Thirty-two minutes after the first alarm, all the birds had

disappeared, excepting two red-eyed vireos. The vireos continued to

scold vigorously. The owl had intruded on their nesting-ground. Not

twenty feet away a vireo's nest swung lightly from the horizontal limb

of a red beech. It seemed to me that the owl suspected the presence

of the nest, for he thrust out his head and swung it from side to

side as if searching for something. After awhile he discovered the

nest, and flew to the beech limb. When he had commenced to approach

the nest by short hitches along the limb, the vireos changed their

scolding to cries of alarm. Immediately all the birds returned. Again

the owl was told that he was a robber and a great rascal by every bird

in the grove. As he continued to approach the nest, I thought it time

to interfere. "Hold, there!" I shouted, and the effect on the owl was

instantaneous. He stopped short, crouched on the limb, then twisted his

impish face directly into the back of his neck, and glared at me with

a frightened look in his wide-open eyes. After a brief inspection he

tumbled forward off the limb, caught himself on his wings, and floated

as noiseless as a feather into the dark shadows of Magnolia Swamp. I

examined the vireo-nest and found it empty--in fact, it was not yet

completed.

It was evident, from what took place, that birds of different species

can communicate with each other.

First, the chickadees call other birds to the spot by cries that

certainly are understood to mean danger.

[Illustration]

Afterward, the vireos did the same thing. While the latter were

scolding the owl, other birds paid no attention, but responded at once

to their cries for help.

After the owl had disappeared, the birds scattered as before. The blue

jays and two thrushes stopped back to interview me, and find out if my

intentions were friendly.

When all the birds had disappeared except the vireos, I went in search

of a new sap orchard. I soon found a clump of red maples containing two

trees that had been tapped by woodpeckers. The belt of punctures on

both trees was nearly a foot in width, but the woodpeckers did not show

up during my three hours' tarry.

This woodpecker, the yellow-bellied (_Sphyropicus varius_), does not

nest on the Cape, so had doubtless departed in migration, but three

humming-birds were fighting for the sap-buckets, and a red squirrel

settled matters by driving the hummers from one tree to the other.

[Illustration: YELLOW-BELLIED WOODPECKER.]

The red squirrel was a new feature in a woodpecker's sap orchard. He

did not cling to one spot, as squirrels do when tapping for themselves,

but instead moved rapidly around the tree, thrusting his tongue

into the drills for the sweet sap. I suppose the squirrel owned the

territory where the maple-trees grew, and was more than willing that

the woodpeckers should tap the trees for his benefit.

The drills made by the woodpecker extended through the outside bark and

into the cambium layer. From my observation with a good glass, during

several seasons, I found that the woodpeckers were after the elaborated

sap that descends from the leaves, through the inner bark, and did not

extend the drills into the wood where they would reach the crude sap

flowing up from the roots. The wisdom of this procedure was evident.

The elaborated sap is far richer in nutriment than the crude sap, and

the woodpeckers knew more about the growth of trees than many human

beings, so worked understandingly.

Each drill is made deep enough to hold about two drops of sap. The

upper drills are the only ones to afford sap, which proves that it is

certainly the elaborated sap flowing down from the leaves that the

birds get.

I had read in works on ornithology that the woodpeckers tapped trees so

that the sap would attract insects upon which they could feed. Also

that the birds were after the soft bark, or cambium layer, for food.

While the woodpeckers do catch a fly now and then, it is evident, even

to a careless observer, that it is the sap that is sought. I have seen

them eat small pieces of the cambium layer, but I think they did so

because the soft bark was soaked with sweet sap.

The three humming-birds made that little sunny glade in the forest as

lively as a Mexican fandango. The two males were jealous of each other,

and both birds seemed desperately in love with the demure maid. She

attended strictly to business by drinking from the sap-buckets left

unguarded by the red squirrel. The male hummers spent most of the time

dancing in the air. They took turns in madly pursuing each other; the

pursued never turned tail, but flew backward with a swiftness that was

marvellous. The buzzing of their wings and their shrill cries furnished

the music for the wild dance.

The humming-birds drink from the drills while poised in the air, but

often alight and cling to the bark while drinking, the wings closed

and silent.

[Illustration]

Flies and hornets were in evidence, crawling on the bark of the maples,

or flying around the drills. A hornet stung the squirrel on the ear.

