XXXVII

A note came from Bernard Hall of _The New World_, asking Bertram to go

and see him at his office. He greeted Bertram with that coldness which

was but an outer crust concealing the flame in his heart, flame of

passion against the injustice of life, its tyrannies and cruelties, its

immense unconquerable stupidities.

“Take a seat, won’t you?”

Bertram took a seat in a room strewn with papers and books in careless

disorder. A middle-aged woman with grey hair smoothed back in the Quaker

style, came in and out with proofs, typewritten letters, cards from

visitors, which the editor of _The New World_ put down in the general

litter on his desk.

“I shall be engaged for half an hour, Miss Doe. They can either wait, or

call again.”

Bertram wondered if he were to have the privilege of that half hour, and

what the reason might be.

Bernard Hall stared at his paper knife for a moment, and then looked at

Bertram moodily.

“Janet Welford tells me you’re at a loose end, more or less.”

So it was Janet who had arranged this interview! Bertram felt

embarrassed because of that and his face flushed a little.

“Considerably more than less,” he answered.

Bernard Hall smiled, icily, and then his face resumed its habitual mask

of melancholy.

“Miss Welford and Christy have both spoken highly of that war book of

yours. I’m not surprised you can’t get it published. People want to

forget that time of madness. They’re getting a little ashamed of their

own insanity. My job—and yours, I take it—is to force them to

remember, so that it shan’t happen again very soon.”

“Quite so!” said Bertram.

Bertram Hall stared at his paper-knife again, as though its long blade

symbolised some mystical thing.

“It’s going to happen again,” he said presently, “unless we can get some

sense into the heads of the average man and woman. The politicians are

just preparing the way for a new war, worse than the last—in twenty or

thirty years from now. I’m inclined to think they’ll succeed. The only

chance against it is the intensive education of peoples towards the

international idea. We must try and link up with all active brains in

Europe who are working for peace and commonsense. There are quite a

number of them, but with scattered forces, powerless at the moment

against the tremendous strength of reaction and militarism.”

Bertram wondered again what all this had to do with him. He was

interested, but perplexed that Hall should spend half an hour on a busy

afternoon to talk broodily about the state of Europe.

“The trouble is,” said Bernard Hall, “that what used to be called the

fountain of Truth is walled round by the Enemy and kept under strict

control. Its waters are carefully and systematically poisoned before

they are allowed to flow into the open fields.”

“I don’t quite follow,” said Bertram.

“I mean the distribution of news in the European Press. There’s a

conspiracy against Truth. It’s almost impossible for public opinion to

form any kind of verdict based on actual facts. Newspapers nowadays use

facts merely as the raw material of propaganda. They’re manufactured to

suit the policy of the proprietors, or the purpose of Government. By

suppression, or alteration, or over-emphasis, or the trick of false

perspective, by scare head-lines and editorial comment, they’re made to

convey exactly the particular idea which the newspapers desire to

suggest to its readers. Who knows what is the actual state of things in

Germany, whether she is on the brink of bankruptcy, or getting rich?

What’s the mental state of the German people, after their tremendous

defeat, their blood-bath, the downfall of their pride? Are they

cherishing the hope of revenge, worshipping the old gods, or working out

some way of salvation? France—what about France? Is Poincaré France? Or

Paris? What are the people thinking? Do they really want to invade the

Ruhr and force another war for unborn babes—as sure as Fate. . . . Do

you know, Pollard?”

“No,” said Bertram.

“Well, why not find out?”

He had come to the point of the interview. He had an idea that Bertram

might wander around a bit in Europe—the old battlefields, Paris—not

Paris of the boulevards, but Paris in the back streets, the little

shops, the student quarter, the intellectual clubs—then Germany, among

its peasants, in the back blocks of Berlin, in middle-class households.

Then Russia, if he liked. He could link up with Christy in Moscow, write

different kind of stuff, not statistics or high politics, but the human

side of things, how the people were living—and dying—what they ate,

how they dressed, what was in their minds. He could pick up a bit of

Russian, or find people who spoke something else. He might get a glimpse

or two of the real truth.

It seemed that Bernard Hall had been impressed by Bertram’s article on

“The Mind of the Men,” and one or two other things he had sent in. That

was the kind of thing he wanted. No profound analysis of the European

situation—it was in flux, changing from week to week—but intimate

sketches of life; things seen; things heard; the common thought; wayside

conversations; little flashes revealing the heart of folk.

“Does the idea appeal to you?” he asked.

