The head of one section is-- {181}

"_Newes_ from any-whence, or, _Old Truth_ under a supposal of

_Noueltie_."

Chaucer uses for _the newe_ and of _the newe_ (sc. fashion)

elliptically. _Tiding_ or _Tidings_, from the A.-S. Tid-an, evidently

preceded _newes_ in the sense of inteligence, and may not _newes_

therefore be an elliptic form of _new-tidinges_? Or, as our ancestors

had _newelté_ and _neweltés_, can it have been a contraction of the

latter? If we are to suppose with Mr. Hickson that _news_ was "adopted

bodily into the language," we must not go to the High-German, from which

our early language has derived scarcely anything, but to the

Neder-Duytsch, from the frequent and constant communication with the Low

Countries in the sixteenth century. The following passages from Kilian's

_Thesaurus_, printed by Plantin, at Antwerp, in 1573, are to the

purpose, and may serve to show how the word was formed:--

"_Nieuwtijdinge_, oft _wat nieuws_, Nouvelles, Nuntius vel

Nuntium."

"_Seght ons wat nieuws_, Dicte nous quelquechose de nouveau,

Recita nobis aliquid novi."

"_Nieuwsgierich, nygierich_, Convoiteux de nouveautez, Cupidus

novitatis."

I trust these materials may be acceptable to your able correspondents,

and tend to the resolution of the question at issue.

Notes and Queries, Number 42, August 17, 1850 · 第 9 / 69 题