POINTS--THEIR RELATIVE IMPORTANCE, AND WHERE TO LOOK FOR THEIR
DEVELOPMENT.
A gentleman, when designing to purchase a horse, should think about
the matter, and should determine, in his own mind, the kind of animal
he desires to obtain. The want of such definite knowledge is the great
deficiency with the majority of would-be buyers, and is the chief cause
of those annoyances which, ultimately, tempt too many well-disposed
persons into dishonest company.
Having settled the minutest particulars to his own satisfaction, the
gentleman should never seek to secure a cheap article. Knowing as
may be the general public, horse dealers are quite up to the mark
of popular cunning. Goodness in horse flesh is money’s worth at any
market; and every horse dealer in London is fully sensible to the merit
as well as to the value of all creatures in his yard. Therefore, the
gentleman will best court civility and honesty by being prepared to
give a fair price for that excellence which he is desirous of securing.
The above maxim must be attended to, because a feeling person, when
he buys a horse, will be sensible he is taking a new member into his
family. No right-minded man can ever treat life as it were an inanimate
article;--to be accepted at his will and to be discarded at his
pleasure. A lasting bond should, through ownership, be formed between
mute submission and honored authority; for man, having the right of
choice, tacitly undertakes to shelter and to protect, as a return for
willing service rendered. Such is the implied or natural agreement: its
obligations ought to enforce that gentleness which should guard the
inferior.
To fit the reader for exercising a right of selection in a dealer’s
yard, is the intention of the author. The gentleman who peruses this
page must, therefore, pardon an impertinence if, in the following
descriptions, he is treated as one entirely ignorant of horse flesh.
When all must be addressed, it is clearly impossible to make allowance
for degrees of learning. The most ignorant must be made to understand,
and the best informed must generously overlook those discursions
which, disregarding personal attainments, appeal to the condition of
the uninitiated. To be intelligible, it will be necessary the author
should point out the importance of certain structures, and explain
the uses which appertain to particular organs or parts of the animal
economy.
The skeleton is the framework of the trunk and of the limbs. The
vertebræ are the base, toward which all the other bones concentrate,
or from which all the other osseous parts originate. Therefore, to
start from the commencement, we see at one end of the back-bone the
skull is situated; while at the other extremity the tail is pendent.
The arrangement exactly accords with the system observed in every
well-regulated vessel. The sailor who is appointed to look out, stands
forward; while the individual who steers is always stationed at the
poop. The tail, in the quadruped, principally directs the course. Hence
we perceive the folly of those people who, to gratify a whim, excise or
mutilate the motor integrity of so important a part: thus sacrificing
positive safety to a false notion of improved appearance.
[Illustration: THE SPECIAL USE OF THE HEAD, MANE, AND TAIL, WHEN
EMPLOYED TOGETHER.]
The animal, gazing in the direction which it desires to proceed upon,
inclines the body toward that point; while the tail, being likewise
moved in an opposite course, sways the trunk into the proper track. The
flowing hair, operated upon by the wind, gently favors the inclination.
By understanding this, the reader will comprehend the reason why a
short tail is rarely compatible with perfect safety. The appendage,
which mankind regard as chiefly of service to switch away the flies,
therefore has a higher and far more important function assigned to it.
The want of alacrity in avoiding danger is justly esteemed a great
defect; but what right had man to complain of his dumb companion’s
tardiness, when, to gratify a caprice or to conform with the fashion,
he deprived his servant of the agent by which all sudden motions were
regulated? Happily, however, the barbarous custom which once prevailed
is now generally discarded; although docking is even at the present
moment occasionally practiced, under a notion of improving deficient
quarters, while thinning the tail and mane are commonly adopted.
Nevertheless, the reader of any experience can hardly have failed to
remark that, since the practice of mutilation has become less general,
those fearful horse accidents which during the old coaching days
were of almost hourly occurrence, have not so frequently shocked the
sensibilities of society.
Such a circumstance cannot be accounted for by the smaller number of
animals at present retained for private use. It is well ascertained
that railways, which it was originally supposed would prove detrimental
to the breed of horses, have had a decidedly opposite tendency, the
animals being about twice as numerous as they were during any previous
period. Thus, with more universal distribution, greater security has
been attained; and we perceive, in general operation, only the one
cause to which present security can be assigned. Masters are not much
more prudent now than they were formerly; while fast coaches were not
the sole causes of the catastrophes of our fathers’ days; neither did
such vehicles start at every hour nor travel upon every road.
The turning or guiding power having been pointed out, the attention
must next be directed to the region where all strength centers, and
from which all ability for motion proceeds.
[Illustration: THE BACK OF THE HORSE, AS SEEN FROM ABOVE.]
When the reader has been riding in any vehicle and looking down upon
the spine of the horse, he can hardly have failed to remark that the
widest portion of the body was the prominence of the hip-bones. The
posterior parts, or those behind the projections, are not continuous
of size; but they nevertheless are far more bulky and altogether more
fleshy than any of the forward surfaces of the body. Flesh is only
another term for muscle; consequently where flesh is most conspicuous,
strength most resides. The muscles of the hind limbs spring from a
large bone, variously named in common parlance as the haunch-bone
or the pelvic-bone. It is also spoken of by anatomists as the os
innominata. This large bone joins the spine at the hips, and thus lends
support to the posterior region. But the vertebræ, immediately before
the hips, are aided by no such accessory. The loins stand alone, or are
placed entirely without support. This part of the body merely consists
of certain bones, over which and under which run thick layers or solid
masses of muscular fiber.
[Illustration: THE BACK-BONE OF THE HORSE.]
A thorough comprehension of the osseous weakness apparent in the
skeleton of the loins must convince the reader of the absolute
necessity which exists for some compensating agency, so as to fit the
back for its burden. The loins therefore should be bulky or muscular.
They cannot be too large; but may easily be the reverse. Small loins or
weakly loins admit of no compensation. The author does not remember an
instance where such a formation was not associated with mean quarters;
whereas he does not recollect a case where size, in this region, was
not evidence of general strength and of remarkable vigor. The position
of the part is peculiar. It is intermediate and lies between the
haunches, which are the propelling powers, and the thorax, which region
is formed to endure, to support, or to uphold what the back carries.
All intermediate structures demand strength; because such a position
exposes the part to the full impulse of adjacent force, its office
being simply to transmit that impetus which it directly receives.
Accordingly, the development of the loins, both in man and in horse,
may be cited as the best proof of the vital power which resides within
the frame.
The loins, to evidence the transmitting office peculiar to this region,
receive and convey onward the propelling force of the quarters. So,
when the body is suddenly checked, the loins have to master the first
energy of the onward impetus, or have to endure the full violence of
the sudden arrestation of the forward motion in both the animal and
its burden. In the brief but dangerous feats of leaping, galloping,
etc., the position of the region and the duties involved by it are so
obvious, that the author cannot presume to dilate upon what appears to
be self-evident.
Muscular loins are imperative in racers and in hunters. They should
also characterize all saddle horses; for it is impossible the rider
should be safely carried unless the back be strong. The animal designed
for light harness purposes can, perhaps, best dispense with such an
essential, although even in that case the deficiency is very far
from a recommendation; for weak loins are usually associated with a
narrow chest, a lanky frame, and a total lack of every property which
characterizes endurance.
In fact, every purchaser should first glance at this part; for here
reside those proofs which the scientific mind and the practical
judgment unite in esteeming. No matter what quality may be desired: be
it strength or appearance, be it speed or endurance, breadth of loins
is always important. Lumbar development is essential in all cases. In
short, there is no property for the possession of which the quadruped
can be valued that is not, more or less, and generally much more than
in any degree less, dependent upon this portion of the frame for its
exhibition.
[Illustration: A HOLLOW-BACKED HORSE.]
The back-bone of the horse--lumbar bones and all--is often remarkable
for very opposite developments which pervade its entire length. These
are sinking down or curving inward, and rising up or arching outward.
When the line declines more than usual, the form is denominated a
“hollow back” or “a saddle back,” and is generally supposed to be
indicative of dorsal debility. Animals of such a formation, however,
commonly are possessed of high crests, of full loins, as well as lofty
haunches, and they generally exhibit very proud action.
The late William Percivall, Esq., in his valuable work upon the action
of the horse, alludes to a creature which displayed this peculiar
formation, and nevertheless was an excellent hunter. Many readers will
remember that the once fashionable Lord Petersham used to drive a
quadruped of this description about London. His lordship’s cabriolet
could never stop, but a crowd of admirers immediately gathered about
it. Animals thus shaped, notwithstanding the opinions of horsemen,
are always highly regarded by the populace, and always afford a very
elastic seat for the rider. Judging from inquiry, and guided by the
reports of experience, the author--although such a make does not
warrant an idea of any excessive strength--yet inclines to think
that the decision which condemns it as symptomatic of extraordinary
debility, needs further confirmation before it should be universally
accepted.
Animals with hollow backs are usually conspicuous, even among the
equine race, for many estimable qualities. They are generally very
docile, and uncommonly good tempered. Putting the undue sinking of the
spine out of the question, they display numerous excellent points; and,
even admitting all that may be said about weakness, they exhibit such
prominent good qualities as in many occupations may be justly esteemed
more than an equivalent for their bodily deficiency,--especially when
employed to carry a lady’s saddle.
The very reverse of all that has been recorded above usually
characterizes the “roach back.” The author has hitherto found
creatures thus made, distinguished for the absence of that power
with which prejudice is inclined to invest them. Such animals are to
be seen feeding upon the commons about Essex, being the pictures of
checked development and the representatives of heartless neglect.
The offsprings of aged dams or colts that have been forced to submit
to early labor, every feature testifies to the abuse which they have
undergone. Quadrupeds equally misshapen and equally neglected may
frequently be seen dragging agricultural carts through the streets of
London.
Such deformities are usually vicious and spiteful. They are capable of
little exertion, and offer a seat of torture to the individual who is
so unfortunate as to be mounted upon a roach back. Some years ago, the
author chanced to dissect the body of a quadruped of this description.
Death had not affected the upward protrusion of the spine, which
retained its peculiar curve. The loins were very poor, and several of
the lumbar bones were joined together by abnormal osseous deposit.
