As is customary in such cases, and despite the sympathy that had been
extended to her, Mrs. Steele was turned over to criminologists, who
soon extracted the truth from her. She broke down and wept hysterically.
It was she who had purchased the candy and poisoned it. Her life was
going to pieces. She had wanted to die, so she said now. She had
addressed the wrapper about the candy, as some of the wiseacres of our
paper had contended, only she had first made a tracing on the paper
from Mrs. Davis’ handwriting, on an envelope addressed to her husband,
and had then copied that. She had put not arsenic, but rat poison,
bought some time before, into the candy, and in order to indict Mrs.
Davis, she had put a little in each piece, about as much as would kill
a rat, so that it would seem as though the entire box had been poisoned
by her. She had got the idea from a case she had read about years
before in a newspaper. She hated Mrs. Davis for stealing her husband.
She had followed them.
When she had eaten one of the pieces of candy she had thought, as she
now insisted, that she was taking enough to make an end of it all. But
before taking it she had made sure that Mrs. Dalrymple, the wife of the
newspaperman whom she first called to her aid, was at home in order
that she might call or send her little boy. Her purpose in doing this
was to instil in the mind of Mrs. Dalrymple the belief that it was Mrs.
Davis who had sent the poison. When she was gone, Mrs. Davis would be
punished, her husband would not be able to have her, and she herself
would be out of her misery.
Result: the prompt discharge of Mrs. Davis, but no charge against Mrs.
Steele. According to the District Attorney and the newspapers who
most truly reflected local sentiment, she had suffered enough. And,
as the state of public feeling then was, the District Attorney would
not have dared to punish her. Her broken confession so reacted on the
public mind that now, and for all time, it was for Mrs. Steele, just
as a little while before it was rather for Mrs. Davis. For, you see,
it was now proved that it was Mrs. Steele and not Mrs. Davis who had
been wrought up to that point emotionally where she had been ready and
willing—had actually tried—to make a blood sacrifice of herself and
another woman on the altar of love. In either case it was the blood
sacrifice—the bare possibility of it, if you choose—that lay at the
bottom of the public’s mood, and caused it to turn sympathetically to
that one who had been most willing to murder in the cause of love.
But don’t think this story is quite ended. Far from it. There is
something else here, and a very interesting something to which I
wish to call your attention. I have said that the newspapers turned
favorably to Mrs. Steele. They did. So did the sob-sisters, those true
barometers of public moods. Eulogies were now heaped upon Mrs. Steele,
her devotion, her voiceless, unbearable woe, the tragedy of her mood,
her intended sacrifice of herself. She was now the darling of these
journalistic pseudo-analysts.
As for Mrs. Davis—not a word of sympathy, let alone praise or
understanding for her thereafter. Almost unmentioned, if you will
believe it, she was, and at once allowed to slip back into the limbo
of the unheralded, the subsequently-to-be-unknown. From then on it
was almost as though she had never been. For a few weeks, I believe,
she retired to the home in which she had lived; then she disappeared
entirely.
But now as to Steele. Here was the third peculiar phase of the
case. Subsequent to the exculpation of Mrs. Davis and her noiseless
retirement from the scene, what would you say his attitude would have
been, or should have been? Where would he go? What do? What attitude
would he assume? One of renewed devotion to his wife? One of renewed
devotion to Mrs. Davis? One of disillusion or indifference in regard
to all things? It puzzled me, and I was a rank outsider with no least
concern, except of course our general concern in all such things, so
vital to all of us in our sex and social lives. But not only was it a
puzzle to me; it was also a puzzle to others, especially those who were
identified with the newspaper business in the city, the editors and the
city editors and managing editors who had been following the wavering
course of things with uncertain thoughts and I may say uncertain
policy. They had been, as you may guess, as prepared to hang Steele as
not, assuming that he had been identified with Mrs. Davis in a plot
to do away with his wife. On the other hand, now that that shadow was
removed and it was seen to be a more or less simple case of varietism
on his part, resulting in marital unhappiness for his wife and a
desire on her part to die, they were prepared to look upon him and
this result with a more kindly eye. After all, she was not dead. Mrs.
Davis had been punished. And say what you will, looking at Mrs. Steele
as she was, and at Mrs. Davis as she was—well—with a certain amount of
material if not spiritual provocation—what would you?
Indeed, the gabble about the newspaper offices was all to the above
effect. What, if anything, finally asked some of the city editors and
managing editors, was to be done about Steele? Now that everything
had blown over, what of him? Go on hounding him forever? Nonsense! It
was scarcely fair, and, anyhow, no longer profitable or worth while.
Now that the storm was passing, might not something be done for him?
After all, he had been a fairly respectable newspaperman and in good
standing. Why not take him back? And if not that, how was he to be
viewed in future by his friends? Was he to be let alone, dropped,
forgotten, or what? Was he going to stay here in G——, and fight it out,
or leave? And if he was going to leave or stay, with whom was he going
to leave or stay? Semikindly, semiselfish curiosity, as you see.