CHAPTER XVI

THE cab drew up at the address in Old Compton Street given by Freyberger

to the driver. It was a small shop, filled with antiques, old china,

statuettes, renovated pictures.

Here the art of Japan drew a sword or flirted a fan at you; the Middle

Ages spoke through the mouthpiece of a battle-dented morion.

Behind the counter, in the midst of his treasures, mostly spurious, sat

the owner of the shop I. Antonides, smoking a cigarette and apparently

lost in reverie.

An old man, a very old man, was Antonides. A Greek of the modern Greeks,

with the head of a prophet and the hand of a money changer.

Behind that parchment-coloured forehead lay a knowledge of ancient and

modern art—profound almost as the subject itself.

Beauty of craftsmanship appealed to Antonides. He worshipped the Venus

of Milo, not for the divine beauty of her form, but for the cunning of

the hand that wrought her. A rose had no power to move his soul, but a

goblin by Calot, were it in the best style of that master, made him cry

out with pleasure.

He worshipped art for the sake of art, and he worshipped money for the

sake of money.

His fortune was reputed to be half a million, and he lived on a pound a

week.

He was very frank, with that frankness which sometimes veils the deepest

and most profound deceit; he had no loves or hates, no heart, no wife,

no children or relations. Only his money and his profound knowledge of

men and art.

There were many curiosities for sale in the shop of Antonides, but the

most curious of them all was Antonides, also on sale—at a price.

He nodded to Freyberger.

“I want you to do a little job for me, Mr Antonides.”

“What is the little job, Mr Freyberger?”

“Oh, it’s simple enough to you, impossible to anyone else.”

“Ah!”

“I want you to restore a broken—what shall I say—well, I believe it is a

marble bust.”

“Yes?”

“I want you to do more than restore it, for I want you to do the job as

quickly as possible.”

“Possibility has its limits,” said Antonides. “Show me the article.”

Freyberger went out and took from the cab the drawer wrapped in the

sheet, brought it in and unwrapped it.

Antonides examined the fragments.

“I will restore it for you,” he said, after examining minutely several

of the pieces and gauging in his mind the total number.

“How long will it take?”

“Oh—three days.”

“That won’t do. I want it by to-morrow morning.”

Antonides raised his eyebrows and shrugged his shoulders.

“Look here,” said Freyberger. “What will you charge to do it in three

days?”

“You must understand,” replied Antonides, “that I do not restore marble.

I do not restore pictures now myself. I am getting old, Mr Freyberger.”

“We are all doing that. What will you charge—”

“Getting old,” continued Antonides, as though unconscious of the other’s

question, “costs money; one has to call in help. I have secured an

assistant, an Alsatian; his name is Lermina—”

“Yes, yes, but—”

“I taught him the art of restoration, the knowledge I have placed in

that man’s head,” said the old gentleman, suddenly pretending to turn

savage, “is worth a king’s ransom, and he has repaid me in the oldest

coinage of the world—ingratitude—”

“I know, but what will you charge—”

“One moment, I wish to explain my position. Lermina is a genius.”

“Yes, yes, I grant that—”

“You know what geniuses are, just spoiled children; well, he is also

about to get married—”

“What the devil has that to do with me—”

“One moment. A genius is bad enough to deal with, but a genius in love

is infinitely worse. I ask Lermina to restore this bust, he accepts the

commission, but he is in love and can’t be hurried. Three days, well,

with seven pounds in my hand I believe I could undertake to persuade him

to complete the thing in three days.”

“Well,” said Freyberger, who knew his man right to the place where his

heart ought to have been. “Three days won’t do for me. I must have the

thing completed by to-morrow morning at ten o’clock.”

Antonides said nothing, but, reaching down, produced an enormous

snuff-box from under the counter, took a pinch, tapped the box, and put

it back.

Then he smiled and shook his head.

“Come,” said Freyberger, patiently. “By ten o’clock to-morrow morning.”

“It’s impossible.”

“Nothing is impossible of this sort to you, if you are paid—”

“I would have to sit up all night—”

“Why, you said you had an assistant.”

“I would have to sit up all night helping him; it would be a two mans’

job.”

Then suddenly.

“Twenty pounds?”

“I’ll give you ten.”

“I never haggle.”

“I’ll give you ten.”

“Not a penny under twenty, not a brass farthing, not a denier under

twenty—look at my rent, look at my income-taxes to be paid. Five hundred

pounds they robbed me of this year in income-taxes alone.”

“Five hundred!”

“I mean fifty. I am a very poor man, Mr Freyberger—no, no, no, not a

penny under twenty.”

