JOHN ALGOR.

Eldon Street, Sheffield.

_Notation by Coalwhippers_ (Vol. iv., p. 21.).--The notation used by

coalwhippers, &c., mentioned by I. J. C., is, after all, I expect, but a

part of a system which was probably the origin of the Roman notation.

The first four strokes or units were cut diagonally by the fifth, and

taking the first and last of these strokes we readily obtain V, or the

Roman five; but as the natural systems of arithmetic are decimal, from

the number of fingers, it is most probable that the _tens_ were thus

marked off, or by a stroke drawn across the last unit thus X, whence we

obtain the Roman ten: these tens were repeated up to a hundred, or the

second class of tens, which were probably connected by two parallel

lines top and bottom [C], which would be the sign of the second class of

tens, or hundreds; this became afterwards rounded into C: the third

class of tens, or thousands, was represented by four strokes M, and

these symbols served by abbreviation for some intermediate numbers; thus

X divided became V, or 5, the half of 10; then L, half of [C],

represented 50, half of 100; and M becoming rounded thus (M) was

frequently expressed in this manner CI*C; and this became abbreviated

into D, 500, half of CI*C; or 1000: and thus, by variously combining

these six symbols (though all derived from the one straight stroke),

numbers to a very high amount could be expressed.

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 94, August 16, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 75 / 101 题