The close of the momentous struggle between China and Japan, while

relieving the diplomatic agents of this Government from the delicate

duty they undertook at the request of both countries of rendering such

service to the subjects of either belligerent within the territorial

limits of the other as our neutral position permitted, developed a

domestic condition in the Chinese Empire which has caused much anxiety

and called for prompt and careful attention. Either as a result of a

weak control by the central Government over the provincial

administrations, following a diminution of traditional governmental

authority under the stress of an overwhelming national disaster, or as

a manifestation upon good opportunity of the aversion of the Chinese

population to all foreign ways and undertakings, there have occurred in

widely separated provinces of China serious outbreaks of the old

fanatical spirit against foreigners, which, unchecked by the local

authorities, if not actually connived at by them, have culminated in

mob attacks on foreign missionary stations, causing much destruction of

property and attended with personal injuries as well as loss of life.

Although but one American citizen was reported to have been actually

wounded, and although the destruction of property may have fallen more

heavily upon the missionaries of other nationalities than our own, it

plainly behooved this Government to take the most prompt and decided

action to guard against similar or perhaps more dreadful calamities

befalling the hundreds of American mission stations which have grown up

throughout the interior of China under the temperate rule of

toleration, custom, and imperial edict. The demands of the United

States and other powers for the degradation and punishment of the

responsible officials of the respective cities and provinces who by

neglect or otherwise had permitted uprisings, and for the adoption of

stern measures by the Emperor's Government for the protection of the

life and property of foreigners, were followed by the disgrace and

dismissal of certain provincial officials found derelict in duty and

the punishment by death of a number of those adjudged guilty of actual

participation in the outrages.

This Government also insisted that a special American commission should

visit the province where the first disturbances occurred for the

purpose of investigation. The latter commission, formed after much

opposition, has gone overland from Tientsin, accompanied by a suitable

Chinese escort, and by its demonstration of the readiness and ability

of our Government to protect its citizens will act, it is believed, as

a most influential deterrent of any similar outbreaks.

The energetic steps we have thus taken are all the more likely to

result in future safety to our citizens in China because the Imperial

Government is, I am persuaded, entirely convinced that we desire only

the liberty and protection of our own citizens and redress for any

wrongs they may have suffered, and that we have no ulterior designs or

objects, political or otherwise. China will not forget either our

kindly service to her citizens during her late war nor the further fact

that, while furnishing all the facilities at our command to further the

negotiation of a peace between her and Japan, we sought no advantages

and interposed no counsel.

The Governments of both China and Japan have, in special dispatches

transmitted through their respective diplomatic representatives,

expressed in a most pleasing manner their grateful appreciation of our

assistance to their citizens during the unhappy struggle and of the

value of our aid in paving the way to their resumption of peaceful

relations.

The customary cordial relations between this country and France have

been undisturbed, with the exception that a full explanation of the

treatment of John L. Waller by the expeditionary military authorities

of France still remains to be given. Mr. Waller, formerly United States

consul at Tamatav, remained in Madagascar after his term of office

expired, and was apparently successful in procuring business

concessions from the Hovas of greater or less value. After the

occupation of Tamatav and the declaration of martial law by the French

he was arrested upon various charges, among them that of communicating

military information to the enemies of France, was tried and convicted

by a military tribunal, and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment.

Following the course justified by abundant precedents, this Government

requested from that of France the record of the proceedings of the

French tribunal which resulted in Mr. Waller's condemnation. This

request has been complied with to the extent of supplying a copy of the

official record, from which appear the constitution and organization of

the court, the charges as formulated, and the general course and result

of the trial, and by which it is shown that the accused was tried in

open court and was defended by counsel; but the evidence adduced in

support of the charges, which was not received by the French minister

for foreign affairs till the first week in October, has thus far been

withheld, the French Government taking the ground that its production

in response to our demand would establish a bad precedent. The efforts

of our ambassador to procure it, however, though impeded by recent

changes in the French ministry, have not been relaxed, and it is

confidently expected that some satisfactory solution of the matter will

shortly be reached. Meanwhile it appears that Mr. Waller's confinement

has every alleviation which the state of his health and all the other

circumstances of the case demand or permit.

In agreeable contrast to the difference above noted respecting a matter

of common concern, where nothing is sought except such a mutually

satisfactory outcome as the true merits of the case require, is the

recent resolution of the French Chambers favoring the conclusion of a

permanent treaty of arbitration between the two countries.