It appealed to Bertram enormously. Here was his way of escape, from the

depression of life without an object; from the immediate problem of

earning a “living wage,” perhaps from other troubles which had borne

down on him, like Joyce’s abandonment. It would give her more time to

make up her mind about “one thing or the other.” It would give him more

time to think things out, without desperate conclusions based on

boredom, loneliness, futility, and introspective brooding. Here was

objective work. He would be looking out upon the world, not inwards with

nagging irritation. It would lift his mind, broaden it, re-vitalise it.

It would help him to adopt Janet’s remedy for gloom and

despair—interest in the other fellow’s welfare and sympathy beyond

selfishness.

Bernard Hall spoke about “terms”—a share of expenses, articles paid for

at a fair rate, no particular number laid down, but one a week if

possible. It was good enough, enormously more, as a chance, than he

could have hoped.

“When can you get off?” asked Hall.

“To-morrow morning.”

Bernard Hall smiled for the second time during the interview.

“Not such a hurry as all that.”

So it was fixed and Bertram shook hands on the understanding. As he was

leaving, Nat Verney, the Miners’ leader in the House of Commons, came in

and gave him a friendly nod.

“Good article of yours, Pollard, ‘The Mind of the Men,’ I agreed with

every word of it.”

“How’s the Lock-out?” asked Bernard Hall, and Bertram noticed that he

avoided the word ‘Strike.’

Nat Verney laughed.

“You read of my evidence before that private meeting in the House of

Commons? Most of the members were bowled over by the facts I gave ’em,

and admitted the strength of the men’s case, for at least a compromise.

That’s how it’s going to end. A good old British compromise! The wicked

thing is that it ought to have begun with that. But the owners didn’t

give us a chance. Just flung an ultimatum at our heads with a ‘Take it

or leave it!’ Well, we damn well left it!”

“What about the Triple Alliance?”

Verney shrugged his shoulders.

“They’ve ratted. Timid as rabbits. There won’t be any General Strike, or

Social Revolution. The Government has won that trick. But they look

pretty silly with their Army Reserve and Home Defence. Not a single case

of violence, except among soldiers who looted a village through sheer

boredom.”

A shadow seemed to pass from Bernard Hall’s face.

“I’m relieved to hear all that, Verney. I’m for evolution, not

revolution. If you’d challenged the Government by ‘direct action,’ there

would have been bloodshed and chaos, ending in the utter defeat of

Labour.”

“Perhaps you’re right,” said Verney. “I’m not one of the Reds, anyhow.

I’ve no patience with those who want to destroy at all costs, without a

notion of how they’re going to build up out of ruin.”

Bertram left the two men talking. He had heard enough to know that the

Strike, or Lock-out, or whatever one liked to call it, was going to end

in compromise. After all, he’d been right in backing the men! None of

those awful things had happened which had been prophesied on the one

hand by the Duke of Bramshaw, Lady Ottery, and their set, on the other

by the parlour Jacobins of the “Left Wing.” The miners had gone on

whitewashing their cottages, sowing seeds in little front gardens. The

Unemployed in London, growing in numbers, because of industry closing

down, had not invaded Mayfair, except with collection boxes and banners.

The Government and the Mine-owners had admitted at least half the men’s

case after an ultimatum far too brutal in its original terms. England

was not going to break out in civil conflict just yet, or ever, if the

men were given anything like a fair deal. English character remained the

same as he had seen it in the trenches, solid, steady, without passion.

It had always chosen the middle of the road.

Well, he would soon be out of England, wandering among other peoples,

studying their problems and psychology. Perhaps he would get as far as

Russia, and link up with Christy in Moscow! Extraordinary adventure!

What was it old Christy had said, at the top of his stairs?

“If you’re not cut out for disloyalty—and it needs a special

temperament—cut and run when loyalty’s over-strained. It’s the safest

way . . . and Moscow’s an interesting place.”

Queer words! He hadn’t understood them at the time. Now he seemed to see

a special meaning in them. They referred a little to Joyce, and a little

to Janet. His loyalty to Janet was getting overstrained. He was being

tempted to disloyalty, perhaps to Christy as well as to Joyce. Janet had

put a spell on him. That night in her flat was not very safe for a

lonely man, abandoned, temporarily or otherwise, by his wife. It was too

cosy there, making cocoa over an electric fire for a girl whose laughter

and wisdom and comradeship were given generously. The chance of other

nights like that, and of comradeship closer and more enduring, might

overstrain loyalty to breaking-point. He was human, and pretty weak at

that. “Cut and run,” old Christy had said. For him there would be

torture of conscience in disloyalty. “Sir Faithful,” Janet called him.

At least he wasn’t cut out for the part of Lancelot.

“His honour rooted in dishonour stood,

And faith unfaithful kept him falsely true.”

He remembered words he’d spoken once to Christy. “I believe in loyalty.”

