Evil is that which retards or frustrates development, and

injures some part of the universe. It is akin to disease and

ugliness and misery.

* * * * *

CLAUSE V

“Development” means unfolding of latent possibilities; as a bud unfolds

into a flower, or as a chicken develops from an egg.

The idea controlling this answer is that growth and development are in

accordance with the law of the universe, and that destruction and decay

are features which are only good in so far as they may be on the way to

something better; as leaf-mould assists the growth of flowers, or as

discords in their proper place conduce to, or prepare for, harmony. In

the same way conditions and practices which once were good become in

process of time corrupt; yet out of them must grow the better future.

“The old order changeth, yielding place to new,

And God fulfils Himself in many ways,

Lest one good custom should corrupt the world.”

The law of the Universe, and the will of God, are here regarded as in

some sort synonymous terms. It is impossible properly to define such a

term as “God,” but it is permissible reverently to use the term for a

mode of regarding the Soul of the Universe as invested with what in

human beings we call personality, consciousness, and other forms of

intelligence, emotion, and will. These attributes, undoubtedly possessed

by a part, are not to be denied to the whole; however little we may be

able as yet to form a clear conception of their larger meaning.

It is quite clear that the Universe was not made by man; it must owe its

existence to some higher Power of which man has but an infinitesimal

knowledge. Some primary conception of such a Power has been

independently formed by every fraction of the human race, and is what

under various symbols has been called God.

It is sometimes asserted that God does not possess powers and faculties

and attributes which we ourselves possess. But that is preposterous: for

though we may be able to form no conception as to the particular form

our powers would take, when possessed by a being even moderately higher

in the scale of existence than ourselves; and although vastly more must

be attributed to the Reality denoted by the term “God” than we can even

begin to conceive of; yet such a term, if it is to have any meaning at

all, must at least include everything we have so far been able to

discover as existent in the Universe. It must, in fact, be the most

comprehensive term that can be employed; though for practical purposes

it may be permissible to discriminate, and exclude from its connotation,

portions such as “self,” and “the world,” and sometimes, though with

less excuse, even an abstraction like “nature”; considering these

separately from the more purely personal aspect to which attention is

directed by our ordinary use of the term God. It is convenient to

differentiate the principle of evil also, and to reserve it for separate

study.

Sometimes the totality of existence is spoken of as the “Absolute,” and

the term God is limited to the conception of a Being of infinite

Goodness and Mercy, the ultimate Impersonation of Truth and Love and

Beauty; a Being of whose attributes the highest faculties and

perceptions of man are but a dim shadow or reflexion.

In man, goodness is the path toward higher development, and a radiant

beauty is the crown and perfection of life; so the trinity of Truth,

Goodness, and Beauty, often referred to in literature, may, without

undue stretching, be considered as also equivalent to what is

represented by the words, the Way, the Truth, and the Life; they are

three aspects of what after all is one essential unity. That which is

good, in the highest sense, cannot help being both true and beautiful.

Nevertheless, for many practical purposes, these ideas must be

discriminated; and the question is occasionally forced upon our

attention whether vitality or beauty can possibly be enlisted in the

service of evil; and if so, whether it is still in itself good.

We have to learn that most good things can be misapplied, and that

though they do not in themselves cease to be good, their desecration is

especially deadly. That the corruption of the best abets the cause of

the worst, is proverbial; the prostitution of high gifts to base ends is

the saddest of spectacles.

“Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds.”

Oratory, the power of persuasion, can thus be debased, and the passions

of the multitude may be incited by the Divine fire of eloquence.

Rhetoric and sophistry have been on this ground condemned when they were

misused for the cultivation of the art of persuasion apart from

knowledge and virtue; but almost every good gift—personal affection,

medical science, artistic genius—has every now and then been abused; and

the higher and nobler the faculty, the more sorrowful and diabolical

must be its prostitution.

It has been an ancient puzzle to consider whether the principle of

goodness is the supreme entity in the universe—a principle to which God

as well as man is subject—or whether it represents only the arbitrary

will of the Creator. Many answers have been given, but the answer from

the side of science is clear:—

No existing universe can tend on the whole towards contraction and

decay; because that would foster annihilation, and so any incipient

attempt would not have survived; consequently an actually existing and

flowing universe must on the whole cherish development, expansion,

growth: and so tend towards infinity rather than towards zero. The

problem is therefore only a variant of the general problem of existence.

Given existence, of a non-stagnant kind, and ultimate development must

be its law. Good and evil can be defined in terms of development and

decay respectively. This may be regarded as part of a revelation of the

nature of God.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI

MAN PART OF THE UNIVERSE

_Q. 6.  How does man know good from evil?_

_A._ His own nature, when uncorrupted by greed, is

sufficiently in harmony with the rest of the universe to

enable him to be well aware in general of what is a help or

hindrance to the guiding Spirit, of which he himself is a

real and effective portion.