The quarters were mean, the belly large, the withers low, the neck
ewe-shaped, the head big, and the legs long. In short, such horses
are equally misshapen and mischievous. Any gentleman had better endure
fatigue than accept such a creature for the companion of his journey.
[Illustration: A ROACH-BACKED HORSE.]
My respected friend, Mr. Waller, informs me that he once had a
“roach-backed” or a “hog-backed” mare which was remarkable for
an ungainly aspect. But it had very large loins and an excellent
barrel. It could draw a loaded gig fifty miles in one day, and, at
the journey’s end, go direct to the manger. Here malformation was
compensated by the existence of other qualities; but the above example
was not benefited by the “hog back,” which must have interfered with
its natural powers. The same gentleman bears testimony to an excellent
hunter, of the above conformation, having likewise fallen under his
observance. The animal, to be sure, used to “buck jump” its fences;
or, in other words, it used to spring suddenly from the earth, without
notice or preparation for the movement. It never gave the rider
any warning of its intention by rising to its leap. Therefore the
loins must have been defective, although the animal was endowed with
extraordinary power, which alone could have enabled it to endure the
frequent repetition of so unnatural a proceeding. However, the person
who was seated, during a hard ride across country, on the top of a
“roach back,” and was indulged with numerous “buck jumps” during the
morning’s amusement, although he should invariably be the first in at
the death, does by no means present to the author’s mind an object
deserving of any man’s envy.
Neither a long nor a short backed horse is, necessarily, desirable. All
depends upon the strength of those muscles which support the spine;
though, all other points being equal, length generally provides a
springy seat for the saddle: whereas a short back commonly possesses
the greater endurance. A long back, having bulging loins, is, however,
infinitely to be preferred to a short back, with deficient lumbar
muscles. The mere extent of a part can be no absolute proof in either
direction; though, should a choice lie between two carcasses, supposing
each to be equally deficient or both to be equally favored, then
the short back should be preferred, because all increase of length
necessitates a greater strain upon the organs of support.
But the spine cannot be too long, supposing length to be accompanied
by a proportionate excess of muscle; for length and strength of course
increase speed. The practice, common among the vulgar, of placing the
open hand upon the upper part of the abdomen to ascertain the distance
of the last rib from the hip-bone, is a silly custom, and can prove
nothing but the ignorance of those by whom it is exhibited. A living
body should be judged as a whole. One part should be viewed in its
relation to another development. No opinion on such a subject ought to
be formed upon any solitary test or independent development.
When considering this portion of the subject, the author may be
permitted to state, it is a disgrace to the intelligence of the present
age that any cart should be built without springs. The weight and
the uses of the vehicle are the reasons supposed to necessitate the
custom. But reason perceives that the real question is, whether living
thews and muscles shall endure the burden, or whether this shall be
imposed upon inanimate metal? Reducing the matter to a calculation of
pounds, shillings, and pence,--which is the cheaper? Which is the more
delicate? Which is easier to repair, or the less costly to renew? Fact
pronounces iron to be the answer to the foregoing questions; and sense
also declares life has no right to be subjected to that unmitigated
labor which Providence has provided a means to alleviate.
The tail is a continuation from the vertebræ. Therefore there is reason
why a stout dock or a thick root to the tail should be regarded as a
sign of excellence; because the part affords some evidence concerning
the stoutness and the muscularity of the spine itself. Or, at all
events, such testimony is the nearest approach to positive proof
which circumstances permit reason to obtain. Nevertheless, it allows
of nothing stronger than an inference; but the position of the tail
is more decided. It should originate level with the prolonged line
of the back, and should look the thing it is, a continuation of the
spine; for, in this position, it necessitates a greater length in the
posterior muscles of the haunch, some of which extend from the last
bone of the vertebræ almost to the hock. In a body whose power is
dependent on contractility, of course length of substance favors the
ability to shorten or to contract. In proof of this, animals with the
tails “well set on” are commonly remarkable for speed and for activity.
The reader will perceive how much the aspect of the quarters is
governed by the position of the tail, when he inspects the illustration
which is here submitted to his examination.
[Illustration:
THOROUGH-BRED
ARAB
WELL BRED
RAT TAIL
ORDINARY TAIL
LOWLY BRED
CART TAIL
]
The Arab naturally bears the tail erect; and by the rapidity of its
motions, together with the power of the organ, an explanation is
afforded of the ease and the grace with which this breed of horses
can perform the most difficult evolutions. The tail of the English
thorough-bred, without emphasizing the Arab trait, nevertheless, by
its position and its graceful carriage, declares the origin whence
its lineage is derived. A rat tail is a deformity generally disguised
in large towns. There exist a wide class of experienced horsemen who
assert they never knew a rat tail to spring from a bad body. Why
baldness of a particular region should indicate general excellence,
cannot be explained; but the author is not prepared to quote a single
known exception to this all but universal prejudice, although it may be
opposed to reason.
The vast majority of quadrupeds, however, are not conspicuous either
for the carriage or the position of the tails. The dock, in the
greater number, is compressed between the haunches. The filthy custom
of nicking was intended to rectify this position. A portion of the
depressor muscle was wantonly destroyed, which of course left the
opposing agent with uncontrolled power. Such barbarity, assuredly,
made the tail _stick_ out. But it injured its utility by damaging
its activity. It, moreover, left the situation of the organ without
amendment or made it more conspicuous. It was a silly practice, and is
now, happily, all but discarded.
The reader, having had his attention directed to the subject, will
probably be surprised to notice how seldom horses have tails well set
on to their bodies. In short, the position of the tail, if employed
as a test for excellence, would cause the majority of quadrupeds to
be rejected. The tail, however, should always be observed, not as an
absolute proof of the properties, but as suggestive of the breed. The
cart horse exhibits a thick dock, which is not remarkable for activity.
It has one peculiarity; this is, the extent to which the coat grows
backward, or the manner in which the origin of the long hairs is
deficient near to the haunch.
The head is the opposite to the tail. In the last, the spinal marrow
is represented only by thread-like nerves. In the first, the center
of all sense resides. The brain, with the bones that inclose it and
the parts that surround it, constitutes no inconsiderable burden. Many
structures aid in its support; but the general idea that it is upheld
by the vertebræ, is no more than a popular error. The bones of the
neck rather prevent the muscular force dragging the head backward, or
limit the action of those agents, than actually support any portion of
the weight. The ease and the grace with which a head, well set on, is
carried, presents a beautiful object for contemplation; our admiration
should be excited by a perception that, great as the weight may be,
it is so exquisitely poised as to inflict no sense of oppression upon
the creature. The chin can, without effort, almost repose upon the
chest: the nostril, by the mere operation of the will, can be elevated
to the breeze. The motions are equally varied, rapid, and incessant.
Each inclination is directed by a purpose; and volition is exercised,
without experience of the vast machinery by which the changes are
accomplished, although the motions are as active as the power must be
great by which they are directed.
The course of the body is, as was before stated, greatly governed by
the position of the head. To the inexperienced, the freedom of this
part may appear of little consequence; thus, ladies are well known
to be the principal perpetuaters of the bearing-rein, although it
has for ages been recognized that constant tension will destroy that
sensibility of lip by which the course of the animal is now directed.
The bit, operating upon a natural mouth, can sway the body during the
topmost speed; for by the inclination of the head is the trunk to be
rapidly turned.
It is therefore imperative, for the ease and safety of the rider or
the driver, that the head should be well set on, and should be carried
without sensible restriction. Should the rein be held too tight and a
false step be made, or should the foot be placed upon a rolling stone,
the quadruped is almost certain to fall; for the rapid motion of the
head being impossible, it cannot be used to restore the disturbed
balance. The nimbleness which could avoid sudden danger is destroyed
by the fashionable want of feeling. It is a matter for surprise that
the presence of the bearing-rein is never alluded to when gentlemen
seek redress because their vehicles have been damaged. Most horsemen,
however, esteem the neck for its appearance, and few comprehend its
utility.
Any person can discern the difference which characterizes the necks
here represented. The galloway in front has a well-formed neck,
although many pretended judges would object that it is too bulky.
Bulk supposes the presence of muscle; therefore a neck, if properly
shaped, cannot be too thick. The majority of the cervical motor agents
extend either to the trunk or to the fore limbs. The size of the neck,
consequently, influences other regions, and confers positive advantage
of both strength and activity.
[Illustration: THE FORM OF NECK GENERALLY INDICATES THE DISPOSITION OF
A HORSE.]
A head well set on is carried in advance of the body only so far as may
be necessary to counteract the comparative lightness of the forward
structures.
On the other hand, thinness and smallness of neck is one of the
peculiar features of emaciation in the horse. It is always seen in the
old and in the half-starved quadruped. Hence it may be inferred not to
be a sign of vigor in any condition. The observation should be directed
to the balance, the ease, and the activity of the cervical region. As
respects its bulk, the author never remembers to have beheld an animal
with a neck too thick; though, he is sorry to confess, he has witnessed
many of man’s servitors with this part of the body most lamentably
attenuated.
The second horse, in the foregoing illustration, has that form of
neck which is commonly seen upon what are called “well-bred” and
“good horses.” It is not incompatible with safety of pace; but it is
deficient in beauty of outline or grace of carriage; and it cannot
be fully equal to all the uses of a well-formed neck. The chin may
be lowered; but it will be at the expense of an effort, and by the
unscrupulous employment of the bit or the rein. Such a resort must
inflict acute torture, especially as this particular kind of neck is
rarely accompanied by breadth of channel or width of space between the
branches of the lower jaw.
The inability to lower the head with ease, removes the eye from the
ground, and exposes an animal to trip or to stumble, should any sudden
inequality be present in the road. The second form is, therefore,
preferable to the succeeding neck, which, though possessed of a more
graceful crest, yet in the protrusion of the nose indicates that strain
upon the muscular system by which progression is accomplished. No
force, save that of mechanism, can possibly bring and hold down such
a head. This defect exposes the animal to much suffering, renders it
liable to fall, makes it very heavy in the hand, and speedily ruins the
mouth.