When I left, the latter was shaking his head and telling the hornets

what he thought of them.

When I returned to the cabin, I found a pair of catbirds in trouble.

They nested in a dense mass of shrubbery about eighty feet from the

dooryard. The male catbird met me some distance from the nest, and by

his excited cries I knew that some bird enemy was near at hand. When I

came in sight of the nest I discovered the trouble. A black snake was

making his way through the bushes toward the nest, and the mother-bird

was waging a fierce but fruitless battle.

I killed the snake, which was over five feet in length. The nest

contained four eggs. For the time being they were safe.

In due time the nest contained four baby catbirds. One moonlight night,

about ten o'clock, there was a great outcry from the old catbirds.

I had gone to bed, in my hammock, in the open air, with but a roof

over me to keep off the rain, so I could hear the birds and knew that

they were fighting to save their little ones. Before I could go to the

rescue, one of the catbirds flew to the bushes within three feet of my

head, and frantically called to me for help. When I came in sight of

the nest I saw a snake drop to the ground. One of the young catbirds

was missing. A hurried search beneath the bushes in the dim light was

unsuccessful. The snake had silently and swiftly disappeared with his

victim.

The old catbirds were pets of mine of several years' standing, and the

tragic fate of the baby-bird caused me to try to save the other three.

I removed the nest and placed it in a covered box in the cabin. The

catbirds followed me to the cabin door, but made no protest. The next

morning before sunrise the birds awoke me by their cries. When I was

dressing they spent the time flying to and fro, from cabin to hammock,

calling to me to hurry up and bring out their babies. Both birds had

insects in their bills. I did not take the nest to the old spot, but

instead placed it in a clump of bushes near the cabin. When I had

secured the nest, the old birds gave the three babies their breakfast.

This programme was followed day after day, until the young birds were

old enough to fly.

About two hundred visitors one Sunday inspected the nest, and the old

birds did not make a protest or show fear. They knew that I would

protect their little ones. A clear case of bird intelligence.

[Illustration]

Returning from the city, while the catbirds were rearing their young,

I heard a great outcry from a number of birds in the cabin dooryard.

At first I thought some bird enemy had destroyed the young catbirds,

but I found them all right. Just over the wall in the bushes was a nest

of the veery. This nest was in ruins. That morning it had contained

four newly hatched birds. While I was examining the nest, one of the

catbirds flew to a bush near me, and raised an outcry to attract my

attention. I spoke to the bird, and immediately it flew to the old

wall on the opposite side of the road. I went over, and saw the tail

of a black snake hanging from the Hunting wall. I firmly grasped the

tail, but could not pull the snake from between the rocks. I thought

of a plan to get the reptile out. I pushed the tail into the wall, and

when the snake had loosened his hold, by a strong pull I could gain

a few inches. Twenty minutes' hard work brought the snake out so I

could grasp him by the neck. He coiled around my arm with such power

as to stop the circulation. It reminded me of a wire rope tightened by

machinery. I unwound the coils and took my captive to a large dry-goods

box. I made a cage out of another box by putting wire netting over the

top. I placed the box on its side on some stakes, and introduced the

snake. He tried every inch of that box and netting for means of escape.

Two hours later he settled down for a good long sleep, and when he

awoke he appeared contented. I offered him food, but he would not eat.

For a month he did not eat or drink. I noticed that his skin was loose

in patches.

[Illustration: "HE COILED AROUND MY ARM."]

It was a month before the regular time for the black snake to shed its

skin, but it was evident that this interesting event was about to take

place. I put some rough rocks in the cage, and the snake pulled himself

between them in such a way as to pull off the old skin. Before this,

the snake was totally blind. He shed the skin over his eyes, and his

sight was restored. Shortly after he had shed his skin he glided to

the front of the cage and opened his mouth. I took this to mean food,

and gave him a frog, which he swallowed. After this, whenever he was

hungry, he would look at me with his mouth open. This snake was six

feet and two inches in length, and large accordingly. His muscular

power I had tested, and had found it to correspond to his size.

It is singular how many persons there are that think a snake's tongue

is a stinger. My snake would run his tongue through the wire mesh, and

sometimes I would touch it with a finger. At such times, the most of

the visitors present would cry: "Look out, he'll sting you!"