“All right,” said Freyberger. “If you won’t do the job I know a man who

will.”

He took the drawer and carried it to the door.

“Eighteen,” shrieked Antonides, as the detective fumbled with the door

latch.

“I tell you what,” said Freyberger. “I’ll give you fifteen, and that’s

my ultimatum.”

“Done,” said Antonides. As a matter of fact he would have done the job

for five pounds—for nothing. He divined, from the pieces he had

examined, that the thing was superexcellent and by a master’s hand, and

he would have been satisfied to have put it together on spec if he were

given a chance of purchasing it when completed.

Freyberger left the shop, and, getting into the cab, ordered the

cab-driver to take him to the Yard.

The War Office sometimes nods, and the Admiralty has been known to

indulge in reverie, but New Scotland Yard never sleeps.

The construction of the Criminal Investigation Department resembles the

construction of some beautiful and intricate piece of mechanism.

The detection of crime is its chief function, but it has others. It

keeps the eye of a stern father upon the law-breakers. There is not a

considerable criminal walking about free in London who is not known and

docketed at the Yard.

It knows more about him than he knows about himself; it knows his

height, weight and colour of his hair; it has the prints of his fingers

and the photograph of his face, it knows where he lodges and with whom

he associates, it knows the exact extent and bent of his moral twist.

When a crime of a special nature has been committed by some unknown

person, the Yard searches amongst the criminals who make that especial

crime their speciality.

One might fancy that in the case of a crime committed by a man in the

position of Sir Anthony Gyde, that the search for him would not be any

more difficult than the search for a professional criminal. As a matter

of fact, it is much more so.

Your non-professional law-breaker has no associates to betray him, and,

what is more, being a novice, he adopts no beaten methods. He will often

escape, because of his ignorance as to how he should hide, just as a

novice in fencing will sometimes, through his own stupidity and want of

knowledge, succeed in touching a master-at-arms.

There is nothing a detective dreads more than the ingenuous.

Whilst Freyberger had been pursuing his investigations, the Yard had not

been idle.

By eleven o’clock that morning an embargo had been laid upon all the

ports of England, as close as that which Buckingham laid in the case of

Anne of Austria’s jewels.

No person in the least like Sir Anthony Gyde could possibly have left

the Kingdom, unless by flight.

Every paper appearing after twelve carried his portrait far and wide. A

hundred and fifty detectives were at work upon the case, and not a train

left London for the north, south, east or west whose passengers were not

“filtered.”

The Yard knows the importance of acting promptly and efficiently in a

case like this. The first few hours are vital; it pours out money like

water. Should the required person escape the first furious rummaging of

the detective force the pursuit slackens, or seems to do so. In reality,

the nets are still out. Months pass, the suspected one feels himself no

longer searched for. “I am forgotten,” he says. Then one day he makes a

false move and feels a hand upon his shoulder.

When Freyberger returned to the Yard, he found his chief in consultation

with his subordinates.

When a crime of great magnitude or intricacy occurs, a council of the

brightest intelligences in the detective service is called.

It is technically known as the council of seven, which does not in the

least mean that the number of consultants are always seven, for

sometimes this or that member may be absent.

On this occasion there were only four men in consultation, including the

chief, but these four men constituted a galaxy of almost infernal

talent. They were seated about the room, and at the table, pen in hand,

sat the chief. Inspector Frost, a clean-shaved, youngish-looking man,

with a dark moustache twisted up at the ends, sat nearly opposite the

chief.

Standing at the table, hat in hand and preparing to go, stood a

medium-sized middle-aged man, with black hair, small black moustache,

fresh coloured face and an extraordinarily sharp and penetrating eye.

This was Professor Salt, the Home Office expert, the surgeon called in,

in all cases of murder, when the skill of a surgeon or pathologist can

be of any avail.

He had just been detailing the result of his examination of the head

found at 110B Piccadilly.

The dentist who attended Sir Anthony was, unfortunately, away on a

holiday in Cairo, so his evidence could not be obtained as to whether

the head was truly that of Sir Anthony or not. Several men who had known

him had examined the thing, and they all differed. Some said it most

certainly was; some recognized a strong likeness, but could not be sure;

several declared that, in their opinion, it wasn’t.

These people, who had been hurriedly summoned for the purpose of

identifying the thing, were of all grades and professions.

Club waiters, a nobleman or two, the servants of the house, and others.

When Freyberger, who was not a member of the high council, but who was

admitted on account of his being an active agent in the case, had closed

the door, saluted his chief and taken a modest seat in a corner of the

room, Professor Salt was just finishing the remarks he was making.

