MONDAY AFTER INVOCAVIT

[Sidenote: Necessity and Choice]

Dear Friends: You heard yesterday the characteristics of a Christian

man, how his whole life is faith and love. Faith is directed toward

God, love toward man and one's neighbor, and consists in such love and

service for him as we have received from God without our work and

merit. Thus there are two things: the one, which is the most needful,

and which must be done in one way and no other; the other, which is a

matter of choice and not of necessity, which may be kept or not,

without endangering faith or incurring hell. In both, love must deal

with our neighbor in the same manner as God has dealt with us; it must

walk the straight road, straying neither to the let nor to the right.

In the things which are "musts" and are matters of necessity, such as

believing in Christ, love nevertheless never uses force or undue

constraint. Thus the mass is an evil thing, and God is displeased with

it, because it is performed as a sacrifice and work of merit.

Therefore it must be abolished. Here there is no room for question,

just as little as if you should ask whether you should pray to God.

Here we are entirely agreed: the private mass must be abolished, as I

have said in my writings[3]. And I heartily wish it would be abolished

everywhere and only the evangelical mass for all the people be

retained. Yet Christian love should not employ harshness here nor

force the matter. It should be preached and taught with tongue and

pen, that to hold mass in such a manner is a sin, but no one should be

dragged away from it by force. The matter should be let to God; His

word should do the work alone, without our work. Why? Because it is

not in my power to fashion the hearts of men as the potter moulds the

clay, and to do with them as I please. I can get no farther than to

men's ears; their hearts I cannot reach. And since I cannot pour faith

into their hearts, I cannot, nor should I, force any one to have

faith. That is God's work alone, who causes faith to live in the

heart. Therefore we should give free course to the Word, and not add

our works to it. We have the _jus verbi_[4], but not the

_executio_[5]; we should preach the Word, but the consequences must be

let to God's own good pleasure.

[Sidenote: Compulsion and Persuasion]

Now if I should rush in and abolish the mass by force, there are many

who would be compelled to consent to it and yet not know their own

minds, but say: I do not know if it is right or wrong, I do not know

where I stand, I was compelled by force to submit to the majority. And

this forcing and commanding results in a mere mockery, an external

show, a fool's play, man-made ordinances, sham-saints and hypocrites.

For where the heart is not good, I care nothing at all for the work.

We must first win the hearts of the people. And that is done when I

teach only the Word of God, preach the Gospel and say: "Dear lords or

pastors, desist from holding the mass, it is not right, you are

sinning when you do it; I cannot refrain from telling you this." But I

would not make it an ordinance for them, nor urge a general law; he

who would follow me could do so, and he who refused would remain

without. In the latter case the Word would sink into the heart and

perform its work. Thus he would become convinced and acknowledge his

error, and all away from the mass; to-morrow another would do the

same, and thus God would accomplish more with His Word than if you and

I would forge into one all power and authority. For if you have won

the heart, you have won the whole man--and the mass must finally fall

of its own weight and come to an end. And if the hearts and minds of

all men are united in the purpose--abolish the mass; but if all are

not heart and soul for its abolishment--leave it in God's hands, I

beseech you, otherwise the result will not be good. Not, indeed, that

I would again set up the mass; I let it live in God's name. Faith must

not be chained and imprisoned, nor bound by an ordinance to any work.

This is the principle by which you must be governed. For I am sure you

will not be able to carry out your plans, and if you should carry them

out with such general laws, then I will recant all the things that I

have written and preached, and I will not support you, and therefore I

ask you plainly: What harm can the mass do to you? You have your

faith, pure and strong, toward God, and the mass cannot hurt you.

[Sidenote: Paul's Method]

Love, therefore, demands that you have compassion on the weak, as all

the apostles had. Once, when Paul came to Athens, a mighty city, he

found in the temple many altars, and he went from one to the other and

looked at them all [Acts 17:16 ff.], but did not touch any one of them

even with his foot. But he stood in the midst of the market-place and

said they were all idolatrous works, and begged the people to forsake

them; yet he did not destroy one of them by force. When the word took

hold of their hearts, they forsook their idols of their own accord,

and in consequence idolatry fell of itself. Now, if I had seen that

they held mass, I would have preached and admonished them concerning

it. Had they heeded my admonition, they would have been won; if not, I

would nevertheless not have torn them from it by the hair or employed

any force, but simply allowed the Word to act, while I prayed for

them. For the Word created heaven and earth and all things; the Word

must do this thing, and not we poor sinners.

[Sidenote: Luther's Method]

[Sidenote: Jerome and Augustine]

In conclusion: I will preach it, teach it, write it, but I will

constrain no man by force, for faith must come freely without

compulsion. Take myself as an example. I have opposed the indulgences

and all the papists, but never by force. I simply taught, preached,

wrote God's Word; otherwise I did nothing. And then while I slept, or

drank Wittenberg beer with my Philip[6] and with Amsdor[7], the Word

so greatly weakened the papacy, that never a prince or emperor

inflicted such damage upon it. I did nothing; the Word did it all. Had

I desired to foment trouble, I could have brought great bloodshed upon

Germany, Yea, I could have started such a little game at Worms that

even the emperor would not have been safe. But what would it have

been? A fool's play. I did nothing; I left it to the Word. What do you

suppose is Satan's thought, when an effort is made to do things by

violence? He sits back in hell and thinks: How fine a game these fools

will make for me! But it brings him distress when we only spread the

Word, and let it alone do the work. For it is almighty and takes

captive the hearts, and if the hearts are captured the evil work will

all of itself. Let me cite an instance. Aforetime there were sects,

too, Jewish and Gentile Christians, differing on the law of Moses in

respect to circumcision. The former would keep it, the latter not [1

Cor. 7:18 ff.]. Then came Paul and preached that it might be kept or

not, it mattered not one way or the other; they should make no "must"

of it, but leave it to the choice of the individual; to keep it or

not, was immaterial. Later came Jerome, who would have made a "must"

out of it, and wanted laws and ordinances to prohibit it. Then came

St. Augustine, who held to the opinion of St. Paul: it might be kept

or not, as one wished; St. Jerome had missed the meaning of St. Paul

by a hundred miles. The two doctors bumped heads rather hard over the

proposition. But when St. Augustine died, St. Jerome accomplished his

purpose. After that came the popes; they would add something of their

own, and they, too, made laws. Thus out of the making of one law grew

a thousand laws, until they have completely buried us under laws. And

so it will be here; one law will soon make two, two will increase to

three, and so forth.

Let this be enough at this time concerning the things that are

necessary, and let us beware lest we lead astray those of weak

conscience.

Works of Martin Luther, with Introductions and Notes (Volume II) · 第 88 / 131 题