OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_BY MR. PUNCH'S STAFF OF LEARNED CLERKS_.)

MR. COMPTON MACKENZIE gives us in _Sylvia and Michael_ (SECKER) a

continuation--I hesitate to say a conclusion--of the adventures of

that amazing heroine, _Sylvia Scarlett_, which, being not a sequel but

a second volume, needs some familiarity with the first for its full

enjoyment. Not that anyone even meeting _Sylvia_ for the first time

in mid-course could fail to be intrigued by the astounding things that

are continually happening to her. The variety and piquancy of these

events and the general brilliance of Mr. MACKENZIE'S colouring must

keep the reader alert, curious, scandalized (perhaps), but always

expectant. His scheme starts with an invigorating plunge (as one might

say, off the deep end) into the cabaret society of Petrograd in 1914,

where _Sylvia_ and the more than queer company at the pension of _Mère

Gontran_ are surprised by the outbreak of war. Incidentally, _Mère

Gontran_ herself, with her cats, whose tails wave in the gloom "like

seaweed," and her tawdry spiritualism--"key-hole peeping at infinity"

the heroine (or the author) rather happily calls it--is one of the

least forgettable figures in the galaxy. I have no space to indicate

what turns of this glittering kaleidoscope eventually bring _Sylvia_

and _Michael_ together during the Serbian retreat, though there are

scenes upon which I should like to dwell, notably that of the death

of _Guy Hazlewood_, an incident whose admirable restraint shows Mr.

MACKENZIE at his best. One question I have to ask, and that is how

has _Sylvia_ learnt to imitate so bewilderingly the mannerisms of

_Michael_? Her soliloquies especially might have come straight from

the first volume of _Sinister Street_, so much more do they suggest

the cloistered adolescence of Carlington Road than a development from

her own feverish youth. While I cannot pretend that she has for me the

compelling vitality of _Jenny Pearl_, her adventures certainly make

(for those who are not too nice about the morals or the conversation

of their company) an exhilarating, even intoxicating entertainment,

the end of which is, I am glad to think, still remote.

* * * * *

The publishers, in their preface to Mr. HUGH SPENDER'S new novel, _The

Seekers_ (COLLINS), led me to believe that it was written with the

object of denouncing the dangers and the frauds of spiritualism. This,

however, is by no means the case. To be sure the first few chapters do

contain an account of a _séance_, which serves not so much to lay

bare the mysteries of spiritualism as to bring together a few of the

characters in the novel. From that point onward there is nothing

more about spooks, save for an occasional reference. It is when the

_dramatis personæ_ have been well collected in and about a Yorkshire

vicarage that things really get a move on and begin to hum. No reader

is entitled to complain of a lack of excitement; the mortality,

indeed, is almost Shakspearean. _Rudge_, a medium, who must not be

confused with our old friend, _Mr. Sludge_, perishes in a snowstorm.

_John Havering_ batters in the head of _Hubert Kenyon_, and later

on commits suicide, while _Beaufort_, a Labour leader, is wrongfully

charged with the murder of _Hubert_ and barely escapes with his life.

Everything however ends comparatively well, owing to a strong female

interest. Mr. SPENDER is usually a careful workman, but sometimes his

sentences get the better of him. Here is one such: "She wondered if

Peter, who must have seen Mary as he came into the vicarage disappear

into the study, had gone in, hoping to find her there as he left the

house." It is not often however that Mr. SPENDER leaves his clauses to

fight it out together like that.

* * * * *

In _The Golden Rope_ (LANE) Mr. J.W. BRODIE-INNES has tried to combine

a tale of mystery and murder with the love-story of a man of fifty;

and, on the whole, it is a fairly successful effort. _Alan Maclean_,

the middle-aged one, who tells the tale, was a celebrated artist, and,

when he made his way to Devon to paint Pontylanyon Castle, he little

expected to find himself involved in a maze of intrigue and adventure.

The castle, however, was owned by a lady of great but unfortunate

possessions. In the first place she had a dual personality (and,

believe me, it is the very deuce to have a dual personality); and,

secondly, she possessed a crowd of relatives (Austrian) who wanted her

estate and were ready to remove mountains and men to get it. I know

nothing of _Mr. Maclean's_ pictures except that I am assured by the

author that they were exquisitely beautiful, but I do know that Mr.

