On Bank holidays the patients invited their own friends to come to

tea and spend the afternoon, and a variety entertainment was arranged

to promote the holiday feeling. At Christmas there were concerts and

variety shows, and Mrs. Grein’s pantomime delighted all beholders.

Mystery plays and masques, whist-drives, sports and many other kinds of

fun were introduced and eagerly taken up.

‘I never knew,’ said one, ‘that it was possible to have such pleasure

and enjoy ourselves so much without being drunk!’

A beautiful pageant was arranged in 1915, representing the Patron

Saints of the wards. Miss Waldegrave as St. Mary led the procession,

and each saint entered preceded by her banner-bearer. St. Barbara,

the patron saint of Arms, and St. Felicitas with her seven sons,

were followed by the Abbess Hildegarde and St. Joan of Arc. Rachel,

surrounded by an international group of children, and St. Ursula with

her band of noble maidens completed a very interesting and artistic

spectacle.

The recreation room was a moving sight when it was packed to its

uttermost by an eager and happy audience. On one side of the

gangway were men in beds, and ranks of wheel-chairs with their more

convalescent occupants; on the other, a solid mass of men in blue were

crowded on chairs, window-sills or tables, wherever a corner could

be found; and at the back, a few members of the staff found standing

room. The audience listened with rapt attention to the singing of Mr.

Courtice Pounds, Miss Jean Sterling MacKinlay and Miss Grainger Kerr;

or followed the performances of Sir Johnston Forbes-Robertson, Mr.

H. B. Irving, Miss Ellis Jeffreys, Mr. Nigel Playfair and Miss Helen

Haye with great delight. The laughter and cheers which greeted each

item marked their appreciation and pleasure. The programmes were never

long, so that patients who were less well could be included in the fun,

and many of them tried to get better in time for the entertainments.

More than a thousand artistes visited the hospital each year, and

between May 1915 and May 1919 five hundred and eleven entertainments

were held. During these years the Committee arranged two hundred

and sixty concerts; seventy ward concerts; ninety-five orchestras;

fifty-two plays; four pantomimes; and thirty sing-songs.

The King and Queen gave a party to wounded soldiers at Buckingham

Palace, to which a number of Endell Street patients were invited. There

was a sumptuous tea, followed by a wonderful variety entertainment--an

all-star show of the very best. When the men returned, having

thoroughly enjoyed themselves, one of them admitted:

‘Yes, they did us very well; but of course we had seen all the turns

before on our own stage.’

The hospital owed a great deal to the many artistes who so generously

came again and again to amuse and interest the patients.

In the wards reserved for serious cases there were always men whose

beds could not be moved to the recreation room, and these found

pleasure and amusement through the electrophone installed beside their

beds. Every evening men who were still suffering greatly forgot their

pain for a time as they lay with the receivers fastened over their

ears, listening to ‘The Bing Boys’ or other plays. It was delightful to

see them laughing, and often they fell asleep and were unaware of the

night-nurse when she came round and removed the apparatus from their

heads. New-comers were always eager to share in this treat, and a man

who had just arrived and was having an operation done in the afternoon

made his neighbours in the ward promise to rouse him when the time came

for ‘The Bing Boys.’ His surgeon, visiting the ward in the evening, was

surprised to find him propped up in bed, with a smile on his face and

the receiver on his head.

But daily occupations and interests had to be provided for those who

were confined to the hospital for long periods, and to supply this want

basket-weaving, knitting, rug-making and needlework were introduced.

Lady Anderson and a small committee of ladies organised the needlework

and found that the embroidery done by the men was quite unexpectedly

good. About seven thousand regimental badges were worked, but those

who had any aptitude were not restricted to this kind of sewing only.

Miss Rosamond S. Wigram produced designs copied from old pieces of

needlework or from pictures, and taught the men how to do needlework

pictures. Some who had never sewed before developed great skill, and

worked baskets of flowers in excellent shading, or gardens full of

colour, and having learnt to make French knots, they produced life-like

woolly lambs and rabbits. The workers became happily absorbed in their

work, and would take up their sewing frames as soon as it was light and

only lay them aside when it grew dark. Each year a sale of the work

done for the committee was held, at which some of the pictures fetched

a price of five and seven guineas each.

[Illustration: IN THE LIBRARY

(Page 196)

(_Photo, Topical Press_)

]

[Illustration: ORDERLIES IN PROCESSION GOING TO BUCKINGHAM PALACE

(Page 197)

]

Before the Endell Street Hospital opened in 1915, Miss Beatrice

Harraden and Miss Elizabeth Robins were requested to join the staff as

Honorary librarians, and the value of the library which they created

cannot be over-estimated. The important educative influence which it

exercised was due to the personal work of Miss Beatrice Harraden, who

spent many hours daily among the men, sacrificing, during the whole

period of the hospital’s existence, her own work and her leisure to

their needs. Miss Robins was unfortunately unable to continue her help

for long, but in the first weeks Miss Harraden and she made a fine

collection of books and organised an ambulatory service for the wards.

Magazines, newspapers, stationery, stamps, and very often matches,

were supplied freely by the librarian, and the demands made upon this

department were so heavy that it was necessary to give Miss Harraden

two assistants, and in addition she was glad of the help which Miss

Evelyn Glover gave in the afternoons.

At all hours of the day the librarians were to be met in the wards,

getting orders for books, and giving advice or encouragement. Miss

Harraden used to talk to the men till they felt that they wanted to

read the books she spoke of. She catered for every taste: the old

reader and the new reader were equally stimulated. Beginning with

_Tit Bits_ or _Blighty_, by way of Charles Garvice and W. W. Jacobs,

they were led along the path of literature till they found themselves

absorbed in _Henry VIII._ or Bacon’s _Essays_!

A proportion of the patients were educated men, with literary tastes,

to whom a good library made all the difference. Six subscriptions at

Mudie’s were taken out and placed at the disposal of such readers;

so that books could be changed daily if necessary. The rule of the

library was to provide every book asked for, on whatever subject

and in whatever language. If these books were not in the library or

obtainable at Mudie’s, Miss Harraden knew where to find them, and many

valuable books, on seventeenth-century furniture, old silver, zoology

and metaphysics, were lent to the hospital. The technical bookcase

was well stocked, and those who had trades or hobbies were encouraged

to read their own subject. There were many gardeners in the wards, who

pored over books on rose-growing, ferns or chrysanthemums, and furious

debates would rage as to the relative superiority of their favourite

flowers.

Handbooks about motors, aeroplanes and engines were popular, and some

men found interest in fossils and archæology. Men who had been in India

said that they learnt more about that country from an illustrated book

than from living there for seven years, and it was found that there

was quite a vogue for the History of Mexico, Dante and _Don Quixote_.

Abridged representations of Shakespeare’s plays in the recreation room

would send up the demand for this author. One or two men studied for

the London Matriculation examination whilst in hospital, the librarian

finding the text-books and directing their course. To most of them,

reading proved a great source of interest and a great education.

Some, it is true, appraised the value of literature by its price! One

man, who had been devoted to reading tales published at twopence and

had been persuaded to read one of H. Seton Merriman’s books in the

sevenpenny edition, told the librarian that ‘this sevenpenny author

is an improvement on the twopenny ones. Perhaps I might try something

better now. Have you a shilling author I could have?’

‘Oh! why did they bring me back? Why didn’t they let me die?’ groaned

a poor young fellow, restlessly moving his head on his pillow. The

presence of the librarian by his bed roused his interest. He was a

musician, and he asked her to bring him the life of a musician. She

brought _The Life of Chopin_, and a smile came over his face as she

placed it in his hands. That afternoon, still smiling and still holding

the book between his hands, he passed peacefully away.

In a neighbouring ward a man described himself as a sociologist, and

said that the subject he wished to read was ‘one which you will not

know anything about here.’ It was Woman’s Suffrage! With all her years

of suffrage work behind her, Miss Harraden said nothing, but produced

the books required. A few days later, she asked him: ‘Why did you think

that we knew nothing about Woman’s Suffrage here?’ and went on to tell

him something of the practical interest which she herself and other

members of the hospital staff took in that movement.

‘But none of you ever talk about it,’ the man exclaimed with

astonishment. And he listened earnestly while she showed him how the

propaganda was going on all the time, though it was a propaganda of

deeds and not of words.

The book-cases were not locked, and men could handle the books and

choose for themselves, and the staff also had free access at all times

and made great use of the privilege. Some books were lost; but the

main object of the library was to promote reading, and the losses were

accepted quietly. There were generally five thousand books in the

library and large surplus stocks were sent away periodically to start

libraries in other hospitals and to supplement those in Y.W.C.A. huts

and munition factories. The librarian brought real education to the

bedside, and aroused intelligence and interest in a wonderful degree.

CHAPTER V

THE WOMEN ORDERLIES

The mention of the staff of the hospital calls up a picture of that

splendid band of young women who responded to the call of patriotism

and who, laying aside their habits of ease and pleasure, gave

themselves up to the strenuous toil and restricted life of those who

serve in hospitals. It is true that the staff included doctors, matron,

and trained nurses; but they were professional people, carrying out

their professional work; and though each and all of them took her share

and played her part well, their effort did not compare with that of the

young girls, who took up the burden as a simple duty.

