CHAPTER II.

Different routes from London to Paris.--Aspect of the city as first

presented to the English traveller, according to the road by which

he may enter.--Its extent, population, etc.

The first measure to be adopted after any one has decided upon visiting

Paris, is to provide himself with a passport, which he will procure at

the French Ambassador's office in Poland street, for which there is no

charge, but it is requisite to state by which port you mean to proceed;

but in order to leave some latitude for caprice, you may mention two

places, as Calais or Boulogne, or Dieppe or Havre, etc. There are now

many different means of travelling to Paris; that which was once the

most frequently adopted was by coach to Dover, then embarking for

Calais, as those are the two ports which present the shortest distance

between the two countries, being only about twenty-one miles apart; many

however prefer embarking at Dover at once for Boulogne, thus avoiding

about twenty-five miles by land from Calais to Boulogne, which certainly

does not afford a single object of interest, and the distance by sea is

only increased eight miles. Another route is by railway to Brighton,

then crossing to Dieppe, and which is certainly the straightest line of

any of the routes from London to Paris; but on account of there being

more sea, the distance is not generally performed in so short a period

as the other routes, from the uncertainty of the Ocean. It is not

therefore so much frequented by travellers as those on which they can

reckon with more accuracy; the same may be said of the route by

Southampton, which is performed by railway to that town, and afterwards

by steam-packet to Havre, which includes above a hundred miles by sea,

consequently but little resorted to as compared with the former routes.

There was another means of reaching Paris, and that was from London to

St. Vallery by sea; which being near Abbeville and only 33 leagues from

Paris, there was the least of land travelling, consequently it was the

cheapest if all went smoothly, and this line was often adopted by strict

economists, who however have frequently found themselves much

disappointed, as sometimes it happened they could not make the port, and

have either been obliged to put back and lie off Ramsgate, or lay to,

for some hours, and perhaps after having landed, have been detained at

St. Vallery, from not having been able to find places in the diligences

for Paris. This means, however, of proceeding to Paris no longer exists,

as the steamers have been sold, but it is thought that they will be

replaced by others. The route which is by far the most frequented is

that of embarking from London direct for Boulogne, and is on the long

run the most economical, and maybe comfortably performed, living

included, for three pounds, at the present prices, which are 1_l._ in

the best Cabin from London to Boulogne, then about 1_l._ 4_s._, in the

inside from Boulogne to Paris; and the other expenses will amount to

about fifteen or sixteen shillings; with respect to the charges on the

other routes, they are so often varying that it might only deceive the

reader by stating them as they at present exist, when in a few weeks

they may be higher or lower as circumstances may arise. Some persons

choose, the route by Southampton and Havre as being the most

picturesque, as from the latter town to Rouen such exquisite scenery is

presented by the banks of the Seine, as you pass in the steamer between

them, that the passenger is at a loss on which side to bestow his

attention, whilst rapidly hurried through so delightful and fertile a

country; in fact, he is tempted for once to regret the velocity of steam

conveyance, in not permitting him to tarry awhile to contemplate the

beautiful scenes by which he is environed. Rouen, where the traveller

should at least remain some days, is an object of great attraction. As

my work is especially devoted to Paris, I cannot afford much space to

the description of towns on the road; but as the city of Rouen is the

largest, the most interesting, and the most connected with history and

English associations of any upon the routes to Paris, I cannot pass it

over without some comment. Its boulevards first strike the English, as

being not only most picturesque and beautiful, but as presenting a scene

to them wholly novel, the noble vistas formed by towering trees,

mingling their branches, shading beneath their foliage many a cheerful

group, the merchant's stone villas, seen amongst their bowers, the high

shelving grassy banks, and the lively bustle that is ever going forward,

has so animated an effect that the beholder cannot but catch the

infection and feel his spirits elevated by the enlivening spectacle. But

what a contrast on entering the city; the streets narrow, dark, and with

no foot pavement, have a mean and gloomy appearance, but many of them

being built mostly of wood, carved into fantastic forms, offer a rich

harvest to the artist, and those of our own country have amply profited

by the innumerable picturesque objects which Rouen presents. The

cathedral, built by William the Conqueror, is one of the most

interesting monuments of France; the Church of St.-Ouen is at least as

beautiful, and there are several others which well repay the visiter for

the time he may expend in visiting them. The statue of the Maid of

Orleans stands in the _Marché aux Veaux_, on the spot where she was

burnt as a sorceress under the sanction of the Duke of Bedford in 1431.