My snake proved to be fond of music. Evenings I would play on the

flute, while he would come to the front of his cage and listen. Some

tunes would excite him so he would glide about the cage. The Swiss

Waltz would always set him a-going. Shrill, discordant notes would send

him to the darkest spot in his cage, where he would coil and remain so

quiet as to appear lifeless. On the approach of cold weather the snake

became torpid, and he was killed.

Some years, snakes, of all kinds indigenous to this climate, are

numerous enough to destroy the nests of the small birds. Therefore

I kill the snakes that are bird-hunters, because I prefer birds to

snakes. I have found that some snakes, that come to my dooryard for my

pets, are so crafty as to make it nearly impossible to kill them. A

big black snake often came down the hill to the cabin, and when he had

reached a boulder he would look around to see if I was there writing.

This snake had a saucy, independent way of looking at me, as much as

to say, "Are you the hermit?" A movement on my part toward a club sent

the snake into the bushes. Throughout one season I tried my best to

kill that black snake without success. The next year he did not appear.

Very few snakes came out of winter quarters that spring.

[Illustration]

Another black snake had determined to swallow a pet toad. The toad

was a monster, and had escaped several times, but his hind legs were

badly scarred. The toad would come to me for protection. Usually he

would hop on to my feet when pursued. The snake was too crafty, to come

near enough for me to use my snake-club. I was telling some visitors

from the city about the toad and snake, when one young lady expressed

a strong desire to see a live snake. While we were talking, I heard

the toad cry out, and I knew that the snake was after him. I told my

visitors to keep quiet and they would see the toad come to me for

protection. The young lady that wanted to see a live snake gathered

up her skirts and fled down the old highway. The toad came in sight,

dragging the snake, which was clinging to a hind leg. When the snake

saw us, he dropped his hold but did not retreat. The toad hopped on

to my feet, nearly exhausted. The snake must have been made bold by

hunger, for he made a rush for the toad. My snake-club was near at

hand, and he was soon killed. The young lady that fled would not return

until fully convinced that the snake was dead. She did not see the

snake when he was alive, for she fled when I said one was coming.

A garter-snake made a home beneath my cabin. He was too small to

injure birds, so I did not disturb him. He became very tame during the

summer. His hole was under the door of my cabin. I could sit in the

doorway, and when he was passing in or out, he would stop for me to

rub his head. The second year he had increased in size. There was a

chestnut-sided warbler's nest near the cabin, containing young birds. I

heard cries of distress from the old birds, and when I investigated,

found the garter-snake trying to get at the nest. I struck him with a

small stick, and he hid in the weeds. That blow severed his friendship

for me. If he returned to the cabin and saw me in the doorway, he would

retreat until the coast was clear. Twice more I caught him at the

birds' nest. He escaped each time. He must have come to the conclusion

that I was protecting the birds for my own eating, for he left them

after that. The next year he ate a pet frog and robbed several bird's

nests. He had moved to an old stone wall, and did most of his hunting

by night. He tried to loot a catbird's nest, but the birds gave the

alarm, and the moon helped me to find the marauder. One blow and it was

all over. It would have been pleasant to study this snake, but I could

not allow my pet birds to be so cruelly persecuted.

XII.

THE INSTINCT OF THE COWBIRD

The books on ornithology tell us that the cowbird (_Molothrus ater_) is

a common summer resident of New England, without regard to locality.

However true this may be as to other parts, it is a fact that the bird

was unknown to me in Penobscot County, Maine.

Cowbirds are summer residents of Cape Ann, and I have studied their

habits for years. I commenced by requiring answers to the following

questions:

Why do birds, when victimized, rear the young cowbird?

Why does the young cowbird desert its foster parents to associate with

its own kind?

Why do young cowbirds lay eggs in other birds' nests, instead of

building nests for themselves?

How did the cowbird acquire this unnatural habit?

Writers on the subject usually answer the first question by the term

"stupidity," and the other three by the word "instinct."

In all my life I have never found the birds stupid. They are as

intelligent as to the requirements of bird life as man is as to the

requirements of human life.

The theory of instinct is only a dream of the uninitiated. Nature's

children are never troubled by such nightmares.

