CHAPTER II

LITERARY NEW YORK

Although the New York of my youth had little claim to be recognized as a

literary centre, it yet was a city whose tastes and manners were much

influenced by people of culture. One of these, Robert Sands, was the

author of a poem entitled "Yamoyden," its theme being an Indian story or

legend. His family dated back to the Sands who once owned a considerable

part of Block Island, and from whom Sands Point takes its name. If I do

not mistake, these Sands were connected by marriage with one of my

ancestors, who were also settlers in Block Island. I remember having

seen the poet Sands in my childhood, a rather awkward, near-sighted man.

His life was not a long one. A sister of his, Julia Sands, wrote a

biographical sketch of her brother, and was spoken of as a literary

woman.

William Cullen Bryant resided in New York many years. He took a

prominent part in politics, but mingled little in general society, being

much absorbed in his duties as editor of the "Evening Post," of which he

was also the founder.

I first heard of Fitz-Greene Halleck as the author of various satirical

pieces of verse relating to personages and events of nearly eighty years

ago. He is now best remembered by his "Marco Bozzaris," a noble lyric

which we have heard quoted in view of recent lamentable encounters

between Greek and Barbarian.

Among the lecturers who visited New York, I remember Professor Silliman

of Yale College, Dr. Follen, who spoke of German literature, George

Combe, and Mr. Charles Lyell.

Charles King, for many years editor of a daily paper entitled "The New

York American," was a man of much literary taste. He had been a pupil at

Harrow when Byron was there. He was an appreciative friend of my father,

although as convivial in his tastes as my father was the reverse. I

remember that once, when a temperance meeting was going on in one of our

large parlors, Mr. King called and, finding my father thus engaged,

began to frolic with us young people. He even dared to say: "How I

should like to open those folding doors just wide enough to fire off a

bottle of champagne at those temperance folks!"

He was the patron of my early literary ventures, and kindly allowed my

fugitive pieces to appear in his paper. He always advocated the

abolition of slavery, and could never forgive Henry Clay his part in

effecting the Missouri Compromise. He and his brother James, my father's

junior partner, were sons of Rufus King, a man eminent in public life. I

was a child of perhaps eight years when I heard my elders say with

regret that "old Mr. King was dying."

Quite late in his life, Mr. Charles King became President of Columbia

College. This institution, with the houses of its officers, occupied the

greater part of Park Place. Its professors were well known in society.

The college was very conservative in its management. The professor of

mathematics was asked one day by one of his class whether the sun did

not really stand still in answer to the prayer of Joshua. He laughed at

the question, and was in consequence reprimanded by the faculty.

Professor Anthon, of the college, became known through his school and

college editions of many Latin classics. Professor Moore, in the

department of Hellenics, was popular among the undergraduates, partly,

it was said, on account of his very indulgent method of conducting

examinations. Professor McVickar, in the chair of Philosophy, was one of

the early admirers of Ruskin. The families of these gentlemen mingled a

good deal in the society of the time, and contributed no doubt to impart

to it a tone of polite culture. I should say that before the forties the

sons of the best families of New York city were usually sent to Columbia

College. My own brothers, three in number, were among its graduates. New

York parents in those days looked upon Harvard as a Unitarian

institution, and shunned its influence for their sons.

The venerable Lorenzo Da Ponte was for many years a resident of New

York, and a teacher of the Italian language and literature. When

Dominick Lynch introduced the first opera troupe to the New York public,

sometime in the twenties, the audience must surely have comprised some

of the old man's pupils, well versed in the language of the librettos.

In earlier life, he had furnished the text of several of Mozart's

operas, among them "Don Giovanni" and "Le Nozze di Figaro."

Dominick Lynch, whom I have just mentioned, was an enthusiastic lover of

music. His visits to my father's house were occasions of delight to me.

He was without a rival as an interpreter of ballads, and especially of

the songs of Thomas Moore. His voice, though not powerful, was clear and

musical, and his touch on the pianoforte was perfect. I remember

creeping under the instrument to hide my tears when I heard him sing the

ballad of "Lord Ullin's Daughter."