The women orderlies who served in the various departments gave the

hospital its distinctive character and were largely responsible for the

fine spirit which kept all ranks united in such complete harmony and

good-fellowship. They were young, and they brought the grace and charm

of youth inside the grey walls. Some of them were beautiful and all of

them looked charming in their uniform, with their fine physique, their

shining hair and look of freedom and self-determination. Their attitude

recalled the words of the poet:

She had the step of the unconquered, brave,

Not arrogant; and if the vessel’s mast

Waved liberty, no challenge did it wave.

Gently nurtured, expensively but ineffectively educated, they were

unequipped and untrained; but they had fine courage, and did not lack

resolution and intelligence, and, with a little training, they took

responsibility in the wards and tackled any difficulty or any situation

on the administrative side. They brought laughter into the wards. Their

very aspect was cheering. They encouraged, protected, chaffed, and

sympathised. Their gaiety was infectious, and their willingness a thing

that could be counted on.

The men felt their influence; but it was only the Australians who could

put their feelings into words.

‘Disciplined women,’ said Sergt. Peto. ‘I have never seen such women.

Ours can’t touch them.’

And it was not only their beauty and their kindness that counted, for

they worked hard and well. They controlled the wards in the absence of

the Sister; they managed the sick or wilful, and they were dignified or

motherly, authoritative or persuasive, at need. The wounded depended

upon them and trusted them, and in return, sought for complimentary

interpretations of the ‘W.H.C.’ on their shoulder-straps. The

‘What-Ho-Corps,’ ‘Wounded Heroes’ Comforters,’ and suchlike, were meant

appreciatively.

At the gate, in the stores, in the offices, they had one desire and

one intention--to make the hospital a success. They worked early and

late, at dull, ever-repeating tasks, in inconvenient quarters, with

humour and with laughter. And out of hours, the residential parts of

the building resounded with merriment. They slept, and rose again with

shouts of talk and laughter, reassuring to those who feared that the

hard work might be too much for them.

The main office was a centre of life, where a cheerful clamour of

voices would arise, regardless of open doors; and tales would be told

by one and another of how the Doctor-in-Charge had looked or spoken

in different circumstances, and how awful it was, and how funny. They

rocked with mirth and capped the stories, till at last a voice from the

other office across the passage broke in: ‘I am sure I didn’t say it

like that.’ Then a sudden silence fell, followed by subdued laughter.

And one by one grey figures flitted right and left, and business was

resumed. To the end of the time, those girls never remembered the open

door nor the Doctor-in-Charge working in the adjacent office!

In the quartermaster’s offices there was a young team, full of good

spirits and ready for any enterprise. They fed and clothed and

administered the hospital, and were ready for every entertainment and

piece of fun. They prepared extra teas and extra suppers; rehearsed

and performed, if need be; danced or sang, or carried tables and

handed refreshments, with equal vigour and enthusiasm. Messages of

appreciation came to the stores from the wards: letters of thanks for

special teas, requests for tomatoes or other dainties. Or a sergeant

would come to the clothing store, to say that the men in his ward were

obliged for being clothed so quickly, and especially for the trouble

taken to give them the proper sizes. Men who had left would write with

confidence to the quartermaster for jerseys, socks, cakes, musical

instruments, belts and other wants, and in answer she constantly sent

parcels to France and Salonika.

It was the orderlies who made the special atmosphere of the hospital

and who kept its standard of conduct high. Though young in years,

they were wonderfully sensible. Their duties were performed with

friendliness and charm, but with unfailing dignity, and no man ever

took liberties or caused them inconvenience.

They threw themselves readily into amusements for the wards, and under

their guidance, men dressed up and played parts, while others sang and

recited. Sports and games were organised, and the designs for Christmas

decorations owed much to their suggestions and ingenuity.

They formed a choir which sang carols in the square at Christmas time,

and which on Christmas Eve clothed itself in white dominoes and hoods,

and bearing gaily coloured lanterns, passed singing from ward to ward.

This little procession of white-robed girls singing the familiar old

carols in their sweet voices touched many of the men. One of them told

his nurse next day that when it had passed he had said his prayers,

‘though he didn’t usually.’

An Australian described his arrival at the hospital, when he was on

leave in London and felt unwell.

‘When I went in at the gate, a flapper asked me what I had come for.

Then she called another flapper to take me to the sick-room. I found

another flapper there, and she took my temperature and told me to sit

down. Then she brought another flapper, and she said I should go into

a ward. So I was taken upstairs, and there were more of them. And I’m

blest! if another flapper didn’t come and stand by my bed and write my

medicine down.’

But he stayed long enough to become much attached to the ‘flapper’s

hospital.’

‘What beats me,’ he said, ‘is that they all go on as though they had

been doing it always.’

This was true; for each one learnt her part or her office very quickly,

and carried on her work with a sense of responsibility and without

self-consciousness.

The orderlies showed a great power of endurance. Many of them remained

at work for four and a half years, while others stayed for three or two

years. It was rare to have any one leave under one and a half years.

Miss Anderson, Miss Nicholson, and Miss Paul nursed right through.

They were among the first to come and the last to go. Miss Chance

and Miss Tanner gave four years, many months of which were spent in

the operating theatre. Miss Joyce Ward joined up at the beginning,

aged sixteen, as a messenger, and finished in November 1919, as head

financial clerk. There were many others who did equally well, and more

than one girl asked to have a vacancy reserved for her before her last

term at school was ended. There were failures, but they were allowed

to go and were forgotten. There were disappointments, but they were

grieved over in silence. The bulk of the girls inspired pride and

admiration in those who looked on.

The management disliked rules, and none were drafted for the guidance

of the staff. It was desired that they should be free when off duty,

and the trust reposed in them was not abused. The orderlies were asked

only to take one late pass a week, and they generally fell in with this

request; but they appreciated the freedom of the life they might lead,

and used to say how lovely it was to be able to go out without being

asked where you were going to. Some supervision and some advice were

given to those who were younger and less experienced; but the absence

of rules and regulations was insisted on, and girls who could not do

without them, were advised to return to their mothers. Rumour in the

main office had it that the Doctor-in-Charge disapproved of mothers and

of marriage, and that you should keep your mother from her, and never,

never on any account allow your parents to write to her. The fact

was that, acting on the principle that they were adult people, doing

responsible work, the Doctor-in-Charge did not write to their parents

without their knowledge, and whenever a letter came from parents, even

though it contained a request for secrecy, the orderly in question

was invited to come and discuss it. From the Doctor-in-Charge’s point

of view, it was impossible to treat these young women as children, or

carry on a correspondence which concerned them without their knowledge,

and they would have had little confidence in a chief who acted in such

a manner.

It was strange how the kindest of parents thought it proper to control

the actions of women well over age, and how younger brothers, uncles,

brothers-in-law and the family doctor would think that they had a right

to interfere in her business, and would invite the Doctor-in-Charge or

the Matron to conspire with them. One could not help sympathising with

healthy girls who were made to relinquish the work in which they were

successful, and a life which they enjoyed, because ‘Mother was dull at

home’ or ‘Father likes to have his girls with him in the evenings,’

or ‘She has been away long enough.’ No one could blame the girls so

coerced if they were bitter and discontented, or the others if they

‘strictly forbade’ their mothers to interfere. But on the other hand,

there were parents whose self-sacrifice and devotion equalled that of

their daughters. They gave them their freedom generously, watching them

develop with pride, and finding compensation in their happiness and in

the knowledge that they were successful and appreciated.

From time to time, an effort was made to interest the orderlies in

public questions and to educate their communal sense; but they viewed

these attempts as mild peculiarities on the part of those senior

persons who made them, and, smiling and polite, they discouraged them.

In January 1918, the Bill enfranchising women passed the House of

Lords, and early the next morning the Doctor-in-Charge was on the steps

of her office. She made known to Sergt. Robertson her desire to have

the flags run up.

‘Certainly doctor,’ he replied. And then hesitated.

‘I was not aware, Doctor, that it was any special occasion.’

The significance of the occasion was explained to him, and the whole

place was soon gay with bunting.

The young women viewed this celebration with some amusement. They were

kind about it, and a little patronising in their congratulations.

‘I am so glad your bill has passed all right’; ‘It is awfully nice your

bill is through’; ‘Simply topping about your bill’; said the potential

voters, pleased that the older members of the community should have

obtained something they desired, and personally quite untouched by

their possible share in it.

The beautiful spirit which dominated the staff pervaded the hospital.

It was inspiring and uplifting, uniting every one in loyalty and

affection, and triumphing over all difficulties and all sorrows. It was

the spirit of hope and youth and courage; the spirit which breathed

charity for each other and success for all.

When Dr. Louisa Woodcock was dying, she sent her love to Endell Street.

‘It is a nice place,’ she said, ‘a nice spirit.’ And then, ‘Spirit is

the thing that counts.’

It counted, as year succeeded year, and effort had to be multiplied and

sacrifice prolonged. It kept the women loyal and generous, harmonious

and disciplined. No one came there without being sensible of the

spirit of the place, and no one left without being touched by it.

