CONCERNING CORONERS.

I am glad to notice that in the East there is a growing disfavor in

the public mind for selecting a practicing physician for the office of

coroner. This matter should have attracted attention years ago. Now it

gratifies me to notice a finer feeling on the part of the people, and

an awakening of those sensibilities which go to make life more highly

prized and far more enjoyable.

I had the misfortune at one time to be under the medical charge of a

coroner who had graduated from a Chicago morgue and practiced medicine

along with his inquest business with the most fiendish delight. I do

not know which he enjoyed best, holding the inquest or practicing on his

patient and getting the victim ready for the quest.

One day he wrote out a prescription and left it for me to have filled. I

was surprised to find that he had made a mistake and left a rough draft

of the verdict in my own case and a list of jurors which he had made in

memorandum, so as to be ready for the worst. I was alarmed, for I did

not know that I was in so dangerous a condition. He had the advantage

of me, for he knew just what he was giving me, and how long human life

could be sustained under his treatment. I did not.

That is why I say that the profession of medicine should not be allowed

to conflict with the solemn duties of the coroner. They are constantly

clashing and infringing upon each other's territory. This coroner had

a kind of tread-softly-bow-the-head way of getting around the room that

made my flesh creep. He had a way, too, when I was asleep, of glancing

hurriedly through the pockets of my pantaloons as they hung over a

chair, probably to see what evidence he could find that might aid the

jury in arriving at a verdict. Once I woke up and found him examining a

draft that he had found in my pocket. I asked him what he was doing with

my funds, and he said that he thought he detected a draft in the room

and he had just found out where it came from.

After that I hoped that death would come to my relief as speedily as

possible. I felt that death would be a happy release from the cold touch

of the amateur coroner and pro tern physician. I could look forward with

pleasure, and even joy, to the moment when my physician would come

for the last time in his professional capacity and go to work on

me officially. Then the county would be obliged to pay him, and the

undertaker could take charge of the fragments left by the inquest.

The duties of the physician are with the living, those of the coroner

with the dead. No effort, therefore, should be made to unite them. It is

in violation of all the finer feelings of humanity. When the physician

decides that his tendencies point mostly toward immortality and the

names of his patients are nearly all found on the moss-covered stones of

the cemetery, he may abandon the profession with safety and take hold

of politics. Then, should his tastes lead him to the inquest, let

him gravitate toward the office of coroner; but the two should not be

united.

No man ought to follow his fellow down the mysterious river that

defines the boundary between the known and the unknown, and charge him

professionally till his soul has fled, and then charge a per diem to the

county for prying into his internal economy and holding an inquest over

the debris of mortality. I therefore hail this movement with joy

and wish to encourage it in every way. It points toward a degree of

enlightenment which will be in strong contrast with the darker and more

ignorant epochs of time, when the practice of medicine was united

with the profession of the barber, the well-digger, the farrier, the

veterinarian or the coroner.

Why, this physician plenipotentiary and coroner extraordinary that I

have referred to, didn't know when he got a call whether to take his

morphine syringe or his venire for a jury. He very frequently went to

see a patient with a lung tester under one arm and the revised statutes

under the other. People never knew when they saw him going to a

neighbor's house, whether the case had yielded to the coroner's

treatment or not. No one ever knew just when over-taxed nature would

yield to the statutes in such case made and provided.

When the jury was impanelled, however, we always knew that the medical

treatment had been successfully fatal.

Once he charged the county with an inquest he felt sure of, but in the

night the patient got delirious, eluded his nurse, the physician and

coroner, and fled to the foot-hills, where he was taken care of and

finally recovered. The experiences of some of the patients who escaped

from this man read more like fiction than fact. One man revived during

the inquest, knocked the foreman of the jury through the window, kicked

the coroner in the stomach, fed him a bottle of violet ink, and, with a

shriek of laughter, fled. He is now traveling under an assumed name with

a mammoth circus, feeding his bald head to the African lion twice a day

at $9 a week and found.

[Illustration:0105]

Bill Nye's Red Book New Edition · 第 27 / 133 题