The last horse exhibits the worst form of the group,--or it presents
a long neck with the head pointing downward. Such an animal is never
safe in harness; but is totally unsuited for the saddle. Creatures thus
formed are commonly good tempered, but sluggish. This position of the
head should to all, save only the totally inexperienced, characterize a
deficiency of nervous energy; and likewise indicate the cost at which
pace is maintained, and declare the uncertainty of foot. The neck
should never be protruded, save during the exertion of the greatest
speed. An animal which habitually assumes this attitude, suggests that
an ordinary effort is felt to be a mighty tax upon its capabilities.
The following illustration exhibits a peculiarity of form which the
author believes is confined to the heavier breed of draught horses.
Such a neck is alone compatible with slowness of pace. It is, however,
falsely imagined to denote excessive strength. So far as thickness
is concerned, muscle must be present, or adipose tissue must abound;
but in length there is a deficiency which necessarily will limit the
amount of motor power. In justification of this opinion, may be quoted
a well-known fact, that the huge mountains of flesh which parade the
streets of London before the brewers’ drays, are not remarkable for a
power of draught, for a capability of endurance, or for any length of
existence.
[Illustration: A BULL NECK.]
[Illustration: THE EWE NECK.]
The ewe-necked horse is one in which every appearance of crest is
absent. Such a form may possess length; but it is generally wanting
both in depth and in substance. Animals of this formation are generally
active, but weakly: other parts are too often characterized by a
narrowness of build, which materially detracts from a capability for
endurance. The appearance is, moreover, mean; this is usually rendered
more conspicuous by a thinness and a shortness of mane. The shape of
the neck is not, however, to be considered only as governing other
organs, but is also to be regarded as a consequence of a prevailing
absence of development. So may the frequent accompaniment of a vicious
disposition be viewed as the result of that feebleness which converts
the easiest task into a mighty labor, and of that absence of beauty
which can neither kindle the pride nor awaken the fondness of the owner.
Certain supposed judges are greatly prejudiced in favor of a short
neck. The characteristic is in some minds associated with the
presence of bodily strength; but it cannot be remarkable for denoting
the existence of such a quality, because an absence of length must
abbreviate the amount of muscular fiber. Shortness of neck, besides
suggesting the presence of fat, and interfering with activity, unfits
the animal for certain situations. A bull neck, although its possessor
inhabited the most luxuriant pasture, would compel the creature to
subsist on short commons. _Nags_, however long may be the legs, or
short shall be their necks, generally manage to crop the grass,
although to do so may cause a constant strain upon the limbs, thus
counteracting one of those effects which the run is invariably supposed
to realize. Below is inserted an illustration showing the artifice
adopted by animals of this description.
[Illustration: THE MANNER IN WHICH A SHORT-NECKED HORSE MANAGES TO FEED
OFF THE GROUND.]
Having noticed those portions of the spinal column in which the
vertebræ are not associated with other bones, or do not enter into
the formation of compound parts, it may assist the judgment of the
reader if the relative importance of these regions is more particularly
descanted upon.
However desirable an arched and lofty crest may be, it is not, when
separately considered, any absolute proof of estimable properties.
Conjoined with other points, it renders excellence more excellent;
but, alone, no deduction should be drawn from it. In many parts of
Germany, the horses exhibit beautifully formed necks, bearing luxuriant
manes; but in other respects the quadrupeds are lanky, weak, and washy
creatures. The dock deserves attention, although it can warrant no
more than an inference. If it suggests that which other developments
equally support, it constitutes a valuable accessory toward a sound
opinion; but, by itself, it is of no importance. On the contrary, the
loins are absolute proof: their swelling testimony may be trusted,
should both neck and tail oppose their evidence. This portion of the
body never deceives. It is worthy of all reliance: what it declares
must be implicitly received. And, to many minds, it may appear the more
deserving of estimation, because full loins are commonly accompanied by
a stout dock.
[Illustration: A LOW-BRED HORSE.]
[Illustration: A WELL-BRED HORSE.]
Attached to the neck is the head, which, in the horse, always bespeaks
those changes produced by varieties of treatment and difference of
climate. The favorite and the companion of the semi-civilized Arab
is, by its association with its master, elevated in intelligence as
in beauty. The agricultural teamster of this country exhibits, in
its expression, the apathy with which it is regarded by its rustic
attendant. These are, probably, the extremes of the race. That the
reader may recognize the distinction between them, front views of both
heads are above shown.
In the Arab, the spectator can hardly fail to remark the distance by
which the eyes are divided. The brow is equally characterized by its
length as by its breadth, and constitutes no mean portion of the entire
head. In the lowly-bred face, the region of the brain is comparatively
small, its width presenting no obvious contrast to the other features.
The nostrils are not only compressed, but their margins are thick;
while the upper lip is adorned by a pair of abundant mustaches. Some
animals the author has beheld with embellishments of this order which
would not have disgraced the most hirsute of guardsmen.
The head of a well-bred horse has been frequently described as forming
a straight line in its forward margin, when it is contemplated from
the side. Such an assertion is generally true; but it must not be
received as absolutely correct. Horses have been imported from Arabia
with the craniums and the frontal sinuses considerably enlarged. Such
a peculiarity is not esteemed a defect by the natives of the East.
This fact is established by animals, thus characterized, having been
sent to this country as presents for personages of exalted rank.
Such developments may not strictly accord with English notions of
equine beauty; but the size of the case, in some measure, denotes the
magnitude of that which it contains. A large brain can be no detriment
to any animal which is partly prized for its intelligence.
[Illustration: BULGING FRONTAL SINUSES.]
[Illustration: A CART HORSE, WITH THE ROMAN NOSE.]
Another peculiarity exhibited by a few English thorough-breds, is the
Roman nose, or a prominence of the nasal bones. The trait is, however,
less common in the pure Arabian blood than is the previous development.
There is a breed of blood horses which exhibit a prominence of the
nasal bones, or, in other words, present what is designated as the
“Roman nose.” This particular shape, however, is with the coarser
breeds far from unusual; although in animals of slow work it cannot be
esteemed a beauty, it also should not be condemned as a huge defect.
The depression of the nasal point may allow less freedom to the
nostril; but in a creature whose kind of labor permits slow respiration
to be employed, this constitutes no absolute objection; while many
quadrupeds of this formation are conspicuous for their high courage and
their lively disposition.
The leading or distinguishing characteristic of the thorough-bred horse
is its superior intelligence. The stranger hardly has spoken to the
creature, before it begins to investigate his personal appearance. It
appears to appreciate the words addressed to it, and it responds to
any act of kindness which may be lavished upon it. Added to this, is
the evident neatness of its formation; the clearness of its various
features; the grace as well as the lightness of its construction,
united with speaking evidences of strength and of energy. The quadruped
appears fit to be the associate of man, and almost seems upon an
intellectual level with its master. As we contemplate the lustrous eye,
and feel the rush of inquisitive breath, it is impossible not to credit
the tales narrated of the creature’s affection and of its generosity.
We can then sympathize with the love of the Arab for his steed, and
sensibly feel that life in the desert would be rendered less desolate
by the presence of such a companion.
Yet this elegant quadruped is cast in no arbitrary mould. Its beauty
admits of the same variety which is conspicuous in other animated
bodies. The ears usually are small, and approximate toward their tips;
but they may also be large, and the points may be even wider apart than
the roots of the organs. Yet, in every shape, a thinness or a delicacy
of the outer walls, a nice arrangement of the internal protecting
hairs, together with a fineness in the investing coat, attest to the
purity of the parental stock.
A tribe of lop-eared thorough-breds are known to exist upon the English
course: this peculiarity, however, is not a distinguishing mark of
purity of blood, or a characteristic running throughout the race. The
fall of the ear exposes the interior of the organ to the eye of the
spectator: that circumstance, no doubt, suggested the removal of the
hairs which nature placed as guards before the opening. It is now a
common practice, with almost every groom, to _singe_ off these hairs
with the flame of a candle. Such an agent cannot be safely intrusted
to vulgar hands; probably to this foolish custom is owing the deafness
which by horses is so frequently exhibited. Any protruding hair
the scissors might excise; but as regards the interior of the ear,
grooms, had they even a slight acquaintance with physiology, would
know that the common Father was actuated by benevolence in all His
ordinizations, and therefore hairs have their appointed uses.
[Illustration: GOOD AND ACTIVE EARS.]
[Illustration: LARGE EARS.]
[Illustration: EARS WIDE APART.]
[Illustration: LOW-BRED EARS.]
With the ears no corporal excellence is connected, but with the health
of this organ the general safety is associated; for the acuteness of
the animal’s hearing affords no mean protection to the rider. The
absolute quietude of the ears indicates that sounds are powerless to
excite the organ. Excessive restlessness of these parts suggests that
by straining of one sense, the animal is endeavoring to recompense the
obscurity of another: that the vision is either lost or imperfect. A
lively carriage of the ears expresses a sprightly temper, and generally
denotes a kind disposition; whereas one member constantly directed
forward and the other backward, is a frequent sign of “vice,” or of
timidity in its watchfulness.
Near the ear is the seat of another special sense. Many people will
pretend to discover the disposition of a horse by the character of the
eyes. A restlessness of the globe, the display of any unusual quantity
of white, and a perpetual tension on the upper lid are imagined to
signify a “vicious” inclination; but, in reality, these traits express
only the watchfulness of fear. Such indications are evidences of that
suffering which has been experienced; and these traits are consonant
with an anxiety to escape the future assaults of brutality. Despair
may not be desirable as a companion; but it is not, therefore, to be
falsely stigmatized.
A prominent eye, expressive of repose, and not exhibiting an abundance
of white, has been pronounced to be declarative of honesty, though
certain parties have condemned it as indicative of slothfulness. A
quickness or activity, as contradistinguished from a restlessness in
the visual organ, is, however, to be desired. The small eye usual with
the coarser breed of animals should be avoided, because it is generally
accompanied by a heaviness of movement. The retracted or deep-set eye,
which displays the organ only partially, which is somewhat angular in
figure, and which is commonly spoken of as “a pig-eye,” denotes either
weakness of the part, or, to the majority of horsemen, will suggest a
previous attack of specific ophthalmia. The disease, however, is not,
in the author’s opinion, hereditary, but is generated by that closeness
of abode and that absence of ventilation to which all grooms strongly
incline. The present writer has most frequently beheld ophthalmia in
full and in perfect organs.
