It is generally known, that Papists believe in the doctrines of

miracles. So do I, and so do all Christians. But it is not so well known

that the miracles, in which Protestants believe, differ widely from

those which the Romish church teaches her followers. We believe the

miracles recorded in the Holy Scriptures; to these, however, the

_infallible church_ pays little or no attention, but hands us down a

catalogue of miracles, for the truth of which she herself vouches, and

calls upon all to receive them as the "genuine article." It may be

edifying, and if not, it can not fail to be amusing to American

Protestants, to see a specimen or two of Popish miracles. I assure

the reader, they are very fair ones, to my own personal knowledge, and

considered as such by every true Roman Catholic in this city of Boston

as well as elsewhere.

St. Hieronymus, better known by the name Jerome, who died early in the

fifth century, relates the following miracle:--"After St. Hilary

was banished from France to Phrygia, he met in the wilderness a huge

Bactrian camel, and having seen, in a vision, that his camelship was

possessed of the devil, he exorcised him, and the devil sprang out from

him, running wild through the wilderness, leaving behind him a strong

smell of brimstone." He tells us another miracle, with much gravity.

"Paul the Hermit," says this saint, "happening to die in the wilderness,

his body remained unburied, until discovered by St. Anthony. The saint

being alone, and not having the means of digging a grave, nor strength

enough to place in it the body of the hermit, prayed to the Virgin

Mary to aid him in his difficulties. The result was, two lions, of the

largest species, walked up to him, licked his hands, and told him that

they would dig the grave themselves with their feet, and place the body

of Paul in it. They did so; and having finished their business, went on

their knees, asked the saint's blessing, and vanished in the woods."

Palladus, who lived in the fifth century, and was greatly distinguished

in the Romish church, tells us of a hyena, which, in a certain wood in

Greece, killed a sheep. The next day, a pious hermit, who happened to

live in the neighborhood, was surprised at seeing this hyena at the-door

of his cave; and on asking it what was the matter, the hyena addressed

him in the following language: "Holy father, the odor of thy sanctity

reached me; I killed a sheep last night, and I came to ask your

absolution." The saint granted it, and the hyena departed in peace. We

find in Butler's Lives of the Saints, which is for sale in almost

all Roman Catholic bookstores, an account of some most extraordinary

miracles, for the truth of which, the _infallible_ church pledges her

veracity. For instance; when heretics cut off the head of St. Dennis,

the saint took it up, put it under his arm, and marched off some miles

with it. Butler relates another extraordinary miracle, and if American

Protestants presume to doubt it, they may expect a bull from the Pope of

Rome.

A certain lady in Wales, named Winnefride, was addressed by a young

prince, named Caradoc. But she, being a _nun_, could not listen to his

addresses. The young prince got impatient, and finally, in a fit of rage

and disappointment, he pursued her in one of her walks, and cut off her

head. A saint, by the name of Beuno, hearing of this outrage, went in

pursuit of Caradoc, and having come up with him, he caused the earth to

open and swallow him. Upon his returning where the _nun's_ head fell, he

found that a well had opened, emitting a stream of the purest water, the

drinking of which, to this day, is believed to cast out devils. When the

holy St. Beuno looked at the head of the _nun_, he took it up and

kissed it, placed it on a stump, and said mass. No sooner was the mass

finished, than the beheaded nun jumped up, with her head on, as if

nothing had happened.

Come forward, Americans, if you dare, and deny this miracle. The _holy

church_ vouches for its truth. St. Patrick, the great patron of Daniel

O'Connell, whom his holiness the Pope calls the _greatest layman

living_, performed some very extraordinary miracles, as we are told;

among them was the following: A poor boy strayed from home, and died of

starvation, or something else, and the body was nearly devoured by

hogs, when St. Patrick, chancing to pass that way, discovered it in this

mutilated condition. The holy saint touched it, and it instantly

sprang into life, resuming its former shape and proportions. On another

occasion, as we read in the Lives of the Saints, St. Patrick fed

fourteen hundred people with the flesh of one cow, two wild boars, and

two stags; and what is more strange than all, the same old cow was seen,

on the following morning, brisk and merrily grazing on the very same

field where she was killed, cooked, and eaten by the multitude.

We read of another very great miracle, which no Roman Catholic can

doubt, without running the risk of being considered a _heretic_. St.