The health of the staff was good on the whole. In 1916, measles claimed

a number of victims; but when once disinfection by means of the steam

spray was introduced, the rate of sickness was kept very low. During

the second influenza epidemic in 1919, only twenty-two persons out of

a staff of a hundred and eighty-four were laid low, and this at a time

when every one was exposed to infection and was working very hard.

The hospital did not escape without having to mourn the loss of more

than one comrade. In January 1918, Miss Eva Prior passed away, dying

of Vincent’s Angina after a tragic forty-eight hours’ illness. She

was in the second year of her service, and loved by every one for her

sweet disposition and her strength of character. It was the first

tragedy. In July 1918, at a time of high pressure and great anxiety,

Miss Gladys E. Morrison developed influenza and pneumonia and died, in

spite of all that nurses and doctors could do. She was one of those who

joined the hospital when it opened, and she had just completed three

years continuous and splendid service. Her long association with the

hospital had made her part of it, and her many friends and admirers

missed her sadly. Miss Helen Wilks, who had been one of the assistants

in the Pathological Laboratory, died at home on January 15th, 1919, of

appendicitis, after many weeks of illness. She was only eighteen and

full of promise. Dr. Elizabeth Wilks, her mother, wrote:

Endell Street was the great time of her life. She loved the

place and was completely happy. She was sixteen and a half

when Dr. Murray agreed to take her. We wanted her to continue

her studies, thinking her too young for war work, but she was

absolutely determined to take her part.... It was completely

successful, and we always felt so thankful that we agreed to

her doing what she wanted to do; for the last eighteen months

were lived with intense enthusiasm and satisfaction.

In February 1919, Miss Joan Palmes succumbed to influenza and

pneumonia, her death casting a sad gloom over the hospital. Although,

for family reasons, her service had not been continuous, she had been a

member of the staff since 1915. She had a most endearing personality,

gay and courageous and considerate for others.

In the same year Miss Mary Graham died, away from the hospital, to the

great sorrow and regret of all who knew her.

In a small community, so united and so friendly as Endell Street,

tragedies like these were deeply felt, and those who fell were not

forgotten. When Dr. Woodcock died, her funeral took place from Christ

Church, Endell Street. And in January 1918, when Dr. Elizabeth Garrett

Anderson died, a memorial service for her was held there also. So each

fallen comrade was honoured in the church, a guard of honour standing

round her, and her comrades forming the choir which gave the Nunc

Dimittis. Then, following in sad procession, they stood round her in

the square and with sorrowful hearts, took their last farewell. Their

feeling was voiced in the paragraph which appeared in ‘Orders for the

Day’:

It is with the deepest sorrow and regret that I have to record

the death on active service, at this hospital of ..........

She was our comrade and fellow-worker. She leaves in our hearts

a fine memory of one who gave generous and tender service to

those who suffered, of one whom we admired and trusted because

she responded with courage and devotion to the call of her

country.

Our united sympathy will go out to her mother and to those who

love and mourn her.

From her work, her example and her sacrifice let us draw fresh

inspiration and fresh courage. Let us also put Duty first, as

she did. Let us strive to give more, to do more, to sacrifice

more, in memory and for the sake of our lost comrade.

In April of 1919, the Doctor-in-Charge was informed that the hospital

would be required until the autumn, and arrangements for staffing it

for this further period had to be considered.

It was reluctantly decided to demobilise the greater number of the

nursing orderlies. The presence of so many young people, however

delightful, had always been a heavy responsibility, and the dread of

serious illness occurring amongst them again was ever present. Many of

them were tired; others were young and immature; and since the pressing

need for their services no longer existed, it was felt that they should

not be subjected to the strain of another six months’ work. Only a few

of them wished to go, and the motive which prompted those in authority

was probably not appreciated, even if it were understood; but the

wisdom of the decision was undoubted. The sorrow and regret at parting

was mutual; it was the first step towards disintegration; and their

fellow-workers and the hospital missed them sorely.

The senior nursing orderlies, who remained by their own wish, were

supplemented in the wards by R.A.M.C. men, of whom plenty were

available then. Their want of training and want of interest in the

work made them poor substitutes for the girls who had left.

Time takes them home that we loved, fair names and famous,

To the soft long sleep, to the broad sweet bosom of death;

But the flower of their souls he shall take not away to shame us,

Nor the lips lack song for ever that now lack breath.

For with us shall the music and perfume that die not dwell,

Though the dead to our dead bid welcome, and we farewell.

CHAPTER VI

THOSE WHO MADE THE WHEELS GO ROUND

In such a community, one of the most difficult offices to fill

successfully was that of chaplain; for it is not always possible to

combine a vocation for the sick with a sympathetic understanding of

young men and women. The chaplain’s work was solitary and lacked the

stimulus of companionship, which was so helpful to the doctors; and

it cannot be denied that a large proportion of the patients were

more interested in the quality of the surgeons than of the parsons.

The efforts of the Church of England chaplains were supplemented by

chaplains of other denominations, but these only visited the wards and

did not give their whole time to the hospital.

Five chaplains were appointed in succession to Endell Street, but,

except the Rev. Edward Wells, none of them remained there for any

length of time. Mr. Wells’s close and happy association with the

hospital continued for more than two years and was only terminated in

1919 by his decision to accept a living. From time to time, a locum

tenens came for holiday duty or during an interregnum; but the duties

were not easy, and the young and inexperienced men who were sent must

often have felt discouraged.

The attitude of the soldier to the chaplain was one of shyness or

embarrassment. He was unwilling to be seen talking long with him

because other men might tease him about it. Every new chaplain

approached him in a different way--some with assumed confidence, some

with a brotherly bluffness, some with diffidence. They seemed to find

it as hard to be natural as he did. One of them who laid his hand on

the patients’ heads and stroked their faces, ruined his own cause by

the discomfort he caused them. A convalescent, speaking of him, said,

‘I am sure he speaks beautifully, but I never could listen: I was so

afraid he was going to kiss me.’ And the fear was not unfounded; for in

his earnestness, the parson used to bend nearer and nearer, till the

men became so nervous that they almost screamed.

Visits out of ordinary hours had a terrifying effect upon the seriously

ill, and the wrath of Heaven, in the form of the Chief Surgeon,

overtook one chaplain who ventured to disturb a case she was specially

concerned about at eleven o’clock at night and again at seven in the

morning.

Private Stephens, white and trembling, asked: ‘Doctor, is it true I am

dying?’

‘No, you’re not going to die. Who said you were?’

He rejoined, with tears, ‘Chaplain says I must be prepared; but I’d

rather trust in you, Doctor.’

Which he did, with the best result.

The visiting of the acutely ill required judgment; for if it caused

fear and excitement instead of comfort, it could be harmful; and

at times both Sister and doctor might be anxious to ward off the

chaplain’s visit, and yet hesitate to interfere with his prerogative.

Under Army Orders, church parade was compulsory. It was unfortunate

that it was almost the only thing which was compulsory at Endell

Street. In church, the men sat rigidly during the sermons, their eyes

fixed on the preacher with an appearance of attention, which must have

been very helpful to him. The methods of preaching varied with the

chaplains. Those who were young, favoured local colour. The Bible would

be referred to as a trenching tool; the Prayer Book as an enamelled

mug, and the Twelve Apostles were termed staff officers. Stories of

the piety of men in the trenches or other hospitals were given and

letters from men to the chaplain were often quoted. One preacher was

fond of inventing allegories, and conversations between himself and

imaginary soldiers, which mystified the men very much. And another who

was in favour of Women’s Suffrage, preached on the ‘New Womanhood,’

and exhorted his hearers not to regard those in charge of the hospital

as ‘playthings,’ but as ‘their own equals in every respect’; the women

being for the time in the position of the men’s superior officers!

In the summer of 1919, an Education officer was added to the staff of

the hospital, and a few of the men were persuaded to take classes.

The first of these officers was unfortunate in having a hesitating,

uncertain manner and a bad delivery, which made the men call him ‘Mr.

Er-er.’ The second was very deaf. As a rule, the patients showed little

desire to study anything, and only about two per cent. welcomed the

scheme, on which the country was spending such enormous sums of money.

Teachers in every branch of knowledge were produced. One came to teach

shorthand; another, book-keeping; others, history, German, singing, or

typewriting. The Jewish men were the most anxious for lessons, but they

preferred instruction in voice-production or singing, and one wished

the army to train him for the operatic stage. The attempt was not very

successful. It did not equal the real education which the librarian had

carried on during the years that had gone before.

[Illustration: STRETCHER-BEARERS AND SERGEANT-MAJOR HARRIS

(Page 218)

(_Photo, Reginald Haines_)

]

[Illustration: QUARTERMASTER CAMPBELL AND ORDERLY COOK MAKE PLASTER

PYLONS

(Page 219)

(_Photo, Reginald Haines_)

]

The Hospital was more than fortunate in its R.A.M.C. detachment, which,

though small, was excellent of its kind. Sergt.-major Harris was in

charge of it from August 1915, until his demobilisation in July 1919.

