I trust in the kindness of His law, and the goodness of His work.

And I will strive to love Him, and keep His law, and see His work,

while I live.

II. I trust in the nobleness of human nature, in the majesty of its

faculties, the fulness of its mercy, and the joy of its love.

And I will strive to love my neighbour as myself, and, even when I

cannot, will act as if I did.

III. I will labour, with such strength and opportunity as God gives

me, for my own daily bread; and all that my hand finds to do, I

will do with my might.

IV. I will not deceive, or cause to be deceived, any human being

for my gain or pleasure; nor hurt, or cause to be hurt, any human

being for my gain or pleasure; nor rob, or cause to be robbed, any

human being for my gain or pleasure.

V. I will not kill nor hurt any living creature needlessly, nor

destroy any beautiful thing, but will strive to save and comfort

all gentle life, and guard and perfect all natural beauty, upon the

earth.

VI. I will strive to raise my own body and soul daily into higher

powers of duty and happiness; not in rivalship or contention with

others, but for the help, delight, and honour of others, and for

the joy and peace of my own life.

VII. I will obey all the laws of my country faithfully; and the

orders of its monarch, and of all persons appointed to be in

authority under its monarch, so far as such laws or commands are

consistent with what I suppose to be the law of God; and when they

are not, or seem in anywise to need change, I will oppose them

loyally and deliberately, not with malicious, concealed, or

disorderly violence.

VIII. And with the same faithfulness, and under the limits of the

same obedience, which I render to the laws of my country, and the

commands of its rulers, I will obey the laws of the Society called

of St. George, into which I am this day received; and the orders of

its masters, and of all persons appointed to be in authority under

its masters, so long as I remain a Companion, called of St. George.

I will not enter in the present letter on any notice of the terms of

this creed and vow; nor of the grounds which many persons whose help I

sincerely desire, may perceive for hesitation in signing it—further

definitions of its meaning will be given as occasion comes; nor shall I

ever ask any one to sign it whom I do not know to be capable of

understanding and holding it in the sense in which it is meant I

proceed at once to define more explicitly those laws of the Company of

St. George to which it refers, and which must, at least in their power,

be known before they can be vowed fealty to.

The object of the Society, it has been stated again and again, is to

buy land in England; and thereon to train into the healthiest and most

refined life possible, as many Englishmen, Englishwomen, and English

children, as the land we possess can maintain in comfort; to establish,

for them and their descendants, a national store of continually

augmenting wealth; and to organize the government of the persons, and

administration of the properties, under laws which shall be just to

all, and Secure in their inviolable foundation on the Law of God.

“To buy land,” I repeat, or beg it; but by no means to steal it, or

trespass on it, as I perceive the present holders of the most part of

it are too ready to do, finding any bits of road or common which they

can pilfer unobserved. Are they quite mad, then; and do they think the

monster mob, gaining every day in force and knowledge, will let their

park walls stand much longer, on those dishonest terms? Doubtful enough

their standing is, even on any terms!

But our St. George’s walls will be more securely founded, on this wise.

The rents of our lands, though they will be required from the tenantry

as strictly as those of any other estates, will differ from common

rents primarily in being lowered, instead of raised, in proportion to

every improvement made by the tenant; secondly, in that they will be

entirely used for the benefit of the tenantry themselves, or better

culture of the estates, no money being ever taken by the landlords

unless they earn it by their own personal labour.

For the benefit of the tenantry, I say; but by no means, always, for

benefit of which they can be immediately conscious. The rents of any

particular farmer will seldom be returned to him in work on his own

fields, or investment in undertakings which promote his interest. The

rents of a rich estate in one shire of England may be spent on a poor

one in another, or in the purchase of wild ground, anywhere, on which

years of labour must be sunk before it can yield return; or in

minerals, or Greek vases, for the parish school. Therefore with the use

made of the rents paid, the tenantry will have no practical concern

whatever; they will only recognise gradually that the use has been

wise, in finding the prices of all serviceable articles diminishing,

and all the terms and circumstances of their, lives indicative of

increased abundance. They will have no more right, or disposition, to

ask their landlord what he is doing with the rents, than they have now

to ask him how many race-horses he keeps—or how much he has lost on

them. But the difference between landlords who live in Piccadilly, and

spend their rents at Epsom and Ascot, and landlords who live on the

grounds they are lords of, and spend their rents in bettering it, will

not be long in manifesting itself to the simplest minded tenantry; nor,

I believe, to the outside and antagonist world.