Above all, the traveller must not fail to visit Mount Catherine, which

rises just above the city, and commands a view equally beautiful and

extensive. The delightful environs of Rouen are displayed before him,

comprising almost every scenic beauty that a country can afford; even

the factories, which in most places rather deform the view than

otherwise, are here so constructed as to contribute to its ornament,

more resembling villas than buildings solely for utility. Hills, wood,

water, bridges, chateaux, cottages, corn fields and meadows are so

picturesquely intermingled, that every object which can give charm to a

landscape is here united. There are several hills round Rouen which

present prospects nearly equal to that which is witnessed from Mount

Catherine, and in fact it is difficult to imagine any situation which

affords so many pleasant walks and such enchanting scenery. Indeed, all

the way to Paris by this route (that is by what is called the lower

road) which for a considerable distance runs within sight of the Seine,

the country is most highly interesting, passing through Louvier,

Gaillon, Vernon, Mantes and St. Germains.

Calais, as being the nearest point to the English coast, and at which we

so often obtain our first peep at France, merits some notice, and

although it offers but few attractions, and is surrounded by a flat

cheerless country, yet there are connected with it some associations

which are replete with interest; as who that has ever read Sterne's

Sentimental Journey can forget the simple but impressive description he

gives of the poor friar and other objects which he there met, and which

he has engraven on the minds of his readers, in his own peculiar style,

in characters never to be erased; for my part, as I first approached

Calais I thought but of Sterne and his plain, unvarnished tale, of the

trifles he encountered, around which he contrived to weave an interest

which is felt even by the inhabitants of Calais to this day; although

they knew his works but through the spoiling medium of translation,

still they never fail to exhibit to the Englishman the alcove in which

he is said to have written his adventures in Calais. As I entered the

town, instantly the works of Hogarth appeared before me, for who is

there that does not remember his excellent representation of the Gates

of Calais, with the meagre sentinel and still more skinny cook bending

under the weight of a dish crowned with an enormous sirloin of beef, no

doubt intended to regale some newly-arrived John Bull, whilst a fat monk

scans it with a longing eye. Next the bust of Eustache de St. Pierre

awakes the attention, and the surrender of Calais and his devoted

patriotism rises in one's memory. Another souvenir also must not be

forgotten, namely, the print of the foot of Louis the Eighteenth, which

is cut in the stone, and a piece of brass let in where he first stepped

on shore, and undoubtedly represents a very pretty little foot; but when

a Frenchman who was no amateur of the Bourbon dynasty was asked to

admire its symmetry, he observed it was very well, but that it would

look much better if it was turned t'other way, that is to say, going out

of the kingdom instead of coming into it. If the traveller have time, it

is worth while to mount a tower, at the top of which is a sort of

lantern capable of containing about a dozen persons, and commanding a

most extensive view over the sea, and on the opposite side the country

is visible for a considerable distance, bearing a most uninviting

appearance. There are a great number of hôtels at Calais, and I have

been at many of them, but have found that kept by M. Derhorter, called

the Hôtel Bourbon, the most comfortable and economical, and the civility

of the master cannot anywhere be surpassed. Dessin's, for the nobility

and those who have equipages, is still the favourite and has been for

time immemorial.

Nothing worthy of note presents itself between Calais and Boulogne,

except the little village of Wimille, which made some impression upon my

mind, as being so much prettier and so much more village-like than any

other through which we had passed, and near here perished the

unfortunate æronauts Pilatre and Romain, falling from their balloon when

at a prodigious height from the ground and in sight of many spectators.

They were buried in the churchyard, in which a monument has been erected

commemorative of the event. About two miles from this hamlet Boulogne

appears in sight, cheering the spectator by its gay and animated aspect,

the numerous groups of genteel-looking persons constantly promenading

the streets, pier and port, give it a most lively appearance, which is

enhanced by the extreme cleanliness which is observed in all the

principal streets, and the cheerful air afforded by the white stone

houses with their green balconies and shutters. But the numerously

well-dressed portion of the population, which so greatly contribute

towards enlivening the scene, consists almost wholly of English, as the

few French families which still reside in Boulogne, above the rank of

the tradespeople, keep themselves very close and retired as in all other

provincial towns in France; and in Boulogne they are very suspicious of

the English, having had such numbers of bad characters who at first

preserved a very respectable appearance but ultimately proved to be

swindlers. The higher French families, therefore, decline any

association with the English, unless with persons who have come

highly-recommended, or have resided many years in the town with an

unimpeachable character. It so happened that circumstances brought me in

contact with two or three of these exclusive personages, and their

remarks about the English afforded me much amusement, and may be taken

as types of the general observations of the provincial French upon our

country-people.