[Illustration]

The most of our bird books have the earmarks of the library. An author

may be familiar with a few birds studied afield, but the greater number

are studied in the library. Take the cowbird as an example. One author

after another rings in the same old chestnut about the disreputable

bird that lays its eggs in other birds' nests and deserts its

offspring. These authors wind up by calling attention to the wonderful

instinct that causes the young cowbird to desert its foster-parents

to associate with its kind. I will say now, that long before I had

the opportunity to study the bird, I did not believe it possible for

a young bird, by its own knowledge, to hunt up and associate with

birds of its kind. That would be a miracle, and the days of miracles

are passed. In my study of birds I have found that old birds educate

the young, and I knew that the young cowbird was piloted by its

mother, or the foster-parents turned it over to its kind to be rid of

incumbrances. Few writers have studied the cowbird through the nesting

season. Mr. John Burroughs writes that he found small eggs in the path

that had two pricks in the shell. Afterward he detected the cowbird

removing an egg from a bird's nest. Mr. Burroughs intimates that the

cowbird did this to deceive the owners of the nest. They, finding the

proper number of eggs, would not detect the fraud. I was sincerely

grieved that a delightful writer on natural history should make such

a break. His interpretation would endow the cowbird with a keen

reasoning power, and would make chumps of the others; too senseless

to know their own eggs. In my observations, when the victimized birds

return and find the alien egg, they exhibit great distress.

[Illustration: BLUE-WINGED YELLOW WARBLER.]

My first study of the cowbird happened in an unexpected manner. I was

watching the nest of a pair of yellow warblers (_Dendroica æstiva_)

that contained two eggs. While the owners were absent I saw a cowbird

flutter on to the nest and add her parasite egg to its contents. When

the yellowbirds returned they at once discovered what had taken place,

and acted as if wild with alarm and distress. For a half-hour the birds

flew wildly about, uttering plaintive cries, after which they settled

down on a twig, where they could overlook the nest. They now seemed

less excited, and were evidently holding a consultation. After awhile

they seemed to agree on a course of action, for the female went on

to the nest and the male bird tried to sing away the trouble, but I

thought his song less earnest than usual.

No more eggs were laid, which was somewhat remarkable, as the

yellowbird's number is usually four.

[Illustration]

I found the young cowbird hatched out just twelve days after the egg

was laid. The next morning I found the two yellowbirds out of the

shell. When the cowbird was two days old he crowded both the little

birds out of the nest. When I found them, one was dead and the other

gasping as if fatally hurt. While I was watching the latter, the

mother-bird appeared with an insect. She offered the food to the dying

bird, and appeared greatly troubled when it was not received. After

awhile she seemed to comprehend that the little one could not eat, and

she fed the insect to the cowbird. Before flying away, she returned to

the gasping bird, and looked at it by turning her head from side to

side, while she uttered a succession of low, plaintive notes.

After this, both yellowbirds had all they could do to supply the black

giant with food. When he was old enough to fly, or, at least, was

completely feathered, his foster-parents coaxed him out of the nest

after the manner of all bird-kind. Birds know when their young are old

enough to leave the nest, and withhold food until the little ones are

downright hungry, and then tempt them out with a dainty morsel. While

tempting the young cowbird from the nest, the yellowbirds made as much

effort and appeared as joyous when successful as if the labor had been

performed for their own bright-eyed, pretty birdlings.

[Illustration]

The young cowbird, when once out, did not return to the nest for

shelter. His growing appetite taxed the strength of both birds to the

utmost. Every moment of daylight was occupied in catering to his wants.

One day I missed the female yellowbird, and, after a long search, found

her engaged in building a new nest. She had forsaken her former charge.

Heretofore I have neglected to state that I often saw the mother

cowbird. I think she visited the nest several times a day after the

egg was laid. Her frequent visits had accustomed the young bird to her

presence, thus making possible what followed.

After discovering the new nest, I looked up the young cowbird, and

found the male yellowbird feeding him as usual, but not alone. The

old cowbird was acting as assistant, as if just aroused to the

responsibility of maternal duties. For several days both birds fed the

young cowbird, after which the yellowbird spent much of his time with

his mate, gradually deserting his charge, to return no more when the

second brood was out.

Thus my observations had answered two questions; my first and second.

My first question, "Why the victimized birds rear the parasite?" was

answered to my belief in this way: I believe that the yellowbirds had

had experience with cowbirds before, and intelligently understood that

they must sacrifice their first brood in order to raise a second brood

unmolested. The actions of the birds when they discovered the parasite

egg, their great distress, their consultation and prompt action, their

neglect to lay the usual number of eggs can be construed in no other

light. It is far beyond the province of instinct.