Sundry questions lately asked me by intelligent correspondents as to

the intended relations of the tenantry to the Society, may best be

answered by saying simply what I shall do, if ever the collected wealth

of the Company enables me to buy an estate for it as large as I could

have bought for myself, if I had been a railroad contractor.

Of course I could not touch the terms of the existing leases. The only

immediate difference would be, the definitely serviceable application

of all the rents, as above stated. But as the leases fell in, I should

offer renewal of them to the farmers I liked, on the single condition

of their complying with the great vital law of the St. George’s

Company,—“no use of steam power, nor of any machines where arms will

serve;” allowing such reduction of rent as should fully compensate them

for any disadvantage or loss which they could prove they incurred under

these conditions. I should give strict orders for the preservation of

the existing timber; see that the streams were not wantonly polluted,

and interfere in nothing else.

Such farms as were thrown up by their tenants, rather than submit to

these conditions, I should be in no haste to re-let; but put land

agents on them to cultivate them for the Society in the best manner,

and sell their produce;—as soon as any well recommended tenant offered

for them, submitting to our laws, he should have them for fixed rent.

Thus I should give room for development of whatever personal faculty

and energy I could find, and set, if successful, more easily followed

example. Meantime my schools and museums, always small and instantly

serviceable, would be multiplying among the villages,—youth after youth

being instructed in the proper laws of justice, patriotism, and

domestic happiness;—those of the Companions who could reside on the

lands would, each on his own farm, establish entirely strict obedience

to the ultimate laws determined upon as necessary:—if these laws are

indeed, as I do not doubt but that sincere care can make them,

pleasantly tenable by honest humanity, [61] they will be gradually

accepted voluntarily by the free tenants; and the system is as certain

to extend itself, on all sides, once seen to be right, as the branches

of an oak sapling.

While, therefore, I am perfectly content, for a beginning, with our

acre of rocky land given us by Mrs. Talbot, and am so little impatient

for any increase that I have been quietly drawing ragged-robbin leaves

in Malham cove, instead of going to see another twenty acres promised

in Worcestershire,—I am yet thinking out my system on a scale which

shall be fit for wide European work. Of course the single Master of the

Company cannot manage all its concerns as it extends. He must have, for

his help, men holding the same relation to him which the Marshals of an

army do to its General;—bearing, that is to say, his own authority

where he is not present; and I believe no better name than ‘Marshal’

can be found for these. Beneath whom, there will again be the

landlords, resident each in his own district; under these, the land

agents, tenantry, tradesmen, and hired labourers, some of whom will be

Companions, others Retainers, and others free tenants: and outside all

this there will be of course an irregular cavalry, so to speak, of more

or less helpful friends, who, without sharing in the work, will be glad

to further it more or less, as they would any other benevolent

institution.

The law that a Companion shall derive no profit from his companionship

does not touch the results of his own work. A Companion farmer will

have the produce of his farm as much as a free tenant; but he will pay

no dividends to the Companions who are not farmers.

The landlords will in general be men of independent fortune, who,

having gifts and ingenuity, choose to devote such gifts to the service

of the Society; the first condition of their appointment to a lordship

will be that they can work as much better than their labourers at all

rural labour as a good knight was wont to be a better workman than his

soldiers in war. There is no rule of supremacy that can ever supersede

this eternal, natural, and divine one. Higher by the head, broader in

the shoulders, and heartier in the will, the lord of lands and lives

must for ever be, than those he rules; and must work daily at their

head, as Richard at the trenches of Acre.

