AUSTRIA AND RUSSIA

Once again we had successfully withstood one of the many threats against

the strength characterizing our policy. Russia had been obliged to give

way to us all along the line, as she never got an opportunity to advance

Serbian wishes. Albania was set up as an Austrian vassal State, and

Serbia was driven away from the sea. The conference was thus a fresh

humiliation for Russia.

As in 1878 and 1908, we had opposed the Russian program without German

interests being brought into play. Bismarck had to minimize the mistake

of the Congress by a secret treaty, and his attitude in the Battenberg

question--the downward incline being taken by us in the Bosnian

question--was followed up in London, and was not given up, with the

result that it led to the abyss.

The dissatisfaction then prevalent in Russia was given vent to during

the London Conference by an attack in the Russian press on my Russian

colleague and on Russian diplomacy.

His German origin and Catholic faith, his reputation as a friend of

Germany, and the accident that he was related both to Count Mensdorff

and to myself were all made use of by dissatisfied parties. Although not

a particularly important personality, Count Benckendorff possessed many

qualities of a good diplomat--tact, worldly knowledge, experience, an

agreeable personality, and a natural eye for men and things. He sought

always to avoid provocative attitudes, and was supported by the attitude

of England and France.

I once said: "The feeling in Russia is very anti-German." He replied:

"There are also many strong influential pro-German circles there. But

the people generally are anti-Austrian."

It only remains to be added that our exaggerated Austrophilism is not

exactly likely to break up the Entente and turn Russia's attention to

her Asiatic interests.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 348 / 400 题