XXVII

Sometimes, again, a writer in the midst of a narrative in the third

person suddenly steps aside and makes a transition to the first. It is a

kind of figure which strikes like a sudden outburst of passion. Thus

Hector in the _Iliad_

"With mighty voice called to the men of Troy

To storm the ships, and leave the bloody spoils:

If any I behold with willing foot

Shunning the ships, and lingering on the plain,

That hour I will contrive his death."[1]

The poet then takes upon himself the narrative part, as being his proper

business; but this abrupt threat he attributes, without a word of

warning, to the enraged Trojan chief. To have interposed any such words

as "Hector said so and so" would have had a frigid effect. As the lines

stand the writer is left behind by his own words, and the transition is

effected while he is preparing for it.

[Footnote 1: _Il._ xv. 346.]

2

Accordingly the proper use of this figure is in dealing with some urgent

crisis which will not allow the writer to linger, but compels him to

make a rapid change from one person to another. So in Hecataeus: "Now

Ceyx took this in dudgeon, and straightway bade the children of Heracles

to depart. 'Behold, I can give you no help; lest, therefore, ye perish

yourselves and bring hurt upon me also, get ye forth into some other

land.'"

3

There is a different use of the change of persons in the speech of

Demosthenes against Aristogeiton, which places before us the quick turns

of violent emotion. "Is there none to be found among you," he asks, "who

even feels indignation at the outrageous conduct of a loathsome and

shameless wretch who,--vilest of men, when you were debarred from

freedom of speech, not by barriers or by doors, which might indeed be

opened,"[2] etc. Thus in the midst of a half-expressed thought he makes

a quick change of front, and having almost in his anger torn one word

into two persons, "who, vilest of men," etc., he then breaks off his

address to Aristogeiton, and seems to leave him, nevertheless, by the

passion of his utterance, rousing all the more the attention of the

court.

[Footnote 2: _c. Aristog._ i. 27.]

4

The same feature may be observed in a speech of Penelope's--

"Why com'st thou, Medon, from the wooers proud?

Com'st thou to bid the handmaids of my lord

To cease their tasks, and make for them good cheer?

Ill fare their wooing, and their gathering here!

Would God that here this hour they all might take

Their last, their latest meal! Who day by day

Make here your muster, to devour and waste

The substance of my son: have ye not heard

When children at your fathers' knee the deeds

And prowess of your king?"[3]

[Footnote 3: _Od._ iv. 681.]

On the Sublime · 第 38 / 62 题