“You see,” he said, “it is a matter of extraordinary difficulty to say

exactly how long this head has been removed from the body; it has been

dipped in some agent or passed through some process, which has

discoloured the skin and shrunk the tissues. An acid might have done

this, but, unfortunately for that theory, the skin gives a slightly

alkaline reaction when touched with moist litmus paper. It has, to me,

the appearance of a head that had been dried just as you dry a ham, by

smoking it. Yet there is no trace of carbon to be found on the skin. I

confess I am somewhat at a loss, for a case of the kind has never come

before me up to this, and I believe it is unique in forensic medicine.

That head might have been removed from the body a year ago, so

dehydrated are the tissues. I do not say, having in view some unknown

preservative agent, that it may not have been removed twelve hours ago.

But I can say this, that whoever removed it was a most skilled

anatomist. I have had many cases of dismemberment; in all of them the

head has been hacked off through the cervical vertebra. This is quite

different, the head has been removed above the atlas, the ligaments

cleanly divided; no trace of hacking is discernible at the base of the

skull. The thing was not so much dismemberment as a surgical operation,

conducted with extraordinary skill, the most extraordinary skill. I do

not think,” he finished with a grim smile, “that I could have done the

thing so completely and artistically myself.” He buttoned up his

overcoat, bowed to the chief, nodded to the detectives and departed.

“Well, Freyberger?” said the chief, “what news have you brought?”

“First, sir, may I ask two questions? Has the dentist given his

decision? and have Coutts’s examined the handwriting of Sir Anthony

Gyde?”

“The dentist is absent and can’t be called,” replied the other. “And as

for the bankers, Sir Anthony went in, signed a receipt for the delivery

of the parcel containing his wife’s jewels, which receipt was handed to

the manager who released the jewels.

“The receipt was written before and handed to a man who knew Sir Anthony

Gyde perfectly well. He asked Sir Anthony would he care to see the

manager personally. Sir Anthony replied, no; that he was in a hurry. The

man, one of the chief clerks, is prepared to swear on oath that it was

Sir Anthony Gyde who signed the receipt, and no other. The chief cashier

received the receipt from the manager’s room, glanced at it, and passed

it. Not long ago, on our applying to him to glance at it again and make

sure, he has done so. He says he is sure that it is Sir Anthony’s

handwriting, but there is something about it that he can’t make out;

that it is not a forgery he is _certain_, but all the same, there is

something about it strange to him, some fine difference to the ordinary

writing of Sir Anthony.

“He says he would cash a cheque on the signature without a moment’s

hesitation; you know, in a forgery, it is the slavish imitation and

consequent cramping that marks the thing; no man’s handwriting is

exactly alike twice. Well, this thing is no slavish imitation of Gyde’s

handwriting; it is his, flowing and easy, and written under the eye of a

clerk. All the same, there is something about it strange. Gyde, it would

appear, must have been in a totally different frame of mind to what he

has ever been before in his life when he wrote that signature. I can

understand the cashier’s meaning, I think, for these men’s eyes and

brains are so wonderfully trained that they can tell from a signature

almost the emotions of the person to whom it belongs. Gyde may have been

under the influence of some extraordinary emotion, never felt by him

before, when he signed that receipt—as undoubtedly he was.”

Freyberger listened attentively, and then proceeded to give the results

of his investigations, speaking clearly and to the point.

He told how Gyde had hired the cab and driven to Howland Street,

presented a letter from Kolbecker and occupied his room; how Kolbecker

had lived in Cumberland for the last six weeks and had been paying for

his room in London, sending several postal orders to his landlady. “I

have secured the envelope of the last of these letters,” he said, taking

the envelope from his pocket.

“Give it to me,” said the chief.

He glanced at it, and a change came over his face.

“The Chief Constable of Cumberland has sent me, with splendid

promptitude, the blackmailing letters of Klein,” he said. “They arrived

only half an hour ago by special messenger. Here they are, and the

handwriting of Kolbecker is the handwriting of Klein.”

There could be no doubt; all three documents were in the same weird,

extraordinary hand.

“Gyde,” said Inspector Frost, “before he murdered his man must have got

him to write that letter. One can understand him, having the murder in

his mind, being wishful to have some hole or corner to hide in during

the night. He could not stay the night at Piccadilly, knowing that at

any moment he might be arrested.”

“Yet,” said Freyberger, “he went next morning to his bankers—an equally

dangerous proceeding.”