When he was promoted to the rank of corporal and sent to Endell Street,

his friends in the 35th Company R.A.M.C. kindly prophesied failure and

disaster; but he remained there for four years as one of the pillars

of the hospital. His experience had been gained in the St. John’s

Ambulance Brigade and in the South African War, and he had not had the

advantage of any training in the work of a warrant officer. However,

his sense of responsibility and his devotion to duty overcame all

obstacles, and his value to the hospital grew with his rapid promotion.

There were occasions on which neither the Doctor-in-Charge nor he felt

sure of the correct procedure, and then they would shut themselves

up in her office with ‘King’s Regulations’ and ‘Regulations for the

R.A.M.C.,’ and make a careful study of those wonderful and intricate

volumes. Emerging later, with minds made up, they pursued the line

of action decided upon, with an air of confidence and custom, very

impressive to all who witnessed it.

In the sergt.-major, the medical staff had a loyal supporter, who never

failed to back up their authority. He adopted the hospital; took it to

his heart; and often sacrificed Mrs. Harris and his own leisure to its

service. When women were added to his detachment he trained and drilled

them, and guarded them in a manner almost paternal. In the sergeants’

mess of the 35th Company R.A.M.C., which he visited occasionally, he

upheld the credit of his hospital and of his mixed Company. After such

visits, he would tell the Doctor-in-Charge interesting details, chiefly

about the discipline in other hospitals, where men habitually stayed

out all night, and where lists of forty or sixty defaulters were of

daily occurrence. ‘Nothing like that here, Doctor,’ he would say, with

pardonable self-congratulation.

He was assisted and supported in his duties by Sergt. Robertson, who

began as a private in 1915, and whose reliability and excellence soon

brought him promotion. His good nature was unfailing. He believed

that the Endell Street Hospital showed the way to all others, and his

chivalry towards women, whether working under him or as his officers,

never failed; his avuncular manner included them all.

When the hospital opened, Privates Bishop, Price, and Hedges, who had

been in France with the Corps, and who had enlisted in February 1915,

were transferred to the 35th Company R.A.M.C., and included in the

Endell Street detachment. The help of such experienced nurses in the

first year was invaluable and their places were always in the serious

wards, where the heaviest cases and the greatest need of skill were to

be found. Later, when all men of class ‘A’ were sent abroad, they found

wider fields of usefulness and more thrilling experiences in France and

in the East.

Corpl. Musselbrook was theatre orderly. Under the training of the

Chief Surgeon and Sister, he had become very expert in his duties,

when to every one’s regret he was suddenly called in and sent, with

several hundred other R.A.M.C. men, to be trained and transferred

into an infantry regiment. He took with him a document certifying

him to be a trained theatre orderly; and on the strength of this, he

subsequently got back into the R.A.M.C. and was sent to Salonika and

Russia. On his return to England in 1919, he came to Endell Street and

related his experiences and successes. He described his feelings when

he went to a hospital in Salonika and was detailed for duty in the

operating theatre. How the major, in his apron, holding out his gloved

hands, stood silently watching him arrange the patient; how he himself

perspired with anxiety, as he placed the hands and folded the clothing;

and how suddenly he was asked: ‘Where have you been?’ When he replied

that he had been at Endell Street, it was a joy to find that the major

had been there too, and that he shared Corpl. Musselbrook’s admiration

for that place and for its women surgeons. Through all the months that

followed, he had one important post after another, attributing his

success to the early training and to the document, which he always kept

on him.

Corpl. Washington succeeded him in the operating theatre, and soon

equalled him in skill and keenness, remaining at his post through

several years of pressure. He was a favourite with the rest of the

staff, and on summer mornings, when ices were sold in the canteen,

Orderly Tanner might be met slowly ascending the stairs, consuming an

ice with her right hand and carrying another for Washington in her left.

The duties of the R.A.M.C. included the care of the intoxicated men

who were constantly brought in by the police or by the London County

Council ambulances.

These ambulances were staffed by a fine set of young women, whose

serviceable uniform and alert, well-drilled bearing were a credit to

their service. It was a pleasure, when the ambulance turned into the

square, to see these active girls, in their navy blue suits of breeches

and tunic, swing themselves off the car, throw the doors open, unload

and bear the stretcher with its burden to the casualty room. If they

thought that the N.C.O. on duty might be chary of receiving a case of

drunkenness--for, strictly speaking, unless otherwise injured, such

cases should not have been brought to the hospital--they were clever

in finding another diagnosis: ‘Case of drugging,’ they would cry

confidently, tip the man on to a couch and be off in a whirl of wheels

and blue legs, before the N.C.O. could stop them. More often they

favoured fractures, and their cases would arrive bound in first-aid

splints or with collar bones duly bandaged. When splints and bandages

were unfastened, it was not uncommon to have the injured man make

violent use of his arms and legs.

The Y.M.C.A. huts also were too kind to diagnose drunkenness, and

many a time the hospital sent for cases described by their workers

as ‘serious’ or ‘immediate,’ only to find them ‘fighting drunk.’ The

huts always seemed to postpone dealing with such cases until late at

night, and many an uproar arose in the Johnny Walker Ward when the

sergt.-major asked these ‘serious’ cases to show their ‘passes.’ Men

with ‘both collar bones broken’ were known to attack him with their

fists! Some put their feet through the panels of the door, and others

their heads through the window-panes; and the peace of the hospital

was so often disturbed that the Doctor-in-Charge finally reported the

matter to the Command. Her report included as instances an account

of one man who ‘bit a policeman and struck the sergt.-major,’ and of

another, supposed to have a dislocated shoulder, who arrived at 10 P.M.

‘As it was a Sunday,’ she wrote, ‘some of the staff were off duty, and

there were only the sergt.-major and a dwarf, and a man with a wasted

arm to deal with him.’ For in 1917 the physique of the R.A.M.C. was

very poor.

There were men who became habitués of the Johnny Walker Ward, for they

knew enough to simulate fits when in the hands of the police, and these

symptoms would insure that they were taken to the nearest hospital. One

of these, who was well known to the doctors, was quieting down after

the departure of the police, and the doctor sent for lemonade for him.

He took a long pull at the mug, and then looked up at her, and with a

regretful sigh said:

‘Och! Dochter, jist think ef it was beer!’

Many half-intoxicated men had to be admitted to the wards for slight or

serious injuries; for they jumped from windows or fell down areas in

their attempts to evade the police; and the nurses and orderlies became

more or less accustomed to looking after them. A voluntary worker at

a railway station, thinking that a man in this state was really ill,

brought him to the hospital, where he was detained for the night. Not

being very busy, the voluntary worker called next morning, full of kind

intentions, and was able to conduct the man to the railway station. He

wrote afterwards, complaining that the gate officer ‘was not by any

means sympathetic’ about the poor fellow; which in the circumstances

may have been natural, for his case was not exceptional.

When the women orderlies were demobilised in 1919, the male detachment

was increased. The men who were sent to the hospital were mostly

infantrymen, who for some disability had been transferred to the

R.A.M.C. They had had no training, and as a rule they had little liking

for ward work, and when put on night duty, they firmly believed that

they were entitled to a certain number of hours sleep at night, and

to the indignation of the Sisters, were found rolled in rugs on empty

beds. It was a rude change, after being accustomed to the ways of the

intelligent, gentle young women, to go to a ward at night and ask if

a case, newly operated upon, was comfortable, and to be told by a

stableman in khaki, ‘T’ y’ung chaap in t’ carner be ’eavin’ a bit.’

From which it was inferred that the patient was somewhat sick.

The mysteries of hospital life and Sisters’ orders, were new to them.

One of them, being instructed to shave the leg of a patient going up

for operation, was greatly puzzled. ‘Shave him very close,’ said the

Sister. ‘You must not leave a single hair anywhere.’ The orderly’s

knowledge of asepsis was meagre. He had never heard that legs or

arms required shaving; but wishing to carry out his instructions, he

attacked the man’s face with energy: strictly obedient, he insisted

upon removing his moustache; and so clean did he make his shave that

the patient was found sitting up wiping blood from his chin with

cotton-wool; but his leg remained unprepared.

There is always some one behind the scenes who plays an important part

in making the wheels go smoothly, some one who works hard and gets

no kudos; and this was so at Endell Street also. There was a band

of some twenty-eight or thirty women, referred to on the pay-sheet

as ‘cleaners’ and by most people as ‘char-ladies,’ who cleaned and

scrubbed and swept and washed-up, day in and day out, year after year.

It is impossible to estimate the value of faithful, continuous service

of this sort. The cessation of it is demoralising in an institution,

for every one’s comfort depends upon it. So the char-ladies never

failed to come. Labouring patiently, they learnt to love the hospital

and to regard it as their own. And on the anniversary of their

third year of continuous service, the hospital fêted them. A small

presentation was made to each one; they were appraised by the C.O. in a

speech which ‘went right through you and was felt in yer very bones,’

and cheered by the assembled patients.

Working well together, the staff could also play together; and

sometimes a dance would be given, into which they threw themselves with

delight. Every one came to it--the char-ladies too; and for once in

their lives, these hard-worked, toil-worn women flung care and husband

and family aside, and gave themselves up to pleasure. Some yielded to

the novelty of wearing men’s clothes and appeared in khaki or blue, as

jockeys or as workmen, dancing all night, enjoying the supper and the

speeches, and looking back on it afterwards as ‘a little glimpse of

’Eaving.’