The worthy matrons of families have often said to me, "How is it, Sir,

that the wives and mothers of your country can manage their domestic

concerns, when they are seen almost continually walking about the

streets at hours when we find it indispensable to attend to our

household affairs."

I replied, that after having given their orders they relied in a great

degree upon their servants executing them with punctuality.

"Indeed!" was the exclamation; "how fortunate they must be to have such

immaculate servants that they can so entirely depend upon them: we

should be very happy if we could have such as did not require looking

after, but unfortunately French servants partake too much of human

nature for mistresses to be able to leave them wholly to themselves."

I observed that perhaps English servants generally being more humble,

obedient, and subservient to their superiors, greater reliance might be

placed upon them, and undoubtedly more certainty as to their obeying the

instructions they received.

"Then it is surprising," said the ladies, "that your country people do

not always bring servants with them, and very unlucky that in so many

instances when they have done so, that their domestics should so often

be brought before the Tribunals of Correction for different

irregularities."

I replied, that many good and regular servants did not like to quit

their native land, and of those who were brought over, certainly in many

instances their employers had been disappointed; that in a foreign

country all was new to them, and they forgot their former regular

habits, and certainly in too many instances had misbehaved themselves.

"Consequently," returned my interlocutors, "requiring a more vigilant

eye to superintend them. But there is another subject which affords us

much surprise, and that is the manner in which English parents permit

their daughters to go alone about the streets, or to walk with a

gentleman who is neither their father nor brother."

I assigned as a reason for our allowing them so much liberty, that we

had such perfect confidence in them that we felt assured we could trust

to their own firmness and discretion to prevent any improper

consequences arising from the freedom they were permitted to enjoy.

"Unfortunately, that confidence is but too frequently abused," rejoined

one of the ladies, "if we are to judge from several lamentable

occurrences which have latterly taken place in this town amongst the

English young ladies."

I felt the rebuke, as I knew to what circumstances they alluded, and

observed that the English society inhabiting Boulogne were by no means

what could, be termed the _élite_ of the nation, although there were

many families of the highest respectability.

The ladies, perceiving by my manner that I was somewhat nettled,

endeavoured to soften what they had said, by observing that certainly it

would not be just to estimate the English people by the samples which

came to reside at Boulogne, as they had generally understood that they

were persons of indifferent reputation, who fled from their own country

because they could no longer live there in credit, but that amongst the

number there undoubtedly were some very quiet people.

A stranger would not appreciate the degree of praise which is contained

in the word quiet when used by the French, who appear to consider it as

comprising all the cardinal virtues; when seeking a house or apartments,

if you say any thing favourable or unfavourable of them, they never fail

to remind you that they are so quiet. The same eulogy they will

pronounce on their daughters with peculiar pride and energy, when they

wish to extol them to the skies, and in good truth their _demoiselles_

are quiet enough in all conscience, for it requires often a

considerable degree of ingenuity to extract from them more than

monosyllables. We have been accustomed to consider the French as a

restless, capricious, volatile people, and so I suppose they might have

been formerly, but now they are undoubtedly the reverse, being a quiet

routine plodding sort of people, particularly as regards the

provincials; and even amongst the Parisians there are thousands that

reside in one quarter of the city, which they seldom quit, never

approaching what they consider the gay portion of Paris, but live

amongst each other, visiting only within their own circle, consisting

almost entirely of their relations and family connexions. This feeling

is certainly exemplified still farther at Boulogne, as I knew an old

couple who lived in the upper town, which joins the lower town except by

the separation of the wall of the fortifications, and had not been in

the latter for five years, because they considered it was too bustling

and too much a place of pleasure for such quiet, homely, and orderly

folk as they professed to be and certainly were, in every sense of the

word. At Bordeaux I knew three old ladies who were born in that city,

and never had been in any other town during their whole lives, nor ever

desired to pass the walls of their native place. Many persons who have

been accustomed to spend their days in the provinces have a sort of

horror of Paris; I remember an old gentleman at Rouen, who with his

antiquated spouse lived a sort of Darby and Joan kind of life, their

only daughter being married and living elsewhere; and on my once asking

him if he had ever been to Paris, he replied that he was once so

situated as to be compelled to go upon urgent business that rendered his

presence indispensable, but that he saw very little of the place,

because he had always heard that it was a city replete with vice and

dissipation, and that during the few days his affairs compelled him to

stay he kept close to his apartment, only quitting it to proceed to the

house wherein he had to transact business, and then he went in a

_fiacre_, as, if he had walked perhaps he might have been jostled, run

over, robbed, or something unpleasant might have occurred. "Ah! that's

very true, you did quite right, and acted very prudently, my dear,"