Xavier, who is considered one of the most distinguished saints in the

Romish church, had a valuable crucifix. On one of his journeys at sea,

it fell overboard, much to his regret. When he arrived at his place

of destination, he took a walk along shore, meditating on the power,

grandeur, and infallibility of the _mother of saints_, and what was the

first object that caught his eye? Lo, and behold, he saw a crab moving

towards him, bearing in its mouth the saint's crucifix, and continued

to advance until he reverently laid it at his feet. No Roman Catholic

writer, since the days of St. Xavier, questions the truth of this

miracle.

The Popish biographers of St. Xavier tell us of another great miracle

performed by him, the truth of which is attested by the _infallible

church_. The devil tempted Xavier, and the "_old boy_" assumed the

shape of a lovely female; the saint ordered her off, but she refused,

and attacked him again on the same day; but the saint, unwilling to be

annoyed any longer, spit in the devil's face, and he instantly fled.

I cannot dismiss, this subject without relating a few more of those

miracles which Roman Catholics believe. They may be seen in Belarmine's

Treatise on the _Holy Eucharist_, book iii. ch. 8. St. Anthony, of

Padua, got into an argument with a heretic, concerning the doctrine

of _transubstantiation_ or the changing of bread and water, by Romish

priests, into the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ. After arguing the

question for a long time, the heretic proposed to St. Anthony to settle

their controversy in the following manner: "I have a horse," said the

_heretic_, "which I will keep fasting for three days; at the expiration

of that time, come with your _host_ (an image) and I will meet you with

my horse. I will pour out some grain to my horse, and you will hold the

host before him; if he leave the grain, and adores the host, I shall

believe." They met, and St. Anthony addressed the horse in the following

words. I translate, literally, from that illustrious writer in the Roman

church, Belarmine.

"_In virtue, and in the name of thy creator, whom I truly hold in my

hand, I command and enjoin thee, O horse, to come, and with humility,

adore him." The horse, instanter, left his corn, advanced towards the

host in the priest's hand, and, devoutly kneeling, adored it as his

God._

St. Andrew, as we read in Romish history, was a man of great eminence

and _sanctity_. Papists pray for his intercession daily. The _infallible

church_ informs us, that he performed some very great miracles I beg to

give my readers one, as a sample of the many which he performed.

The devil, armed with an axe, and accompanied by several minor devils,

with clubs in their hands, made an attack upon the saint, whereupon he

called upon St. John, the apostle, to rescue him. St. John lost no time

in making his appearance, and summoning some holy angels to aid him,

with chains in their hands, he rescued St. Andrew from these devils, and

chained every one of them to the spot; whereupon, as we are informed in

the _Acts of the Saints_, St. Andrew burst into laughter, and the devils

fell to screaming and crying mercy.

In the year 1796, a work, entitled _Official Memoirs_, was published in

Ireland, under the authority of Dr. Bray, archbishop of Cushel, and Dr.

Troy, archbishop of Dublin. In this work it is stated--and to doubt the

fact in Ireland, would be-_heresy_--that in the month of May, 1796, at

Toricedi, tears were seen to flow from the eyes of a _wooden image_ of

the Virgin Mary. Impious as such doctrines are, they are now believed by

Roman Catholics.

I was myself personally acquainted with archbishop Troy, and I remember,

when young, that he and the priests by whom I was instructed, took much

more pains in impressing upon my mind the truth of such miracles, as

that of the wooden Virgin Mary, than they did the truths of the Gospel;

and, in fact, every Catholic is taught to rest his _salvation_, almost

entirely, upon the intercession of the _virgin_. Ninety-nine in a

hundred of Irish Catholics rest all their hopes of salvation on the

Virgin Mary. They adore her, they worship her, and what is worse, Popish

bishops and priests teach them to do so. They even compel them to adore

the virgin, though the miserable beings have the hardihood to deny it

before Americans. But will they dare do it before me? When a poor,

ignorant Catholic goes to confession, the usual penance imposed by the

priest, for minor offences, is the repetition of the following address

to the Virgin Mary, two or three times a day, for a week or more,

according to the heinousness of the sin committed:!!!!!

