LETTER XXI.

PARIS, August, 1805.

MY LORD:--That the population of this capital has, since the Revolution,

decreased near two hundred thousand souls, is not to be lamented. This

focus of corruption and profligacy is still too populous, though the

inhabitants do not amount to six hundred thousand; for I am well

persuaded that more crimes and excesses of every description are

committed here in one year than are perpetrated in the same period of

time in all other European capitals put together. From not reading in

our newspapers, as we do in yours, of the robberies, murders, and frauds

discovered and punished, you may, perhaps, be inclined to suppose my

assertion erroneous or exaggerated; but it is the policy of our present

Government to labour as much as possible in the dark; that is to say, to

prevent, where it can be done, all publicity of anything directly or

indirectly tending to inculpate it of oppression, tyranny, or even

negligence; and to conceal the immorality of the people so nearly

connected with its own immoral power. It is true that many vices and

crimes here, as well as everywhere else, are unavoidable, and the natural

consequences of corruption, and might be promulgated, therefore, without

attaching any reproach to our rulers; but they are so accustomed to the

mystery adherent to tyranny, that even the most unimportant lawsuit,

uninteresting intrigue, elopement, or divorce, are never allowed to be

mentioned in our journals, without a previous permission from the prefect

of police, who very seldom grants it.

Most of the enormities now deplored in this country are the consequence

of moral and religious licentiousness, that have succeeded to political

anarchy, or rather were produced by it, and survive it. Add to this the

numerous examples of the impunity of guilt, prosperity of infamy, misery

of honesty, and sufferings of virtue, and you will not think it

surprising that, notwithstanding half a million of spies, our roads and

streets are covered with robbers and assassins, and our scaffolds with

victims.

The undeniable TRUTH that this city alone is watched by one hundred

thousand spies (so that, when in company with six persons, one has reason

to dread the presence of one spy), proclaims at once the morality of the

governors and that of the governed: were the former just, and the latter

good, this mass of vileness would never be employed; or, if employed,

wickedness would expire for want of fuel, and the hydra of tyranny perish

by its own pestilential breath.

According to the official registers published by Manuel in 1792, the

number of spies all over France during the reign of Louis XVI. was

nineteen thousand three hundred (five thousand less than under Louis

XV.); and of this number six thousand were distributed in Paris, and in a

circle of four leagues around it, including Versailles. You will

undoubtedly ask me, even allowing for our extension of territory, what

can be the cause of this disproportionate increase of distrust and

depravity? I will explain it as far as my abilities admit, according to

the opinions of others compared with my own remarks.

When factions usurped the supremacy of the Kings, vigilance augmented

with insecurity; and almost everybody who was not an opposer, who refused

being an accomplice, or feared to be a victim, was obliged to serve as an

informer and vilify himself by becoming a spy. The rapidity with which

parties followed and destroyed each other made the criminals as numerous

as the sufferings of honour and loyalty innumerable; and I am sorry to

say few persons exist in my degraded country, whose firmness and

constancy were proof against repeated torments and trials, and who, to

preserve their lives, did not renounce their principles and probity.

Under the reign of Robespierre and of the Committee of Public Safety,

every member of Government, of the clubs, of the tribunals, and of the

communes, had his private spies; but no regular register was kept of

their exact number. Under the Directory a Police Minister was nominated,

and a police office established. According to the declaration of the

Police Minister, Cochon, in 1797, the spies, who were then regularly

paid, amounted to one hundred and fifty thousand; and of these, thirty

thousand did duty in this capital. How many there were in 1799, when

Fouche, for the first time, was appointed a chief of the department of

police, is not known, but suppose them doubled within two years; their

increase since is nevertheless immense, considering that France has

enjoyed upwards of four years’ uninterrupted Continental peace, and has

not been exposed to any internal convulsions during the same period.

You may, perhaps, object that France is not rich enough to keep up as

numerous an army of spies as of soldiers; because the expense of the

former must be triple the amount of the latter. Were all these spies,

now called police agents, or agents of the secret police, paid regular

salaries, your objection would stand, but most of them have no other

reward than the protection of the police; being employed in

gambling--houses, in coffee--houses, in taverns, at the theatres, in the

public gardens, in the hotels, in lottery offices, at pawnbrokers’, in

brothels, and in bathing-houses, where the proprietors or masters of

these establishments pay them. They receive nothing from the police, but

when they are enabled to make any great discoveries, those who have been

robbed or defrauded, and to whom they have been serviceable, are, indeed,

obliged to present them with some douceur, fixed by the police at the

rate of the value recovered; but such occurrences are merely accidental.