An invitation has been extended by France to the Government and people

of the United States to participate in a great international exposition

at Paris in 1900 as a suitable commemoration of the close of this the

world's marvelous century of progress. I heartily recommend its

acceptance, together with such legislation as will adequately provide

for a due representation of this Government and its people on the

occasion.

Our relations with the States of the German Empire are in some aspects

typical of a condition of things elsewhere found in countries whose

productions and trade are similar to our own. The close rivalries of

competing industries; the influence of the delusive doctrine that the

internal development of a nation is promoted and its wealth increased

by a policy which, in undertaking to reserve its home markets for the

exclusive use of its own producers, necessarily obstructs their sales

in foreign markets and prevents free access to the products of the

world; the desire to retain trade in time-worn ruts, regardless of the

inexorable laws of new needs and changed conditions of demand and

supply, and our own halting tardiness in inviting a freer exchange of

commodities, and by this means imperiling our footing in the external

markets naturally open to us, have created a situation somewhat

injurious to American export interests, not only in Germany, where they

are perhaps most noticeable, but in adjacent countries. The exports

affected are largely American cattle and other food products, the

reason assigned for unfavorable discrimination being that their

consumption is deleterious to the public health. This is all the more

irritating in view of the fact that no European state is as jealous of

the excellence and wholesomeness of its exported food supplies as the

United States, nor so easily able, on account of inherent soundness, to

guarantee those qualities.

Nor are these difficulties confined to our food products designed for

exportation. Our great insurance companies, for example, having built

up a vast business abroad and invested a large share of their gains in

foreign countries in compliance with the local laws and regulations

then existing, now find themselves within a narrowing circle of onerous

and unforeseen conditions, and are confronted by the necessity of

retirement from a field thus made unprofitable, if, indeed, they are

not summarily expelled, as some of them have lately been from Prussia.

It is not to be forgotten that international trade can not be

one-sided. Its currents are alternating, and its movements should be

honestly reciprocal. Without this it almost necessarily degenerates

into a device to gain advantage or a contrivance to secure benefits

with only the semblance of a return. In our dealings with other nations

we ought to be open-handed and scrupulously fair. This should be our

policy as a producing nation, and it plainly becomes us as a people who

love generosity and the moral aspects of national good faith and

reciprocal forbearance.

These considerations should not, however, constrain us to submit to

unfair discrimination nor to silently acquiesce in vexatious hindrances

to the enjoyment of our share of the legitimate advantages of proper

trade relations. If an examination of the situation suggests such

measures on our part as would involve restrictions similar to those

from which we suffer, the way to such a course is easy. It should,

however, by no means be lightly entered upon, since the necessity for

the inauguration of such a policy would be regretted by the best

sentiment of our people and because it naturally and logically might

lead to consequences of the gravest character.

I take pleasure in calling to your attention the encomiums bestowed on

those vessels of our new Navy which took part in the notable ceremony

of the opening of the Kiel Canal. It was fitting that this

extraordinary achievement of the newer German nationality should be

celebrated in the presence of America's exposition of the latest

developments of the world' s naval energy.

Our relations with Great Britain, always intimate and important, have

demanded during the past year even a greater share of consideration

than is usual.

Several vexatious questions were left undetermined by the decision of

the Bering Sea Arbitration Tribunal. The application of the principles

laid down by that august body has not been followed by the results they

were intended to accomplish, either because the principles themselves

lacked in breadth and definiteness or because their execution has been

more or less imperfect. Much correspondence has been exchanged between

the two Governments on the subject of preventing the exterminating

slaughter of seals. The insufficiency of the British patrol of Bering

Sea under the regulations agreed on by the two Governments has been

pointed out, and yet only two British ships have been on police duty

during this season in those waters.

The need of a more effective enforcement of existing regulations as

well as the adoption of such additional regulations as experience has

shown to be absolutely necessary to carry out the intent of the award

have been earnestly urged upon the British Government, but thus far

without effective results. In the meantime the depletion of the seal

herds by means of pelagic hunting has so alarmingly progressed that

unless their slaughter is at once effectively checked their extinction

within a few years seems to be a matter of absolute certainty.

The understanding by which the United States was to pay and Great

Britain to receive a lump sum of $425,000 in full settlement of all

British claims for damages arising from our seizure of British sealing

vessels unauthorized under the award of the Paris Tribunal of

Arbitration was not confirmed by the last Congress, which declined to

make the necessary appropriation. I am still of the opinion that this

arrangement was a judicious and advantageous one for the Government,

and I earnestly recommend that it be again considered and sanctioned.