The R.A.M.C. gleefully decorated the recreation room and polished the

floor, and then arrived disguised as niggers, cowboys, or nurses, led

by the Sergt.-major dressed as a ‘lady doctor.’

The Sisters, the masseuses, and the orderlies were well known to the

assistants at Clarkson’s and Simpson’s, whose shops they ransacked

periodically. Every kind of dress was worn. ‘Little Bits of Fluff’ and

cavaliers, pages, sailors, officers, ballet girls; early Victorian

ladies jostled doctors in Plantagenet costumes, doctors as Turkish

houris, as pierrots or as navvies. Colonel and Mrs. Dug-out--the one

exuberant in kilt and plaid, with fierce red whiskers; the other

clinging and elegant, in lace cap and mittens--received the guests

and joined in the dance. The invitation to sit down to supper was

greeted with loud cheers by the guests, so was the Colonel’s speech;

and the toast of ‘The Hospital’ was drunk with Highland honours and

much acclamation. There never were such dances as those. Youth, in its

beauty and happiness, was at its best.

No record of Endell Street would be complete which did not mention

‘Keogh Garrett.’ At the age of six months, he sat on the office table,

asking for approval: a rather weak puppy, with a beautiful head, neat

pointed ears and a manner which won all hearts. Once assured of his

position, he grew more attractive every day; and a chorus of praise

and adulation was wont to follow him as he passed--a dainty little

aristocrat, full of character, full of idiosyncrasies, trotting at the

heel of the Chief Surgeon, lying down before those he loved, turning

a deaf ear and a white eye to those he did not favour. Affectionate

to Sister Lawrence, who massaged his weak forelegs, adoring the

Quartermaster, he was reticent and dignified towards the patients,

failing to notice their friendly advances, but remonstrating with any

man not in khaki or blue who entered the square. Outside, in park or

street, he would recognise and run to greet the hospital uniform. To

this day a floating veil attracts him, and he will do homage to unknown

nurses.

The long hours that his family spent in the operating theatre tried

him, and as the afternoon waned, he would come upstairs and lie with

his nose on his paw just outside the door. He knew he must not enter

and cross that shining surface of floor; but he also knew that it

mattered less about the floor if the Sister was at tea. What hours he

spent on the table in the office window, watching the lift by which

friends came back to his world again; how many muddy footprints he left

on official documents, and how many colonels he growled at, from his

safe retreat on the blotting-paper!

For the sake of companionship, a little ball of white fluff with the

blackest of black eyes and nose was added to the staff; and as they

grew older, they became wonderfully possessive. William was every one’s

friend--a veritable cupboard lover and wheedler. He had an unsubdued

and boisterous spirit.

How naughty they were to the cats of Soho, who sought a refuge in the

hospital precincts, and how rude to the Matron’s dog, whose lineage

they persistently insulted. On their walks abroad, they excited

admiration and constant reference to Buchanan’s Whisky. Elderly

gentlemen, tightly buttoned into majors’ tunics, would journey the

whole length of a railway car, swinging perilously on the straps, to

bend over their guardian and chuckle, ‘Black and white!’ The patients

thought they must be brothers, regardless of the difference of breed;

and some even thought them the sons of Matron’s ‘Bully’; while the

_Daily Mail_, describing a historic scene, referred to them as

‘Black and white Airedales.’ Garrett had all the dignity and airs of

Dog-in-Charge. William was the little friend of all the world, and they

accepted their position as the pets and mascots of the hospital.

CHAPTER VII

THE POSITION OF WOMEN UNDER THE WAR OFFICE

In the Spring of 1916, Sir Alfred Keogh called for forty women doctors

to replace men in the hospitals of Malta. It was already a well-known

fact that the soldier and the woman doctor were compatibles, and the

outcry which had greeted the establishment of the Military Hospital,

Endell Street, was not repeated. Out of her experience as an army

surgeon, Dr. Garrett Anderson wrote to those who were engaged in

recruiting these doctors, urging that an effort should be made to

secure temporary rank as officers for them, and that they should ask to

be formed into a uniformed corps attached to the R.A.M.C. She pointed

out that as they were proceeding abroad and were to be distributed

among the various hospitals, they would be working with R.A.M.C.

officers, and that they would be at a disadvantage professionally if

they had not the same status and position as their men colleagues.

Her advice was not taken, and the medical women left England in mufti.

They were not graded, nor paid at officers’ rates, but were given a

flat rate which made no allowance for seniority. These terms, once

accepted, were imposed, in spite of protest, upon all the medical

women--except those at Endell Street--who subsequently served in

hospitals and camps at home or abroad under the War Office. They

did fine work in Malta, Egypt, Salonika, India, and in France with

the Q.M.A.A.C. At least four hundred of them gave of their best in

the service of the sick and wounded, carrying on courageously and

generously, although the conditions under which they had taken service

often proved difficult and humiliating.

The Army’s need of women’s service grew greater every day, and the

War Office was forced to consider the necessity of introducing them

widely into hospitals and camps, as dispensers, storekeepers, cooks,

and motor-drivers. In November 1916, a deputation of Red Cross ladies,

headed by Dame Katherine Furse, visited the Doctor-in-Charge, to

inquire into the work done by women who had replaced men at Endell

Street, and to discuss the formation of a new section of V.A.D.’s

for general service. The uniform of the Women’s Hospital Corps was

highly approved by the deputation as a practical service dress, and

when a letter was received asking for the name of the maker, the

Doctor-in-Charge thought it advisable to request in writing that it

might not be too closely copied. In her reply Dame Katherine Furse

wrote:

Would a different colour, style and absence of veil on cap and

black shoes and stockings, be sufficient protection?... It

would be iniquitous to copy your uniform, which is very much

respected by all of us here.

The writer went on to ask questions as to the physical fitness of women

for the work it was proposed that they should do.

The Doctor-in-Charge was also asked to give evidence before a Committee

of Enquiry which met in December under the auspices of the Board

of Education, with a view to determining the capacity of women as

substitutes for men. She was actively questioned by the members of the

Committee on the subject of stretcher-bearing by women, and offered to

arrange a demonstration, so that they might see how well-trained women

could acquit themselves in this work.

[Illustration: THE CHIEF COMPOUNDER IN THE DISPENSARY

(Page 232)

(_Photo, Reginald Haines_)

]

[Illustration: THE CHIEF CLERK IN THE OFFICE

(Page 233)

(_Photo, Alfieri_)

]

A few weeks later, Dr. Chalmers Watson, C.B.E., engaged in the

organisation of the Q.M.A.A.C., and many long talks over formations

and detail were held in the doctor’s sitting-room upstairs, when Dr.

Chalmers Watson’s ideas on uniforms and her views on discipline and

regulations came in for some friendly criticism. It was at Endell

Street, too, that she and Dame Helen Gwynne Vaughan were first made

known to each other, and it was from the same quarter that she drew

some of the early members of her corps. In the desire to help the new

service, the Doctor-in-Charge set free Miss Ethel Thomas, the Steward,

and Miss Doreen Allen, the Assistant Steward, that they might take

administrative posts in the Q.M.A.A.C. Afterwards she always maintained

that their success in that corps was due, not so much to their own

ability and exceptional qualities, as to the training which they had

received at Endell Street.

Dr. Chalmers Watson steered the Q.M.A.A.C. through the shoal of

vexatious delays and difficulties which beset its early days with

great skill, and she and Dr. Laura Sandeman made a gallant struggle

to procure for the women doctors serving with it a position and terms

equal to those granted to men.

The first detachments of Q.M.A.A.C. were hurried overseas in the

early summer of 1917, and as was only natural, a demand for hospital

accommodation arose almost at once. In August, the Deputy Director of

Medical Services, finding himself at a loss how to meet this demand,

approached the Doctor-in-Charge and asked whether Endell Street could

make temporary accommodation for women returning from France. The

arrangement of the building did not lend itself easily to this purpose,

but his request was met most willingly, and the top floor of one of

the blocks was made ready for their reception. The situation was

complicated by an order from the War Office to set aside two beds for

officials of the corps.

At first a little room on the Women’s floor was adapted for these

ladies; but an order was shortly received to make room for women

requiring to be segregated, and the little room was no longer

available for general use. Small rooms on other floors were very

seldom empty, and in these circumstances the only beds which could be

offered to officials were those in curtained cubicles in the general

ward, which were used in sickness by the Sisters of the hospital.

The ladies objected to this accommodation even temporarily, and they

were certainly entitled to better quarters; but they were apt to

lay the blame for a situation over which it had no control on the

hospital, instead of on the Army Medical Department. After frequent

representations from the Doctor-in-Charge, extending over nine months,

instructions were given for the reception of officials elsewhere; but

in the meantime irate administrators, arriving in the middle of the

night and refusing to make use of the only empty bed in the hospital,

were sometimes a real difficulty.