He had said them sincerely then, before temptation had come, testing him

under heavy strain. But there was something in him still which forbade,

under pain of self-torture, easy ways of escape which many men chose in

such a case as his—new love for old, a kind mistress for an unkind

wife, excuse for divorce, the usual routine.

What forbade him? What did he mean by conscience? Not religious

scruples, for he had no certain faith. Not rigid principles of high

morality, for he was tolerant of other men’s personal arrangements in

this affair of sex. But by heredity, environment, upbringing, his mind

was hedged round with restraints and secret laws. If he broke them, he

would break himself. He could only be disloyal to such laws within

himself by being an outlaw to his own code. Joyce had gone away from

him, but he must be faithful in body and soul to his pledge of loyalty

to her, or suffer hideously in self-esteem.

Perhaps that was egotism again, the need of self-pride, the prick of

self-conceit and not of conscience. All very difficult! Who could get

down to the hidden springs, even in his own soul? One could only know

the effect of their working, by experience of mental states resulting

from thwarted instincts or acts opposed to instincts. One could balance

the profit and loss of obedience to the inner law and disobedience.

Obedience was generally more profitable, however difficult to resist the

lure of disobedience. When the lure was too strong in its spell,

Christy’s advice was “Cut and run!” Not heroic, but safer. . . .

* * * * *

When he told Janet that he owed her the best chance of his life, his

voice broke a little.

“When are you starting?” she asked, and when he told her that he was

crossing to France the very next day, she exclaimed, like Bernard Hall,

that there was no such burning hurry. But he told her he was in a hurry

to “make good,” as the Americans say, and that if he stayed a few more

days in town he might have to seek escape from loneliness again in her

little sanctuary, which would strain her patience, and his virtue.

That seemed to amuse her mightily, and she mocked him as a modern St.

Anthony, and liked his flattery (she said) of her poor beauty.

She sent her love to Christy, if Bertram had the chance of meeting him

in Moscow.

“If I don’t hear from you at least once a month,” she told him, “I’ll

abandon my blinded men to rescue you from Bolshevists!”

“Then I’ll never write till you come!” he said.

They talked, mostly nonsense, until he rose to say good-bye.

“There’s a chance,” said Bertram, “that I mayn’t see you again.”

“Good Lord!” she cried, in sham alarm. “Are you going to make another

war?”

“No, but there’s the usual risk from one street to another. A falling

chimney-pot, a typhus bug, or some other way of accident. Anyhow, I want

to tell you now that I’m eternally grateful for all you’ve done for me,

in lovingkindness. Wherever I am in the world, or beyond it, I’ll never

forget my dear comrade.”

She let him take her hands and put them to his lips, when she answered

him.

“Sir Faithful, I’m not good at serious speech, and don’t much believe in

it, except at odd times, as a concession to human weakness. But I’ve

liked your company, sir, and I’m sorry we can’t be closer

partners—because of fate and other things.”

“Perhaps one day—” he said, and didn’t end his sentence.

She shook her head, as though understanding his unfinished words.

“You’ll go back to Joyce. That’s best for you. She’s the Beatrice of

your _Divina Commedia_.”

He didn’t dispute that. It was the truth, as far as he knew it in his

own heart.

“At least our friendship is eternal,” he said in a low voice.

“Absence is the ditch of forgetfulness,” she said lightly, and then

quoted a French verse he had heard before, in war-time, when a French

girl had sung it in an old inn at Cassel, on the way to Ypres.

“_Partir, c’est mourir un peu,_

_C’est mourir à ce qu’on aime._”

Before he went away, he asked her a question in which she understood a

subtle meaning.

“About Christy, what shall I say to him?”

Janet laughed, with a touch of extra colour in her cheeks.

“Tell him he needn’t have gone as far as Moscow. The Superfluous Woman

is a stay-at-home, and very happy with her blind boys.”

She came out onto the stone landing with him, outside her flat.

“It’s not midnight yet,” he said. “Will you risk it?”

“Without a qualm of conscience,” she answered, and gave him her lips to

kiss.

“Good luck, _mon ami_!” So she called into the well of the great

staircase, as he stumbled down.

“My heart’s thanks!” he answered back from a lower flight.

“‘_Partir, c’est mourir un peu!_’” she said in a laughing way, yet a

little sad too, he thought.

He spoke the second line:

“‘_C’est mourir à ce qu’on aime!_’”

Some people came out of the flat on the second floor and tramped down

the stone stairs noisily, and he had no more chance of farewell with

Janet Welford.

“Cut and run,” old Christy had said. Well, he was doing so. As Joyce

said, “It must be one thing or the other.”

Next morning he crossed from Folkestone to Boulogne.

The Middle of the Road: A Novel · 第 37 / 61 题