[Illustration: A WATCHFUL AND TIMID EYE.]
[Illustration: AN HONEST EYE.]
[Illustration: A LOW-BRED EYE.]
[Illustration: A DISEASED, OR PIG-EYE.]
Before quitting the consideration of the face, it is imperative that
the mouth and nostrils should be alluded to. In the well-bred horse,
these are both large, when compared with the same developments in
the animal of a coarser origin. The lips should be smooth, soft,
compressed, and suggestive of energy; but they should be without the
smallest aspect of ill temper. About them, numerous isolated and long
hairs may be located; but there should be no accumulation resembling a
mustache, or bearing even a distant likeness to a beard. Such growths
are commonly removed by the scissors of the groom; but the palm of the
hand, if placed against the muzzle, is certain to ascertain the truth
if those things ever have been in existence.
[Illustration: LARGE MOUTH AND NOSTRIL OF A WELL-BRED HORSE.]
[Illustration: SMALL MOUTH AND NOSTRIL OF A LOW-BRED HORSE.]
[Illustration: THE MOUTH AND NOSTRIL OF AN OLD, DEJECTED, WELL-BRED
HORSE.]
The lowly-bred animal, being chiefly employed for slow uses, has
not the need for those ample draughts of air which the faster speed
necessitates should be rapidly respired; nor is the mouth declarative
of the same determination which marks the lips of the purer blood.
The bit is scarcely ever present upon the carter’s harness, nor
are the mouths of his charges formed to retain this invention. The
characteristics of low birth cannot be effaced from the countenance
of a quadruped. Age or privation cannot confound the two breeds.
The thorough-bred in ruin is not to be mistaken for the teamster. No
want, no suffering, no length of years can obliterate the evidence of
nobility from the animal of pure descent.
When purchasing a horse, it is always well to examine the angles of
the lips. If any sign of induration is remarked, it signifies that
the animal has suffered from the abuse of the bit. If on any limited
space, however small, a patch of white skin is observed located upon a
dark ground, it denotes that “once upon a time” the true skin has been
removed from that place, while cicatrix now exists to apprise future
purchasers of the fact. If anything like a hardened lump should be felt
in this situation, it demonstrates that the quadruped has a hard mouth,
and is an obstinate puller, or that it has passed through the hands of
an unfeeling master.
In either case, the creature is not a desirable possession. Harshness
is not a kindly educator, nor does it beget docility of spirit in the
being which is subjected to its exactions. A hard mouth necessitates
one of the severest trials which can be inflicted on a horse
proprietor. It is painful, every time a change of direction is desired,
for the rider to tug at the reins; such a necessity soon destroys every
pleasure of the exercise. But a regular puller is always a dangerous
servant. Generally it turns out to be a “bolter,” and, before running
away, will seize the bit between its teeth, when the driver or the
rider alike is helpless. Our entreaty to the reader is, to turn his
back upon the offer, should he ever be solicited to buy a horse having
a damaged mouth.
At this point it is requisite the author should review the various
organs which, together, constitute the head. An activity equally
removed from stillness and from restlessness, denotes health to be
present in all the seats of special sense. These things are of more
importance than at first glance is apparent, because such united
testimony is the best security as regards the general system. It
equally testifies to the soundness of the brain and to the healthiness
of the body. When the animal suffers, the perceptions mostly are
inactive; when the brain is oppressed, the loss of sense first
announces the disorder.
These organs also deserve attention for their own sakes. Man is not
gifted with remarkable faculties either in seeing, in hearing, or in
smelling. He therefore desires such assistance as the companion of his
journey may afford. The value, consequently, of an animal is materially
deteriorated by the loss of any of its protective powers. These, when
all enjoyed in perfection, assist one another. When any organ is
excited, the rest are seldom dormant. Thus when the quadruped perceives
in the distance some obscure object, the ears are advanced and the
nostrils are inflated. The same general movement is remarked whenever
the hearing catches a distant sound, or whenever the scent detects a
novel odor. All are conjoined to produce one result; therefore the loss
of one cannot be without effect upon the uniformity of action.
As regards the formation of the countenance, an enlarged cranium is no
detriment; but the Roman nose sometimes interferes with the capacity of
the nostril. When it produces such a result, the peculiarity warrants
either a reduction of price or an absolute rejection of the offered
sale. In other respects, this make is regarded as of no importance;
but it certainly does not add to the appearance of the animal. Horses
are generally prized in proportion to their beauty: nor can the author
quarrel with such a foundation of judgment, as, in most animals,
harmony of figure justifies a belief that excellence of spirit also
exists.
The nostrils, however, are associated with the important function of
respiration; therefore these organs demand consideration, when regarded
apart from the other senses. They admit the air which is inhaled by
the expansion of the chest; consequently the dimension of the nostrils
allows an inference to be drawn as to the capacity of the lungs. This
opinion, however, should be only advanced after the alteration has
been noted between their size when at rest and their enlargement when
excited. Should no marked variation be produced by the opposite states,
then the value of the animal is only to be considered in connection
with slow work, as the speed must be regulated by the capability of
receiving a quantity of vital air proportioned to the power exerted.
After the capacity has been observed, the nature of the movements of
the nasal openings should be noticed. Subsequent to exertion, ease of
motion is not to be anticipated; but nothing approaching to spasmodic
action should be remarked. The nostrils ought to be regularly expanded:
not to fly open with a jerk, or to suddenly enlarge their form, as
under the influence of a gasp. A capability of dilatation, attended
with an evenness of motion, however fast the movement may be, are the
points which should be looked for in the nostrils of a horse,--because
the characteristic changes attending inhalation best expose any defect
in the respiratory apparatus; for, by such a test, the remotest
disposition to become a roarer, or to exhibit diseased wind, is easy of
detection.
Connected with the head, every horseman comprehends how much width
of channel, or of space between the branches of the lower jaw, is to
be desired. The reason why such a form is highly prized in an animal
of fleetness or of exertion, is because such an opening allows room
for the varied movements necessary for the offices of respiration, or
for the change of position imperative in the larynx, which is located
near to or within the hollow thus provided. Clear space is of course
imperative, wherever rapidity of movement has to be executed. There
is also another thing equally desirable. That addition is a full
development of the motor power which affects the larynx.
[Illustration: WIDE AND NARROW CHANNELS.]
This last point has never been sought for, although the writer has
seen it prominently exhibited in some animals. Wherever it has been
beheld, the author has confidently pronounced the high character of
the quadruped; he has not, in a single instance, been mistaken in his
conclusion. The muscles which are attached to the spur process of os
hyoides, or to the bone which regulates the movement of the larynx,
when well developed, are discernible in the living animal. They form
a kind of indication as though nature was half disposed to invest the
animal with a miniature dew-lap. They lead the muscles of the neck
perceptibly more forward than these agents run in the majority of
horses, and in some specimens they may, with a little manipulation, be
traced almost to the point of their insertion.
[Illustration: PROMINENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE HYOIDEAL MUSCLES.]
The muscles last alluded to all originate from the trunk, the more
forward cavity of which is known as the chest. There is much dispute
concerning the best form of the horse’s thorax; but such a question can
only be decided by the uses to which the animal is to be subservient.
For instance, below is inserted the illustration of a cart horse with
an almost circular chest. Such a form permits the presence of a huge
pair of lungs, and favors the increase of weight.
[Illustration: A CART HORSE.]
Sufficient oxygen is always present to convert the starch or the
sugar of the food into fat: during slow work, enough of atmosphere
to vitalize the blood must be inhaled, nor is excessive exertion
calculated to materially increase the amount. Where weight is more
desired than activity, where propulsion is to be chiefly accomplished
by bringing the heavy carcass to bear against the collar, such a make
is admirable. All creatures, in which speed is not required, should
possess circular chests; for by such a shape the quadrupeds are adapted
for the accumulation of fat, and for the performance of slow, of
continuous, or of laborious work.
There are, however, numerous animals which are required to possess
capability for a “burst;” for the acme of which phrase is embodied in
the rush or the closing struggle of the race-course. The creature of
speed, therefore, should exhibit rather the deep than the round thorax;
for fat is not desired on such an animal. The deep cavity, moreover,
admits of an expansibility which is imperative during the extremity of
muscular exertion. It is, however, sad to see well-bred animals in and
about the metropolis forced to pull carts, for which employment nature
has unfitted them. They possess no weight of body with which to move
the load. The burden must be propelled by the almost unaided power
of the muscles. The limbs, strained by the constant necessity of the
position, soon become crippled, while excessive labor causes the flesh
to waste; hence the miserable objects which are sometimes witnessed
toiling along the thoroughfares of the metropolis.
[Illustration: DIAGRAMS, ILLUSTRATING THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES OF THE
OPPOSITE FORMATIONS OF THORAX.
THE THORAX OF A CART HORSE.
THE THORAX OF A BLOOD HORSE.
_A A._ The capacities of the two chests in the quiet condition.
_B B, B B._ The limits of expansibility in each, when excited.
_c c, c c._ The outside of the coat in the quiet condition.
_d d, d d._ The surface of the body in the excited state.
]
To render the above facts comprehensible to the generality of readers,
let it be granted that the lungs of the cart and of the blood horse,
when expanded to the uttermost, would occupy the like space. When not
excited, or both being of the normal size, the respiratory apparatus
of the coarser breed is by far the larger of the two. In the passive
condition, the heavy quadruped inhales much more oxygen than is needed
to vivify the blood. The excess is, therefore, appropriated by the
food and nourishes the frame; hence dray horses have a tendency to
become fat. On the contrary, in the ordinary mood, the lungs of the
thorough-bred receive scarcely more air than is required to uphold
vitality; therefore this kind of quadruped exhibits, as a general rule,
no vast disposition toward excessive obesity.
During all quickened movements, however, the action of the lungs and
the speed of the circulation are much increased. The impetus given by
motion to the vital fluid causes the detention in the lungs to be of a
comparatively brief duration. The period of change is shortened; at the
same time a larger absorption of the vivifying agent becomes absolutely
imperative. The greater depth of chest in the racer admits of a greater
change of dimension; then air is inhaled equal to the rapidity of
movement. The pace, therefore, can be maintained with comparative ease.