observed his wife, "and nobody knows the anxiety I felt till you came

back again." Although the rising generation of the French is not quite

so dormant in their ideas as that which is passing, yet there is not

even with them the same spirit of travel and enterprise which exist in

the English. That France has had, a reputation for restlessness, love of

change, and tumult, can only be explained by stating that until the

present time for the last two centuries, with the exception of Louis the

Eighteenth, she has been most unfortunate in her rulers, who have been

supporting a state of extravagant splendour which could alone be

sustained by being wrung from the middle and the lower classes; hence

the revolution in 1789, which might be considered as the ripened fruit

which the preceding reigns had been nurturing. Of the affair of the

three days in 1830, few I believe will deny the intensity of the

provocation, but then it will be said how do you account for their

having been so turbulent and discontented during the present reign? To

which I should answer in the same manner as an officer, who, defending

the character of his regiment, observed that it was composed of a

thousand men, of which nine hundred and fifty were peaceable and quiet

subjects, but the other fifty being very noisy they were constantly

heard of, and his corps had obtained the appellation of the noisy

regiment, as no one bestowed a thought upon the 'nine hundred and fifty

men who were orderly' because no one ever heard of them: thus it may be

said of France, the population may be estimated at about thirty-five

millions, of which perhaps one million may be discontented, and amongst

them are many persons connected with the press, who not only contrive by

that means to extend their war-whoop to every corner of France, but as

newspapers are conveyed to all the civilised parts of the world, and the

only medium by which a country is judged by those who have not an

opportunity of visiting it and making their own observations by a

residence amongst the people, it naturally is inferred in England and in

other nations that the French are a most dissatisfied and refractory

people. But a case in point may be cited, which proves that the

dissatisfaction is not general, nor has ever been during the present

reign. From the time that Louis-Philippe accepted the throne in 1830,

until June the 6th, 1832, a number of young men in the different

colleges at Paris occupied themselves constantly with the affairs of the

state, each forming a sort of political utopia, and however different

were their various theories, they all united in one object, and that was

to overthrow the existing government, and secretly took measures for

arming themselves, and mustering what strength they could collect in

point of numbers, which was but very insignificant compared to the

importance of the blow they intended to strike; but they counted on the

rising of the people, and the event proved they counted without their

host. June the 6th, 1832, being the day appointed for the funeral of

General Lamarque, they chose it for the development of their project,

and although the misguided youths fought with skill, constancy and

courage, even with a fanatic devotion to their cause, yet the populace

took no part with them, and the National Guard were the first to fire

upon them; and after two days hard fighting in the barricades they had

raised, scarcely any remained who were not either killed or wounded.

Since that, no attempt of the slightest importance has been made to

overthrow the government, and in fact I have ever found that ninety-nine

Parisians out of a hundred exclaim "_Tranquillité à tout prix_," that is

quiet at all prices, and all classes are interested in cherishing this

wish, the nobles and gentry that they may tranquilly enjoy what they

possess, the tradesman that he may obtain a sale for his goods, and the

workman that he may procure work. It is only a set of political

enthusiasts, to be found amongst the students, whose wild republican

schemes have dazzled others and induced the different outbreaks which

have occurred since the event of the three days, and having been treated

with lenity in the first instance, unprecedented in the annals of every

other government, they were emboldened to repeat their daring attempts.

