Woe unto you, scribes

and Pharisees, hypocrites! which say, Whosoever shall swear by the

temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the

temple, he is a debtor! Ye fools and blind; for whether is greater?

the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?" [Matt. 23:13, 16

f.] Is it not clear that Christ here condemns their doctrines of men?

He can, therefore, not have confirmed them by speaking of sitting in

Moses' seat; else He would have contradicted Himself. Therefore Moses'

seat must mean no more than the Law of Moses, and the sitting in it no

more than the preaching of the Law of Moses.

This is what Moses himself said of his seat and doctrine, Deuteronomy

iv, 2, "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you." [Deut.

4:2] And in Deuteronomy xii, 32, "What thing soever I command you,

observe to do it; thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it."

[Deut. 12:32] These doctrines they were required to teach in Moses'

seat; therefore Moses' seat cannot endure any doctrines of men.

[Sidenote: St. Augustine]

St. Augustine is quoted as having written in _the Book against the

Letter of the Manicheans_[7], "I would not believe the Gospel if I did

not believe the Church."

Here you see, they say, we are to believe the Church more than the

Gospel.

[Sidenote: Authority]

I answer: Even if Augustine had used those words, who gave him

authority, that we must believe what he says? What Scripture does he

quote to prove the statement? What if he erred here, as we know that

he frequently did, as did all the fathers? Should one single sentence

of Augustine be so mighty as to refute all the texts quoted above?

That is not what God wills; St. Augustine must yield to them.

Further, if that were St. Augustine's meaning, he would contradict

himself; for in very many places he exalts the Holy Scriptures above

the opinions of all teachers, above the decrees of all councils and

churches, and will have men judge of him and of the teachings of all

men according to the Scriptures. Why then do the faithful shepherds

pass by those sayings of St. Augustine, plain and clear as they are,

and light on this lonely one, which is so obscure and sounds so unlike

Augustine as we know him from all his writings? It can only be because

they want to bolster up their tyranny with idle, empty words.

[Sidenote: Words Perverted]

Furthermore, they are deceivers, in that they not only ascribe to St.

Augustine an opinion he did not hold, but they also falsify and

pervert his words. For St. Augustine's words really are, "I would not

have believed the Gospel if the authority of the whole Church had not

moved me." Augustine speaks of the whole Church, and says that

throughout the world it with one consent preaches the Gospel and not

the Letter of the Manicheans; and this unanimous authority of the

Church moves him to consider it the true Gospel. But our tyrants apply

this name of the Church to themselves, as if the laymen and the common

people were not also Christians. And what they teach they want men to

consider as the teaching of the Christian Church, although they are a

minority, and we, who are universal Christendom, should also be

consulted about what is to be taught in the name of universal

Christendom. See, so cleverly do they quote the words of St.

Augustine: what he says of the Church throughout all the world, they

would have us understand of the Roman See.

But how does it follow from this saying that the doctrines of men are

also to be observed? What doctrine of men has ever been devised that

has been accepted and preached by all of the universal Church

throughout the world? Not one; the Gospel alone is accepted by all

Christians everywhere.

[Sidenote: Their True Meaning]

But then we must not understand St. Augustine to say that he would not

believe the Gospel unless he were moved thereto by the authority of

the whole Church. For that were false and unchristian. Every man must

believe only because it is God's Word, and because he is convinced in

his heart that it is true, although an angel from heaven and all the

world preached the contrary. His meaning is rather, as he himself

says, that he finds the Gospel nowhere except in the Church, and that

this external proof can be given heretics that their doctrine is not

right, but that that is right which all the world has with one accord

accepted. For the eunuch in Acts viii, 37, believed on the Gospel as

preached by Philip, although he did not know whether many or few

believed on it [Acts 8:37]. So also Abraham believed the promise of

God all by himself, when no man knew of it, Romans iv, 18 [Rom. 4:18].

