SYNCRETIC LITERATURE.

_Concluding remarks on an Epic Poem of Giles Scroggins and Molly Brown._

The circumstance which rendered Giles Scroggins peculiarly ineligible as a

bridegroom eminently qualified him as a tenant for one of those

receptacles in which defunct mortals progress to "that bourne from whence

no traveller returns." Fancy the bereaved Molly, or, as she is in grief,

and grief is tragical, Mary Brown, denuded of her scarf and black gloves,

turning faintly from the untouched cake and tasteless wine, and retiring

to the virtuous couch, whereon, with aching heart, the poet asserts she,

the said

"Poor Molly, laid her down to weep;"

and then contemplate her the victim of somnolent consequences, when--

"She cried herself quite fast asleep,"

Here an ordinary mind might have left the maiden and reverted "to her

streaming eyes," inflamed lids, dishevelled locks, and bursting sigh, as

satisfactory evidences of the truth of her broken-heartedness, but the

"great anonymous" of whom we treat, scorns the application of such

external circumstances as agents whereby to depict the intenseness of the

passion of the ten thousand condensed turtle-doves glowing in the bosom of

_his_ heroine. Sleep falls upon her eyes; but the "life of death," the

subtle essence of the shrouded soul, the watchful sentinel and viewless

evidence of immortality, the wild and flitting air-wrought impalpabilities

of her fitful dreams, still haunt her in her seeming hours of rest. Fancy

her feelings--

"When, standing fast by her bed-post,

A figure tall her sight engross'd,"

and it cried--

"'I be's Giles Scroggins' ghost.'"

Such is the frightful announcement commemorative of this visitation from

the wandering spirit of the erratic Giles. Death has indeed parted them.

Giles is cold, but still his love is warm! He loved and won her in

life--he hints at a right of possession in death; and this very

forgetfulness of what he _was_, and what he _is_, is the best essence of

the overwhelming intensity of his passion. He continues (with a beautiful

reliance on the faith and _living_ constancy of Molly, in reciprocation,

though dead, of his deathless attachment) to offer her a share, not of his

bed and board, but of his shell and shroud. There is somewhat of the

imperative in the invitation, which runs thus:--

"The ghost it said so solemnly,

'Oh, Molly, you _must_ go with me,

All to the grave, your love to cool.'"

We have no doubt this assumption of command on the part of the ghost--an

assumption, be it remembered, never ventured upon by the living

Giles--gave rise to some unpleasant reflections in the mind of the

slumbering Molly. _Must_ is certainly an awkward word. Tell any lady that

she _must_ do this, or _must_ do that, and, however much her wishes may

have previously prompted the proceeding, we feel perfectly satisfied, that

on the very shortest notice she will find an absolute and undeniable

reason why such a proceeding is diametrically opposed to the line of

conduct she _will_, and therefore ought to, adopt.

With an intuitive knowledge of human nature, the great poet purposely uses

the above objectionable word. How could he do otherwise, or how more

effectually, and less offensively, extricate Molly Brown from the

unpleasant tenantry of the proposed under-ground floor? Command invariably

begets opposition, opposition as certainly leads to argument. So proves

our heroine, who, with a beautiful evasiveness, delivers the following

expostulation:--

"Says she, 'I am not dead, you fool!'"

One would think _that_ was a pretty decent clincher, by way of a reason

for declining the proposed trip to Giles Scroggins' little property at his

own peculiar "Gravesend;" but as contradiction begets controversy, and the

enlightened poet is fully aware of the effect of that cause, the undaunted

sprite of the interred Giles instantly opposes this, to him, flimsy

excuse, and upon the peculiar veracity of a wandering ghost, triumphantly

exclaims, in the poet's words--words that, lest any mistake should arise

as to the speaker by the peculiar construction of the sentence, are

rendered _doubly_ individual, for--

"_Says_ the _ghost_, says _he_, vy that's no rule!"

There's a staggerer! being alive no rule for _not_ being buried! how _is_

Molly Brown to get out of that high-pressure cleft-stick? how! that's the

question! Why not in a state of somnolency, not during the "death of each

day's life; no, it is clear, to escape such a consummation she must be

wide awake." The poet sees this, and with the energy of a master-mind, he

brings the invisible chimera of her entranced imagination into effective

operation. Argument with a man who denies first premises, and we submit

the assertion that vitality is no exception to the treatment of the dead,

amounts to that. We say, argument with such a man is worse than nothing;

it would be fallacious as the Eolian experiment of whistling the most

inspiriting jigs to an inanimate, and consequently unmusical, milestone,

opposing a transatlantic thunder-storm with "a more paper than powder"

"penny cracker," or setting an owl to outstare the meridian sun.

The poet knew and felt this, and therefore he ends the delusion and

controversy by an overt act:--

"The ghost then seized her all so grim,

All for to go along with him;

'Come, come,' said he, 'e'er morning beam.'"

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, September 25, 1841 · 第 43 / 67 题