CHAPTER VI.

_JOSHUA'S CHARGE TO THE PEOPLE._

JOSHUA i. 10-18.

God has spoken to Joshua; it is now Joshua's part to speak to the

people. The crossing of the Jordan must be set about at once, and in

earnest, and all the risks and responsibilities involved in that step

firmly and fearlessly encountered.

And in the steps taken by Joshua for this purpose we see, what we so

often see, how the natural must be exhausted before the supernatural

is brought in. Thus, in communicating with the people through the

_shoterim_, or officers, the first order which he gives is to "command

the people to prepare them victuals." "Victuals" denotes the natural

products of the country, and is evidently used in opposition to

"manna." In another passage we read that "the manna ceased on the very

morning after they had eaten of the old corn of the land" (chap. v.

12). This may have been a considerable time before, for the conquest

of Sihon and Og would give the people possession of ample stores of

food out of the old corn of the land. The manna was a provision for

the desert only, where few or no natural supplies of food could be

found. But the very day when natural stores become available, the

manna is discontinued. One cannot but contrast the carefully limited

use of the supernatural in Scripture with its arbitrary and unstinted

employment in mythical or fictional writings. Often in such cases it

is brought in with a wanton profusion, simply to excite wonder,

sometimes to gratify the love of the grotesque, not because natural

means could not have accomplished what was sought, but through sheer

love of revelling in the supernatural. In Scripture the natural is

never superseded when it is capable of either helping or accomplishing

the end. The east wind helps to dry the Red Sea, although the rod of

Moses has to be stretched out for the completion of the work. The

angel of God knocks Peter's chains from his limbs and opens the prison

gates for him, but leaves him to find his way thereafter as best he

can. So now. It is now in the power of the people to prepare them

victuals, and though God might easily feed them as He has fed them

miraculously for forty years, He leaves them to find food for

themselves. In all cases the co-operation of the Divine and the human

is carried out with an instructive combination of generosity and

economy; man is never to be idle; alike in the affairs of the temporal

and the spiritual life, the Divine energy always stimulates to

activity, never lulls to sleep.

A little explanation is needed respecting the time when Joshua said

the Jordan must be crossed--"within three days." If the narrative of

the first two chapters be taken in chronological order, more than

three days must have elapsed between the issuing of this order and the

crossing of the river, because it is expressly stated that the two

spies who were sent to examine Jericho hid themselves for three days

in the mountains, and thereafter recrossed the Jordan and returned to

Joshua (ii. 22). But it is quite in accordance with the practice of

Scripture narrative to introduce an episode out of its chronological

place so that it may not break up the main record. It is now generally

held that the spies were sent on before Joshua issued this order to

the people, because it is not likely that he would have committed

himself to a particular day before he got the information which he

expected the spies to bring. In any case, it is plain that no needless

delay was allowed. Half a week more and Jordan would be crossed,

although the means of crossing it had not yet been made apparent; and

then the people would be actually in their own inheritance, within the

very country which in the dim ages of the past had been promised to

their fathers.

Yes, the people generally; but already an arrangement had been made

for the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh on the

east side of the river. How, then, were they to act in the present

crisis? That had been determined between them and Moses when they got

leave to occupy the lands of Sihon and Og, on account of their

suitableness for their abundant flocks and herds. It had been arranged

then that, leaving their cattle and their children, a portion of the

men likewise, the rest would cross the river with their brethren and

take their share of the toils and risks of the conquest of Western

Canaan. All that Joshua needs to do now is to remind them of this

arrangement. Happily there was no reluctance on their part to fulfil

it. There was no going back from their word, even though they might

have found a loophole of escape. They might have said that as the

conquest of Sihon and Og had been accomplished so easily, so the

conquest of the western tribes would be equally simple. Or they might

have said that the nine tribes and a half could furnish quite a large

enough army to dispossess the Canaanites. Or they might have

discovered that their wives and children were exposed to dangers they

had not apprehended, and that it would be necessary for the entire

body of the men to remain and protect them. But they fell back on no

such after thought. They kept their word at no small cost of toil and

danger, and furnished thereby a perpetual lesson for those who, having

made a promise under pressure, are tempted to resile from it when the

pressure is removed. Fidelity to engagements is a noble quality, just

as laxity in regard to them is a miserable sin. Even Pagan Rome could

boast of a Regulus who kept his oath by returning to Carthage, though

it was to encounter a miserable death. In the fifteenth psalm it is a

feature in the portrait of the man who is to abide in God's tabernacle

and dwell in His holy hill, that he "sweareth to his own hurt, and

changeth not."

