Rouse thee, my limping son![92]

In this instance, Homer does (as it were) deride those who are ashamed

of their lameness or blindness, as not thinking any thing a disgrace

that is not in itself disgraceful, nor any person liable to a reproach

for that which is not imputable to himself but to Fortune. These two

great advantages may be made by those who frequently study poets;—the

learning moderation, to keep them from unseasonable and foolish

reproaching others with their misfortunes, when they themselves enjoy a

constant current of prosperity; and magnanimity, that under variety of

accidents they be not dejected nor disturbed, but meekly bear the being

scoffed at, reproached, and drolled upon. Especially, let them have

that saying of Philemon ready at hand in such cases:

That spirit’s well in tune, whose sweet repose

No railer’s tongue can ever discompose.

And yet, if one that so rails do himself deserve reprehension, thou

mayst take occasion to retort upon him his own vices and inordinate

passions; as when Adrastus in the tragedy is assaulted thus by Alcmaeon.

Thy sister’s one that did her husband kill,

he returns him this answer,

But thou thyself thy mother’s blood did spill.

For as they who scourge a man’s garments do not touch the body, so

those that turn other men’s evil fortunes or mean births to matter

of reproach do only with vanity and folly enough lash their external

circumstances, but touch not their internal part, the soul, nor those

things which truly need correction and reproof.

14. Moreover, as we have above taught you to abate and lessen the

credit of evil and hurtful poems by setting in opposition to them

the famous speeches and sentences of such worthy men as have managed

public affairs, so will it be useful to us, where we find any things

in them of civil and profitable import, to improve and strengthen

them by testimonies and proofs taken from philosophers, withal giving

these the credit of being the first inventors of them. For this is

both just and profitable to be done, seeing by this means such sayings

receive an additional strength and esteem, when it appears that what

is spoken on the stage or sung to the harp or occurs in a scholar’s

lesson is agreeable to the doctrines of Pythagoras and Plato, and that

the sentences of Chilo and Bias tend to the same issue with those

that are found in the authors which children read. Therefore must we

industriously show them that these poetical sentences,

Not these, O daughter, are thy proper cares,

Thee milder arts befit, and softer wars;

Sweet smiles are thine, and kind endearing charms;

To Mars and Pallas leave the deeds of arms;

Jove’s angry with thee, when thy unmanaged rage

With those that overmatch thee doth engage;[93]

differ not in substance but bear plainly the same sense with that

philosophical sentence, Know thyself. And these,

Fools, who by wrong seek to augment their store,

And know not how much half than all is more;

Of counsel giv’n to mischievous intents,

The man that gives it most of all repents;[94]

are of near kin to what we find in the determination of Plato, in his

books entitled Gorgias and Concerning the Commonwealth, to wit, that it

is worse to do than to suffer injury, and that a man more endamageth

himself, when he hurts another, than he would be damnified if he were

the sufferer. And that of Aeschylus,

Cheer up, friend; sorrows, when they highest climb,

What they exceed in measure want in time,

we must inform them, is but the same famous sentence which is so much

admired in Epicurus, that great griefs are but short, and those that

are of long continuance are but small. The former clause whereof is

that which Aeschylus here saith expressly, and the latter but the

consequent of that. For if a great and intense sorrow do not last, then

that which doth last is not great nor hard to be borne. And those words

of Thespis,

Seest not how Jove,—because he cannot lie

Nor vaunt nor laugh at impious drollery,

And pleasure’s charms are things to him unknown,—

Among the Gods wears the imperial crown?

wherein differ they from what Plato says, that the divine nature is

seated far from both joy and grief? And that saying of Bacchylides,

Virtue alone doth lasting honor gain,

But men of wretched souls oft wealth attain;

and those of Euripides much of the same import.

Hence temperance in my esteem excels,

Because it constantly with good men dwells;

How much soe’er to honor thou aspire,

And strive by riches virtue to acquire,

Still shall thy lot to good men wretched seem;

do they not evidently confirm to us what the philosophers say of riches

and other external good things, that without virtue they are fruitless

and unprofitable enjoyments?

Now thus to accommodate and reconcile poetry to the doctrines of

philosophy strips it of its fabulous and personated parts, and makes

those things which it delivers usefully to acquire also the reputation

of gravity; and over and above, it inclines the soul of a young man to

receive the impressions of philosophical precepts. For he will hereby

be enabled to come to them not altogether destitute of some sort of

relish of them, not as to things that he has heard nothing of before,

nor with an head confusedly full of the false notions which he hath

sucked in from the daily tattle of his mother and nurse,—yea, sometimes

too of his father and pedant,—who have been wont to speak of rich men

as the happy men and mention them always with honor, and to express

themselves concerning death and pain with horror, and to look on virtue

without riches and glory as a thing of nought and not to be desired.

Whence it comes to pass, that when such youths first do hear things of

a quite contrary nature from philosophers, they are surprised with a

kind of amazement, trouble, and stupid astonishment, which makes them

afraid to entertain or endure them, except they be dealt with as those

who come out of very great darkness into the light of the bright sun,

that is, be first accustomed for a while to behold those doctrines

in fabulous authors, as in a kind of false light, which hath but a

moderate brightness and is easy to be looked on and borne without

disturbance to the weak sight. For having before heard or read from

poets such things as these are,—

Mourn at one’s birth, as th’ inlet t’ all that grieves;

But joy at death, as that which man relieves;

Of worldly things a mortal needs but twain;

The spring supplies his drink, the earth his grain:

O tyranny, to barbarous nations dear!

This in all human happiness is chief,

To know as little as we can of grief;[95]

they are the less disturbed and offended when they hear from

philosophers that no man ought to be much concerned about death; that

the riches of nature are defined and limited; that the happiness of

man’s life doth not consist in the abundance of wealth or vastness

of employments or height of authority and power, but in freedom from

sorrow, in moderation of passions, and in such a temper of mind as

measures all things by the use of Nature.

Wherefore, upon all these accounts, as well as for all the reasons

before mentioned, youth stands in need of good government to manage

it in the reading of poetry, that being free from all prejudicate

opinions, and rather instructed beforehand in conformity thereunto, it

may with more calmness, friendliness, and familiarity pass from thence

to the study of philosophy.

Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) · 第 42 / 147 题