Comments of German Publicists

Immediately following the sending out by the semi-official Wolff

Telegraph Bureau on March 19 of an account of the discussion in the Main

Committee of the Reichstag on March 16 of the Lichnowsky memorandum,

together with excerpts from that document, the editorial writers of the

German newspapers began emptying vials of wrath upon the head of the

former Ambassador in London. With the exception of the Socialist and a

few Liberal newspapers, the press was practically a unit in condemning

the Prince for his "treasonable and indiscreet acts" and in asserting

that, although his "revelations" might be welcomed with shouts of joy in

the allied countries, they would have no serious effect upon the

fighting spirit of the German Nation.

In trying to explain what prompted Prince Lichnowsky to write his

memorandum for "the family archives," nearly all the German editors lay

great stress upon his alleged personal vanity and his resentment at

seeing his efforts toward strengthening the bonds between England and

Germany made a grim joke by the outbreak of the world war. The Prince is

also called a simple-minded person, completely taken in by the deceptive

courtesy of the British diplomats and possessing none of the

qualifications necessary to make him a profitable representative of the

Kaiser at the Court of St. James's. All through the comments, from

extreme Pan-German to socialistic, runs a vein of sarcastic criticism of

the peculiar "ability" shown by the German Foreign Office in picking its

Ambassadors.

All the Pan-German and annexationist papers take occasion to link up

Prince Lichnowsky with Dr. von Bethmann Hollweg, the former Imperial

Chancellor, and make the latter responsible for the appointment of the

"pacifist" Prince. In doing this they renew all their old charges of

weakness and pacifism against the ex-Chancellor, and intimate that he

may be the next German formerly occupying a high place in the Government

to write memoranda for his family archives. Some of the papers did not

wait to write regular editorials about the memorandum, but interlarded

their reports of the meeting of the Reichstag Committee with sarcastic

comment and explanations. This was notably the case with the Vossische

Zeitung, the leading exponent of reconciliation with Russia at the

expense of Great Britain.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 391 / 400 题