But the round form of thorax allows of little enlargement: the demands
made by exertion cannot be complied with, and the heavy horse, when
hurried, is consequently soon exhausted.
It is not, therefore, the size or dimension of its thorax which fits
the steed to the purposes of fleetness. That quality depends on the
adaptability of the cavity to the exigencies of excitement; for such
purposes, the quadruped with a round chest is not to be preferred. At
present there is no instrument by which the motions of the horse’s ribs
can be accurately ascertained: thus the reader is forced to guess at
an alteration which cannot, under existing circumstances, be regarded
with that confidence which is inspired by the knowledge of a fact. A
quarter of an inch between the enlargement of the ribs in different
animals (supposing the other points equal) should more than determine
the winner of a race, since the change which takes place in the blood
regulates the other properties of vitality.
The belly and the chest are distinct cavities, although there is
communication between the organs of each. Thus the great artery
which originates at the heart, travels into the abdomen; while the
veins which traverse the larger division also penetrate the thorax.
Nevertheless, the contents and the uses of each space are generally
distinct. The principal agents of the more forward cavity are the heart
and the lungs, the thorax being chiefly sacred to the purposes of
respiration and of circulation. The liver, the stomach, the spleen, and
the intestines are inclosed within the abdomen, the function of this
region being engrossed by the offices of appropriation or by those of
nutrition.
Most judges admire the horse which presents a belly apparently well
filled by its contents. Certainly this appears to be the soundest of
the many prejudices which appertain to horse flesh. The shape of the
thorax must, in no unimportant degree, regulate that of the abdomen,
the two cavities being only parted by a fleshy screen denominated the
diaphragm. The herring-gutted quadruped is commonly as deficient in the
respiratory as it is wanting in the nutritive functions. Of course this
rule is not absolute; but a capacious thorax is required to counteract
any absence in the process of nutrition. The animal which rapidly
narrows toward the flank generally purges upon work, is commonly of
a washy constitution, and usually possesses a bad appetite. Such a
retainer will frequently spoil more fodder than it will consume; while
the little eaten shall afford less support than the like amount would
yield unto the majority of stabled animals.
[Illustration: HERRING-GUTTED HORSE.]
Horses of the above conformation are soon found wanting in other
respects. Narrowing toward the flank being accompanied with deficient
quarters, enables them to slip through their body-clothes, and renders
it difficult to retain a saddle in its proper situation. The groom may
in vain give extra attention to the fastenings; the dwindling form
empowers little motion to displace the tightest of girths. The saddle
always has an inclination to glide backward; and the rider, when such
an occurrence happens, must be placed in no enviable position.
[Illustration: COW-BELLIED HORSE.]
Objection even to a greater extent is engendered by the opposite
kind of abdomen, or by one which is known as “a cow-belly,” or “a
pot-belly.” Animals of this make always seem immatured, as though
they had been brought into the world before the proper period, or had
been forced to perform hard labor at too early an age: their legs are
long; their withers are low; their muscles are mean; their chests are
narrow, and their countenances are distorted by a querulous expression.
These unhappy creatures possess but little strength for work; if made
to travel fast, they are speedily blown. In the stable, they are
greedy; when out of it, they are vicious. Many of their faults are to
be attributed to disease, the digestive functions being invariably
disordered. They are worthless, or are “all too feeble” for harness;
while the enlarged belly, when favored by the motion of the limbs,
renders retention of a saddle an utter impossibility.
The legs of a horse,--these can hardly prove too short; for brevity of
limb is always an accompaniment to depth of chest and proportionably
powerful quarters. The long leg always attests to the light carcass;
hence the motor agency of the limbs is deficient, while the cavities
of respiration and of nutrition are necessarily diminished. A narrow
thorax almost enforces low withers and an upright shoulder. The bone of
the arm, or the humerus, is pushed into an undue slant by the forward
position of the blade-bone, or of the scapula. This compels the front
leg to stand too far under the body. Such an arrangement favors neither
beauty, speed, nor safety; in fact, it is one of the worst forms which
the components of the frame are capable of assuming.
The action of the shoulder-blade, during progression, is upward and
backward, or it is drawn toward the highest processes of the withers.
Low withers are, of course, opposed to extended motion in such a line.
The lessened action of the bone necessarily limits the movement of
the structures which depend from it, or the action of the humerus is
governed by that of the shoulder-blade. The trivial motion permitted
by low withers, therefore, limits the advance of the forearm, the
parts being, as it were, tied together. The natural carriage of such
a malformation is with the head and neck protruded, so as to favor
progression by strain upon the cervical muscles. At the same time the
body inclines forward, which throws the limbs backward, or out of their
proper situations; and this circumstance accounts for animals of this
particular make so frequently encountering “accidents.”
[Illustration: A STRAIGHT SHOULDER, SHOWING THE POSITION OF THE BONES.]
The gait characteristic of an upright shoulder is very peculiar. A bad
forehand is the most common defect witnessed in London thoroughfares.
In the metropolis of the world, it is indeed a rare sight to behold
a carriage drawn by a pair of really good animals. The quadrupeds in
general use for such purposes are mostly faulty about the shoulders.
The forehand is placed upon the trunk in too upright a position.
The job master is conscious of this defect. He always endeavors
to convince his patrons that such a make is advantageous, where a
creature is designed for harness. Possibly the tradesman might succeed
in persuading his customers into a false belief, were not prejudice
opposed to his suggestions. Ladies admire high action in the steeds
attached to their vehicles; this is the kind of step which most of the
horses just described are incapable of long exhibiting.
[Illustration:
DIAGRAM, SHOWING THE NATURAL ACTION APPERTAINING TO A STRAIGHT
SHOULDER, AND ALSO ILLUSTRATING THE CHANGE SOMETIMES OCCASIONED
BY THE UNSCRUPULOUS EMPLOYMENT OF THE BIT OR OF THE BEARING-REIN.
]
Art or cruelty, however, can partially amend the faulty motion of the
limbs. Force the head into an unnatural attitude by the unscrupulous
employment of the bit or of the bearing-rein; retain the neck erect,
without regard to the cramp induced, or heed of the strain cast upon
the muscles,--and the torture, although the life be shortened and the
safety of the owner endangered, nevertheless may occasion the feet to
be raised during progression. This fact is illustrated in the following
engraving. The natural mode of going is indicated by the letters A A;
the possible change of form is to be seen in the parts distinguished
as B B, although the action there depicted certainly displays a most
unusual degree of amendment, to induce which must shorten the existence.
Any such improvement is always procured at a vast personal risk; for
the head, being raised, partially throws the eyes out of use. It
also impedes the circulation, ruins the mouth, distorts the body,
and deranges the breathing. All these evils are inflicted to obtain
the kind of pace which is never natural, but which closely resembles
the sort of step that is characteristic of blindness in the horse.
Few of the animals, thus treated, live to descend very low in the
scale of equine existence. They mostly perish young; but the reader
may recognize them drawing the broughams of gentility, and too
often presenting one of the cramped, forced, and uneasy paces which
are depicted below; for into such kinds of action all upon service
ultimately subside.
[Illustration: VERY FAULTY ACTIONS.]
On the other hand, the animal with a deep chest and with high withers,
almost as a necessary adjunct, possesses a slanting shoulder; or, at
all events, this probability is favored by that particular formation.
Such an arrangement of parts must be accompanied by an upright
position of the humerus and the advanced location of the fore limb.
This conformation is bettered, materially, by an arched crest and a
head “well set on.” Unfortunately, these latter points are seldom
encountered, the proper disposition of the fore quarter being rarely
attended with the last-named grace.
Such horses, however, Stubbs, the animal painter, used to delineate.
Either the artist was particularly fortunate in his models, or beauty
has been sacrificed in the anxiety to breed other properties. Such
horses appear to have been common in England when the racer was
compelled to possess endurance, and if report be truth, the last
animals exhibited a greater speed than their descendants can display.
Hunters were formerly something better than the rejected of the course;
they could show a beauty equal to their strength. Creatures with
the forehand such as has been described, are not only more pleasant
to contemplate, but they are also capable of working with far less
exhaustion to the system.
With a front limb of this nature, the movements of the leg are
regulated by that of the shoulder. When the blade-bone is drawn
upward, the humerus leaves its almost erect position, and assumes a
forward inclination. This causes the arm to be advanced, and propels
the leg and foot. Thus the movement of a part governs the motion of
the whole: a grace or harmony of action is the result. The various
components of the member change their relative positions to one another
without effort, but with evident intention; all parts of the limb are
simultaneously advanced. The work is not cast upon one set of muscles
to the injury of another region. A well-made animal is one perfect
whole, and formerly was common throughout the land. People may sigh
that such quadrupeds are now lost to the nation: this regret, however,
does not accord with the folly that upholds the racing mania, which has
engulfed the once-prized native breed of English horses.
[Illustration: A SLANTING SHOULDER, SHOWING THE POSITION OF THE BONES.]
[Illustration: A SLANTING SHOULDER IN ACTION.]
The articulated skeletons which are exhibited in museums present but
poor resemblances of the living framework as it is arranged by the hand
of nature. In these artificial preparations, the fore limbs are always
straight, as are the supports of a kitchen table. But contemplate
the living example. The positive perpendicular is never observed.
The member abounds in gracefully swelling prominences and admirably
poised inclines. The chest may be wide; but the hoofs are placed close
together. Such a necessity renders an erect line an impossibility.
Try the same rule in another direction. Let a plummet be dropped from
the point of the shoulder of a living and well-made animal; it will
mark the limit to which the toe is extended when the healthy horse
is resting the limb. Such a fact proves the sheer upright form of the
member to be an unnatural distortion and a positive impossibility.
[Illustration: DIAGRAMS OF BONES WITHIN THE HORSE’S FORELEG.]
The importance of the shoulder and of the arm bone having been enlarged
upon, there remains to direct the reader’s attention toward that which
in general acceptance constitutes the forearm, as well as the knee, the
leg or the shin, the pastern and the foot. Where the limb quits the
trunk, it should be characterized by muscular developments, since at
this place resides the chief of that power by which the lower portions
of the member are directed. The flesh should bulge forth, and cannot
be too abundant; for a thin forearm is incompatible with goodness in a
horse.