To these are to be added all individuals of either sex who by the law are

obliged to obtain from the police licenses to exercise their trade, as

pedlars, tinkers, masters of puppet-shows, wild beasts, etc. These, on

receiving their passes, inscribe themselves, and take the oaths as spies;

and are forced to send in their regular reports of what they hear or see.

Prostitutes, who, all over this country, are under the necessity of

paying for regular licenses, are obliged also to give information, from

time to time, to the nearest police commissary of what they observe or

what they know respecting their visitors, neighbours, etc. The number of

unfortunate women of this description who had taken out licenses during

the year 12, or from September, 1803, to September, 1804, is officially

known to have amounted to two hundred and twenty thousand, of whom forty

thousand were employed by the armies.

It is no secret that Napoleon Bonaparte has his secret spies upon his

wife, his brothers, his sisters, his Ministers, Senators, and other

public functionaries, and also upon his public spies. These are all

under his own immediate control and that of Duroc, who does the duty of

his private Police Minister, and in whom he confides more than even in

the members of his own family. In imitation of their master, each of the

other Bonapartes, and each of the Ministers, have their individual spies,

and are watched in their turn by the spies of their secretaries, clerks,

etc. This infamous custom of espionage goes ad infinitum, and appertains

almost to the establishment and to the suite of each man in place, who

does not think himself secure a moment if he remains in ignorance of the

transactions of his rivals, as well as of those of his equals and

superiors.

Fouche and Talleyrand are reported to have disagreed before Bonaparte on

some subject or other, which is frequently the case. The former,

offended at some doubts thrown out about his intelligence, said to the

latter:

“I am so well served that I can tell you the name of every man or woman

you have conversed with, both yesterday and today; where you saw them,

and how long you remained with them or they with you.”

“If such commonplace espionage evinces any merit,” retorted Talleyrand,

“I am even here your superior; because I know not only what has already

passed with you and in your house, but what is to pass hereafter. I can

inform you of every dish you had for your dinners this week, who provided

these dinners, and who is expected to provide your meats to-morrow and

the day after. I can whisper you, in confidence, who slept with Madame

Fouche last night, and who has an appointment with her to-night.”

Here Bonaparte interrupted them, in his usual dignified language: “Hold

both your tongues; you are both great rogues, but I am at a loss to

decide which is the greatest.”

Without uttering a single syllable, Talleyrand made a profound reverence

to Fouche. Bonaparte smiled, and advised them to live upon good terms if

they were desirous of keeping their places.

A man of the name of Ducroux, who, under Robespierre, had from a barber

been made a general, and afterwards broken for his ignorance, was engaged

by Bonaparte as a private spy upon Fouche, who employed him in the same

capacity upon Bonaparte. His reports were always written, and delivered

in person into the hands both of the Emperor and of his Minister. One

morning he, by mistake, gave to Bonaparte the report of him instead of

that intended for him. Bonaparte began to read: “Yesterday, at nine

o’clock, the Emperor acted the complete part of a madman; he swore,

stamped, kicked, foamed, roared--“, here poor Ducroux threw himself at

Bonaparte’s feet, and called for mercy for the terrible blunder he had

committed.

“For whom,” asked Bonaparte, “did you intend this treasonable

correspondence? I suppose it is composed for some English or Russian

agent, for Pitt or for Marcoff. How long have you conspired with my

enemies, and where are your accomplices?”

“For God’s sake, hear me, Sire,” prayed Ducroux. “Your Majesty’s enemies

have always been mine. The report is for one of your best friends; but

were I to mention his name, he will ruin me.”

“Speak out, or you die!” vociferated Bonaparte.

“Well, Sire, it is for Fouche--for nobody else but Fouche.”

Bonaparte then rang the bell for Duroc, whom he ordered to see Ducroux

shut up in a dungeon, and afterwards to send for Fouche. The Minister

denied all knowledge of Ducroux, who, after undergoing several tortures,

expiated his blunder upon the rack.

Memoirs of the Court of St. Cloud (Being secret letters from a gentleman at Paris to a nobleman in London) — Complete · 第 42 / 107 题