The Q.M.A.A.C. Hospital at Isleworth was not opened till the end of

January 1919, and the ‘temporary accommodation’ at Endell Street was

required for more than two years. The other women’s services found it

convenient to use it, and members of the G.S.V.A.D., the W.R.N.S.,

N.A.C.B., W.R.A.F., and W.L., found a resting place there. Ladies were

admitted from overseas and the East, with babies, nurses, governesses,

and occasionally husbands; while, under the heading of ‘civilians,’

women who were working in France with the Y.M.C.A., the Soldiers’

Christian Union, the Expeditionary Force Canteens, the Lena Ashwell

Concert Parties, and officers’ wives and servants, were also given

hospitality.

While this development in the women’s services was proceeding, the

Government was making increasing demands upon medical women, and

was introducing them in greater numbers into the hospitals at home

and abroad. In August 1917, a cable from Lady Chelmsford reached Dr.

Garrett Anderson, asking to be informed as to the terms of appointment

of doctors at Endell Street, and this was followed by a letter from

the Secretary of the Central Committee of the Countess of Dufferin’s

Fund at Simla. She stated that it had been decided ‘that one of the

large military hospitals in Bombay should be handed over to women

doctors,’ and she asked for information and suggestions which might be

helpful in organising it. The reply sent gave details of the Endell

Street establishment, and urged that the women should undertake the

‘entire control and management’ of the hospital. It advised, on

grounds of economy, that women should be employed as quartermasters

and storekeepers, spoke of the ease with which discipline could be

maintained by women, and of the help which a good warrant officer could

give.

The Indian hospital was established on one of the finest sites in

Bombay; but the charge of the hospital was vested in men, a Colonel

and a Registrar being appointed, although women doctors could have

filled these posts. The professional work, however, was in the hands

of women, and they made an undoubted success of it. In 1919 when men

were brought home from India in large numbers, some who had been in the

Women’s Hospital at Bombay came to Endell Street. They said it was ‘the

only good hospital they had been to in India,’ and spoke of it and of

its doctors with great appreciation and pleasure.

A request for information and help came from medical women in

America during 1918, enclosing a copy of a resolution which the

Women Physicians of California were sending to their Government. The

resolution urged

upon the Secretary of War that the services of women physicians

be utilised to the fullest extent by the United States War

Department in the present war; that opportunities for medical

service be given to medical women equal to the opportunities

given to medical men, both as members of the staffs of base

hospitals and otherwise; and that the women so serving be given

the same rank, title and pay given to men holding equivalent

positions.

As a result of this petition, the American War Department communicated

with the British War Office, asking a number of questions concerning

the employment of women doctors. The right hand of the War Office never

seemed to know what the left hand was doing, and three separate staff

officers, each armed with notebook and pencil, called on three separate

occasions to obtain the information which the American Government

required from the Doctor-in-Charge.

Doctors working for the Army in isolated posts wrote to Endell Street

to tell of difficulties or grievances arising out of their anomalous

position. They were doing the work of officers and were supposed to

exercise the authority of officers, yet they were not officers. In

some cases, they were refused first-class travelling warrants and were

furnished with third-class ‘as for soldiers’ families,’ while their

R.A.M.C. colleagues and the nurses were issued with the former. Or, on

the ground that they were ‘civilian women,’ the right to drive in an

army motor-car would be withheld from them; or they would be excluded

from the officers’ mess.

One wrote from East Africa, stating that her position had been

excellent under a C.O. who allowed her to wear a captain’s badge of

rank, but that his successor had ordered her to remove it, and she was

therefore a discredited person in the hospital to which she was posted.

Women working under R.A.M.C. colonels in R.A.M.C. hospitals were at

the mercy of the wisdom or the prejudices of the officers-in-charge,

and the pin-pricks and little indignities to which they were often

subjected were very unfair. They were volunteers, in the best sense of

the word, and if their services were accepted at all, no difference

should have been made between them and the men they worked among.

In a women’s unit, internal difficulties like these did not arise; but

the officer-in-charge of a military hospital is required to deal with

small offences; and when the Doctor-in-Charge ‘admonished’ defaulters,

she was conscious that her authority would have been greatly

strengthened if she had been wearing the badges of a lieut.-colonel.

In the casualty room, where men might not recognise a woman as an

officer, the doctors were sometimes placed at a disadvantage; but the

good feeling of the N.C.O.’s and the support which they gave to their

medical staff avoided any real trouble.

Urged thereto by the President of the Medical Women’s Federation,

Dr. Garrett Anderson and Dr. Flora Murray took up the question with

the War Office, and asked for honorary rank or commissioned rank for

women doctors serving with H.M. Forces. The Department refused, but

it was interesting to find that many individual officers could see no

objection to rank being held by women.

During the weeks of tension and anxiety which preceded the armistice,

no further action seemed possible; but shortly after that event, the

medical staff was unanimously in favour of reopening the matter. The

campaign started with a letter from Dr. Garrett Anderson to _The

Times_. But the Editor suppressed the correspondence which followed,

and the doctors therefore circularised the House of Commons. A leaflet

entitled ‘Bricks without Straw’ was sent out to all Members of

Parliament in November 1918. It stated the disabilities complained of

by medical women serving under the War Office, and called attention to

the action of the Income Tax Commissioners, who had refused their claim

to be assessed at the service rate.

Women had been recently enfranchised and the General Election was

approaching. The circular received a large and sympathetic response.

One member wrote:

As they are doing the same work as men in the military

hospitals, I can see no reason why they should not be entitled

to the same style or commission....

Other members wrote:

There is ample precedent for the grant of honorary rank to

ladies in the Armies of Europe--and seeing that the practical

value of it can be proved in this case, I think it should be

given.

The decision of the Income Tax Commissioners referred to in

your letter to _The Times_ must be reversed if the rank is

granted, and should be challenged if the rank is not granted.

And:

... You may rely upon me now and upon all future occasions to

support the demand you make.

And:

There seems to me to be great force in your contention that

where a woman doctor has to perform the duties of a colonel, in

authority over a large number of different sorts of troops in a

general military hospital, she should have the advantage which

military rank would give in maintaining discipline among them.

Altogether sixty-two Members of Parliament gave definite promises of

support and many others expressed a desire to help. Questions were

asked in the House; and the amount of sympathy and interest evinced by

Members were astonishing to those who made the usual official replies.

It was, however, too late in the session to do more. Parliament was on

the point of dissolving, and every one’s thoughts were concerned with

the coming election.

When the new House of Commons met in February 1919, the Prime Minister

and Mr. Bonar Law were pledged ‘to remove all existing inequalities

of the law as between men and women.’ The doctors circularised the

new House without delay, desiring to obtain consideration for their

requests before the new Army Act and Finance Act were drafted.

The documents forwarded to Members were entitled: ‘Memorandum on

the position of Women Doctors serving under the War Office,’ and

‘Application for Relief under Service Rate of Income Tax by Women

Doctors serving the War Office.’ The first requested that legislation

might ‘be introduced under the New Army Act to enable women doctors

serving under or attached to the War Office to hold Commissions.’ The

second asked for an alteration in the wording of the Income Tax Act.

In 1915–16, the doctors had claimed to be assessed under the Service

Rate of Income Tax, quoting Schedule E, page 2:

Persons who have served during the year as members of any

of the naval or military forces of the Crown, or in service

of a naval or military character in connection with the

present war for which payment is made out of money provided by

Parliament ... special rates of tax and scales of allowances

are applicable to the pay in connection with any such service.

The Surveyor of Taxes, however, disallowed the claim, though he could

give no reason for doing so. The matter was referred to the Secretary

of the Board of Inland Revenue in 1916–17, and without giving any

reason, he also informed them that they were not eligible for the

special rate of tax. In 1917–18, an appeal was heard by the Income Tax

Commissioners, who decided that ‘on the wording of the Section relief

could not be granted,’ and advised them to spend a large sum of money

in making an application to the High Court. All these persons were

profuse in expressions of sympathy, which were naturally irritating to

women who were only asking for justice. The application to Parliament

made a point of asking that relief might be made retrospective over

the years 1914–1919. This appeal to the House of Commons met with far

less response than the first one had done. Members who had written

almost gushingly before the general election, forgot to reply at all;

others thought that everything had been done which could be done, or

pointed out that the War was over; and when unsatisfactory replies to

questions were received and friends moved the adjournment of the House,

sufficient support was not forthcoming.

The women were supported by the British Medical Association. The matter

had been brought before the Naval and Military Sub-Committee, and its

members had been unanimously in favour of commissioning medical women.

Although the first point was not conceded, the second was, and the

new Income Tax gave women doctors relief under the Service Rate,

and allowed them to claim to be refunded, as from the year 1915–16.

The staff at Endell Street had learnt to look upon Surveyors and

Commissioners as ‘oppressors of the poor,’ and it was with genuine

satisfaction that they forwarded to these sympathetic gentlemen claims

for abatement and refund.

In the autumn of 1919, an official circular letter invited the

commanding officers of all units and formations to suggest ‘amendments’

to the Army Act. This gave the Doctor-in-Charge a last opportunity of

pleading for equality for women and men, whether as medical officers,

nursing orderlies, general service orderlies, clerks, or storekeepers.

And it enabled her to propose the formation of a reserve of women

organised on territorial lines and available in future emergencies.