One arrangement was made by these transjordanic tribes that was

perfectly reasonable--a portion of the men remained to guard their

families and their property. The number that passed over was forty

thousand (Josh. iv. 13), whereas the entire number of men capable of

bearing arms (dividing Manasseh into two) was a hundred and ten

thousand (Num. xxvi. 7, 18, and 34). But the contingent actually sent

was amply sufficient to redeem the promise, and, consisting probably

of picked men, was no doubt a very efficient portion of the force. The

actual fighting force of the other tribes would probably be in the

same proportion to the whole; and there, too, a section would have to

be left to guard the women, children, and flocks, so that in point of

fact the labours and dangers of the conquest were about equally

divided between all the tribes.

Here, then, was an edifying spectacle: those who had been first

provided for did not forget those who had not yet obtained any

settlement; but held themselves bound to assist their brethren until

they should be as comfortably settled as themselves.

It was a grand testimony against selfishness, a grand assertion of

brotherhood, a beautiful manifestation of loyalty and public spirit;

and, we may add, an instructive exhibition of the working of the

method by which God's providence seeks to provide for the

dissemination of many blessings among the children of men. It was an

act of socialism, without the drawbacks which most forms of socialism

involve.

God has allowed many differences in the lots of mankind, bestowing on

some ample means, for which they toiled not neither did they spin;

bestowing, often on the same individuals, a higher position in life,

with corresponding social influence; setting some nations in the van

of the world's march, bestowing on some churches very special

advantages and means of influence; and it is a great question that

arises--what obligations rest on these favoured individuals and

communities? Does God lay any duty on them toward the rest of mankind?

The inquiry in its full scope is too wide for our limits; let us

restrict ourselves to the element in respect of which the

transjordanic tribes had the advantage of the others--the element of

time. What do those who have received their benefits early owe to

those who are behind them in time?

The question leads us first to the family constitution, but there is

really no question here. The obligations of parents to their children

are the obligations of those who have already got their settlement to

those who have not; of those who have already got means, and

strength, and experience, and wisdom to those who have not yet had

time to acquire them. It is only the vilest of our race that refuse to

own their obligations here, and this only after their nature has been

perverted and demonized by vice. To all others it is an obligation

which amply repays itself. The affection between parent and child in

every well-ordered house sweetens the toil that often falls so heavily

on the elders; while the pleasure of seeing their children filling

stations of respectability and usefulness, and the enjoyment of their

affection, even after they have gone out into the world, amply repay

their past labours, and greatly enrich the joys of life.

We advance to the relation of the rich to the poor, especially of

those who are born to riches to those who are born to obscurity and

toil. Had the providence of God no purpose in this arrangement? You

who come into the world amid luxury and splendour, who have never been

required to work for a single comfort, who have the means of

gratifying expensive tastes, and who grudge no expenditure on the

objects of your fancy:--was it meant that you were to sustain no

relation of help and sympathy to the poor, especially your neighbors,

your tenants, or your workpeople? Do you fulfil the obligations of

life when, pouring into your coffers the fruits of other men's toil,

you hurry off to the resorts of wealth and fashion, intent only on

your own enjoyment, and without a thought of the toiling multitude you

leave at home? Is it right of you to leave deserving people to fall

peradventure into starvation and despair, without so much as turning a

finger to prevent it? What are you doing for the widows and orphans?

Selfish and sinful beings! let these old Hebrews read you a lesson of

condemnation! They could not selfishly enjoy their comfortable homes

till they had done their part on behalf of their brethren, for

wherever there is a brotherly heart a poor brother's welfare is as

dear as one's own.