And what am I, myself then, infirm and old, who take, or claim,

leadership even of these lords? God forbid that I should claim it; it

is thrust and compelled on me—utterly against my will, utterly to my

distress, utterly, in many things, to my shame. But I have found no

other man in England, none in Europe, ready to receive it,—or even

desiring to make himself capable of receiving it. Such as I am, to my

own amazement, I stand—so far as I can discern—alone in conviction, in

hope, and in resolution, in the wilderness of this modern world. Bred

in luxury, which I perceive to have been unjust to others, and

destructive to myself; vacillating, foolish, and miserably failing in

all my own conduct in life—and blown about hopelessly by storms of

passion—I, a man clothed in soft raiment,—I, a reed shaken with the

wind, have yet this Message to all men again entrusted to me: “Behold,

the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Whatsoever tree therefore

bringeth not forth good fruit shall be hewn down, and cast into the

fire.”

This message, yet once more; and, more than message, the beginning of

the acts that must fulfil it. For, long since, I have said all that

needs to be said,—all that it was my proper charge and duty to say. In

the one volume of ‘Sesame and Lilies’—nay, in the last forty pages of

its central address to Englishwomen—everything is told that I know of

vital truth, everything urged that I see to be needful of vital

act;—but no creature answers me with any faith or any deed. They read

the words, and say they are pretty, and go on in their own ways. And

the day has come for me therefore to cease speaking, and begin doing,

as best I may; though I know not whether shall prosper, either this or

that.

And truly to all wholesome deed here in England, the chances of

prosperity are few, and the distinctness of adversity only conquerable

by fixed imagination and exhaustless patience—‘Adversis rerum

immersabilis undis.’ The wisest men join with the fools, and the best

men with the villains, to prevent, if they may, any good thing being

done permanently—nay, to provoke and applaud the doing of consistently

evil things permanently. To establish a national debt, and in the most

legal terms—how easy! To establish a national store, under any legal or

moral conditions of perpetuity—how difficult! Every one calls me mad

for so much as hoping to do so. ‘This looks like a charity, this

educating of peasants,’ said the good lawyer, who drew up the already

published conditional form of association. ‘You must not establish a

fund for charity; it is sure to lead to all sorts of abuses, and get

into wrong hands.’

Well, yes—it in merely human probability may. I do verily perceive and

admit, in convinced sorrow, that I live in the midst of a nation of

thieves and murderers; [62] that everybody around me is trying to rob

everybody else; and that, not bravely and strongly, but in the most

cowardly and loathsome ways of lying trade; that ‘Englishman’ is now

merely another word for black-leg and swindler; and English honour and

courtesy changed to the sneaking and the smiles of a whipped pedlar, an

inarticulate Autolycus, with a steam hurdy-gurdy instead of a voice. Be

this all so; be it so to the heart’s content—or liver and gall’s

content—of every modern economist and philosopher. I yet do verily

trust that out of this festering mass of scum of the earth, and

miserable coagulation of frog-spawn soaked in ditch-water, I can here

and there pluck up some drowned honour by the locks, and leave written

orders for wholesome deed, and collected monies for the doing thereof,

which will be obeyed and guarded after I am gone; and will by no means

fall into the power of the mendicant tribe who, too cowardly and

heartless to beg from the face of the living, steal the alms of the

dead, and unite the apparently inconsistent characters of beggar and

thief, seasoning the compound with sacrilege.

Little by little, if my life is spared to me, therefore, (and if I die,

there will I doubt not be raised up some one else in my room)—little by

little, I or they will get monies and lands together; handful gleaned

after handful; field joined to field, and landmarks set which no man

shall dare hereafter remove. And over those fields of ours the winds of

Heaven shall be pure; and upon them, the work of men shall be done in

honour and truth.

In such vague promise, I have for the most part hitherto spoken, not

because my own plans were unfixed, but because I knew they would only

be mocked at, until by some years of persistence the scheme had run the

course of the public talk, and until I had publicly challenged the

denial of its principles in their abstract statement, long enough to

show them to be invincible. Of these abstract principles, the

fifteenth, sixteenth, twentieth, twenty-second and twenty-third letters

in ‘Time and Tide,’ express all that is needful; only, in the years

that have passed since they were written, the ‘difficulties’ stated in

the seventeenth chapter have been under constant review by me; and of

the ways in which I mean to deal with them it is now time to speak.

Let us understand then, in the outset, the moral difference between a

national debt and a national store.

