Brickette and daub were so scarce that many pieces were catalogued as
specimens. These present an interesting class of materials and give aid
far beyond their intrinsic worth in telling the Lawhorn story. Once
again this points up the value of saving everything found during the
course of field work.
There is no way of knowing how much of this material has been lost as a
result of erosion and the almost melting away of softer pieces in the
heavy rains of the passing centuries. Slightly over 100 pieces which
were eroded beyond identification were picked up during the course of
excavation. They represent either daub or broken clay objects of unknown
use. There were 103 pieces of daub, broken into various sizes, which had
been heavily impregnated with grass. Six of these specimens show
impressions of small poles which would have been from 2 to 5 cm. in
diameter (Fig. 26;2). The composition of the fired material ranges from
a sandy clay to a white ball clay with a heavy sand admixture. It should
be noted that the natural soils of the Lawhorn site do not contain
enough clay to fire into a brickette form. Consequently such brickette
as was found must be the result of clays brought in from a distance.
Most specimens were rather soft and it is doubtful if they had ever been
used as heating stones. Many samples show some surface smoothing as if
they were portions of floors, firebasins or perhaps house walls. It is
presumed that if the daub was used on house walls, the firing was
accidental as the result of house burnings, that only a minor portion of
such daub would survive. However, judging from the burned clay floors
and fire basins found, it is evident that burned clay, as such, fired
well enough to withstand the erosion of time. A higher percentage of
wall daub should have been found if it had been extensively used.
[Illustration: Figure 25. Bone Tools
_(1. Ulna awls, 2. Beamer, 3. Deer scapula hoe, 4. Splinter awls)_]
[Illustration: Figure 26. Bone Beads and Burned Clay Daub
_(1. Cut bone, a step in making beads, and bone beads. 2. Daub with
whole cane impressions and evidence of interweaving of canes)_]
There were twenty pieces of brickette flattened and smoothed in such a
way as to indicate that they were probably part of house floors. They
were smoothed on one side and grass impregnated on the underside and
throughout the body of the specimen as the result of puddling the clay.
They were made of a sandy clay and ranged in size from 2 to 4 cm. in
thickness. The undersurface was irregular and showed no contact with a
prepared surface such as the cane mats of wall daub specimens would
leave.
There were 163 pieces of fired clay objects showing considerable use
which were made of a poorly fired sandy clay. Four specimens were
tempered with crushed shell while one was clay tempered. Most of the
others contain some grass although many are without any apparent
tempering material. Use of these specimens is undetermined. One specimen
(FS 425) was a rectanguloid brickette 10 × 12.5 cm. and 2 cm. thick with
a slightly rounded base (Fig. 27;3). This was found in a form fitting
depression on the fired clay floor of house 3. It shows considerable
wear from use, especially on the bottom. It, perhaps, was used for
grinding seeds or rubbing skins. The other clay objects are of different
shapes, seemingly of round cylindrical devices with flat bottoms and
rounded edges. From some of the better samples they appear to be about
five inches in diameter but the length or height could not be
determined. They do not show any appreciable wear. There was no evidence
of excessive firing and most of the specimens crumble easily. The latter
may be due to the sandy clay from which they were formed. It is
suggested that these were anvils or stretchers for use in skin work or
other soft materials such as textiles. They certainly were an important
domestic item.
There was one specimen with a central hole, apparently lengthwise, which
suggests that it was suspended, perhaps as a loom weight (Fig. 27;1).
The clay objects occur in considerable numbers in all parts of the site
and throughout the deposit and constitute the biggest percentage of all
the brickette material from the site. In point of fact these items are
not broken bits of daub, such as are so common on Mississippian sites,
but are items of domestic importance in the material culture assemblage,
and must be so treated in the final analysis. They are not accidental
formations, such as building daub, but have been precisely formed to a
pattern. While many seemed to conform to a cylindrical shape others did
not. One specimen has a groove around it but its position with reference
to the complete object was not apparent. One piece shows a coarse
textile impression on one side and a surface well smoothed on the other.
It is not a potsherd. Another piece shows the imprint of a finger
apparently curled around the clay—a very small finger—probably that of a
child at play. One piece looks as if it could have been a pottery
trowel, but is a questionable specimen.
Two of the broken clay objects have been secondarily used as abraders
for sharpening bone awls or similar pointed items. One specimen (FS 217)
is the stem of a pottery trowel, a standard item of Mississippian
groups. A complete modified conical object was recovered from a nearby
site and is a graphic representation of another shape of these objects
(Fig. 27;2).
[Illustration: Figure 27. Brickettes or Fired Clay Artifacts
_(Brickette with central hole, 2. Semi-conical clay objects. 3.
Rectanguloid clay brickette)_]
It should be obvious from the above that much of the burned clay
material from Lawhorn is not truly daub but rather fragmentary pieces of
a multitude of domestic utility objects which played an important part
in the material culture of the people.