Then there is the case of nations, and pre-eminently of our own. Some

races attain to civilization, and order, and good government sooner

than others. They have all the benefit of settled institutions and

enlightened opinion, of discoveries in the arts and sciences, and of

the manifold comforts and blessings with which life is thus enriched,

while other nations are sunk in barbarism and convulsed by disorder.

But how much more prone are such nations to claim the rights of

superiority than to play the part of the elder brother! We are

thankful for the great good that has been done in India, and in other

countries controlled by the older nations. But even in the case of

India, how many have gone there not to benefit the natives, but with

the hope of enriching themselves. How ready have many been to indulge

their own vices at the cost of the natives, and how little has it

pained them to see them becoming the slaves of new vices that have

sunk them lower than before. Our Indian opium traffic, and our drink

traffic generally among native races--what is their testimony to our

brotherly feeling? What are we to think of the white traders among the

South Sea islands, stealing and robbing and murdering their feebler

fellow-creatures? What are we to think of the traffic in slaves, and

the inconceivable brutalities with which it is carried on? Or what are

we to think of our traders at home, sending out in almost uncountable

profusion the rum, and the gin, and the other drinks by which the poor

weak natives are at once enticed, enslaved, and destroyed? Is there

any development in selfishness that has ever been heard of more

heartless and horrible? Why can't they let them alone, if they will

not try to benefit them? What can come to any man in the end but the

well-merited punishment of those who out of sheer greed have made

miserable savages tenfold more the children of hell than before?

We pass over the case of the early settlers in colonies, because there

is hardly any obligation more generally recognised than that of such

settlers to lend a helping hand to new arrivals. We go on to the case

of Churches. The light of saving truth has come to some lands before

others. We in this country have had our Christianity for centuries,

and in these recent years have had so lively a dispensation of the

gospel of Christ that many have felt more than ever His power to

forgive, to comfort, to lift us up and bless us. Have we no duty to

those parts of the earth which are still in the shadow of death? If we

are not actually settled in the Promised Land, we are as good as

settled, because we have the Divine promise, and we believe in that

promise. But what of those who are yet "without Christ, alienated from

the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise,

having no hope, and without God in the world"? Have we no

responsibility for them? Have we no interest in that Divine plan which

seeks to use those who first receive the light as instruments of

imparting it to the rest? Infidels object that Christianity cannot be

of God, because if Christianity furnishes the only Divine remedy for

sin it would have been diffused as widely as the evil for which it is

the cure. Our reply is, that God's plan is to give the light first to

some, and to charge them to give it freely and cordially to others. We

say, moreover, that this plan is a wholesome one for those who are

called to work it, because it draws out and strengthens what is best

and noblest in them, and because it tends to form very loving bonds

between those who give and those who get the benefit. But what if the

first recipients of the light fold their hands, content to have got

the blessing themselves, and decline to do their part in sending it to

the rest? Surely there is here no ordinary combination of sins!

Indolence and selfishness at the root, and, with these, a want of all

public spirit and beneficent activity; and, moreover, not mere neglect

but contempt of the Divine plan by which God has sought the universal

diffusion of the blessing. Again we say, look to these men of Reuben,

Gad, and Manasseh. They were not the _élite_ of the race of Israel.

Their fathers, at least in the case of Reuben and Dan, were not among

the more honoured of the sons of Jacob. And yet they had the grace to

think of their brethren, when so many among us are utterly careless of

ours. And not only to think of them, but to go over the Jordan and

fight for them, possibly die for them; nor would they think of

returning to the comfort of their homes till they had seen their

brethren in the west settled in theirs.

And this readiness of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh to

fulfil the engagement under which they had come to Moses, was not the

only gratifying occurrence which Joshua met with on announcing the

impending crossing of the Jordan. For the whole people declared very

cordially their acceptance of Joshua as their leader, vowed to him the

most explicit fidelity, declared their purpose to pay him the same

honour as they had paid to Moses, and denounced a sentence of death

against any one that would not hearken to his words in all that he

commanded them.