A national debt, like any other, may be honestly incurred in case of

need, and honestly paid in due time. But if a man should be ashamed to

borrow, much more should a people; and if a father holds it his honour

to provide for his children, and would be ashamed to borrow from them,

and leave, with his blessing, his note of hand, for his grandchildren

to pay, much more should a nation be ashamed to borrow, in any case, or

in any manner; and if it borrow at all, it is at least in honour bound

to borrow from living men, and not indebt itself to its own unborn

brats. If it can’t provide for them, at least let it not send their

cradles to the pawnbroker, and pick the pockets of their first

breeches.

A national debt, then, is a foul disgrace, at the best. But it is, as

now constituted, also a foul crime. National debts paying interest are

simply the purchase, by the rich, of power to tax the poor. Read

carefully the analysis given of them above, Letter VIII., p. 7.

The financial operations of the St. George’s Company will be the direct

reverse of these hitherto approved arrangements. They will consist in

the accumulation of national wealth and store, and therefore in

distribution to the poor, instead of taxation of them; and the fathers

will provide for, and nobly endow, not steal from, their children and

children’s children.

My readers, however, will even yet, I am well aware, however often I

have reiterated the statement to them, be unable to grasp the idea of a

national store, as an existing possession. They can conceive nothing

but a debt;—nay, there are many of them who have a confused notion that

a debt is a store!

The store of the St. George’s Company, then, is to be primarily of

food; next, of materials for clothing and covert; next, of books and

works of art,—food, clothes, books, and works of art being all good,

and every poisonous condition of any of them destroyed. The food will

not be purveyed by the Borgia, nor the clothing dyed by Deianira, nor

the Scriptures written under dictation of the Devil instead of God.

The most simply measurable part of the store of food and clothing will

be the basis of the currency, which will be thus constituted.

The standard of value will be a given weight or measure of grain, wine,

wool, silk, flax, wood, and marble; all answered for by the government

as of fine and pure quality, variable only within narrow limits.

The grain will be either wheat, oats, barley, rice, or maize; the wine

of pure vintage, and not less than ten years old; [63] the wool, silk,

and flax of such standard as can be secured in constancy; the wood,

seasoned oak and pine; and for fuel in log and faggot, with finest wood

and marble for sculpture. The penny’s worth, florin’s worth, ducat’s

worth, and hundred ducats’ worth of each of these articles will be a

given weight or measure of them, (the penny roll of our present

breakfast table furnishing some notion of what, practically, the grain

standard will become.) Into the question of equivalent value I do not

enter here; it will be at once determined practically as soon as the

system is in work. Of these articles the government will always have in

its possession as much as may meet the entire demand of its currency in

circulation. That is to say, when it has a million in circulation, the

million’s worth of solid property must be in its storehouses: as much

more as it can gather, of course; but never less. So that, not only,

for his penny, florin, ducat, or hundred-ducat note, a man may always

be certain of having his pound, or ton, or pint, or cask, of the thing

he chooses to ask for, from the government storehouses, but if the

holders of the million of currency came in one day to ask for their

money’s worth, it would be found ready for them in one or other form of

those substantial articles. Consequently, the sum of the circulating

currency being known, the minimum quantity of store will be known. The

sum of the entire currency, in and out of circulation, will be given

annually on every note issued (no issues of currency being made but on

the first day of the year), and in each district, every morning the

quantities of the currency in and out of circulation in that district

will be placarded at the doors of the government district bank.

The metallic currency will be of absolutely pure gold and silver, and

of those metals only; the ducat and half-ducat in gold, the florin,

penny, halfpenny, and one-fifth of penny in silver; the smaller coins

being beat thin and pierced, the halfpenny with two, the one-fifth of

penny with five, apertures. [64] I believe this double-centime will be

as fine a divisor as I shall need. The florin will be worth tenpence;

the ducat, twenty florins.

