CX.

That which has been called the “negative theology,” has been spreading

rapidly these last few years, though for the most part silently. In

the first instance it may have been simply “a recoil from some of the

doctrines which are to be heard at church and chapel; a distrust of

the old arguments for, or proofs of, a miraculous revelation; and

a misgiving as to the authority, or extent of the authority of the

Scriptures.” But as was sure to be the case, the “negative theology”

could not stop, and has not stopped here. Men who have come across

these recoils, distrusts, misgivings, will soon find, if they are

honest and resolute with themselves, that there is another doubt

underlying all these, a doubt which they may turn from in horror when

it is first whispered in their hearts, but which will come back again

and again. That doubt is whether there is a God at all, or rather,

whether a living, personal God, thinking, acting, and ruling in this

world in which we are, has ever revealed Himself to man.

This is the one question of our time, and of all times; upon the answer

which nations or men can give to it hang life and death.... One cannot

stand upon a simple negation. The world is going on turning as it used

to do, night succeeding day and generation generation; nations are

waking into life, or falling into bondage; there is a deal of wonderful

work of one sort or another going on in it, and you and I in our little

corner have our own share of work to get done as well as we can. If you

put out my old light, some light or other I must have, and you would

wish me to have. What is it to be?

You will answer, probably, that I have touched the heart of the matter

in putting my question. Night follows day, and generation, generation.

All things are founded on a “permanent order,” “self-sustaining

and self-evolving powers pervade all nature.” Of this order and

these powers we are getting to know more every day; when we know

them perfectly, man, the colossal man, will have reached the highest

development of which he is capable. We need not trouble ourselves

about breaking them, or submitting to them; some of you would add,

for we cannot either break them or submit to them. They will fulfil

themselves. It is they, these great generalizations, which are alone

acting in, and ruling the world. We, however eccentric our actions may

be, however we may pride ourselves on willing and working, are only

simple links in the chain. A general _law of average_ orders the unruly

wills and affections of sinful men.

But here I must ask, on what is this permanent order, on what are these

laws which you tell me of, founded? I acknowledge a permanent order,

physical laws, as fully as you can, but believe them to be expressions

of a living and a righteous will; I believe a holy and true God to be

behind them, therefore I can sit down humbly, and try to understand

them, and when I understand, to obey. Are the permanent order, the laws

you speak of, founded on a will? If so, on whose will? If on the will

of _a_ God, of what God? Of a God who has revealed His character, His

purpose, Himself, to you? If so, where, how, when?

But if you tell me that these laws, this order, are not founded on

any living will, or that you do not know that they are, then I say you

are holding out to me “an iron rule which guides to nothing and ends

in nothing—which may be possible to the logical understanding, but

is not possible to the spirit of man”—and you are telling me, since

worship is a necessity of my being, to worship that. In the name and

in the strength of a man, and a man’s will I utterly reject and defy

your dead laws, for dead they must be. They may grind me to powder,

but I have that in me which is above them, which will own no obedience

to them. Dead laws are, so far as I can see, just what you and I and

all mankind have been put into this world to fight against. Call them

laws of nature if you will, I do not care. Take the commonest, the most

universal; is it or is it not by the law of nature that the ground

brings forth briers and all sorts of noxious and useless weeds if you

let it alone? If it is by the law of nature, am I to obey the law, or

to dig my garden and root out the weeds? Doubtless I shall get too old

to dig, and shall die, and the law will remain, and the weeds grow over

my garden and over my grave, but for all that I decline to obey the law.

I see a law of death working all around me; I feel it in my own

members. Is this one of your laws, a part of the “permanent order,”

which is to serve me instead of the God of my fathers? If it be I mean

to resist it to the last gasp. I utterly hate it. No noble or true

work is done in this world except in direct defiance of it. What is to

become of the physician’s work, of every effort at sanitary reform, of

every attempt at civilizing and raising the poor and the degraded, if

we are to sit down and submit ourselves to this law?

Am I never to build a house, out of respect to the law of gravitation?

Sooner or later the law will assert itself, and my house will tumble

down. Nevertheless I will conquer the law for such space as I can.

In short, I will own no dead law as my master. Dead laws I will hate

always, and in all places, with all my heart, with all my soul, with

all my mind, and with all my strength.

True Manliness From the Writings of Thomas Hughes · 第 114 / 211 题