And Mary, Luke i, 38 [Luke 1:38], believed the message of Gabriel by

herself, and there was no one on earth who believed with her. In this

way Augustine also had to believe, and all the saints, and we too,

every one for himself alone.

For this reason St. Augustine's words cannot bear the interpretation

they put upon them; but they must be understood of the external proof

of faith, by which heretics are refuted and the weak strengthened in

faith, when they see that all the world preaches and regards as Gospel

that which they believe. And if this meaning cannot be found in St.

Augustine's words, it is better to reject the words; for they are

contrary to the Scriptures and to all experience if they have that

other meaning.

[Sidenote: The Apostles Also Men]

Finally, when they are refuted with Scripture so that they cannot

escape, they begin to blaspheme God and say, "But St. Matthew, Paul

and Peter also were men; therefore what they teach is also the

doctrine of men. And if their doctrine is to be observed, let the

pope's doctrine be observed as well!" Such blasphemy is now being

uttered even by some princes and bishops, who count themselves wise.

When you hear such utterly hardened and blinded blasphemers, turn away

from them or stop your ears; they are not worthy that one should talk

with them. If that argument were to hold, then Moses also was a man,

and all the prophets were men. Then let us go our way, and believe

nothing at all, but regard everything as the doctrine of men, and

follow our fancy.

[Sidenote: Answer]

But if you will talk with them, do so, and say, Well, let St. Paul or

Matthew be the doctrine of men; then we ask, Whence comes their

authority? How will they prove that they have authority to teach and

to be bishops? Or how shall we know where the Church is? If they say

that St. Matthew has so asserted in Matthew xvi, 19 [Matt. 16:19], or

St. Paul in some place or other, do you say, But that does not hold:

they are the doctrines of men, as you say; you must have God's Word to

confirm you. And then you will find that these hardened blasphemers

put themselves to shame and confusion with their own folly. They

cannot even distinguish between a man who speaks for himself and one

through whom God speaks. The words of the Apostles were commanded them

by God, and confirmed and proved by great miracles, such as were never

done for the doctrines of men. And if they are certain in themselves,

and will prove it to us, that God has commanded them to teach as they

do, we will believe them as we believe the Apostles. If it is

uncertain whether the words of the Apostles are of God, who will give

us certainty that their doctrines of men are of God? _O furor et

amentia his saeculis digna!_[8]

[Sidenote: Why Doctrines of Men are Condemned]

But we do not condemn the doctrines of men because they are the

doctrines of men, for we would gladly endure them, but because they

are contrary to the Gospel and to the Scriptures. The Scriptures set

the consciences of men free, and forbid that they be taken captive

with the doctrines of men. The doctrines of men take captive the

conscience. This conflict between the Scriptures and the doctrines of

men we cannot reconcile. Hence, because these two forms of doctrine

contradict one another, we allow even young children to judge here

whether we are to give up the Scriptures, in which the one Word of God

is taught from the beginning of the world, or the doctrines of men

which were newly devised yesterday and change daily? And we hope that

every one will agree in the decision that the doctrines of men must be

forsaken and the Scriptures retained. For they cannot be reconciled,

but are by nature opposed to one another, like fire and water, like

heaven and earth; As Isaiah Iv, 8 f. says: "As the heavens are exalted

above the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways." [Isa. 55:8 f.]

Now he who walks on the earth cannot at the same time walk in heaven,

and he who walks in heaven cannot walk on the earth.

Therefore we request the papists that they first reconcile their

doctrines with the Scriptures. If they accomplish that, we will

observe their doctrines. But that they will not do before the Holy

Spirit has become a liar. Therefore we say again. The doctrines of men

we censure not because they are spoken by men, but because they are

lies and blasphemies against the Scriptures. And the Scriptures,

although they also were written by men, are not of men nor from men,

but from God. Now since Scriptures and the doctrines of men are

contrary the one to the other, one must lie and the other be true. Let

us see to which of the two they themselves will ascribe the lie. Let

this suffice.

Works of Martin Luther, with Introductions and Notes (Volume II) · 第 110 / 131 题