Joshua, in fact, obtained from them a promise of loyalty beyond what

they had ever given to Moses till close on his death. It was the great

trial of Moses that the people so habitually complained of him and

worried him, embittering his life by ascribing to him even the natural

hardships of the wilderness, as well as the troubles that sprang

directly from their sins. It is the unwillingness of his people to

trust him, after all he has sacrificed for them, that gives such a

pathetic interest to the life of Moses, and makes him, more than

perhaps any other Old Testament prophet, so striking an example of

unrequited affection. After crossing the Red Sea, all the marvels of

that deliverance from Pharaoh of which he had been the instrument are

swallowed up and forgotten by the little inconveniences of the

journey. And afterwards, when they are doomed to the forty years'

wandering, they are ready enough to blame him for it, forgetting how

he fell down before God and pled for them when God threatened to

destroy them. Moreover, his enactments against the idolatry they loved

so well made him anything but popular, to say nothing of the

burdensome ceremonial which he enjoined them to observe. The time of

real loyalty to Moses was just the little period before his death,

when he led them against Sihon and Og, and a great stretch of fertile

and beautiful land fell into their hands. Moses had just gained the

greatest victory of his life, he had just become master of the hearts

of his people, when he was called away. For Moses at last did gain the

people's hearts, and those to whom Joshua appealed could say without

irony or sarcasm, "According as we hearkened unto Moses in all things,

so will we hearken unto thee."

In point of fact a great change had been effected on the people at

last. Moses had laboured, and Joshua now entered into his labours. The

same thing has often occurred in history, and notably in our own. In

civil life how much do we owe to the noble champions of freedom of

other days, through whose patriotism, courage, and self-denial the

hard fight was fought and the victory won that enables us to sit under

our vine and under our fig tree. In ecclesiastical life was it not the

blood of the martyrs and the struggles of those of whom the world was

not worthy, who wandered in deserts and in mountains and in dens and

caves of the earth, that won for us the freedom and the peace in which

we now rejoice? What blessings we owe to those that have gone before

us! And how can we better discharge our obligations to them than by

hastening to the aid of those who have but emerged from the period of

struggle and suffering, like the Christians of Madagascar or of

Uganda, whose fearful sufferings and awful deaths under the merciless

rule of heathen kings made Christendom stand aghast, and drew a wail

of anguish from her bosom?

The unanimity of the people in their loyalty to Joshua is a touching

sight. So far as appears there was not one discordant note in that

harmonious burst of loyalty. No Korah, Dathan, or Abiram rose up to

decline his rule and embarrass him in his new position. It is a

beautiful sight, the united loyalty of a great nation. Nothing more

beautiful has ever been known in the long reign of Queen Victoria than

the crowding of her people in hundreds of thousands to witness her

procession to St. Paul's on that morning when she went to return

thanks for the rescue of her eldest son from the very jaws of death.

Not one discordant note was uttered, not one disloyal feeling was

known; the vast multitude were animated by the spirit of sympathy and

affection for one who had tried to do her duty as a queen and as a

mother. It was a sight not unlike to this that was seen in the streets

of New York at the centennial celebration of the inauguration of

George Washington as first President of the United States. One was

thrilled by the thought that not only the multitude that thronged the

streets, but the representatives of the whole nation, gathered in

their churches throughout the land, were animated by a common

sentiment of gratitude to the man whose wisdom and courage had laid

the foundation of all the prosperity and blessing of the last hundred

years. Are not such scenes the pattern of that spirit of loyalty which

the entire race of man owes to Him who by His blood redeemed the

world, and whose rule and influence, if the world would but accept of

it, are so beneficent and so blessed? Yet how far are we from such a

state! How few are the hearts that throb with true loyalty to the

Saviour, and whose most fervent aspiration for the world is, that it

would only throw down its weapons of rebellion, and give to him its

hearty allegiance! Strange that the Old Testament Joshua should have

got at once what eighteen hundred years have failed to bring to the

New Testament Jesus! God hasten the day of universal light and

universal love, when He shall reign from sea to sea, and from the

river to the ends of the earth!

"One song employs all nations, and all cry

'Worthy the Lamb, for He was slain for us'!

The dwellers in the vales and on the rocks

Shout to each other, and the mountain tops

From distant mountains catch the flying joy,

Till nation after nation taught the strain

Earth rolls the rapturous Hosanna round."

The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Joshua · 第 6 / 33 章