"Holy Mary, Holy mother of God, Holy virgin of virgins, Mother of

Christ, Mother of divine grace, Mother most pure, Mother most chaste,

Mother undefiled, Mother untouched, Mother most amiable, Mother most

admirable, Mother of our Creator, Mother of our Redeemer, Virgin most

prudent, Virgin most venerable, Virgin most renowned, Virgin most

powerful, Virgin most merciful, Virgin most faithful, Mirror of justice,

Seat of wisdom, Cause of our joy, Spiritual vessel, Vessel of honor,

Vessel of singular devo-Mystical rose, Tower of David, Tower of

ivory, House of gold, Ark of the covenant, Gate of heaven, Morning star,

Health of the weak, Refuge of sinners, Comfort of the afflicted, Help

of Christians, Queen of angels, Queen of patriarchs, Queen of prophets,

Queen of apostles, Queen of martyrs, Queen of confessors, Queen of

virgins, Queen of all saints."

The above tissue of blasphemy is daily, nay, several times in a day,

repeated by Catholic priests and their _penitents;_ and I am much

mistaken, if there is upon the face of the globe, whether in Pagan,

Mahometan,1 or Heathen countries or creeds, to be found any thing

equally blasphemous, or more disgusting to the mind of any individual

who believes in the _pardon of sin through the atonement of Christ_;

and I hesitate not to say, that the Christian, who countenances such

a doctrine, or contributes, in any way, to its propagation, denies his

Saviour, and shows himself unworthy of the name he bears.

To the professed infidel I have nothing to say. To him, who mocks

and scoffs at the Triune God, I will attach no blame; with him I have

nothing in common, further than brotherhood of the same species; but

I must appeal to the Christian, and seriously ask him, Why do you

encourage such blasphemy as this address to the Virgin Mary? Why do

you encourage its propagation amongst your brethren? Why do you hold

communion with those who utter it? Would the primitive Christians, if

they now lived, hold any communion with idolaters? Would they contribute

their money to build temples for _Isis and Dagon?_ Would they basely

bend the knee to the golden calf of old? No. Sooner--much sooner--would

they lay their heads upon the block. They would look upon it as a

denial of their God, and a recantation of their faith in him. Would your

Puritan forefathers give the right hand of fellowship to the worshippers

of a wooden image? Would they give their money to a priest, to build

churches, and teach his followers that they could hew out for them

images of wood, possessing power to work miracles, or in other words,

to change the laws of nature, which the _Eternal Law-Maker_ alone can

change or suspend?

Custom, the point of the bayonet, or even that cruel tyrant, early

education, may enforce such idolatry on the Old World; but the free-born

American, unbiassed by education--unawed by tyrants--has no apology. His

submission to such doctrines is an unqualified surrender of his reason,

his religion, and the liberties of his country.

When the star of our independence first arose, it was hailed by the

Christian philosophers of the old world, as a foreshadowing of the

downfall of tyranny, superstition, and idolatry. They looked upon it

as fatal to the bastard Paganism, taught in the Popish church; but what

must be their astonishment, if permitted at the present day to look

down upon our country, and see our people practising that same Paganism,

nicknamed Christianity, and asking from our government protection--a

privilege which the framers of our constitution never intended should be

extended to tyrants or idolaters!

Here I would stop, and never more put pen to paper, for or against

Popery, did I not see many of my fellow-citizens, possessing the finest

minds and precious souls, falling victims to the sophistry, ingenuity,

and quibbling casuistry of Popish priests and bishops.

It is not long since I saw a letter from the Roman Catholic bishop

Fenwick, of the diocese of Massachusetts, in which he informs the

_authorities of Rome_ that he is making converts from some of the _first

families_ in his diocese. This, I presume, is correct, and these are the

very individuals most easily imposed upon. They know nothing of Popery.

They are not aware that Papists have two sides to the picture, which

they exhibit of their church. One is fair, brilliant, dazzling, and

seductive. Nothing is seen in their external forms of worship but

showy vestments, dazzling tights, and the appearance of great devotion.

Nothing is heard but the softest and most melting strains of music. No

wonder these should captivate minds which are strangers to guilt; nor is

it strange that they should bring into their church those who are most

guilty, in the full assurance that their guilt shall be forgiven, and

their crimes effaced from the records of heaven, by only confessing them

to one of their priests.

