SAYS FRANCE ASKED TERMS

God is my witness that we have tried everything possible to avoid a new

offensive. The Entente would not have it. A short time before the

beginning of the offensive in the west M. Clemenceau inquired of me

whether and upon what basis I was prepared to negotiate. I immediately

replied, in agreement with Berlin, that I was ready to negotiate, and

that as regards France I saw no other obstacle for peace than France's

desire for Alsace-Lorraine.

The reply from Paris was that France was willing to negotiate only on

that basis. There was then no choice left.

The gigantic struggle in the west has already begun. Austro-Hungarian

and German troops are fighting shoulder to shoulder as they did in

Russia, Serbia, Rumania, and Italy. We are fighting united for the

defense of Austria-Hungary and Germany. Our armies will show the Entente

that French and Italian aspirations to portions of our territory are

Utopias which will be terribly avenged.

The explanation of this attitude of the Entente Powers, which verges on

lunacy, is to a great extent to be sought in certain domestic events

here, to which I shall return later. Whatever may happen, we shall not

sacrifice German interests any more than Germany will desert us. Loyalty

on the Danube is not less than German loyalty. We are not fighting for

imperialist or annexationist ends, either for ourselves or for Germany,

but we shall act together to the end for our defense, for our political

existence and for our future.

The first breach in the determination of our enemies to war has been

driven by the peace negotiations with Russia. That was a break-through

by the idea of peace.

It is a symptom of childish dilettantism to overlook the close

relationship of the various peace signatures with each other. The

constellation of enemy powers in the east was like a net. When one mesh

was cut through the remaining meshes loosened of their own accord.

We first gave international recognition to the separation of Ukraine

from Russia, which had to be accomplished as an internal affair of

Russia. Profiting from resultant circumstances which were favorable to

our aims, we concluded with the Ukraine the peace sought by that

country.

This gave the lead to peace with Petrograd, whereby Rumania was left

standing alone, so that she also had to conclude peace. So one peace

brought another, and the desired success, namely, the end of the war in

the east, was achieved.

The peace concluded with Rumania, it is calculated, will be the starting

point of friendly relations. The slight frontier rectifications which we

receive are not annexations. Wholly uninhabited regions, they serve

solely for military protection. To those who insist that these

rectifications fall under the category of annexations and accuse me of

inconsistency, I reply that I have publicly protested against holding

out a license to our enemies which would assure them against the dangers

of further adventures.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 271 / 400 题