INNES'S own canvas suffers from overcrowding, and, although I admire

the deft way in which he handles his embarrassment of figures, his

task would have been less complicated and my enjoyment more complete

if he had managed to do with fewer. Otherwise I can recommend _The

Golden Hope_ both for its exciting episodes, lavish of thrills, and

for the warning it gives to men of fifty to stick to their pigments,

or whatever their stock-in-trade may be.

* * * * *

_The Cinderella Man_ (HODDER AND STOUGHTON), "a romance of youth,"

by HELEN and EDWARD CARPENTER, is more suited to the ingenuous than

the sophisticated reader. Its hero is a poet, _Tony Quintard_, very

poor and deathly proud. The scene is set in New York and largely

in _Tony's_ attic verse-laboratory, which _Marjorie_, the rugged

millionaire's daughter, visits by way of the leads in a perfectly

proper if unconventional mood. The idiom occasionally soars into

realms even higher. Thus when _Tony's_ father dies he is "summoned, by

the Great Usher of Eternity." When the gentle _Marjorie_, reading out

one of _Tony's_ efforts--

"Love whose feet are shod with light

Lost this ribbon in her flight;

Rosette of the twilight sky,

Waft to me Love's lullaby!"

(the note of exclamation is _Tony's_), says, "Anyone who can write

songs like that ought to write an opera," you realise that her

heart is sounder than her pretty head. Anyway _Tony_, who needed no

encouragement, wrote his opera and landed a ten-thousand dollar prize

for same, together with the daughter of the millionaire, who began to

see, no doubt, that there might be something in poetry after all.

* * * * *

_Indian Studies_ (HUTCHINSON) one may call a work partly descriptive

and historical, partly also polemic. Its author, General Sir O'MOORE

CARAGH, V.C. (and so many other letters of honour that there is hardly

room for them on the title page), writes with the powerful authority

of forty years' Indian service, five of them as Commander-in-Chief.

His book is, in compressed form, a survey of the Indian Empire that

deserves the epithet "exhaustive"; history, races, religious castes

and forms of local government are all intimately surveyed; the

chapters on the India Office and (especially) the army in India will

command wide attention both among experts and the general public.

Naturally the word "experts" brings me to the controversial side of

the subject, the much discussed Montagu-Chelmsford Report, concerning

which the late C.-in-C. holds views that might fairly be described

as pronounced. Where authorities differ the honest reviewer can but

record impartially. Really we have here the old antagonism between the

upholder of one school of Imperial thought, fortified by many years'

experience of it's successful application, and the theories of a

newer and more experimental age. Without attempting a judgment on its

conclusions, I can safely agree with the publishers that this is a

book that "will be read with special interest in military, diplomatic

and Government circles"; also--my own postscript--more vociferously

debated in certain club smoking-rooms than almost any volume of recent

years.

* * * * *

A "Literary Note" thoughtfully inserted in the fly-leaves of _The

Elstones_ (HUTCHINSON) informs me that it will "make a strong appeal

to all those who have experienced the suffering caused by religious

conflict." It is not entirely because it has been my lot to escape the

ordeal in question that Miss ISABEL C. CLARKE'S latest book failed

to make the promised appeal. She takes two hundred and odd pages

of peculiarly eye-racking type to convert the _Elstone_ family to

Catholicism without indicating in any way how or why her solemn

puppets are inspired to change their beliefs. Now and again a

completely nebulous cleric happens along to perform the necessary

function of receiving a moribund neophyte into the Church; otherwise

the conversion appears to take place as it were by spontaneous

combustion and not as the result of any visible proselytising agency.

However the _Elstones_ bear no resemblance to real human beings--you

can hardly expect it of people called _Ierne_ and _Magali_ and _Ivo_

and _Elvidia_ and names like that--so perhaps it doesn't matter how

they came to see the great light. The important thing obviously from

the authoress's point of view is to get them into the fold; and good

Catholics who look at the end rather than the means may enjoy _The

Elstones_. As a novel it will try them hard.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Manager of Gasworks_ (_to aeronaut who has just had

his balloon inflated_). "EXCUSE ME, SIR, BUT I WOULD LIKE YOU TO

UNDERSTAND CLEARLY THAT OUR TERMS FOR GAS ARE STRICTLY CASH."]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, April 9, 1919 · 第 47 / 48 题