Statement by Sir Eric Geddes

_First Lord of the British Admiralty_

_Sir Eric Geddes in a speech before the House of Commons on

March 20, 1918, for the first time revealed the total shipping

losses of Great Britain and the other Allies and neutrals from

the beginning of the war up to Jan. 1, 1918. His summary was

followed next day by a statement from the Admiralty Office

giving the figures in fuller detail. This was made public

simultaneously at London and Washington. The essential portions

of both utterances are presented below. Sir Eric Geddes said:_

The world's tonnage from the commencement of the war until Dec. 31,

1917, exclusive of enemy-owned tonnage, has fallen by a net figure of,

roughly, 2,500,000 gross tons. This is out of 33,000,000 estimated

allied and neutral ocean-going tonnage, which is arrived at after

deducting small craft, river and estuary craft, and a considerable

amount of lake tonnage, tugs, &c., so that with a net loss of 2,500,000

tons we, the allied and neutral world, have suffered about 8 per cent.

reduction in ocean-going tonnage of the world, excluding enemy

countries. The total world's tonnage, exclusive of enemy tonnage, is

42,000,000, and the deduction is made after careful consideration and

investigation. The percentage of net loss in British tonnage alone is

higher than this, and reaches 20 per cent. for British tonnage, the more

favorable allied and neutral tonnage percentage being, of course, due

largely to a credit brought in by the United States of interned German

ships.

The main submarine attack is upon us. It was to starve these islands

that the enemy instituted this form of warfare. In 1915-16 the output of

new tonnage was very low--it was lowest in 1916. In fact, before the

intense submarine warfare commenced we were over 1,300,000 tons to the

bad from all causes since the beginning of the war. Then our shipping

has been in the war zone to a far greater extent and far longer than has

that of some of our allies, and our navigational risks and losses, which

are included, are greater, because of the absence of lights in the

waters around our coast and elsewhere.

With regard to enemy exaggeration: For the twelve months of

unrestricted submarine warfare, from Feb. 1, 1917, to Jan. 31, 1918, the

enemy has proclaimed in his public notifications that he has sunk over

9,500,000 tons of British, allied, and neutral shipping. The actual

figures of vessels sunk by submarine action, including those damaged and

ultimately abandoned, amount roughly to 6,000,000 tons, so that we have

an exaggeration of 3,500,000 tons in twelve months, or well over 58 per

cent. In January the exaggeration was 113 per cent. It is rather amusing

that since I publicly showed up this grossly false declaration of

results the usual return of submarine sinkings for February has not been

issued by Berlin. It is now overdue. I think, if any proof of the

failure of the campaign is needed, this exaggeration and Berlin's

reticence would show it.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 204 / 400 题