If, however, this does not meet with the favor of Congress, it

certainly will hardly dissent from the proposition that the Government

is bound by every consideration of honor and good faith to provide for

the speedy adjustment of these claims by arbitration as the only other

alternative. A treaty of arbitration has therefore been agreed upon,

and will be immediately laid before the Senate, so that in one of the

modes suggested a final settlement may be reached.

Notwithstanding that Great Britain originated the proposal to enforce

international rules for the prevention of collisions at sea, based on

the recommendations of the Maritime Conference of Washington, and

concurred in, suggesting March 11, 1895, as the date to be set by

proclamation for carrying these rules into general effect, Her

Majesty's Government, having encountered opposition on the part of

British shipping interests, announced its inability to accept that

date, which was consequently canceled. The entire matter is still in

abeyance, without prospect of a better condition in the near future.

The commissioners appointed to mark the international boundary in

Passamaquoddy Bay according to the description of the treaty of Ghent

have not yet fully agreed.

The completion of the preliminary survey of that Alaskan boundary which

follows the contour of the coast from the southernmost point of Prince

of Wales Island until it strikes the one hundred and forty-first

meridian at or near the summit of Mount St. Elias awaits further

necessary appropriation, which is urgently recommended. This survey was

undertaken under the provisions of the convention entered into by this

country and Great Britain July 22, 1892, and the supplementary

convention of February 3, 1894.

As to the remaining section of the Alaskan boundary, which follows the

one hundred and forty-first meridian northwardly from Mount St. Elias

to the Frozen Ocean, the settlement of which involves the physical

location of the meridian mentioned, no conventional agreement has yet

been made. The ascertainment of a given meridian at a particular point

is a work requiring much time and careful observations and surveys.

Such observations and surveys were undertaken by the United States

Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1890 and 1891, while similar work in the

same quarters, under British auspices, is believed to give nearly

coincident results; but these surveys have been independently

conducted, and no international agreement to mark those or any other

parts of the one hundred and forty-first meridian by permanent

monuments has yet been made. In the meantime the valley of the Yukon is

becoming a highway through the hitherto unexplored wilds of Alaska, and

abundant mineral wealth has been discovered in that region, especially

at or near the junction of the boundary meridian with the Yukon and its

tributaries. In these circumstances it is expedient, and, indeed,

imperative, that the jurisdictional limits of the respective

Governments in this new region be speedily determined. Her Britannic

Majesty's Government has proposed a joint delimitation of the one

hundred and forty-first meridian by an international commission of

experts, which, if Congress will authorize it and make due provision

therefor, can be accomplished with no unreasonable delay. It is

impossible to overlook the vital importance of continuing the work

already entered upon and supplementing it by further effective measures

looking to the exact location of this entire boundary line.

I call attention to the unsatisfactory delimitation of the respective

jurisdictions of the United States and the Dominion of Canada in the

Great Lakes at the approaches to the narrow waters that connect them.

The waters in question are frequented by fishermen of both

nationalities and their nets are there used. Owing to the uncertainty

and ignorance as to the true boundary, vexations disputes and injurious

seizures of boats and nets by Canadian cruisers often occur, while any

positive settlement thereof by an accepted standard is not easily to be

reached. A joint commission to determine the line in those quarters on

a practical basis, by measured courses following range marks on shore,

is a necessity for which immediate provision should be made.

It being apparent that the boundary dispute between Great Britain and

the Republic of Venezuela concerning the limits of British Guiana was

approaching an acute stage, a definite statement of the interest and

policy of the United States as regards the controversy seemed to be

required both on its own account and in view of its relations with the

friendly powers directly concerned. In July last, therefore, a dispatch

was addressed to our ambassador at London for communication to the

British Government in which the attitude of the United States was fully

and distinctly set forth. The general conclusions therein reached and

formulated are in substance that the traditional and established policy

of this Government is firmly opposed to a forcible increase by any

European power of its territorial possessions on this continent; that

this policy is as well rounded in principle as it is strongly supported

by numerous precedents; that as a consequence the United States is

bound to protest against the enlargement of the area of British Guiana

in derogation of the rights and against the will of Venezuela; that

considering the disparity in strength of Great Britain and Venezuela

the territorial dispute between them can be reasonably settled only by

friendly and impartial arbitration, and that the resort to such

arbitration should include the whole controversy, and is not satisfied

if one of the powers concerned is permitted to draw an arbitrary line

through the territory in debate and to declare that it will submit to

arbitration only the portion lying on one side of it. In view of these

conclusions, the dispatch in question called upon the British

Government for a definite answer to the question whether it would or

would not submit the territorial controversy between itself and

Venezuela in its entirety to impartial arbitration. The answer of the

British Government has not yet been received, but is expected shortly,

when further communication on the subject will probably be made to the

Congress.