But let any one traverse the provinces of France, get acquainted with

the people, make inquiries around him and penetrate into their habits

and customs, and he will find that the predominant feeling is love of

the spot on which they are born; the farmer will keep on the farm his

ancestors tilled before him for ages, and if offered a better farm, if

it be far removed from his home and that of his fathers he will reject

it; with the same tenacity the labourer clings to his cottage and the

little bit of land he has always delved. But it is with the landed

proprietor that one finds the most powerful example of the durability of

their adhesion to the cradle of their birth. There are many persons

possessed of estates of no great extent, from eight to fifteen hundred a

year, which have regularly descended to them from their ancestors, to

whom they have been granted, at as remote a period as the time of

Charlemagne, and have descended to the present possessors from

generation to generation, whilst there does not appear to have been in

all that period any great elevation or depression in their

circumstances. The habit of living up to their incomes as in England is

very rare in France; if they have daughters, from the day they are born

the parents begin to save for their dowry; even the peasant will follow

that practice if he can only put by a sou a day. I have known many

landed proprietors of from fifteen hundred to two thousand a year that

did not support any thing like the style that a person with a similar

fortune would in England; if a Frenchman has more than two or three

children, he seldom spends half his income if it be possible to live

upon a quarter, his object is that he may leave all his children in an

equal pecuniary position without dividing his land; as although the law

of primogeniture does not exist, yet parents like that one son should

keep up the estate intact, and the one fixed upon for that purpose is

generally the eldest, the others receive their portions in money from

the father's savings, and are usually brought up to one of the liberal

professions, and in many instances are sufficiently fortunate as to

realize by promotion or their talents, emoluments equal with what

portion they inherit to place them in as favourable a position as the

brother on whom devolves the estate. In other instances the son who

holds the land is taxed to pay from it a certain amount to his brothers

and sisters, in order to render their situation in life somewhat upon a

par; but it so happens that very large families are not so frequent in

France as in England. A system of frugality is prevalent amongst all

classes of the French, and a habit of contenting themselves with but

little as regards their daily expenses; nor have they that ambition to

step out of their class so general throughout England. A farmer in

France works much the same as his men, dresses in a plain decent manner,

and considers himself very little superior to his men, whilst his wife

goes to market with her butter and eggs upon one of the farm horses; and

without any education herself she thinks she does wonders in having her

daughters taught to read, write and cypher, but invariably economises to

give them a marriage portion. This applies to most of the farmers

throughout France, and will be found descriptive of those inhabiting the

country from Calais to Paris; but in Normandy they are frequently what

is in French estimation considered very rich, and their habits and

expenses are in proportion; and about Melun and some few parts of France

where the farms are very large, the occupiers would even in England be

termed wealthy. The extreme of poverty or what may be designated misery

is but little known; the traveller is deceived by the number of beggars

which infest the high roads, and is induced to imagine that the lowest

orders must be in a most wretched state, but the fact is otherwise, and

begging is no other than a trade on the most frequented roads. Turn into

the by-lanes, penetrate the interior of the country and in the villages

distant from the highways and but few beggars are to be found, nor could

I ever hear of an instance of any one in the country parts of France

perishing from want; yet there are no forced poor rates, the landed

proprietors however regularly give so much a month voluntarily to those

who are past labour and have no relations to provide for them, and

houseless and pennyless wanderers are received and sheltered for a night

by the higher farmers and people of property, the mendicant having soup

and bread given him at night and the same when he starts in the morning.

Of these there are great numbers within the last few years, being

refugees from Spain, Italy and even Poland, driven to seek shelter where

they can find it by the political convulsions of their countries. In

this manner, the French have recently been severely taxed, but they

appear never to have the heart to deny shelter and food, although they

carry economy to such a height as would be styled by many of my affluent

countrymen absolute parsimony; which is perceptible in all their

transactions, and is in a great degree the cause of the miserable state

of their agriculture, which is also in some measure owing to the utter

ignorance of the farmers, who in all that tends towards improvement

display the stupidity of asses with the obstinacy of mules. There can be

no doubt that, generally speaking, the soil of France is capable of

producing half as much more than it at present yields; they still

persevere in the same system as existed in England in the year 1770,

when Arthur Young wrote his Agricultural Tour, describing the various

practices in the different counties throughout the kingdom. Two white

crops and a summer fallow is the usual course in France, sometimes

varied by a crop of clover, and very often they fallow for two years

together; they have no idea of leguminous crops as winter provision for

their cattle, and of the advantage to be derived from stall feeding they

are quite ignorant, except in a few provinces, as a part of Normandy and

Brittany. The same with regard to the drill system; they mostly plough

very shallow, and do not keep their land very clean, with a few

exceptions; the consequence is their crops are generally very light.

Thanks to the natural richness of their meadows in Normandy, they do

certainly produce some beasts of an immense weight for the exhibition

annually held on Shrove Tuesday. There are generally about a dozen

brought to Paris, and the finest is the one selected to be led about the

streets; the one chosen last year weighed 3,800 French pounds, and as

there are two ounces more than in the English pound the immense size of

the animal may be imagined. In the winter, they fatten their beasts with

hay, clover and corn, but oilcake is not known except in a few

instances, when beasts are fattened for prizes or exhibitions. Their

agricultural implements are in keeping with the rest of their system; I

have seen them ploughing even in the lightest land, with the great old

heavy turnwrest ploughs and four bulky horses, which might have been

effected just as well with a light Rotherham plough and one horse.

