IMPRESSIONIST

$1.50 net

CONTENTS: Paul Cezanne--Rops the Etcher--Monticelli--Rodin--Eugene

Carriere--Degas--Botticelli--Six Spaniards--Chardin--Black and

White--Impressionism--A New Study of Watteau--Gauguin and

Toulouse-Lautrec--Literature and Art--Museum Promenades.

"The vivacity of Mr. Huneker's style sometimes tends to conceal the

judiciousness of his matter. His justly great reputation as a journalist

critic most people would attribute to his salient phrase. To the present

writer, the phrase goes for what it is worth--generally it is eloquent

and interpretative, again merely decorative--what really counts is an

experienced and unbiassed mind at ease with its material. The criticism

that can pass from Goya, the tempestuous, that endless fount of facile

enthusiasms, and do justice to the serene talent of Fortuny is certainly

catholic. In fact, Mr. Huneker is an impressionist only in his aversion

to the literary approach, and in a somewhat wilful lack of system. This,

too, often seems less temperamental than a result of journalistic

conditions, and of the dire need of being entertaining.

"We like best such sober essays as those which analyze for us the

technical contributions of Cezanne and Rodin. Here, Mr. Huneker is a

real interpreter, and here his long experience of men and ways in art

counts for much. Charming, in the slighter vein, are such appreciations

as the Monticelli, and Chardin. Seasoned readers of Mr. Huneker's

earlier essays in musical and dramatic criticism will naturally turn to

the fantastic titles in this book. Such border-line geniuses as Greco,

Rops, Meryon, Gustave Moreau, John Martin, are treated with especial

gusto. We should like to have an appreciation of Blake from this ardent

searcher of fine eccentricities. In the main the book is devoted to

artists who have come into prominence since 1870, the French naturally

predominating, but such precursors of modern tendencies or influential

spirits as Botticelli, Watteau, Piranesi are included. Eleven 'Museum

promenades,' chiefly in the Low Countries and in Spain, are on the whole

less interesting than the individual appreciations--necessarily so, but

this category embraces a capital sketch of Franz Hals at Haarlem, while

the three Spanish studies on the Prado Museum, Velasquez, and Greco at

Toledo, are quite of the best. From the Velasquez, we transcribe one of

many fine passages:

"'His art is not correlated to the other arts. One does not dream

of music or poetry or sculpture or drama in front of his pictures.

One thinks of life and then of the beauty of the paint. Velasquez

is never rhetorical, nor does he paint for the sake of making

beautiful surfaces as often does Titian. His practice is not art

for art as much as art for life. As a portraitist, Titian's is the

only name to be coupled with that of Velasquez. He neither

flattered his sitters, as did Van Dyck, nor mocked them like Goya.

And consider the mediocrities, the dull, ugly, royal persons he was

forced to paint! He has wrung the neck of banal eloquence, and his

prose, sober, rich, noble, sonorous, rhythmic, is, to my taste,

preferable to the exalted, versatile volubility and lofty poetic

tumblings in the azure of any school of painting.'

"Here we see how winning Mr. Huneker's manner is and how insidious.

Unless you immediately react against that apparently innocent word

'tumblings,' your faith in the grand style will begin to disintegrate.

It is this very sense of walking among pitfalls that will make the book

fascinating to a veteran reader. The young are advised to temper it with

an infusion of Sir Joshua Reynolds's 'Discourses,' _quantum

sufficit_."--FRANK JEWETT MATHER, JR., in _New York Nation_ and _Evening

Post_.

Franz Liszt · 第 217 / 236 题