JAPAN AND SIBERIA

[The speaker then took up an inquiry regarding a suggestion of Japanese

intervention in Siberia. He said the hypothesis that whenever one

country sends troops into another country those troops invariably stay

where they are sent, and annexation is the result, was false; if such

were the case there would be a bad outlook for the north of France. He

argued that if the Japanese did intervene it would be as friends of

Russia and enemies of Germany, to preserve the country from German

domination, and he proceeded thus:]

Russia lies absolutely derelict upon the waters, and now it has no power

of resistance at all; there can be a German penetration from end to end

of Russia, which, I think, will be absolutely disastrous for Russia

itself, and certainly will be very injurious to the future of the

Allies. I suspect that at this moment a German officer is much safer

traveling at large through Russia than an allied officer. Why? Not

because the Russians love the Germans, but because, as a matter of fact,

the German penetration has really struck at the root of Russian power. I

was informed the other day that only one bank was allowed at Moscow.

That bank is a German bank.

The Bolshevist Government, I believe, sincerely desire--I hope not too

late, though I fear it may be so--to resist this German penetration. How

can they resist it when they themselves or their predecessors have

destroyed every instrument which makes resistance possible?

Inevitably Russia's allies have to ask themselves whether, if Russia

herself has destroyed every instrument of self-protection which she once

possessed, they cannot themselves among themselves supply that which she

now lacks. We do that in Russia's own interests and for Russia's own

sake, if it is done. It is not done to satisfy the greed of this or that

power. That is the Allies' point of view. May I ask the House to

consider the question from the Russian point of view? It is impossible

to penetrate the future. Russia has always been a country of surprises,

and that she remains at the present moment. What are the things which

most of us fear for Russia when we look to the future? Frankly, I tell

the House what I myself fear for Russia is this: Under the impulse,

under the shadow of the great revolution, the cataclysm of social order

has been shaken to its foundations, and many disasters, and I fear many

crimes, have been committed.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 188 / 400 题