Will the heads of those respectable families, to whom Bishop Fenwick

alludes, and from whom he is making so many converts, permit me to ask

them, whether they have ever reflected upon what they were doing, in

permitting Romish priests to come among them? I have myself been a

Catholic priest, as I have more than once stated; I am without any

prejudice whatever. If I know myself, I would do an injustice to no man;

but I hesitate not to tell those heads of families, whether they are the

parents or guardians of those _converts_ to the Romish church, of whom

mention is made, that if they have not used all their authority with

which the laws of nature and of the land invests them, to prevent these

_conversions_, they are highly culpable. If they are parents, they have

become the moral assassins of their own children, and perhaps their

own wives. Do any of those fathers know the _questions_ which a Romish

priest puts to those children, at confession? Do husbands know the

_questions_ which priests put to their wives, at confession? Though a

married man, I would blush to mention the least of them.

Though not so fastidious as others, I cannot even think of them,

much less name them, without a downcast eye and crimsoned cheek, and

particularly those which are put to young and unmarried ladies.

Fathers, mothers, guardians, and husbands of these _converts_, fancy to

yourselves the most indelicate, immodest, and libidinous questions which

the most immoral and profligate mind can conceive!!!!! fancy those ideas

put into plain English, and that by way of question and answer--and you

will then have a faint conception of the conversation which takes

place between a pampered Romish priest and your hitherto pure-minded

daughters. If, after two or three of these _examinations_, in that

_sacred tribunal_, they still continue virtuous, they are rare

exceptions. After an experience of some years in that church,

sooner--far sooner--would I see my daughters consigned to the grave,

than see them go to confession to a Romish priest or bishop. One is not

a whit better than the other. They mutually confess to each other.

It was not my intention, when I commenced this work, to enter into

any thing like a discussion of the doctrines maintained by the

Romish church. My sole object was to call the attention of _American

Republicans_ to the dangers which were to be apprehended, and would

inevitably follow, from the encouragement which they are giving to

Popery amongst them. I have, however, deviated a little from my first

intention, in more than one instance; but I trust, not without some

advantage to many of my readers. I am aware that I have exposed myself

to the charge of carelessness and indifference to public opinion, in not

paying more attention to the construction and order of my sentences. Did

I write for fame, or the applause of this world, I would have been more

careful; but, as my object is only to state facts, in language so plain

that none can misunderstand it, I have no doubt the reader will

pardon any defects which he may find in the language, or want of

consecutiveness in the statements, which these pages contain.

I will now ask the attention of the reader, for a few moments, to

the Popish doctrine of _Indulgences_; and I do so because priests and

bishops deny that such things as _indulgences_ are now either taught

or granted to Catholics. They say from their pulpits and altars that

indulgences are neither * bought nor sold by Catholics, and never were.

It is an axiom in our courts of law--and should be one in every

well-regulated court of conscience--that _falsus in uno, falsus in

omnibus_. The meaning of this axiom is, that he who tells a falsehood in

one case will do so in every other. If this be true--and it is as true

as that two and two make four--I pronounce all Roman Catholic priests,

bishops, Popes, monks, friars, and nuns, to be the most deliberate and

wilful set of liars that ever infested this or any other country, or

disgraced the name of religion. I assert, and defy contradiction, that

there is not a Roman Catholic church, chapel, or house of worship in

any Catholic country, where _indulgences_ are not sold. I will even

go further, and say, that there is not a Roman Catholic priest in the

United States, who has denied the fact, that does not sell indulgences

himself; and yet these priests, and these bishops--these men of sin,

falsehood, impiety, impurity, and immorality--talk of _morals_, and

preach _morals_, while in their sleeves, and in their practices, they

laugh at such ideas as moral obligations. Here I would appeal even to

Irish Catholics who are in this country. I would ask all, or any of

them, if ever they have heard mass in any Catholic chapel in Dublin, or

any other city in Ireland, without hearing published from the altar, a

notice in the following words, or words of similar import.

"_Take notice, that there will be an indulgence on----day,

in--------church. Confessions will be heard on------day, to prepare

those who wish to partake of the indulgence_." I have published hundreds

of such notices myself; and any American, who may visit Ireland, or

any Catholic country, and has the curiosity to enter any of the Romish

chapels, can hear these notices read; but when he returns to the

United States, he will hear the Roman priests say that "there are no

indulgences sold by the Romish Church." Beware, Americans! How long will

you be the dupes of Popish priests?