Recently, however, I have seen some slight ameliorations, and those

parts of France which are nearest England one might expect would improve

the soonest. The farming servants are generally a hard-working, quiet,

sober people, contented with very little, their living costing them a

mere trifle; in harvest-time an Englishman will pour beer down his

throat that will cost as much as would keep a whole French family; there

is a natural economy in their habits that tends to making their wages

more than equal to their demand. An Englishman must have the best

wheaten bread, and when he gets a pound of meat he is ready to eat it

all himself; the Frenchman is contented with a cheap brown bread, quite

as wholesome as the finest, and to his portion of meat he adds some

vegetables with which soup is made, and it gives comfort to the whole

family; and it is quite a mistake to imagine that beer and animal food

produce greater physical strength, as I have in several instances proved

that the French porter will carry much more than the English. I remember

when lodging in Salisbury Street, in the Strand, having packed up my

things for my departure for Paris, when a porter came to carry them to

the Golden Cross, he said it was impossible that any man could take them

at once, and the people of the house joined in saying that it was far

beyond one man's load, consisting of a moderate sized trunk, a large

portmanteau, and a well-stuffed carpet bag; when I declared that the

first porter I should meet with at Paris would take them all the same

distance without raising an objection, a sort of smile of incredulity

passed from one to the other, expressive of how absurd they thought such

an assertion. On arriving at Paris, however, the very first porter I

spoke to in the Diligence-yard took them all, without a question as to

their weight. In several cases, when persons have been quitting London

for Paris with me, I have proved to them how much heavier a burthen the

French porters will carry than the English. I believe the cause arises

in a great degree from the latter not being addicted to drinking ardent

spirits, which is ruinous to the strength and constitutions of such

numbers of the lower classes in London. But the Greek and Turkish

porters will carry twice as much as the French, and their beverage is

nothing but water and their food principally rice. In almost every

description of labour the Englishman has the advantage when what may be

styled knack or method be required; the consequence is, that they make

the most of what physical strength they possess; hence he will plough,

mow, or reap more in a day than a Frenchman. Not only is the machinery

which the Englishman employs much better, but he is what may be termed

more handy in making use of it; in every thing which relates to

husbandry or mechanism the Frenchman is generally awkward; a more

powerful instance cannot be cited than that of their always employing

two men to shoe a horse, one man being occupied to hold up the horse's

leg, whilst the farrier performs his part of the work; is it not

astonishing that after an uninterrupted communication with England for

twenty-seven years, that they should never have observed, that an

English farrier, by taking the animal's leg between his own, is able to

effect his purpose just as well as if two men were employed; but the

French must have remarked that custom in England; only, the besotted

prejudice that exists in that class against every species of innovation

causes them to persevere in their old habits. The agricultural

population in France are more wealthy and generally better clothed than

ours, particularly as regards the women; they pride themselves much upon

their stocks of linen and their bedding; instead of the men expending

their money in drink, what little they can save beyond their daily wants

they lay out in contributing to their solid comforts, and as spinning

and knitting are the constant occupation of the women in their leisure

hours, when their children marry they are enabled to furnish them with a

portion of the fruits of their industry; even the peasant girl has a

trousseau, as it is called, that is, some stock of linen at her

marriage, and a trifle of money wherewith to begin the world. Thus take

France throughout; it will be found, that, in consequence of temperance

and a persevering industry, the peasantry are generally passively happy;

there is a great difference in respect to their wages and comforts,

according to the province to which they belong; but although the

intention of this work is especially to treat upon Paris and its

population, yet as my readers must pass through a considerable portion

of France before they can arrive at Paris, I judged it right to give

them some information of the manners and habits of the population, with

which they must meet in the course of their journey; but without farther

delay will now at once conduct them to the Grand Capital, and as I

consider the first impressions are the most permanent, I will introduce

them by that entrance which presents so grand an appearance, as to

surpass that of any other country in Europe. In coming from England,

they may enter Paris at this point by the Rouen road.

The first object that strikes the traveller, as he approaches Paris, is

the Triumphal Arch, erected with the view of commemorating the victories

of Napoleon, but as those victories were ultimately crowned by defeat,

it is more consistent to consider the Triumphal Arch as a triumph of art

than of arms; as certainly the magnificence and sublimity of the design

is only to be equalled by the exquisite beauty of the execution. Having

passed this noble monument and splendid specimen of architectural

talent, the Champs Elysées extend in all their beauty to the view of the

beholder, presenting a fine broad road with rows of lofty trees on

either side, whilst handsome buildings and superb fountains are

occasionally visible from behind the foliage; and one of the latter,

which rises exactly in the centre, has a most happy effect; from this

circle several roads diverge in different directions, displaying various

objects of interest, but none of so high an order as that of the

Hospital of Invalids, for aged and wounded soldiers, the whole expanse

of which is seen in the distance at the end of a long wide avenue of

trees. From the Triumphal Arch on either side extends a row of

ornamental lamps for nearly a mile, which when lighted have the most

brilliant effect; and when it is considered how very small the

distances are between each lamp, I believe the assertion to be correct,

that there is not another such display of gas anywhere to be found.