The point of the elbow should be prominently emphasized, as this bone
affords a leverage whence many influential muscles originate, and which
some of the principal flexor agents directly operate upon. Toward the
knee the swelling should gradually subside, leaving upon the surface
of the joint a broad, clean, and firm appearance. At the back of the
knee there should stand forth, or rather should stick out, an osseous
point, the size of which is of every value. Its aspect may not please
the inexperienced fancies of the boy; but the uses of this development
are, in no little degree, governed by its magnitude. It affords a
point of insertion to the short flexors of the limb, as well as gives
shelter to the perforans and perforatus tendons in their passage toward
the pastern and the foot. Its magnitude, therefore, not only favors
muscular action, but also indicates the dimension of those important
structures which this bone protects.
[Illustration: INCLINATIONS OF THE PASTERNS.
A LONG AND SLANTING PASTERN.
A NATURAL PASTERN.
AN UPRIGHT PASTERN.
AN OVERSHOT PASTERN.]
The forearm should be long; the shin ought to be comparatively short.
The reach depends on the first, the length of which secures an extra
amount of motor activity. No muscles of importance are located upon the
shin: bone and tendon are the principal components of this region. The
part should not be absolutely straight, for such a form is incompatible
with all idea of living beauty; but at the same time it ought to
present no obvious inequalities or sudden enlargements. The bone should
be compact, giving to this portion of the limb, when viewed from the
front, almost the appearance of being deficient in bulk; but when
regarded from the side, the lower part of the leg cannot be too broad;
for breadth and strength are here synonymous.
The above rule applies with equal stringency to both legs,--to the hind
limb below the hock as well as the more forward member from the knee
downward. Each should be thin, when viewed from the front. Neither can
well be too deep, when seen from the side. Both should appear solid,
and each should feel almost of metallic hardness. The pastern joint
should not present a level surface, when viewed laterally; and as it
proceeds downward to join the foot, a graduated enlargement should
exist.
Much comment is usually indulged upon the horse’s pastern. The degree
in which this part may or may not slope, has been authoritatively
defined. The reader will best judge of these opinions, by considering
the purposes for which the pastern was created. Its intention is to
endow the tread with elasticity. The fetlock of a racer, when the
animal trots, may be seen to touch the earth every time the weight
rests upon the foot: nevertheless, the thorough-bred has, during the
contention, to endure the very excess of action. There must, therefore,
be something erroneous in the popular judgment which connects weakness
with the motion of this part, or no racer could ever reach the goal;
and if a quadruped does occasionally break down, the likelihood of
such a misfortune is not regulated or to be foretold by the pliability
of the pastern joint. However, that the reader may estimate the value
of the prejudice, various pasterns, designed according to the general
phraseology, have been submitted to his inspection.
[Illustration]
To enable the purchaser to arrive at a sound decision, it is necessary
to state that the inclination of this region is governed by the major
flexor tendons which are situated underneath or behind them. Their
slanting, therefore, is regulated by no peculiarity in the forms of
the bones themselves, but is controlled by and dependent upon the
condition of another structure. A short, upright pastern, if it can
bear any evidence at all, testifies to a stubborn and unyielding state
of the great flexor muscles, the weight being then thrown upon the
osseous supports. The play of the pastern denotes nothing more than the
healthy elasticity of the flesh upon the tendon proper to which the
osseous structures repose. The bones have no motor power belonging to
themselves. The upright and the overshot pastern suggest no change in
the more solid frame; but such alterations prove that excessive work
has strained the great flexors of the limb, and destroyed the inherent
property of elasticity with which every muscle is endowed by nature.
The burden being then supported by an osseous pillar instead of an
elastic band, of course jar or concussion ensues upon the abnormal
change.
Thus, alteration in the natural position of an oblique bone is of great
importance to a purchaser; and to judge properly of the pastern joint,
the substance swelling forth beneath the elbow must be regarded. Should
this portion of the body be mean or wanting in development, hard work
will probably induce it to become rigid, or labor may, ultimately,
cause the pastern joint to shoot forward and out of its proper
situation.
The flexor tendon likewise influences another part. The perforans is
inserted into the sole of the coffin-bone, or into the bone of the
foot. The direction in which the toes point is, therefore, regulated
by a substance so far distant that the attempt to connect the two
organs may, to the uninformed mind, seem somewhat ridiculous. Yet, the
statement being correct, the fact renders the position of the elbow of
more importance; for according to the situation of that bone the hoofs
will be directed. Thus, an ulna or an elbow which is drawn toward the
trunk will be attended with a toe inclined outward. When the bone turns
from the body, the forward portion of the hoof is directed inward. When
the framework is properly constructed, the hoofs point forward; for
horses’ hoofs are liable to those derangements which the human foot
exhibits, and generally with like results. Only, in man, striking one
leg against the other, during progression, is not attended with the
unfortunate consequences which such an occurrence often will induce
when this accident happens to the quadruped.
[Illustration: INCLINATIONS AND DEFECTS OF THE FEET, AS WELL AS SAMPLES
OF ODD HOOFS.
HOOFS POINTING FORWARD.
HOOFS POINTING OUTWARD.
HOOFS POINTING INWARD.]
By the pasterns recently exhibited it will have been observed that the
inclination of the bones influences the slant of the hoof. The two
structures are so connected one with the other that neither can be
independent, for the direction of the pastern, of course, determines
the nature of the weight imposed upon the foot. Thus, should the foot
receive more than a normal pressure, this circumstance, by throwing the
weight upon the bones, occasions the muscles to contract, and produces
upright or overshot fetlock-joint. Nevertheless, the hoof is operated
upon by other agency. Diseased action will also interfere with the
growth of its outward covering. The member may, under such injurious
excitement, when long continued, eventually become deformed.
The place of birth also influences the horn. Thus, a quadruped brought
up on the fens of Lincolnshire, generally displays a flat sole, a weak,
a low, and a slanting crust. The horse whose native land is dry or
sandy, mostly exhibits the hoof high in the quarter and thick in its
incasement. The creature with feet of the intermediate sort, which a
few years ago were esteemed the model form, is generally the inhabitant
of a moist, but not of a wet district. The horn, therefore, is indirect
evidence of the rearing; and the author has now to consider how far its
condition can, by itself, be regarded as a positive proof of any other
fact.
There is one defect not generally observed, but which should always
be studied in every examination of the feet. It may surprise the
reader, when the author declares it to be very far from an uncommon
circumstance to encounter a horse with odd hoofs, or with feet of
different sizes. Such a peculiarity is totally independent of the
defective inclination of the toes, and may be seen in horn of any
possible condition, or in feet of any variety of form.
An animal becomes lame in the foot. If the lameness is removed in
reasonable time, the affection disappears, and leaves no trace behind
it. But let it continue for months, and during such a period the
sufferer will throw little or no weight upon the diseased member. The
part will be rested. The purpose or function of the organ will be
counteracted by the will of the animal. The consequence of long disuse
will be a proportionate decrease in size. Upon recovery, the loss of
bulk is seldom restored; for if the foot is then employed, so also
is the sound one; and the action being equal, of course it does not
particularly affect one extremity, but operates on both alike.
The difference in the feet may not be so startling as to enforce
attention to the deformity. It is seldom of this nature. Most
probably it will require some discrimination to detect it. In the
last engraving, the author endeavored to depict the defect as it was
generally exhibited. None of the hoofs there delineated positively
match, though very probably the reader had not remarked their
differences. However, the slightest disagreement is an accepted proof
that disease has been present,--at what time, whether recently or long
ago, of what nature, whether structural or functional, the examiner
cannot tell: he, however, assumes lameness has existed, has endured for
some period, and he fears that the organ which has been afflicted may
retain a liability to repeated visitations of a similar misfortune.
The so-called model foot is very liable to change, and not less likely
to exhibit disease. It is very pretty to look at; but it does not, as
a rule, undergo much work without alteration. This opinion, however,
must be regarded only as announcing a general law; for though the
intelligent Mr. Bracy Clark puts forth engravings illustrative of the
effects which work produces upon the model foot, nevertheless the
writer of the present volume has seen hoofs of this description which
have, without apparent injury, endured constant shoeing, as well as
perpetual battering upon the dreaded London pavement.
The slanting crust, weak heels, and low soles are, however, not to be
commended. These are among the worst points which the equine form can
present, and they are too commonly the forerunners of sad internal
disease, as ossified cartilages, sandcrack, pumice foot, etc.
After long reflection, the author must express a preference for the
high or the stubborn hoof. When doing this, he is consciously opposing
his unsupported opinion against the firmly and repeatedly expressed
judgment of his professional brethren. He therefore can ask no man
to agree with his decision; but he humbly requests the reader to
peruse the grounds of his conviction, before hastily condemning its
declaration.
The horse is a native of a dry and an arid soil. Such a region induces
that which the inhabitants of this country stigmatize as an excess
of horn or an abnormally high sole. This kind of hoof therefore
would appear to be natural to the animal: at all events, such a foot
must have been general before the invention of iron shoes. Moreover,
when the immense weight of the creature’s carcass is considered, and
the manner in which bearing is increased by speed is also properly
regarded, a necessity for the stoutest hoof must be fully apparent.
In addition to the above inferences, the author may advance his own
observation, carefully made through a number of years: that all animals
exhibiting strong crusts are not, necessarily, cripples; but that
the creature with such a development of horn is in consequence less,
infinitely less, liable to pedal derangements. The contrary conclusion
has been upheld, because most men thought the excess of horn must check
expansion, and also severely pinch the internal structures. With regard
to the last deduction, all outward developments are produced by and
are governed by the inward organs which these shelter. The secreting
member may be soft, and the secreted substance may be hard; still, by
a wise provision of nature, the tender structure rules the insensitive
material which it produces. Therefore the horn cannot press upon or
pinch the internal portions of the foot, any more than the skull can
compress the healthy brain which it protects.
Then as to the supposed want of expansibility. The hoof may appear
stubborn when between the human fingers; but while supporting the
body of a horse, it is exposed to the operation of a force altogether
greater than any which man is able to exert. The question therefore is
not whether the hoof is very yielding, but whether it is so obdurate
as to resist the huge weight of the animal when aiding the mechanical
force of speed and the vital action of muscular power.