My second question, "Why the young cowbird deserts its foster-parents?"

is already intelligently answered. It is no desertion. The foster

parents turn over the parasite to its own mother, in a matter-of-fact

way, and then go about their own affairs in peace.

My third question, "Why do young cowbirds lay eggs in other birds'

nests instead of building nests for themselves?"

[Illustration]

When the cowbird was out of the shell, it was big and black. It was my

first young cowbird, and I thought it was a male. I made it a male in

my note-book. While the bird was in the nest I fastened a bit of copper

wire to its leg, and the next spring, when it returned, I found that

the bird was a female. I saw her with another female, I think it was

the mother, visiting birds' nests. So the young cowbird was educated to

lay its eggs in other birds' nests. Nest-building is educational and

not instinctive.

[Illustration]

My fourth question could not be answered by observation.

How did the cowbird acquire this unnatural habit?

The answer to this question is not within the province of proof. It

is fair to assume that the cowbird, in the distant past, reared its

young in a nest of its own. It may have happened that some tragedy had

deprived a family of young cowbirds of their parents. Other birds may

have reared the young ones until they were capable of providing for

themselves. In migration all would remain together, but when nesting

begun the young cowbirds would not be tolerated near a nest. Not

educated in nest building, the female would fly to other nests to drop

her eggs. Other cowbirds may have adopted the same method, finding it

pleasant to have the care of their babies shouldered on to servants,

like some human mothers.

However, the whole thing is mere speculation, and it is not worth while

to follow it further.

[Illustration]

A few years ago a cowbird laid an egg in a chewink's nest. The chewink

visited my dooryard. I did not remove the egg, but watched for the

cowbird. Before the egg was hatched I shot the mother. I wanted to see

if a young cowbird, reared without his own mother, would go out to

the cow-pasture where there was a flock of old cowbirds. The chewinks

reared the cowbird and three of their own babies. This was the first

brood. When the mother chewink made a new nest, the father took care of

the four little ones. Before his mate hatched the second brood, he took

his charge to a bird resort near a pond. This was near the cow-pasture,

and the flock of cowbirds resorted to the pond for water. It gave the

young cowbird a good chance to go with its kind. Several times I saw

cowbirds approach the youngster, but he always fled as if he thought

that his life was in danger. He acted just as young tame crows do when

they see other crows near them. That fall all the chewinks, that is,

the old ones and the first brood, with the cowbird, remained about the

dooryard until migration. The second brood of chewinks was destroyed

by a snake, after which the first family was brought back. The next

spring the cowbird did not return with the chewinks. As a matter of

fact, only two of the five chewinks returned. I suppose the others were

killed in the rice-fields. I had wired the cowbird with copper wire, so

looked for him in the different flocks in my locality. He was not to be

found, and was probably shot because he was with the chewinks in the

rice-fields.

[Illustration]

Two years ago I found a cowbird's egg in the nest of a Maryland

yellowthroat. This nest was under a tussock of cut grass, just over a

stone wall that enclosed the cow-pasture. As usual, it was the first

nest of the Maryland yellowthroats. The young birds, three besides

the cowbird, were crowded out of the nest, but as luck would have it

they fell into a cavity on one side of the nest, and 'were fed by the

parents. I saw the mother cowbird feed her baby before he was out

of the nest, and when he could hop about, his mother led him to the

cow-pasture. Afterward I saw her carry flies from the cows to her

baby, which was in the bushes near the wall. I think the Maryland

yellowthroats covered their own little ones from the night air. Perhaps

one of them protected the cowbird. I did not see the foster-parents

feed the young cowbird after he was able to leave the nest. I watched

one morning for two hours, and saw the birds make many trips with

insects, which they fed to their own birds. The cowbird was near at

hand, over the wall, but the birds did not go near him.

From my observations I am convinced that the cowbird does not desert

its offspring, but; instead, keeps an eye to its welfare, and ends by

assuming the whole care of its food, and leads it to associate with its

kind after it is large, or old enough to fly.

[Illustration]

A Hermit's Wild Friends; or, Eighteen Years in the Woods · 第 7 / 11 段