Arrived at the Place Louis Quinze, or Place de la Concorde, as it is now

called, such a coup d'oeil is presented as remains unrivalled in

Europe, or indeed, in any part of the world. On one side, at the end of

a handsome and regular street, called the Rue Royale, rises in majestic

height the Madeleine, with its noble columns crowned by its sculptured

entablature in mezzo relievo, and adorned by its numerous statues, yet

preserving a chaste simplicity throughout the whole. On the opposite

side facing it, in a direct line at the end of a bridge, is the Chamber

of Deputies, resembling a Roman temple; its style is severe and its

_tout ensemble_ has an air of heavy grandeur, which is consistent with

an edifice in which are to be discussed the affairs of so great a

nation. In the centre of the Place is an Egyptian column, which was with

much difficulty brought from Egypt, and raised with considerable

ingenuity where it now stands, without any accident; gorgeous fountains

of bronze and gold are constantly playing, whilst colossal statues,

being allegorical representations of the principal towns of France, are

placed at regular distances, and appear as it were in solemn

contemplation of the splendid scene by which they are surrounded. Two

noble buildings, the Garde Meuble and the Hôtel de la Marine, which may

be styled palaces, adorn each side of the Rue Royale, and form one side

of the magnificent square, whilst another is occupied by the Elysian

Fields, and that immediately opposite to the Tuileries gardens; but so

beautiful, so wonderful is the whole combined, that accustomed as I have

been to frequent it for upwards of twenty years, I cannot now traverse

it without remaining some time to admire the extraordinary combination

of so many beautiful objects centering in one vast area. Here no mean or

unseemly building meets the eye, but all is made tributary to one grand

effect; even the lamps with their supporters are of bronze and gold,

whilst in the distance the gilded dome of the Invalides peers above all,

and gives a brilliant termination to the sublimity of the scene.

[Illustration: Champin del. Lith. Rigo Frères et Cie Triumphal Arch.

Published by F. Sinnett. 15, Grande rue Verle.]

Thus much for the only entrance of Paris which has aught to boast, but

having, in fact, so many charms that it must be considered by the

visiter as compensating for the deficiencies of every other. In entering

from Boulogne or Calais, nothing can be conceived more discouraging than

the first appearance of Paris as you are borne through the Faubourg St.