The author, however, while making the above declaration, supposes form
to be united with stoutness. Where the heels have become “wired in,”
and the crust has assumed the upright figure, the internal structures
must be in an altered condition, and the points of bearing for the
different portions of the limb must be entirely changed. The quarters
in the last kind of foot are, frequently, remarkably stubborn. They are
rather inclined to crack than to expand. Such parts will not, by their
innate elasticity, fly inward on the leg being raised from the ground,
and thus regulate the amount of blood which shall be poured into the
hoof; neither will they expand when the weight is cast upon the foot,
and thus allow free egress to the current which is violently expelled
in consequence of the superimposed burden driving the fluid upward.
The upright hoof and narrow heels are, generally, all but unyielding.
They have lost their natural function, and the harmony of the whole is
destroyed. In consequence, the blood, instead of being expelled from
the hoof, cannot escape from the pressure of the bony structures. The
vessels within which the fluid circulates are not formed to sustain
uninjured so vast a burden. They rupture under the weight; hence this
peculiar form of foot is commonly accompanied with corns. Therefore,
because corns are a disease, and because disease, being once generated,
is not in its course or duration to be prognosticated with certainty,
an upright hoof and wired in quarters are decided unsoundness: although
stoutness, simply considered, is rather a recommendation than a defect.
The author may not dwell at greater length on this portion of his
subject; but those who desire further information may with advantage
consult Miles’s works upon the horse’s foot, which are the best, the
cheapest, and the most lucid books upon this topic in the English
language. They are written in a style which the most unlettered
may comprehend; but when recommending them, the author, in his own
justification, may state that the views therein expressed frequently
differ from those opinions which are contained in the present volume.
Looking back upon such portions of the frame as have formed the subject
of the late remarks, there are certain points which are invariably
present in every well-made animal. A very broad, full chest is
advantageous for slow work; but for slow work only. Where speed or
activity is desired, depth of thorax is indispensable; yet the cavity
should not be narrow or the sides flat; while the exterior of the
ribs should apparently encircle sufficient space. The general contour
should, moreover, excite no idea of fixedness: the part should convey a
notion of its capability for easy and for rapid alteration of magnitude.
The abdomen should neither be large nor small. The exhibition of
either failing announces a radical defect. The belly ought rather to
gracefully continue the line of the chest, than by its protuberance, or
the reverse, to enforce its existence specially upon the notice of the
spectator. All may be considered right when the form elicits no remark;
but when it challenges observation, the fact does not indicate that
everything is as the purchaser could desire.
The position and the muscularity of the shoulder are the main points in
the forehand. With respect to the limbs, these should leave the body
as though they were parts of its substance. They can hardly be too
large where they emerge from the trunk; and the forearm can scarcely
be too long. The knee-joint should be broad and flat; while the bone
which projects forth posteriorly should be well pronounced and evenly
situated. The shin should be hard to the touch, and broad, when viewed
laterally. The leg should seem straight and strong; the feet standing
close together, and the toes pointing in a forward direction, rather
than inclining to the outward or to the inward direction.
Such is a general view of organs, all of which are of equal importance.
Breathing and digestion are such vital functions, it would be
supererogation did the author pretend to point out _their_ importance.
It may be otherwise with the fore limbs. Their use is not popularly
comprehended; those members are exposed to numerous accidents and
liable to many diseases. This predisposition is generally explained,
by saying they are nearer to the heart than the hind legs are, and the
straighter form is more favorable to a descent of the arterial current
than is the angularity of the posterior extremities; therefore this
portion of the frame is more open to acute affections.
The facts stated are certainly correct. So is the less freedom allowed
to the forelegs, by confinement in and fastening the head to a manger
in a stall. Such, however, is not the whole truth. There are other
causes in operation. The province of the fore limb is to uphold the
trunk. Thus, at all times, the member has to support no inconsiderable
burden; but when that load is increased by the weight of a rider or
is augmented by the drag of the collar, the tug of the shafts, and
the generally pendent position of the head, the reader may conjecture
the force with which the limb must be driven to the earth, especially
during any rapid increase of motion.
The continued battering to which the leg is subjected naturally exposes
it to much suffering, which the comparative fixedness in the stable
greatly aggravates. As the uses are severe, so are its afflictions
painful; and it hazards nothing to assert that very much of the sorrow
which visits the animal is dependent upon the diseases or the accidents
which are inseparable from these forward supports of the body and of
the load.
When, however, the person called upon to exercise a judgment in the
purchase of a nag is so new to the subject as to be incapable of
forming an opinion, there is one primary test which seldom deceives;
and upon the evidence thus evolved the merest tyro is fully qualified
to pronounce. Let such a man mount the animal, and, when seated in
the saddle, he can surely decide whether he appears to be close upon
the neck or placed far behind upon the back. A well-made animal, by
the inclination of the shoulder and by the amplitude of the withers,
forbids the forward location of its rider; whereas a worthless
quadruped, by the lowness of the first dorsal spines and the upright
position of the blade-bones, allows the rider almost to rest upon its
neck--thereby, because of the greater weight to be supported by the
front limbs, increasing the natural liability of the forward members to
exhibit disease.
The reason why such a formation should be specially noticed is, upon
reflection, made apparent. The hind legs, by their greater motor
power, always have a disposition to throw the weight upon the forward
member. When this tendency is augmented by the burden on the back, the
consequence must be a destruction of any approach to an equilibrium.
The horse’s body is, by nature, given four props--one at each corner of
the trunk. But when a human load is lodged almost over the fore limb;
when the front leg is placed far behind the chest; and when the head
swings in advance,--all approach to a proportionate amount of burden
is destroyed. The forward extremities then take a position almost in
the middle of the substance, a proportionate incumbrance being removed
from the posterior extremities. The hind members have less to do, and
excessive duty is imposed upon the weaker organs, the motor machine
being deprived of safety during progression.
While on the back, the rider should ascertain the shoulders are
of equal bulk, or have not suffered injury, and that the trunk is
sufficiently developed to afford a secure grip for the thighs of
the master. Many animals are so narrow as to necessitate sensible
muscular exertion on the part of an equestrian, and thus materially to
detract from the pleasure of horse exercise. This matter is the more
important, because stoutness of the body allows a fair inference to be
drawn as to the substance of the haunches. It is true, no absolute law
may therefrom be deduced; but as expectation is warranted, the fact
should always be remarked.
[Illustration: A RIDER HAVING PLENTY BEFORE HIM WHEN IN THE SADDLE.]
[Illustration: A RIDER CLOSE ON THE NECK WHEN IN THE SADDLE.]
The haunch is that portion of the frame upon which a capability for
work is chiefly dependent. This region, therefore, should appear to be
the embodiment of strength. It should not seem soft, or invite those
pats which inexperienced horsemen are fond of administering to this
portion of the body, but the aspect ought rather to suggest firmness
and power; for here resides the force which must propel the load or
direct the bound. Always choose an animal with good haunches, and
invariably regard the position of the tail; as the situation of the
dock, when on a line with the back-bone, denotes the greatest possible
length, and therefore the largest amount of muscular activity to be
present.
Never purchase a horse which is recommended as fully equal to carry
your weight; for the dealer who asserts this is, by his interest in the
sale, incapacitated from forming a just opinion. But ostensibly appear
to seek a horse for a friend--never for yourself--and state the nominal
owner to ride at least four if not six stone heavier than the would-be
purchaser. There is a saying, that an animal will run away with too
light a load; but that assertion is mere nonsense. Most vicious
quadrupeds are weakly creatures. The powerful frame is generally united
to an even temper. Strength does not endanger the female equestrian,
although ladies generally are mounted upon the best-made, the
strongest, and the most valuable steeds. Indeed, this argument is never
urged, save when a gentleman hesitates to accept a weakly quadruped, or
desires to obtain the one which the dealer is not very anxious should
be purchased.
In illustration of this subject an engraving is inserted, which
represents better-made quarters than are commonly beheld on a native
or coarsely-bred animal. But the reader can hardly fail to remark that
though the developments are not deficient in width, yet the general
aspect rather denotes softness than expresses strength or suggests
determination. The tail is well set on for this kind of quadruped;
still, the point of the rump-bone is not even indicated. The spectator
must guess at its precise location, as he cannot, by the unaided
vision, detect its exact situation. Bulk is not absent, yet that which
should be its attendant is not prominent. The bones of the leg seem
long, but the hocks are not remarkable for size or conspicuous for
form. The limbs are not moved with that independence of action which
gives to the step of the horse its air of resolution, but they are
advanced as though one was timid of proceeding too far without the
other.
[Illustration: A COARSE-BRED HAUNCH.]
Yet, the inquirer may journey long and travel far before he will meet
the equal of the quarters here depicted. The generality of these parts,
on the animals of the coarser breed, are much narrower; the tail is
seldom encountered springing from a position so near to the level of
the spine; while, short as the extent of the posterior muscles may
appear in the previous illustration, these are frequently to be seen of
more circumscribed dimensions.
[Illustration: A THOROUGH-BRED HAUNCH.]
In contrast to the foregoing, the accompanying engraving depicts the
quarters of a blood horse. In this illustration, symmetry and beauty
are equally preserved; but, with these qualities, also are blended
other attributes, which ennoble and elevate the object. Strength,
power, and determination are impressed upon the image. Every muscle
goes direct to the part on which it operates. The posterior line,
on being traced from the dock to the leg, does not seem to hesitate
between the bone of the member and the stifle-joint. The leg itself is
thicker, but its greater substance depends upon the presence of muscle.
The hock is cleaner, and uses of the part are better characterized.
The calcis, as the backward projection is technically termed, stands
forth prominently and affords the greater leverage for the motor agents
to act upon.
When the quarters of the two breeds are contrasted, the difference is
found to be extreme; the pervading attributes of each characterizes
the innate qualities of the animal to which the part belonged. The
distinctions which divide the two are by these members well indicated.
