PAYER'S DEFENSE

Herr von Payer also denied the statement that the then Foreign Secretary

was in Vienna in 1914, as well as the statement that Count von

Pourtalès, the German Ambassador in Petrograd, had reported that Russia

would in no circumstances move. The Sukhomlinoff trial had shown how

unfounded were Prince Lichnowsky's reproaches against Germany for

replying to the Russian mobilization by an ultimatum and a declaration

of war. It was also false to assert that the German Government rejected

all Great Britain's mediation proposals. Lord Grey's last mediation

proposal was very urgently supported in Vienna by Berlin. The aim of the

memorandum was obvious. It was to show the reader how much better and

more intelligent Prince Lichnowsky's policy was, and how he could have

assured the peace of the empire if his advice had been followed.

The Vice Chancellor continued:

"Nobody will reproach the Prince with this belief in himself. He was

also free to make notes about events, and his attitude toward them, but

he should then have considered it a duty that his views should not have

become known to the public, and, no matter how small his circle of

readers was, it was his duty to state nothing contradicting facts which

he knew. As things now are, the memorandum will cause enough harm among

malevolent and superficial people. The memorandum has no historical

value whatever."

Referring to a manifolded copy of a letter from Dr. Mühlon, who is at

present in Switzerland, and at the outbreak of war was on Krupps' Board

of Directors, Herr von Payer said that the letter related to the

utterances of two highly placed gentlemen from which he drew the

conclusion that the German Government in July, 1914, lacked a desire

for peace. Both these gentlemen had stated in writing that Dr. Mühlon

had suffered from nerves, and he (Herr von Payer) also took the view

that his statements were those of a man of diseased mind.

In the discussion that followed, Herr Scheidemann said that the

Socialist Party regarded imperialism as the fundamental cause of the

war. Prince Lichnowsky's memorandum, in which he attempted to put the

blame for the war on Germany, could, in his opinion, only make an

impression on so-called out-and-out pacifists.

Herr Müller-Meiningen said that, notwithstanding what Dr. Mühlon and

Prince Lichnowsky had said, he was absolutely convinced that the

overwhelming majority of the German people, the Chancellor, and the

representatives of the Foreign Office, and, above all, the German

Emperor, always desired peace.

Herr Stresemann expressed a desire to see the last White Book

supplemented. Prince Lichnowsky's memorandum could not be taken

seriously.

Herr von Payer, intervening, said that the question as to whether

criminal or disciplinary action might be taken against Prince Lichnowsky

was considered by the Imperial Department of Justice. The result was

that, on various legal grounds, neither a prosecution of the Prince for

diplomatic high treason in the sense of Paragraph 92 of the Penal Code,

nor proceedings under Paragraph 89 or Paragraph 353, the so-called Arnim

paragraph, would have offered any chance of success. After the Prince's

retirement, there was no longer any question of disciplinary proceedings

against him. The Prince has been prohibited by the Foreign Office from

publishing articles in the press.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 389 / 400 题