* * * * *

CLAUSE VI

We are not something separate from the Universe, but a part of it: a

part of it endowed with some power of control—power to guide ourselves

and others and assist in the scheme of development—power also to go

wrong, to set ourselves contrary to the tendency of things, to delay

progress, and break ourselves in conflict with overpowering forces.

When not thus warped or misled, we fit into the general scheme, and,

like all other portions of existence, can fulfil our function and take

our due share in the general progress. We are a part of the Universe,

and the Universe is a part of God. Even we also, therefore, have a

Divine Nature and may truly be called sons and co-workers with God. The

consciousness of this constitutes our highest privilege, and likewise

our gravest responsibility. Perception of this is dawning with

increasing brightness on the human race in the light of the doctrine of

evolution. The process of evolution has no end: progress is toward an

advancing goal. At one time

“... all tended to mankind,

And, man produced, all has its end thus far:

But in completed man begins anew

A tendency to God.”

We are essential and active agents in the terrestrial order of things,

analogous to the white corpuscles in the human body. The body may be

regarded as a colony of cells, some of which are living and moving on

their own account; in complete ignorance of the feelings and perceptions

of the larger whole of which they are microscopic units, towards whose

health and comfort nevertheless they unconsciously but very really

contribute; it is in fact by their activity that the health of the body

is maintained against adverse influences. So it is with the health of

the body politic, to which our wise activity is necessary and essential;

we are to be a corporate portion of the whole, effective servants of the

guiding and controlling Spirit. But in our case it is not merely

unconscious service that is called for: we are privileged not only to be

servants, but friends; not only to work, but to sympathise; to give not

only dutiful but affectionate service. This is required of the humblest,

and no more is required of the noblest:

“He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord

require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly

with thy God?”

------------------------------------------------------------------------

VII

THE NATURE OF EVIL

_Q. 7.  How comes it that evil exists?_

_A._ Evil is not an absolute thing, but has reference to a

standard of attainment. The possibility of evil is the

necessary consequence of a rise in the scale of moral

existence; just as an organism whose normal temperature is

far above “absolute zero” is necessarily liable to damaging

and deadly cold. But cold is not in itself a positive or

created thing.

* * * * *

CLAUSE VII

The term “evil” is relative: dirt, for instance, is well known to be

only matter out of place; weeds are plants flourishing where they are

not wanted; there are no weeds in botany, there are weeds in gardening;

even disease is only one organism growing at the expense of another;

ugliness is non-existent save to creatures with a sense of beauty, and

is due to unsuitable grouping. Analysed into its elements, every

particle of matter must be a miracle of law and order, and, in that

sense, of beauty.

Recent discoveries in connexion with the internal structure of an atom,

whereby the constituent particles are found to move in intricate and

ascertainable orbits—leading to a new science of atomic

astronomy—emphasise this assertion to an extent barely credible ten

years ago.

Even what can be called filth—that is to say material which, to the

casual observer, or when encountered at unsuitable times, is

disgusting—may to an investigator, or under other circumstances, be of

the highest interest; and may even arouse a sense of admiration, by

reason of manifest subservience to function.

Many social evils are due to human folly and stupidity, and will cease

when the race has risen to a standard already attained by individuals.

Excessive hunger and starvation are manifestly evils of a negative

character: they are merely a deficiency of supply: they have no business

to exist in a civilised and organised community. Famine and pestilence

can be checked by applications of science.

Pain is an awful reality, when highly developed organisms are subjected

to wounds and poison and disease. Some kinds of pain have been wickedly

inflicted by human beings on each other in the past, and other kinds may

be removed or mitigated by the progress of discovery in the future.

Physiologically the nerve processes involved are well worthy of study

and control. Premature avoidance of pain would have been dangerous to

the race, and not really helpful to the individual: but great advances

in this direction are now foreshadowed. Already surgical operations can

be conducted painlessly; and a time is foreshadowed when, through

hypnosis, excessive and useless torture can be shut off from

consciousness, by intelligence and will; somewhat as the random leakage

of an electric supply can be checked. All this will come in due time:

“The best is yet to be,

The last of life for which the first was made:

Our times are in His hand

Who saith a whole I planned,

Youth shows but half: trust God, see all, nor be afraid.”

The contrast between good and evil can be well illustrated by the

contrast between heat and cold. Cold is only the absence of heat, and is

made at once possible and necessary by the existence of degrees of heat.

The fact that we regard excessive cold as an evil is only because our

organisation demands a certain temperature for life; there is nothing

evil about cold in itself: it is only evil in its relation to organisms

sufficiently high to be damaged by it. The real _fact_ is their normally

high temperature, and their delicacy of response to stimuli. These

things are good; and the only evil is a defect or deficiency of these

good things.