“The thing that strikes me,” said Inspector Dewhurst, “is, why did he go

to the Piccadilly house at all? We know he took his jewels with him, but

the jewels came up with him from the north. He could have easily taken

possession of his jewel case, sent his man on home with the rest of the

luggage, telling him that he would not be back till the morning, and

then have disappeared.”

“If he had done that,” said Freyberger, “the valet, Leloir, would now be

alive, and not dead of terror.”

There was a moment’s silence.

“Again,” said Inspector Long, a man with a black beard seated near one

of the windows, “that head found in the cupboard. It is not Klein’s, for

Klein was a clean-shaven man. We know, from the evidence of a

chambermaid, that there was nothing in the cupboard the day before. It

must have been put there during the night; therefore, it must have been

put there by either Gyde or his valet, for they alone were in the room,

therefore they must have brought it from the north. We know for certain

that a man was murdered and decapitated in the north by Sir Anthony

Gyde; there is not a hole in the evidence, the boy is perfectly

believable; he is borne out by half a dozen witnesses, who saw the

motor-car going and coming, and by the headless corpse of Klein. Well,

then, did Sir Anthony bring two heads in that bag with him, the head of

Klein and the one we found, which is so strangely like his own?”

There was another silence, and then Freyberger spoke, telling of the

pieces of marble he had found in the drawer and how he had taken them to

Antonides to be reconstructed.

“I did it on my own responsibility,” he said, “knowing the desperate

urgency of the matter; to-morrow we will see what the thing represents.”

“You did right,” said the chief. “In a case like this, seemingly most

intricate, it is often some by-bit of evidence that opens it up and

exposes everything to the light. One of the points that strike me most

is the anatomical knowledge and the dexterity shown in the removal of

the head.”

He ceased, for a knock came to the door and an officer entered with a

paper in his hand. “Report of the post-mortem examination of the body in

the Gyde case, sir, just telegraphed from Carlisle.”

“Give it me,” said the chief. He took the paper, and the officer

withdrew.

“‘Body of a fairly well-nourished man, dressed in grey tweed—clothes

slashed with a knife, but no wounds found on the body. _Head evidently

removed by a skilled anatomist_—Ha!—severed from neck where atlas meets

occipital bone, ligamentum nuchae divided at a single stroke.’ This, so

far from clearing matters, casts everything into a deeper darkness.” He

paused a moment, and then went on. “We have incontrovertible evidence

that yesterday afternoon Sir Anthony Gyde called upon the man Klein at a

cottage on Blencarn Fell, in Cumberland; that he stayed there an hour

and left with a black bag in his hand. Now, mark you, this boy,

Lewthwaite, had his eye on the cottage the whole time. A very few

minutes after Sir Anthony’s departure he peeped through the window, and

saw the murdered body of Klein lying upon the floor. The whole mass of

evidence goes to show that there were only two men concerned in this

tragedy, Gyde and Klein, for Lewthwaite saw no one in the room.”

“Might a third man have been in hiding in an upstairs room?” put in

Inspector Long.

“He might, but it is highly improbable. Besides, we have no use for a

third man, for the crux of the thing is this: Gyde murdered Klein and

decapitated him. The head found in the cupboard was the head he removed

from Klein’s body; we are almost bound to believe this, from the two

surgeons’ reports as to the manner of decapitation—well, the head

removed from the body of Klein was _not_ Klein’s head, for, leaving

small points aside, Klein was a clean-shaved man and the head was the

head of a bearded man.

“We can say now, almost for a certainty, that Klein has not been

murdered, and that the real victim is a man extraordinarily like Gyde,

the supposed murderer; more, several people have given evidence that the

head _is_ that of Gyde.”

“I for one agree with you, sir, that the head we have here in London and

the body that is lying in Cumberland are one a part of the other.”

It was Inspector Dewhurst who spoke.

“We know,” he continued, “that Sir Anthony went into the cottage and

went out, went to London, was recognized by numerous people; we know

that _he_ is alive; we know that a man very like him was murdered, a man

who, whatever he was, was not Klein. But we know that the only motive

for this deed was the blackmailing of Sir Anthony by Klein. Why, then,

did Sir Anthony murder this other man?”

“Why,” put in Freyberger, “were those blackmailing letters left behind.

We can imagine a novice capable of such a blunder, but the whole of this

affair has been conducted with such terrible precision and coolness that

we can scarcely consider its author capable of such a slip as that. May

I speak, sir?”

“It seems to me you are speaking,” said the chief, with a smile. “Go on,

Freyberger; I am always glad to hear your views.”

