The EXAMINATION of JAMES GRANT of SHEUGLY, Esq.[582]

Westminster to Wit.

_14th Aug. 1746._

Being asked where he was when the Rebellion in Scotland first broke

out, he saith, that he was in his own County in the parish of Urquhart,

where he continued from the beginning to the end of the Rebellion

without going to any Place of any Distance from the said Parish of

Urquhart. Being asked whether he was one of the Gentlemen consulted by

the Laird of Grant upon the occasion of the Lord President’s offering

a company to the said Laird for raising men for the Government which

Gentlemen refused to accept of the said one Company, he saith he was

not, nor was he ever advised with or consulted thereupon: Nor did the

Laird of Grant ever send to the Examinant or to his Father, who is

lately dead, to come to him in order to advise and consult with them

upon the measures to be taken upon that occasion: he saith, that the

Laird of Grant’s Bailly upon the Rebellion first breaking out told the

Grants publickly, that it was the Lairds desire that they should remain

peaceable and quiet, but the said Bailie told this Exam^t and his

father and two other Gentlemen of the name of Grant privately that it

was the said Lairds desire that a Company of the Grants should join the

Pretender’s son privately in order to protect the Country. He saith,

that he was never sent for during the Rebellion by the said Laird of

Grant upon any occasion to be advised with, or consulted with about it:

that in the Progress of the Rebellion, several different parties of the

Rebels came into that part of the Country, where the Exam^t was, and

pressed him to take on with them, but that he constantly refused them,

and would not have anything to do with them.

He saith, that he never was directly nor indirectly concerned in

receiving or conveying of any letters or verbal messages to or from any

Persons in the Rebellion to any persons whatever, nor did he willingly

harbour, protect, or supply in any shape any of the aforesaid Persons,

nor was he ever made privy to any designs or Intentions of the said

Rebels.

He saith, that different Partys of the Rebels who passed thro’ the

Country having threatened to use violence to some of the Grants unless

they would join them, a Party of them with a Gentleman at their Head,

went to Castle Grant to take the Directions of the Laird, and offer’d

to go and join Lord Loudoun or any one else, if he would give them

orders in writing for so doing: that the Laird of Grant told them, they

might go and join the Devil if they would, and imprisoned the Gentleman

who came along with them for two or three days for his officiousness.

He saith, that he made it his Business whenever he had an opportunity,

to dissuade those whom he could come at from engaging in the Rebellion,

and exerted his utmost endeavours to convince them of the rashness of

their undertaking.

Being asked whether he was privy to the Neutrality signed by some

Gentlemen amongst the Grants, whilst the Rebels were at Aberdeen, He

saith, he was not privy to it in any shape, nor doth he know who were

the conductors of that Neutrality.

After the Battle of Culloden some of the Grants remaining in arms for

the Pretender’s Son the Exam^t and his Father were sent to by the

Laird of Grant (who had never sent to the Exam^t or his Father during

the Rebellion before) to go to the said People and persuade them to

surrender: He saith, that he and his Father accordingly went to the

said men, and with the assistance of the Rev^d Mr. John Grant prevailed

with them to surrender, and marched with them for that purpose to

Inverness, where to his great surprise the Exam^t, His Father, and the

said Rev^d Mr. Grant were made Prisoners with the aforesaid Rebels, and

sent up hither for he does not know what.

He saith, that he verily believes that the ill-usage his Father met

with, served in a great degree to shorten his father’s life. He saith,

that all his and his Father’s Cattle were taken from them for some time

for not joining the Rebels: that he never held any correspondences with

the Rebels in any shape, nor ever was instrumental in serving them at

all, and that if he behaved civilly to them whilst they remained in the

Country where the Exam^t was it was out of Fear and not the effect of

Inclination.

Being asked whether it be his opinion that if the Laird of Grant had

wrote to the People in the Country to rise for the Government the said

People would have taken up arms for the Government, he saith, that he

verily believes if the laird of Grant had done so, the Country would

have joined the Kings Troops, and done all the service in their Power,

but this was neglected by the said Laird of Grant till the Battle

of Culloden was over, when the Exam^t joined the said Laird at his

request with 50 or 60 men, being all who were capable of bearing arms

in the Country, and that being the first and only Request which the

Laird of Grant ever made to the Exam^t upon occasion of the Rebellion.

(Signed) JAMES GRANTT.

_Whitehall, August 14, 1746._

Taken before me, THOS. WAITE.

To HIS GRACE the DUKE OF NEWCASTLE, one of his Majesty’s

Principal Secretarys of State, the PETITION of ALEXANDER GRANT

of SHEWGLY, Esq., JAMES GRANT his son, and the Rev. Mr. JOHN

GRANT, minister of the Gospel at URQUHART, prisoners in Tilbury

fort.[583]

Humbly sheweth, that Lewis Grant of Grant, Esq^r, son of Sir James

Grant, Bar^t, having with his men, some days after the Battle of

Culloden, joyned his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland did by his

Royal Highness’s Permission march with them to the Country of Urquhart

near Inverness, to seize and bring in such Rebels as should be found

in arms against the Government, That finding none he apply’d to your

Petitioners who were then (as they had been ever since this unhappy

rebellion) quiet and peaceable at their respective Homes entreating

them as persons of Rank and Figure in that Country to use their best

endeavours with such Rebels as might be still in Arms, to lay them down

and surrender to the said Mr. Grant, with assurances that he would

intercede with his Royal Highness in their behalf, and that after such

surrender they should be permitted to return to their respective Places

of Abode.

That your Petitioners were so successful as to prevail upon 84 Rebels

of the name of Grant to surrender themselves and their arms to the said

Mr. Grant, which he then thankfully and gratefully acknowledged as an

event that would entitle him to some merit in his Royal Highnesses

eye, and desired your Petitioners to accompany him and the said Rebel

prisoners to Inverness, which they did.

That your Petitioners to their own, as well as the Neighbourhoods great

surprise, were upon their Arrival at Inverness represented as Rebels

and corresponding with those in open arms and as prisoners taken by

him, and upon such false Information confined by his Royal Highness and

have since been sent up prisoners without the least ground or charge

but the false Information given by the said Mr. Grant.

That your Petitioners tho’ conscious of their own Innocence, and free

from any guilt, have upon the said false Information been sent from

Inverness to England and have in the course of the voyage been in no

shape distinguished from those in open Rebellion, that from the great

Hardships they have suffer’d, one of your Petitioners Alexander Grant

near 70 years old, and a creditor by Mortgage for large sums of money

upon the said Mr. Lewis Grant’s Estate, has been seized with and still

lies ill of a Malignant Fever, and being, by Reason of his close

confinement deprived of any assistance, is in danger of losing his Life

whereby the said Mr. Lewis Grant’s sordid ends would be answered should

this Petitioner die while under so heavy a charge as that of Treason.

Your Petitioners therefore humbly pray your Grace to take this

their very hard case into consideration and admit them to liberty

upon reasonable Bail to answer such charges as shall be brought

against them, or, at least, to change their present Confinement into

a more comfortable one with Liberty to an Agent to repair to them

at seasonable Times, the better to enable them to manifest their

Innocence, and the Falsehood and Malice of the Charge against them,

when called to an open trial.

Origins of the 'Forty-five · 第 63 / 246 题