Denis; the street, it is true, is wide and the houses large, but they

have a dirty gloomy forlorn aspect, which gives them an uninhabited

appearance, or as if the inmates did not belong to them; as no care

appears to have been taken to give them some degree of neatness and

comfort; in fact, to bestow upon them an air of home; the stranger

continues rattling over the stones between these great lumbering-looking

dwellings, until his eye is attracted by the Porte St. Denis, which is

a triumphal arch built by Louis the Fourteenth, and certainly presents a

most imposing mass of sculpture, which, although blackened by time, is

an object well worthy the attention of the observing traveller; and here

he crosses the Boulevards, by which he gets a little peep at the

inspiring gaiety of Paris, but is soon hurried into noisy streets until

his brain feels in a whirl; and on his arrival at the Diligence-yard,

when he hopes to obtain a little repose, he is annoyed by being asked

for the keys of his trunks, for the Custom House officers, to make

believe to look into them to ascertain that you have not smuggled any

liquors or other material within the walls of Paris. Those who are

fortunate enough to travel in their own carriages, are exempted from

such tiresome ceremony. Some of the other entries to Paris are somewhat

better, but none of them sufficiently so, to be worthy notice; perhaps

the best amongst the bad is by the Faubourg St. Antoine, the Barrières du

Trône, at the commencement and summit of the street, presenting a most

noble appearance; indeed, as far as the barriers are concerned, there

are many which are well worthy of notice, being mostly handsome stone

buildings with columns that give them an imposing effect, particularly

when we recollect the little turnpike gates at the principal entrances

of London, with the exception of the recent erections at Knightsbridge,

which sink into nothingness when compared to the Triumphal Arch at the

entrance already described; and, except foreigners, particularly the

English, enter by that quarter, the first aspect of Paris mostly

excites disappointment; the generality of the streets wanting that

straight line of regularity so prevalent throughout London, the French

capital has an incongruous patchy sort of effect, and its beauties and

objects of interest have to be sought, but to the eye of an artist it is

much more gratifying than that dull sameness which reigns throughout

London, which Canova very justly designated as consisting of walls with

square holes in them; for what otherwise can be said of our houses in

general, but that they are literally upright walls, with square holes

for doors and windows. Regent Street and a few others, which have been

recently erected, form an exception to the rule. But in almost every

street in Paris a draftsman finds subject for his pencil; their richly

carved gateways, their elaborately wrought iron balconies, their

ornamented windows, and even their protruding signs, all help to break

the formal straight line and afford ample food for sketching; and in

many of their old and least fashionable streets, an ancient church with

its gothic doorway, adorned by rich and crumbling sculpture, invites the

artist to pause and exercise his imitative art. Paris at first strikes a

stranger as still more bustling and noisy than London, as the streets

being narrower and hack vehicles more used in proportion, the

circulation gets sooner choked up, and the rattling over the stones of

the carriages is still more deafening, being within so confined a space;

hence also the confusion is greater; then there is always a sort of

bewilderment when one first arrives in a large city, that makes it

appear much more astounding than is found to be the case as soon as the

visiter becomes accustomed to its apparent labyrinth.

According to comparative calculations, and taking the medium, Paris is

about twenty-two miles round, and the population, foreigners included,

one million; many estimate it at eleven hundred thousand, which I have

no doubt it may be, if several villages be included which absolutely

join Paris; such as Passy, Belleville, etc. The extreme height of the

houses would induce a belief, that a more, dense mass of people

inhabited the same space of ground than could be the case in London; but

to counterbalance that circumstance, it must be taken into consideration

that there are such an immense number of large gardens and court-yards

in Paris, which occupy a great extent of ground. I have often been

surprised to find, that in nasty dirty narrow streets, the back windows

of the houses looked over extensive gardens, with lofty trees; these are

oftener to be found in the old parts of Paris than in the modern

quarters. A much greater proportion of the population consists of

foreigners, than is the case in London, consequently it is more moving

and changeable. It is the great post town for almost all Europeans who

visit England, and hundreds of thousands come to Paris, who never think

of going to London, deterred by an exaggerated idea of the expense;

hence it will be found that very few persons from the Continent visit

London who have not already been to Paris, although, now that steam

conveyance affords such facilities of accommodation between London and

many of the large cities in Europe, the case is somewhat altered. But

Paris has been long regarded as the Museum of the Continent, and few men

possessing good fortunes from civilised countries, if gifted with

enquiring minds, consider their education complete if they have not

sojourned some time at Paris, which has for time immemorial had the

reputation of being the seat of the polite arts. Nearly a third of the

houses in Paris are designated hôtels, many of which do not provide

meals but merely furnished lodgings, and most of their inmates are

foreigners, others, persons from the provinces, consequently at least

one quarter of the population of Paris is constantly changing. But

perhaps no city is anywhere to be found where a stranger can sooner

accommodate himself in every respect, as the customs are such that a

person may live as he likes, go where he likes, and do as he likes,

provided he do no harm. In London, if a lady and gentleman from the

country arrive for the purpose of passing a day, and have no

acquaintances, there are no houses as in Paris where one can take a

wife, sister, or daughter to breakfast or dine, without being subject to

remark, unless indeed you can draw up to the door of a hôtel with an

equipage; then certainly every attention and accommodation is to be

found, but only such as will suit a very limited number of purses;

whereas, at Paris a family may find in most of the restaurateurs small

apartments where they can dine by themselves if they object to the

public room, but even in the latter they might take their meal very

undisturbed and without exciting the slightest observation, at various

prices that will either suit the economist or the wealthy individual.

This is amongst many of the conveniences of Paris; as also that of the

libraries being open to the public, any one having the privilege to call

for the book he wishes, where he may read as quietly as in his own

house. This is extremely useful to studious and literary men, as there

are so many works of reference too expensive to be within the compass of

a small private library, which may be found in the liberal

establishments in which Paris abounds. Museums, exhibitions, academies,

gardens, public buildings, etc., are, with a very few exceptions,

accessible to the foreigner merely on the exhibition of his passport.

How to Enjoy Paris in 1842 Intended to Serve as a Companion and Monitor, Containing Historical, Political, Commercial, Artistical, Theatrical And Statistical Information · 第 2 / 15 章