“Well, sir, it seems to me that there are many points in this case, each

giving the lie to the other, each extraordinary. I have never come

across such a chain of circumstances before. Accident might have cast

all these extraordinary circumstances together. Gyde may have gone to

murder his blackmailer, and found in the cottage, as well as his

intended victim, a man very like himself. Gyde may have murdered this

man for some reason or another and taken away his head; Gyde may have

left those letters behind him from some extraordinary blunder. Klein may

have given Gyde a written passport to his lodgings. Leloir, the valet,

may simply have died of heart-disease. Gyde may have been a skilled

anatomist, as well as a financier. All these are unlikely possibilities;

each, taken separately would not, in itself, cause us so very much

surprise, but taken _en masse_, the combination is almost impossible,

viewed as a combination caused by chance.

“If chance did not place these things in juxtaposition to confound our

powers of reasoning, what did?

“There is only one possible answer. The problem before us is the work of

some subtle and profound intelligence, that, for reasons of its own, has

committed a murder, and, for easily understandable reasons, has fouled

the traces, so that we are at fault and in confusion.” Freyberger paused

and then went on: “I believe, reviewing the facts, that this

intelligence, with which we are trying to grapple, is not that of Sir

Anthony Gyde.

“You see, if we admit him to be the murderer, we must admit him to have

committed so many self-condemning faults. Going openly to the cottage,

in a motor-car of all things; leaving the letters behind him to damn him

and expose his motive; removing his victim’s head yet leaving the body

behind; going to his house in Piccadilly; going to his bankers to take

away his jewels, when he could, if he chose, have removed his jewels,

collected his money, and, having made provision for his escape and his

future, then murdered Klein.”

“One moment,” said the chief. “Gyde was a passionate man; he may have

committed this murder in a fit of passion, and, in the upset of his

brain, left those letters behind.”

“Yes,” said Freyberger. “But the hand that did the decapitation did not

show any sign of brain-upset. Again, if a man murders another in hot

blood does he decapitate him? Not as a rule. Let us suppose this head

that of some unknown third party: of course, Gyde, if he were the

murderer, may have had some powerful reason for removing the head; but

why should he leave it in a cupboard in his own house in Piccadilly as

another damning piece of evidence against himself? You will excuse me,

sir, for speaking so long, but I wish to say this:

“The faults before us are the continuous chance blunders of an

unimaginable fool, if we view them as the faults committed by Sir

Anthony Gyde. Sir Anthony Gyde could not have committed them, we may say

_could not_, for they are too many to have been committed by a man with

any reason in his head, even though in criminal matters he is a fool.

“Well, then, we are driven upon the only other supposition; that Gyde

had nothing to do with the murder, and that these seeming faults are

really not faults, or in other words, they are faults committed

purposely by some keen intelligence to bring confusion into the case. I

think what I have said is almost mathematically demonstrable.

“I do not like to say any more, except this, that in my firm belief Sir

Anthony Gyde is innocent.”

There was a murmur from the other men present, a murmur of admiration

for the logical reasoning of the little German.

“Well,” said the chief, “your argument is clever. We must admit that, if

Gyde is the murderer, then Gyde has committed more faults in the

business than it is at all probable he would commit. If Gyde is not the

murderer, then, some other man is; if that is so, I am bound to admit

that this other man has not only successfully fouled his traces but has

cast, in some extraordinary manner, the onus of the affair upon Gyde.

The proof of that is,” he continued, with a short laugh, “he has made us

issue a warrant for Gyde’s arrest. Have you anything more to say,

Freyberger? What you have said already has been to the point.”

“Only this, sir. Dr Murrell is preparing the retina of the valet,

Leloir. He intends photographing it by Mendel’s process. He may, or may

not, succeed; the thing fails as a rule, or only gives the faintest blur

of a picture. But it seems that the rods and cones of the retina take a

far more powerful impression in a case like this, if the subject has

caught his last glimpse of earthly things by the electric light. It is

just possible that the retina of Leloir may give us a picture of what he

saw before he died.”

“The only two successful cases of the kind I have heard of,” said the

chief, “occurred in Germany.”

“That is true, sir,” replied Freyberger. “The case of Ludwig Baumer,

recounted by Casper; and the case of the courtesan, Gretchen Dreschfeld,

which Addeler, the professor of forensic medicine at Bonn, made such a

success of.”

“When did Dr Murrell say his results would be known?” asked the chief.

“He did not say, sir; but, with your permission, I will call upon him

now and see what hopes he can give us of a successful photograph.”

“Do so,” said the chief. And Freyberger departed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Cottage on the Fells · 第 16 / 37 章