Will the reader permit me to take him back a few years, and show him

in what light _indulgences_ were viewed in the 16th century, under the

immediate eye of the Pope and full sanction of the _infallible church!_

The name Tetzel, is familiar to-every reader. He was an authorized agent

for the sale of indulgences. I will give you one of his speeches,

as recorded on the authority of Roman Catholic writers, and recently

published in this country in D'Aubigne's History of the Reformation.

_Indulgences_--says this reverend delegate of the Pope--are the most

precious and sublime of God's gifts.

Draw near, and I will give you letters duly sealed, by which even the

sins you shall hereafter desire to commit shall be all forgiven you.

I would not exchange my privileges for those of St. Peter in heaven; for

I have saved more souls by my indulgences, than he by his sermons.

There is no sin so great, that the indulgence cannot remit it, and even

if any one should--which is impossible--ravish the holy Mother of God,

let him pay, let him only pay largely, and it shall be forgiven him.

The very moment the money goes into the Pope's box, that moment even the

condemned soul of the sinner flies to heaven.

Examine the history of Paganism, and you will not find in its darkest

pages any thing more infamously blasphemous than the above extract,

taken from a speech delivered by one of the Pope's auctioneers for

the sale of indulgences. But even this would be almost pardonable, if

priests did not try to persuade Americans that those sales have long

since ceased.

It is not more than twelve months since I was in the city of Principe

Cuba; and I beg permission to relate to my readers what I have there

personally witnessed; or, as we would express it in our most homely

language, seen with my own eyes.

At an early hour in the morning, I was aroused from my slumbers by a

simultaneous ringing of all the bells in the city. On looking out, I

witnessed the marching of troops, firing of cannons, field-officers in

their full uniforms, all the city authorities wearing their official

robes, with innumerable priests and friars bustling about from one end

of the city to the other. My first impression was, that a destructive

fire must have broken out somewhere, or that some frightful insurrection

had taken place: but, on inquiry, what think you, reader, caused this

simultaneous movement of the whole population of Principe, amounting in

all to about sixty thousand? "Tell it not in Gath; publish it not in

the streets of Askelon:" A huge bull of indulgences had arrived from

the Pope of Rome, and they turned out--troops and all--to pay it _due

homage_, and hear it read in the cathedral of Principe.

A day was appointed for the sale of the indulgences contained in the

aforesaid bull! Accompanied by a Scotch gentleman, with whom I had the

pleasure of forming an acquaintance, we went, with others, to the house

of the _spiritual auctioneer_, and I there purchased of the priest, for

two dollars and fifty cents, an _indulgence_ for any sin I might commit,

except four, which I will not mention. These, I was told, could only be

forgiven by the Pope, and would cost me a considerable sum of money.

Many of our citizens are in the habit of visiting Havana, and can

purchase those indulgences at any sum from twelve and a half cents to

five hundred dollars. Will you still listen to Popish priests, who

tell you that indulgences are neither sold nor bought now in the Romish

church?

From Cuba I immediately proceeded in the United States' ship Vandalia,

to Vera Cruz, and from thence to the city of Mexico. I felt desirous of

ascertaining the state of Popery in that exclusively Popish country, and

availed myself of every opportunity to do so. Accordingly, soon after

my arrival in Mexico, I strolled into the _cathedral_, and saw in the

centre aisle a large table, about forty feet long and four wide,

covered with papers, resembling, at a distance, some of our bank checks.

Curiosity induced me to examine them, and, instead of bank checks, I

found checks on Heaven; or, in other words, _indulgences_ for sins of

all descriptions.

I resolved upon purchasing; but, knowing full well that Americans,

though _the most intelligent people in the world_, but long the dupes of

Roman Catholics, would scarcely believe me if I told them that I bought

an indulgence in Mexico. I went back and requested of our consul there,

Mr. Black, to come with me to the cathedral and witness the purchase of,

and payment by me for an _indulgence_. Will Catholic priests tell you

there is no truth in this? If they do, be not hasty in making up your

minds on the question. There are two or 8* three lines of packets

running from New York to Vera Cruz, and you can easily ascertain,

from Mr. Black, whether I am telling truth, or whether _Papists_ are

humbugging you, as they have been for the last half century.

Popery! As It Was and as It Is. Also, Auricular Confession; And Popish Nunneries · 第 11 / 15 段