Early in January last an uprising against the Government of Hawaii was

promptly suppressed. Martial law was forthwith proclaimed and numerous

arrests were made of persons suspected of being in sympathy with the

Royalist party. Among these were several citizens of the United States,

who were either convicted by a military court and sentenced to death,

imprisonment, or fine or were deported without trial. The United

States, while denying protection to such as had taken the Hawaiian oath

of allegiance, insisted that martial law, though altering the forms of

justice, could not supersede justice itself, and demanded stay of

execution until the proceedings had been submitted to this Government

and knowledge obtained therefrom that our citizens had received fair

trial. The death sentences were subsequently commuted or were remitted

on condition of leaving the islands. The cases of certain Americans

arrested and expelled by arbitrary order without formal charge or trial

have had attention, and in some instances have been found to justify

remonstrance and a claim for indemnity, which Hawaii has not thus far

conceded.

Mr. Thurston, the Hawaiian minister, having furnished this Government

abundant reason for asking that he be recalled, that course was

pursued, and his successor has lately been received.

The deplorable lynching of several Italian laborers in Colorado was

naturally followed by international representations, and I am happy to

say that the best efforts of the State in which the outrages occurred

have been put forth to discover and punish the authors of this

atrocious crime. The dependent families of some of the unfortunate

victims invite by their deplorable condition gracious provision for

their needs.

These manifestations against helpless aliens may be traced through

successive stages to the vicious padroni system, which, unchecked by

our immigration and contract-labor statutes, controls these workers

from the moment of landing on our shores and farms them out in distant

and often rude regions, where their cheapening competition in the

fields of bread-winning toil brings them into collision with other

labor interests. While welcoming, as we should, those who seek our

shores to merge themselves in our body politic and win personal

competence by honest effort, we can not regard such assemblages of

distinctively alien laborers, hired out in the mass to the profit of

alien speculators and shipped hither and thither as the prospect of

gain may dictate, as otherwise than repugnant to the spirit of our

civilization, deterrent to individual advancement, and hindrances to

the building up of stable communities resting upon the wholesome

ambitions of the citizen and constituting the prime factor in the

prosperity and progress of our nation. If legislation can reach this

growing evil, it certainly should be attempted.

Japan has furnished abundant evidence of her vast gain in every trait

and characteristic that constitutes a nation's greatness. We have

reason for congratulation in the fact that the Government of the United

States, by the exchange of liberal treaty stipulations with the new

Japan, was the first to recognize her wonderful advance and to extend

to her the consideration and confidence due to her national

enlightenment and progressive character.

The boundary dispute which lately threatened to embroil Guatemala and

Mexico has happily yielded to pacific counsels, and its determination

has, by the joint agreement of the parties, been submitted to the sole

arbitration of the United States minister to Mexico.

The commission appointed under the convention of February 18, 1889, to

set new monuments along the boundary between the United States and

Mexico has completed its task.

As a sequel to the failure of a scheme for the colonization in Mexico

of negroes, mostly immigrants from Alabama under contract, a great

number of these helpless and suffering people, starving and smitten

with contagious disease, made their way or were assisted to the

frontier, where, in wretched plight, they were quarantined by the Texas

authorities. Learning of their destitute condition, I directed rations

to be temporarily furnished them through the War Department. At the

expiration of their quarantine they were conveyed by the railway

companies at comparatively nominal rates to their homes in Alabama,

upon my assurance, in the absence of any fund available for the cost of

their transportation, that I would recommend to Congress an

appropriation for its payment. I now strongly urge upon Congress the

propriety of making such an appropriation. It should be remembered that

the measures taken were dictated not only by sympathy and humanity, but

by a conviction that it was not compatible with the dignity of this

Government that so large a body of our dependent citizens should be

thrown for relief upon the charity of a neighboring state.

In last year's message I narrated at some length the jurisdictional

questions then freshly arisen in the Mosquito Indian Strip of

Nicaragua. Since that time, by the voluntary act of the Mosquito

Nation, the territory reserved to them has been incorporated with

Nicaragua, the Indians formally subjecting themselves to be governed by

the general laws and regulations of the Republic instead of by their

own customs and regulations, and thus availing themselves of a

privilege secured to them by the treaty between Nicaragua and Great

Britain of January 28, 1860.

State of the Union Addresses(#5029) · 第 20 / 27 段