Every rise involves the possibility of fall. Every advance seems to

entail a corresponding penalty.

The power of assimilating food leaves the organism open to the pangs of

hunger, that is, of insufficient nutriment,—manifestly only the absence

of a good.

In a world devoid of life there is no death; in a world without

conscious beings there is no sin. In a world without affection there

would be no grief; and to a larger vision much of our grief may be

needless:—

“My son, the world is dark with griefs and graves,

So dark that men cry out against the Heavens.

Who knows but that the darkness is in man?”

A mechanical universe might be perfectly good. Every atom of matter

perfectly obeys the forces acting upon it, and there is no error or

wickedness or fault or rebellion in lifeless nature. Evil only begins

when existence takes a higher turn. There is not even destruction or

death in the inorganic world—only transformation. The higher possibility

called life entails the correlative evils called death and disease. The

possibility of keen sensation, which permits pleasure, also involves

capacity for the corresponding penalty called pain: but the pain is in

ourselves, and is the result of our sensitiveness combined with

imperfection.

The still higher attribute of conscious striving after holiness, which

must be the prerogative of free agents capable of virtue or purposed

good, and marks so enormous a rise in the scale of creation,—involves

the possibility that beings so endowed may fall from their high level,

and, by definitely applying themselves to harm instead of good, may

abuse their high power and suffer the penalty called sin; but the evil

in all cases is a warped or distorted good, and has reference to the

higher beings which are now in existence.

“There shall never be one lost good! what was shall live as before;

The evil is null, is nought, is silence implying sound;

What was good shall _be_ good, with, for evil, so much good more;

On the earth the broken arcs; in the heaven a perfect round.”

Some further idea of the necessity for evil can be conveyed as follows:—

Contrast is an inevitable attribute of reality. Sickness is the negative

and opposite of health: without sickness we should not be aware what

health was. There is no sickness in inorganic nature; yet, even there,

contrast is the essence of existence. Everything that _is_ must be

surrounded by regions where it is not. There is no stupid infinity, or

absence of boundaries, about existing things,—however infinite their

totality may be,—no absence of limitation, either of perfection or of

anything else. Existence involves limitation. A tree that is _here_ is

excluded from being everywhere else. Goodness would have no meaning if

badness were impossible or non-existent.

“No ill no good! such counter-terms, my son,

Are border-races, holding, each its own

By endless war.”

We are not machines or automata, but free and conscious and active

agents, and so must contend with evil as well as rejoice in good.

Conflict and difficulty are essential for our training and development:

even for our existence at this grade. With their aid we have become what

we are; without them we should vegetate and degenerate; whereas the will

of the Universe is that we arise and walk.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIII

THE MEANING OF SIN

_Q. 8.  What is sin?_

_A._ Sin is the deliberate and wilful act of a free

agent who sees the better and chooses the worse, and

thereby acts injuriously to himself and others. The

root sin is selfishness, whereby needless trouble and

pain are inflicted on others; when fully developed it

involves moral suicide.

* * * * *

CLAUSE VIII

The essence of sin is error against light and knowledge, and against our

own higher nature. Vice is error against natural law. Crime is error

against society. Sin against our own higher nature may be truly said to

be against God, because it is against that purpose or destiny which by

Divine arrangement is open to us, if only we will pursue and realise it.

Sin is a disease: the whole of existence is so bound together that

disease in one part means pain throughout; the innocent may suffer with

the guilty, and suffering may extend to the Highest. The healing

influences of forgiveness, felt by the broken and the contrite heart,

achieve spiritual reform though they remove no penalty. Every eddy of

conduct, for good or ill, must have its definite consequence.

We have high authority for the statement that hard circumstances and

disabilities, not of our own making, are mercifully taken into account;

while privileges and advantages weigh heavily in the scale against us,

if we prove unworthy:

“If ye were blind ye would have no sin;

but now ye say We see, therefore your sin remaineth.”

A man’s or woman’s nature may be so weakened and warped by miserable

surroundings, that its strength is insufficient to cope with its

environment. Pity, and a wish to help, are the feelings which such a

state of things should arouse, together with an active determination to

improve or remove the conditions which lead to such an untoward result.

Most human failures are the result of bad social arrangements, and they

constitute an indictment against human inertness and selfishness. It is

a terrible responsibility to turn a human soul out of terrestrial life

worse than when it entered that phase of existence. In so far as it

accomplishes that, humanity is performing the function of a devil.

Deterioration of others is usually achieved under the influence of some

of the protean forms of social greed and selfishness.

