R.G.

_Caxton's Printing-office_ (Vol. ii., pp. 99. 122. 142.).--It is a pity

MR. NICHOLS did not take the trouble to see, and, having seen, to notice

in his first communication, that Abbot Islip was mentioned in the

passage from Stow's _Survey_ cited by MR. RIMBAULT. As that gentleman

quotes from, I believe, the second edition of the _Survey_, I may be

allowed to doubt, until it is clearly shown, that "Islip's name has been

introduced by the error of some subsequent writer." But supposing this

to be so, it would in no way affect the only question which is material,

Who was Caxton's patron? nor touch the accuracy of the _Life of Caxton_,

which MR. NICHOLS seems desirous of impeaching. I am anxious to point

this out, because I feel it right to vindicate to the utmost, where they

deserve it, useful works, which, like the little volume I am writing of,

are published at a price that ensures for them a circulation of almost

unlimited extent.

Notes and Queries, Number 42, August 17, 1850 · 第 38 / 69 题