Whether her draft ever reached the War Office, or whether it was buried

in some waste-paper basket on the way, is not known.

CHAPTER VIII

CLOSURE OF THE MILITARY HOSPITAL ENDELL STREET

Government Departments tend to economise by keeping a careful watch

over the salaries of their subordinate staff, and a great deal of

correspondence and effort were directed to improve the conditions of

pay for various groups of the women employed.

A strenuous attempt was made to obtain better terms for clerks, for the

pay given to them in 1915 was not a living wage. Twenty-five shillings

a week was considered enough for shorthand typists; and a colonel who

was interviewed on the subject refused assistance on the ground that

‘the girls in his office got no more, and they looked alright.’ After

weeks of letter writing, the pay was raised to twenty-six shillings,

with overtime at ninepence an hour; and gradually it was pushed up

for all grades of Government clerks. When a bonus for clerks was

introduced, the men received four shillings a week and the women

two shillings, although they were doing the same work. The weekly

salary finally reached thirty-nine shillings and forty-five shillings,

but the rate was always below that paid by civilian employers, and

the Government was in the position of exploiting the patriotism and

generous feeling of the women who worked for it.

The Quartermaster was graded and paid as a sergeant-major and the

storekeepers as sergeants. When these officials had given two years’

service, it was requested that the Quartermaster might be promoted to

a higher grade, and as this was refused because she was a ‘civilian,’

a claim was made for authority to draw the bonus for her and the

sergeants to which civilian employees were entitled. After many weeks

of waiting, the Doctor-in-Charge was informed that these members of the

staff were not civilians. Since they were paid under Royal Warrant,

they were N.C.O.’s, R.A.M.C., and were entitled to draw an additional

penny a day for each year of service. Thus, instead of a bonus

amounting to some shillings weekly, the Quartermaster was allowed to

draw an additional 1s. 2d. per week; and a similar economy was made in

respect of other members of her staff. Many months later, when the army

bonus and new rates of pay were introduced, the authorities would fain

have designated these officials as ‘civilians.’ But the letter calling

them N.C.O.’s, R.A.M.C., was very definite, and both they and the

medical officers benefited by the new rates.

The files were full of letters about inadequate pay or insufficient

allowances, or requests that the staff of Endell Street might come

under new rates announced in Army Council Instructions which did not

specially mention that hospital. In most cases the requests were

granted after long delay, and the arrears which accumulated during the

period of negotiation were drawn in a lump sum, and made a pleasant

impression of wealth.

A notable instance of procrastination occurred over the cooks’ pay,

correspondence concerning which spread over eleven months! The cooks

all had three or four years of continuous service to their credit;

during that period they had not received any increment, and the bonus

granted to ‘civilian subordinates’ had been refused to them. Then the

rate of pay for women engaged in cleaning and in the kitchen work was

raised; and the vegetable women and kitchen maids began to draw higher

pay than the cooks under whom they worked. It speaks volumes for the

good-feeling and loyalty of the cooks that no unpleasantness occurred

over this situation; and that although readjustment was delayed month

after month, everything continued to go smoothly and well. A few weeks

before the hospital closed the new rate of pay was settled, and a

substantial sum in arrears was available for each one.

[Illustration: AIRING LINEN

(Page 246)

(_Photo, Reginald Haines_)

]

[Illustration: HOSING THE SQUARE

(Page 247)

(_Photo, Reginald Haines_)

]

It may have been that the new Women’s Corps and Services offered a

more attractive life to women, or that hospital work began to pall

upon them after several years of war; but it became more difficult to

find recruits, and in 1918 a glad welcome was extended to a number of

American women who came over to London to serve as orderlies at the

Military Hospital, Endell Street. This little group of women was known

as the ‘Hazard unit’; for the work of organising it and sending it to

England was due to the energy, resource and friendship of Mrs. Hazard

of Syracuse. The American women, though untrained in hospital work and

unaccustomed to English life, took up the task before them with great

enthusiasm, and proved very useful members of the staff. The hospital

was much indebted to Miss Nancy Cook and Miss Marion Dickerman, who

gave a year of most valuable service, and whose happy personalities

endeared them to all those with whom they came in contact.

The problem of resting the orderly staff was always important, and as

the years passed, it became more pressing. The holidays allowed under

the terms of appointment were very insufficient, and it was essential

to give each one a full month’s leave in the summer, if they were to

keep well and fit for the work. This could only be done if other girls

could be found to take their places temporarily; for the summer was

always the busiest time of the year. An appeal for temporary workers

was sent to a number of the women’s colleges and girls’ schools, and in

1917 and 1918 a very cordial response was met with.

During the vacation, students from the London School of Medicine for

Women came in large numbers to work in the wards and laboratories and

operating theatre. Teachers from the women’s colleges at Oxford and

Cambridge and from girls’ schools gave up a month or a fortnight of

their hard-earned rest to relieve the hospital orderlies. Older girls

came by tens from Roedean School for girls to take up administrative or

clerical work or to be general duties orderlies. Wycombe Abbey sent its

contingent, and friends and younger sisters volunteered to help also.

The scheme was a great success: the regular orderlies appreciated the

good holiday and came back better for it, and the substitutes enjoyed

the novelty of the work and surroundings, and learnt much that was

useful to themselves. Sunburnt, muscular schoolgirls appeared to find

great pleasure in conveying stores and linen about the hospital, and

their good spirits were a delightful asset. They took an interest too,

in the personnel and customs of the hospital, and were wont to carry

on conversations about them in loud tones, which were very amusing to

those who could not help overhearing them.

A dormitory which three Roedean girls and an Endell Street orderly were

using was very close to the rooms occupied by Dr. Flora Murray and

Dr. Garrett Anderson. One summer night, as the babel of voices in the

residential quarters died down, the piercing conversation close at hand

attracted their attention.

1st Roedean: ‘Do you like Dr. Murray?’

2nd Roedean: ‘No, I don’t think I do.’

1st Roedean: ‘Why don’t you like her?’

2nd Roedean: ‘Oh, I don’t know. I don’t think I like her manner.’

3rd Roedean: ‘Have you ever spoken to her?’

2nd Roedean: ‘Yes, I have, once.’

1st Roedean: ‘What does she do?’

Orderly: ‘Oh, she sits in that office.’

1st Roedean: ‘Do you like Dr. Anderson?’

2nd Roedean: ‘Yes, I like her awfully.’

3rd Roedean: ‘Have you ever spoken to her?’

2nd Roedean: ‘Oh no, I’ve never spoken to her.’

1st Roedean: ‘What does she do?’

Orderly: ‘Oh, she does all the operations.’

Roedean in chorus: ‘Oh! how horrible!’

Warning voice from room above: ‘Campbell!’

Orderly: ‘Yes.’

Voice: ‘_They_ can hear every word you say.’

The silence which fell was almost as penetrating as the voices had been.

But while they retained their independence of mind and their vivacity,

they gave very real service to the hospital; and the Doctor-in-Charge

and the Matron were not less grateful than the orderlies who owed so

much to the students and others who set them temporarily free.

During the winter months which followed the Armistice there was little

change in the work coming into the hospital. Men arrived in large

numbers from France and from the East, and the hospital was full to

overflowing for Christmas 1918. It was to be the last Christmas at

Endell Street, and the Entertainment Committee and the staff decided

that it was to be the best, and festivities and gaieties were organised

on a special scale. As the new year advanced, men began to arrive from

every part of the world; the hospital ships brought them from India,

Egypt, Mesopotamia, Palestine, and Turkey, Salonika and Russia, Italy

and Africa. Some were recovering from wounds; some were repatriated

prisoners of war; and others were suffering from diseases contracted in

the East.

The surgical work became less pressing, and more wards were set aside

for medical patients. Cases of pneumonia and acute appendicitis were as

frequent as ever, but there was less night work; the convoys were fewer

and came at reasonably early hours, and there were no air-raids to get

every one out of bed. Innumerable men on demobilisation leave reported

or were brought in for accidents or illness, and the ‘Johnny Walker’

Ward was in constant use at night.

The returning soldier was strangely unmoved by the countries he had

visited, and seemed to have learnt little of their geography and

inhabitants, and to care not at all what became of them. Palestine,

perhaps, had interested him most, for the familiar Biblical stories and

names of places had made it real for him. A Scotsman, who was wounded

two miles distant from Jerusalem, never ceased to regret that he had

not entered that city. He had been thrilled by the waters of Jordan

and moved by the sight of Gaza and Beersheba, and it was a bitter

disappointment to be carried back and to miss the Holy City. Others

spoke of the Mount of Olivet and the road from Jerusalem to Jericho, of

Joppa and of Lebanon, with an interest and an appreciation which was

very different from that shown for Italy or Greece. But the general

feeling was one of relief at being back in England, combined with an

intense eagerness to be demobilised.