Another reason why selfishness is spoken of as specially deadly, and

even suicidal, depends upon certain regions of scientific inquiry not

yet incorporated into orthodox science and therefore still to be

regarded as speculative; it may be outlined as follows:—

Our present familiar methods of communicating with each other are such

as speech, writing, and other conventional codes of signs more or less

developed. It appears possible that a germ or nucleus of another,

apparently immediate or directly psychical, method of communication may

also exist; which has nothing to do with our known bodily organs,

although its impressions are apprehended or interpreted by the receiver

as if they were due to customary modes or forms of sensation. Whether

that be so or not, it is certain that bodily neighbourhood and blood

relationship confer opportunities for making friends which should be

utilised to the utmost, and that friendship and affection are the most

important things in life.

The intercourse with, and active assistance of, others enlarges our own

nature; and hereafter, when we have lost our bodily organs, it is

probable that we shall be able to communicate only with those with whom

we are connected by links of sympathy and affection.

A person who cuts himself off from all human intercourse and lives a

miserly self-centred life, will ultimately, therefore, find himself

alone in the universe; and, unless taken pity on and helped in a spirit

of self-sacrifice, may as well be out of existence altogether. (A book

called _Cecilia de Noel_ emphasises this truth under the guise of a

story.) That is why developed selfishness is spoken of as moral suicide:

it is one of those evil things which truly assault and hurt the soul. It

is a disintegrating and repelling agency. Love is the linking and

uniting force in the spiritual universe, enabling it to cohere into a

unity, in analogy with attractive forces in the material cosmos.

It has been necessary to dwell on the sin and pain and sorrow in the

world, but the amount of good must be emphatically recognised too.

Our highest aspirations, and longings for something better, are a sign

that better things exist. It is not given to the creature to exceed the

Creator in imagination or in goodness; and the best and highest we can

imagine shall be more than fulfilled by reality—in due time:—

“All we have willed or hoped or dreamed of good, shall exist:

Not its semblance, but itself; ...

When eternity affirms the conception of an hour.”

------------------------------------------------------------------------

IX

DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE

_Q. 9.  Are there beings lower in the scale of existence

than man?_

_A._ Yes, multitudes. In every part of the earth where life

is possible, there we find it developed. Life exists in

every variety of animal, in earth and air and sea, and in

every species of plant.

* * * * *

CLAUSE IX

One of the facts of nature which we must weld into our conception of the

scheme of the universe, is the strenuous effort made by all live things

to persist in multifarious ways,—spreading out into quite unlikely

regions, in the struggle for existence, and establishing themselves

wherever life is possible. The fish slowly developing into a land

animal, the reptile beginning to raise itself in the air and ultimately

becoming a bird, the mammal returning under stress of circumstances to

the water, as a seal or whale, or betaking itself to the air in search

of food, in the form of a bat,—all these are instances of a universal

tendency throughout animate nature.

Sometimes this determined effort at persistence breeds forms that appear

to us ugly and deleterious. For the struggle results not only in

beneficent organisms, but also in parasites and pests and blights, and

may be held to account for the numerous cases of the interference of one

form of life with another: one form utilising another for its own

growth, and sometimes destroying that other in the process. It accounts

also for the ravages of disease, which for the most part is an outcome

of the establishment of a foreign and alien growth in a living body of

higher grade,—a growth whose vital secretions are poisonous to its

temporary host. On the other hand, the theory of manuring, the

purification of rivers, the treatment of sewage, the use of opsonins and

of serum-injections,—all illustrate the ministration of one form of life

to another; they exhibit the contribution of beneficent organisms,—that

is, of forms of life which promote higher development and conduce to

well-being.

Many of the microbes and bacteria and low forms of cell life are

beneficent in this way; and it is our function,—as ourselves one of the

forms of life,—now consciously to intervene and take control of these

vital processes. By investigation and study we can gradually understand

the condition and life-history of each organism, and then can take such

measures as will encourage the beneficent forms whether plant or animal,

and destroy or eliminate those which from the human point of view are

deadly and destructive,—attacking them at their weakest and most

vulnerable stage. Widely regarded or interpreted, this function covers

an immense range of possible activity—from every kind of scientific

agriculture and the extirpating of tropical diseases, to the reformation

of slum dwellings and the encouragement of physical training and school

hygiene. As part of our work in regulating this planet and utilising its

possibilities to the utmost for higher purposes, the regulation of vital

conditions is probably our most pressing, and also at present our most

neglected, corporate duty. Stupidity and a mistaken parsimony are among

the serious obstacles with which the progressive portions of humanity

have to contend.

Another aspect of the universal struggle for self-manifestation and

corporeal realisation, which plays so large a part in all activity and

is especially marked in the domain of life, is illustrated on a higher

level by that overpowering instinct or impulse towards production and

self-realisation, which is characteristic of genius. It may be said that

throughout nature, from the lowest to the highest, a tendency to

self-realisation, and a manifestation of joy in existence, are

conspicuous.

The Substance of Faith Allied with Science (6th Ed.) A Catechism for Parents and Teachers · 第 2 / 13 段