There was, some time back, a loud discussion as to what kind of
horse was best fitted for ordinary purposes. The old staging days
should have settled such a question; for then fast coaches found the
employment of the nobler quadrupeds to their interest. Where slow and
heavy propulsion is desired, the coarser animal is infinitely to be
preferred. For all the gentler purposes of society, the thorough-bred
is, in the author’s opinion, to be recommended. Only, these fine
creatures should be properly reared; they ought not, as now, to be
produced with all the haste of greed, and cast upon the general public
when found unsuited to the purposes for which they were generated.
It is offensive, if not painful, to hear persons speak of certain
horses as though particular quadrupeds were created only for special
uses. A good horse is fit for nearly every purpose; but such an animal
is generally employed for the saddle. A thorough-bred, with lofty and
well-developed quarters, is too valuable not to be appropriated by the
race-course. A blood, with so much bulk and stoutness as to indicate
the qualities of endurance rather than of speed, is always destined to
become a hunter. Horses of the purer breed are supposed not well suited
for gentlemen’s hacks. Good animals of this description are only too
valuable for common purposes; but no creature is, by its intelligence,
its activity, its gracefulness or its beauty, so admirably qualified
for the companionship of man as the noblest type of the equine race.
The manner in which the racer trots is asserted to express the action
which is natural to all of the thorough-breed. Before the reader agrees
to that assertion, he should remember the trot is not a natural pace,
nor one which the racer is broken to exhibit. Seen upon the course,
the foot evidently moves too near the earth to clear the ruts of
most English highways. Yet, as there shown, the motion is not to be
despised. During it, at each step the limbs are extended; the reach is
admirable, and affords a far better foundation for excellence in a hack
than the up-and-down pounding motion which is so highly esteemed by the
ignorant.
The greatest possible speed, with the least possible amount of
exertion, is secured by the thorough-bred trot. The ground is
covered, while the pace is easy and pleasant to the rider. It is very
opposite to that which medical gentlemen occasionally recommend as a
“hard-trotting horse.” A child might sit upon the back of a well-bred
steed. The author recollects to have only seen one animal of this
description employed as the riding companion of a gentleman. The master
(a northern nobleman) was evidently proud of his possession; for the
hack abounded in energy and with fire. The life never appeared fresher
in a colt; but, on inspecting the teeth, the writer was pleasantly
surprised to behold indications which denoted that at least twelve
years had been passed. The following illustration will suggest to the
inexperienced reader the more striking peculiarities which characterize
the well-bred action.
[Illustration: A HACK.]
Any quadruped is supposed suited for the collar when it displays points
which unfit it for the saddle. A prime saddle horse, however, always
makes the best harness animal; only, it is considered too valuable for
such a purpose. There is but one law which is absolute with draught
horses. In them, the forelegs are pardoned a few faults; but the
hind quarters should always be powerful. That is desirable in all
quadrupeds; for draught of every kind it is essential; it should never
be overlooked, or the want of such a property ever be pardoned.
There is another point of importance. Any gentleman purchasing a
draught horse--no matter whether for cart, for carriage, or for
phaeton--be it for any kind of vehicle, he should be certain, before
the transfer is concluded, that the new possession stands high enough.
Nothing looks worse than small horses before a tall carriage. The
living power may be in excess--it can hardly appear too mighty--but an
inch below the requisite size gives to the most elegant and the newest
of “turn outs” a shabby and a mean appearance. The draught may be
light; the horses may not be overweighted; still, no fact or knowledge
can reconcile the eye to the general effect, where animals are small
for the machine to which they are harnessed.
Of recent years there has been displayed a desire to infuse the Eastern
blood into the heavier breed which is native to this country. The
desire was commendable; but its gratification has led only to evil.
It has enabled the dregs of the race-course to be palmed off upon the
public. A thin and lanky offshoot of thorough-bred stock can be of no
value. These things should not be bought by gentlemen for any kind of
service. The time has come, when it is simple prudence that the public
should refuse longer to absorb the cast-offs of the stud farm. No
doubt, before the breeding of blood stock became a general practice,
the infusion of Eastern fire and activity was a national boon; for
a reference to engravings of a few years back exhibits the animal
suited only for a plow used as ladies’ palfreys. The following copy
from a figure, presented in the famous folio work by a former Duke of
Newcastle, will give the reader some notion of the kind of horse once
chosen to carry the fairest portion of creation in the British isles.
[Illustration: LADY, HAWKING.]
From the above illustration, which may be well supposed to embody the
height of fashion and the cream of style shortly after the accession
of Charles the Second, the reader can imagine the practical knowledge
possessed by those writers who speak of James the First as having
greatly improved the _native_ breed of horses, and quote the benefits
conferred upon the national race by the more temperate but equally
determined enthusiasm of Cromwell, operating in the same direction.
At this place, the reader must have patience while the method of
judging the limbs is pointed out. When the dealer exhibits an animal,
the customer’s eye always should endeavor to ascertain the bulk or
substance of the creature which he is expected to purchase. To do
this, let the eye be directed toward the chest, to ascertain if the
forelegs are separated by any breadth of thorax, or whether they spring
from the body almost from the same point. This decided, a glance may
be given to the line of the forelegs; these parts also can be viewed
as the gentleman passes backward. Having reached the last situation,
he observes if the thighs are large and fleshy, keeping the legs well
asunder; also, whether the hocks are rightly placed, are huge, and are
cleanly shaped.
Such remarks are important, since the disposition to cut is generally
decided by the width of the horse’s trunk. Any deficiency in this
respect indicates weakness, as well as declares a general unfitness for
severe labor. This circumstance being observed, it is usual for the
horse to be run up and down the ride. While the limbs are in motion,
the spectator should notice the peculiarities of their carriage. A
flexion of the front shin to the outer side warrants a belief in the
existence of a splint. When the hind limb is not properly flexed, but
the toe is allowed to graze the ground, it is a positive proof that the
hock is disabled by the presence of a spavin.
A worse evil, however, is, when the forelegs, during progression,
crossing each other, the trot becomes a sort of “hand-over-hand” pace.
This kind of action is accompanied by “speedy cut,” or by a wound
made upon one leg, immediately below the knee, with the shoe on the
opposite foot. That defect justifies an instant rejection; for such a
liability is incompatible with safety, as the blow too often brings the
animal and its rider to the earth. The legs being close is the cause of
“brushing” or of “cutting,”--a most troublesome defect, which inflicts
a wound considerably nearer to the ground than speedy cut.
Before purchase, the hair on the inner side of the legs should be
carefully examined. If a cicatrix or a bare spot is discovered near to
the seat of cutting; if any paint or coloring matter can be detected
upon the part; or if the hair does not lie perfectly smooth upon the
place of injury,--have nothing to do with the animal. It is quite
true that most fresh and nearly all young horses will cut--others
strike only toward the end of a long journey; but it is also true that
particular horses, however fresh or however tired they may be, never
strike or cut. The quadruped which a gentleman desires, is one that
does not contain evidences of a liability to accident or to disease. He
wishes for a sound animal; and one disposed to strike certainly cannot,
in the author’s opinion, be so esteemed. Every man wants a horse for
service; but the creature which may at any moment receive a wound
that shall incapacitate, assuredly cannot be esteemed a serviceable
possession, in any meaning of the words.
[Illustration: AN EXAGGERATED VIEW OF A WEAK ANIMAL, WITH DANGEROUS
ACTION.]
While examining the legs, the gentleman should also notice the shoes
upon the different feet. If these are rusty, the fact demonstrates that
the horse has been wearing wet swabs, and has been long stationary
in the stable. The circumstance is suspicious. In horse dealing a
justifiable suspicion is always acted upon as an established fact. If
the shoes are of rude make and much worn, it looks badly; and though it
is no recommendation, it justifies no inference. But if the shoes be
thicker at one part than at another; if the horse, being a nag, should
wear very high calkins; if the toe be shortened, or one side of the
metal is obviously narrowed,--it denotes precautions against clicking
and against overreaching: the first being a most audible annoyance,
which may lead to the forcible tearing away a fore shoe; and the last
causing a fearful, a terrible, and an incapacitating wound upon the
heel of the foreleg. Also, should the toe of the hind shoe be ground
down, while the heel exhibits no obvious wear, the fact demonstrates
the existence of a spavin. Either clicking, overreaching, or spavin is
legitimate cause for rejection.
The reader, from a perusal of the foregoing remarks, will comprehend a
few of the difficulties which beset the purchaser of a horse; and these
may warn him, in some measure, of the dangers that surround a person so
engaged. The author is a veterinary surgeon, of some experience; but
he would be very sorry to buy a steed for himself upon his unsupported
opinion. He would always have the animal examined by a professional
man ere the purchase was concluded. How greatly, therefore, must the
general public stand in need of such protection! Especially when
the known hazard of the transaction and the confusion necessarily
accompanying a direct personal interest in the business help to
confound the intellect and to overpower the judgment!
All persons complain of the roguery that is mixed up with horse
dealing. The complaint is just; but it is not just that the public
should vent it. It is the general abuse and the inhuman treatment to
which animal life is subjected that renders such practices necessary.
The cruelty and the roguery are associated as closely as cause and
effect. Let the provocative be discarded, and its result, of course,
must cease. But no man should blame the conduct which his own deeds
have willfully generated. To hurt and to injure a patient and an
obedient animal is a positive sin,--a violation of the trust confided
by the Creator to the creature. To defraud, in a money transaction, is
simply a crime,--an offense committed upon the laws by man established
over man. Then, what right has he who violates one of the ordinizations
of nature, to point at and to sigh over the person who merely breaks a
human institution?
Christianity, if its benefits were exemplified in man’s actions toward
the creatures living under his dominion, would immediately operate
upon society. The horse, under better treatment, would of course
not be liable to those injuries and accidents which roguery in the
dealer merely endeavors to conceal. There would be no occasion for
cheating when the creature exhibited no scar or defect which the seller
was interested to hide or to deny. Thus one stain upon the present
civilization would be abolished; for, notwithstanding the numerous
assertions to the contrary, the author has yet to see the man who
practiced dishonesty from a sheer love of iniquity.
The well-to-do may lament the immorality of the class below them;
but if gentility would look less leniently upon itself, probably the
exhibition of crime might be viewed as no more than the apex of a
pyramid whose base is deeply planted in the frailties which are common
to general society.