Charles Augustus Davis, the author of the "Letters of J. Downing, Major,

Downingville Militia, Second Brigade, to his old Friend Mr. Dwight, of

the New York Daily Advertiser," was a gentleman well known in the New

York society of my youth. The letters in question contained imaginary

reports of a tour which the writer professed to have made with General

Jackson, when the latter was a candidate for reelection to the

Presidency. They were very popular at the time, but have long passed

into oblivion. I remember that in one of them, Major Downing describes

an occasion on which it was important that the general should interlard

his address with a few Latin quotations. Not possessing any learning of

that kind, he concluded his speech with: "E pluribus unum, gentlemen,

sine qua non."

The great literary boast of the city at the time of which I speak was

undoubtedly Washington Irving. I was still a child in the nursery when I

heard of his return to America, after a residence of some years in

Spain. A public dinner was given in honor of this event. One who had

been present at it told of Mr. Irving's embarrassment when he was called

upon for a speech. He rose, waved his hand in the air, and could only

utter a few sentences, which were heard with difficulty.

Many years after this time I was present, with other ladies, at a public

dinner given in honor of Charles Dickens by prominent citizens of New

York. We ladies were not bidden to the feast, but were allowed to occupy

a small anteroom whose open door commanded a view of the tables. When

the speaking was about to begin, a message came, suggesting that we

should take possession of some vacant seats at the great table. This we

were glad to do. Washington Irving was president of the evening, and

upon him devolved the duty of inaugurating proceedings by an address of

welcome to the distinguished guest. People who sat near me whispered,

"He'll break down--he always does." Mr. Irving rose, and uttered a

sentence or two. His friends interrupted him by applause which was

intended to encourage him, but which entirely overthrew his

self-possession. He hesitated, stammered, and sat down, saying, "I

cannot go on." It was an embarrassing and painful moment, but Mr. John

Duer, an eminent lawyer, came to his friend's assistance, and with

suitable remarks proposed the health of Charles Dickens, to which Mr.

Dickens promptly responded. This he did in his happiest manner, covering

Mr. Irving's defeat by a glowing eulogy of his literary merits.

"Whose books do I take to bed with me, night after night? Washington

Irving's! as one who is present can testify." This one was evidently

Mrs. Dickens, who was seated beside me. Mr. Dickens proceeded to speak

of international copyright, saying that the prime object of his visit to

America was the promotion of this important measure. I met Washington

Irving several times at the house of John Jacob Astor. He was silent in

general company, and usually fell asleep at the dinner-table. This

occurrence was indeed so common with him that the guests present only

noticed it with a smile. After a nap of some ten minutes he would open

his eyes and take part in the conversation, apparently unconscious of

having been asleep.

In his youth, Mr. Irving had traveled quite extensively in Europe. While

in Rome, he had received marked attention from the banker Torlonia, who

repeatedly invited him to dinner parties, the opera, and so on. He was

at a loss to account for this until his last visit to the banker, when

Torlonia, taking him aside, said, "Pray tell me, is it not true that you

are a grandson of the great Washington?"

Mr. Irving had in early life given offense to the descendants of old

Dutch families in New York by the publication of "Knickerbocker's

History of New York," in which he had presented some of their forbears

in a humorous light. The solid fame which he acquired in later days

effaced the remembrance of this old-time grievance, and in the days in

which I had the pleasure of his acquaintance, he held an enviable

position in the esteem and affection of the community.

He always remained a bachelor, owing, it was said, to an attachment, the

object of which had been removed by death. I have even heard that the

lady in question was a beautiful Jewess, the same one whom Walter Scott

has depicted in his well-known Rebecca. This legend of the beautiful

Jewess was current in my youth. A later authority informs us that Mr.

Irving was really engaged to Matilda, daughter of Josiah Ogden Hoffman,

a noted lawyer of New York, and that the death of the lady prevented the

intended marriage from taking place. "He could never, to his dying day,

endure to hear her name mentioned," it is said, "and, nearly thirty

years after her death, the accidental discovery of a piece of her

embroidery saddened him so that he could not speak."

Reminiscences, 1819-1899 · 第 2 / 20 章