Regulations for demobilisation were issued at first in pamphlet

form, and later as thick books in more than one volume. They were

supplemented by conferences held at Headquarters, at which most

confusing discussions took place, and the blind attempted to lead the

blind to their mutual embarrassment. The regulations were amended,

altered, or amplified almost week by week, and the frequent small

changes in procedure had to be observed and noted. It was easy to make

a slip among the complicated rules for the disposal of patients. The

men did not themselves understand the regulations for demobilisation,

and each one was inclined to think himself entitled to ‘get out first,’

or failed to see how his position differed from that of his more

fortunate neighbour. Convoys of convalescent hospital cases arrived

from Russia or Italy or India, all eager to get home, and anxious not

to be detained long in the home hospital. The staff applied itself with

energy to the task of holding Boards and making up documents, and many

were the compliments received from N.C.O.’s and men upon the rapidity

with which their demobilisation was completed. Men from various units

who were about to be demobilised, or men who had been demobilised,

attended by hundreds in the casualty room, for medical examination and

report, and the task of examining them and assessing their disabilities

made heavy demands on the time of the doctors.

As the summer months passed, the tone of the men in the wards gradually

changed. They only wanted to get out of the army: to be rid of

discipline, to get back their former work, or to be pensioned. They

craved for liberty and plenty of amusement, and above everything they

desired to see restrictions of every kind removed. The inevitable

reaction had set in, and they were filled with half-understood desires

and a dissatisfaction which they could not explain.

As other hospitals in London closed, their patients were transferred to

those that remained open, and many such transfers were sent to Endell

Street. Apart from further treatment, which might or might not be

required, numbers of these men were ready to be demobilised, others to

be invalided; and many asked to be transferred to the neighbourhood of

their own homes. The Scots would wish to be sent to Scotland, the Irish

to Ireland, the Welsh to Wales; and for all such local accommodation

was obtained. The tone and manner of men transferred from other

hospitals, where discipline was slack, were unpopular with the staff;

but after a few days, the civilising influences of the nurses triumphed

and the men adopted more gentle ways. There were times when eighty or

a hundred men arrived with the intention of giving trouble, and those

in charge found it necessary to exert their authority and take a firm

stand. It was especially during these latter months that the work of

the doctors would have been much easier if they had been wearing badges

of rank.

In October 1919, an order was issued to evacuate and close the

hospital; and though this instruction had been more or less expected,

it was nevertheless received with regret; for it meant the termination

of the work and the dispersal of those who had been united so long and

so happily in the Women’s Hospital Corps.

No more convoys came in, and as the disposal of the present cases

was systematically proceeded with, the wards gradually fell vacant.

There was stock-taking to do and equipment to be returned to store

before the nursing staff could be released. Deficiencies and breakages

were disclosed, and the unaccountable disappearance of scissors and

bath-towels clouded the last days. By the end of the month, the

remaining patients had been passed over to other hospitals. The doctors

dined together and spent a festive evening at the Alhambra. They held

their last staff meeting and separated, with a pleasant sense of work

accomplished, many happy memories and the knowledge that the ties of

friendship would not be readily broken.

The Matron and Sisters were demobilised, and sadly turned to other

work or holidays. The last of the nursing orderlies said farewell, and

there remained only the clerks and quartermaster’s staff, with the

Doctor-in-Charge, for the purpose of winding up.

In recognition of their services, six awards of the Order of the

British Empire were made to doctors, and eleven Royal Red Crosses were

bestowed upon the Matron and nursing Sisters. Members of the Corps who

had served in France were also entitled to receive the 1914 Star, the

British War Medal and the Victory Medal.

* * * * *

Before finally separating, the members of the Women’s Hospital Corps

determined to perpetuate the name of the hospital which had grown so

dear to them all, and it was decided to raise a Commemoration Fund and

to endow a bed in the Women’s Hospital for Children in Harrow Road.

This hospital was chosen because Dr. Garrett Anderson, Dr. Flora Murray

and Dr. Buckley were on its staff, and because it aimed at giving

opportunities to women doctors in the study and practice of children’s

medicine. Under the able direction of Dr. Buckley and Dr. Sheppard, an

appeal was issued to all who had worked at Endell Street and to all who

had been patients there; and within a few months the first £1000 was

subscribed. The response from old patients was very friendly, and many

of them took a great deal of trouble to collect among their friends

and fellow-workmen, and sent substantial contributions.

Private S---- sent 50s. with a letter: ‘I have done my best for you. I

took the letter you sent me into work with me and some of them agreed

to help me, so I made out a paper as you will see and took it round the

Firm so you must excuse it being so dirty and would you kindly let me

have a letter back to take into work and show my Fellow workmen.’

Private C---- wrote that he had got up a dance. ‘I thought I would like

to do something towards it, being so good to me while I was in Hospital

there, so I have been able to get up a Dance in our village and I am

glad to say I had a good company there to help towards it, being for a

good cause, so I hope you will accept this order for £5, 9s. 0d.’

Private Cl---- enclosed 14s., with the words: ‘I try my best to help

you the way I was cared for when I was there.’

A touching letter from the niece of a man who had been killed since

his stay in the hospital, said: ‘... which my Mother’s brother was

an inmate for a time wounded, I wish to state that he was killed at

Bullecourt in France some few months afterwards. He was my Mother’s

only brother, and she is now the only one left of the family. She

wishes to most heartily thank all who cared and tendered for him whilst

he lay so far from home. She also wishes to send a small donation of

2s. 6d. to help a little your grand and God given work.’

The wife of another man who had died sent £1, ‘on behalf of my Late

Husband ... who died Feb. 28th, 1919, from Influenza and Lobar

Pneumonia after a week’s illness. He was just demobed three weeks to

the day we buried him. It will be a surprise to those who nursed him at

Endell St. He often spoke about it of what they had done for him & the

kindness shown to them the sister he said was a mother to him there was

no hospital as good as Endell St. to him he had some real good times

there & he never forgot them.’

Others became annual subscribers or filled collecting boxes, and their

letters showed affectionate remembrance of the staff. ‘I was very

Thankful for what I had done for me in Endell Street Hospital. And

thanks for sending me the Photo of the Staff. As the Doctor is on it

what attended me. So I can show it to my Friends.’

And again: ‘I was cared for kindly at that hospital and I was sorry to

leave it. I was wounded twice after being at that Hospital but I wasn’t

cared for anywhere else so kindly as I was at Endell St.’

Contributions came, too, from Australia and New Zealand, from Canada,

America, and South Africa; and during the year 1920, enough money was

subscribed to name a second cot after the Military Hospital, Endell

Street.

* * * * *

Endell Street was a changed place. The dreary, empty wards, where

equipment was collected and counted and checked, were miserable in

their loneliness. The busy kitchen was handed over to the R.A.M.C.

cook. The girls who remained counted linen and glass and china, or

sorted cutlery, furniture, pianos, wheel-chairs, and all the hospital

impedimenta. They concentrated on ledgers and registers. They entered

and checked and corrected, from morning till night. Romance had gone

out of the life and ‘Finis’ was written on the walls; but the old

unquenchable cheerfulness still dominated the stores and offices.

The Office of Works invaded the buildings early in November. After

that, workmen, who seemed to be always waiting for something or some

one, hung round the empty wards and staircases. A discourteous foreman

lounged about, with his hands in his pockets, and smoked and spat and

pushed his way into the offices without asking permission. The noise in

the square became intolerable: carts and vans and motor-lorries came

and went constantly; workmen played football at all hours, and the bell

clanged to summon them to and from work. In a confidential moment,

an officer at Headquarters said that ‘the Office of Works was almost

more than flesh and blood could bear.’ And the Doctor-in-Charge fully

endorsed this opinion.

By the end of November the ledgers and returns were practically

finished, and it was possible to demobilise the remaining members

of the staff. When they separated, as they did reluctantly and with

sorrow, the closure of the hospital was complete.

There was other work for professional people, like doctors and nurses

and clerks, to take up; but the future was blank to the young girls who

had been there so long and who were now to be unemployed. They missed

the hospital and the hospital life sadly. In many cases there was no

special place in the home circles for daughters who had been living

away for some years; those who had experienced the joy of work and of

responsibility, had to exchange these for the comparative inactivity of

home-life. Parental restrictions had become unfamiliar and now seemed

irksome to them; and they found unrelieved amusement a poor substitute

for work. Thus they suffered considerably, until they were able to

adapt themselves to new conditions or to find new openings.

The Doctor-in-Charge and Miss Draper, the chief compounder, were

detained for some weeks longer to supervise the removal of the stores

and equipment. Once this was accomplished, their work was finished, and

on the 8th January 1920 the buildings were formally handed over.

The Office of Works took final possession of the premises, and devoted

them to a different purpose under a quite different name, and ‘The

Military Hospital, Endell Street,’ became a wonderful and cherished

memory.

Printed in Great Britain by T. and A. CONSTABLE, Printers to

His Majesty, at the Edinburgh University Press.

Transcriber’s Notes

Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a

predominant preference was found in the original book; otherwise they

were not changed. Spelling variations related to dialect were not

changed.

Simple typographical errors were corrected; unbalanced quotation

marks were remedied when the change was obvious, and otherwise left

unbalanced.

Illustrations in this eBook have been positioned between paragraphs

and outside quotations. In versions of this eBook that support

hyperlinks, the page references in the List of Illustrations lead to

the corresponding illustrations.

Women as army surgeons · 第 12 / 12 章