The weight of the ducat will be a little greater than that of the

standard English sovereign, and, being in absolutely pure gold, it will

be worth at least five-and-twenty shillings of our present coinage. On

one of its sides it will bear the figure of the archangel Michael; on

the reverse, a branch of Alpine rose; above the rose-branch, the words

‘Sit splendour’; [65] above the Michael, ‘Fiat voluntas’; under the

rose-branch, ‘sicut in cœlo’; under the Michael, ‘et in terrâ,’ with

the year of the coinage: and round the edge of the coin, ‘Domini.’

The half-ducat will bear the same stamp, except that while on the ducat

the St. Michael will be represented standing on the dragon, on the

half-ducat he will be simply armed, and bearing St. George’s shield.

On the florin, the St. George’s shield only; the Alpine rose on all

three.

On the penny, St. George’s shield on one side, and the English daisy on

the other, without inscription. The pierced fractional coins will only

bear a chased wreathen fillet, with the required apertures in its

interstices.

There will be considerable loss by wear on a coinage of this pure

metal; but nothing is so materially conducive to the honour of a state

in all financial function as the purity of its coinage; and the loss

will never, on the whole currency, equal annually the tenth part of the

value of the gunpowder spent at present in salutes or fireworks; and,

if a nation can afford to pay for loyal noise and fancies in fire, it

may also, and much more rationally, for loyal truth and beauty in its

circulating signs of wealth. Nor do I doubt that a currency thus

constituted will gradually enter into European commerce, and become

everywhere recognised and exemplary.

Supposing any Continental extension of the Company itself took place,

its coinage would remain the same for the ducat, but the shield of the

State or Province would be substituted for St. George’s on the minor

coins.

There will be no ultimate difficulty in obtaining the bullion necessary

for this coinage, for the State will have no use for the precious

metals, except for its currency or its art. An Englishman, as he is at

present educated, takes pride in eating out of a silver plate, and in

helping out of a silver tureen the richest swindlers he can ask to

dinner. The Companions of St. George may drink out of pewter, and eat

off delft, but they will have no knaves for guests, though often

beggars; and they will be always perfectly well able to afford to buy

five or ten pounds’ worth of gold and silver for their pocket change;

and even think it no overwhelming fiscal calamity if as much even as

ten shillings should be actually lost in the year, by the wear of it;

seeing that the wear of their dinner napkins will be considerably

greater in the same time. I suppose that ten pounds’ worth of bullion

for the head of each family will amply supply the necessary quantity

for circulation; but if it should be found convenient to have

fifteen—twenty—or fifty pounds in such form, the national store will

assuredly in time accumulate to such desirable level. But it will

always be a matter of absolute financial indifference, what part of the

currency is in gold and what in paper; its power being simply that of a

government receipt for goods received, giving claim to their return on

demand. The holder of the receipt may have it, if he likes, written on

gold instead of paper, provided he bring the gold for it to be written

on; but he may no more have a bar of gold made into money than a roll

of foolscap, unless he brings the goods for which the currency is the

receipt. And it will therefore, by St. George’s law, be as much forgery

to imitate the national coin in gold, as in paper.

Next to this store, which is the basis of its currency, the government

will attend to the increase of store of animal food—not mummy food, in

tins, but living, on land and sea; keeping under strictest overseership

its breeders of cattle, and fishermen, and having always at its command

such supply of animal food as may enable it to secure absolute

consistency of price in the main markets. In cases when, by any disease

or accident, the supply of any given animal food becomes difficult, its

price will not be raised, but its sale stopped. There can be no evasion

of such prohibition, because every tradesman in food will be merely the

salaried servant of the Company, and there will be no temptation to it,

because his salary will be the same, whether he sells or not. Of all

articles of general consumption, the government will furnish its own

priced standard; any man will be allowed to sell what he can produce

above that standard, at what price he can get for it; but all goods

below the government standard will be marked and priced as of such

inferior quality;—and all bad food, cloth, or other article of service,

destroyed. And the supervision will be rendered simple by the fewness

of the articles permitted to be sold at all; for the dress being in all

classes as determined as the heraldry of coronets, and for the most

part also rigorously simple, and all luxurious living disgraceful, the

entire means of domestic life will be within easy definition.

Of course the idea of regulating dress generally will be looked upon by

the existing British public as ridiculous. But it has become ridiculous

because masters and mistresses attempt it solely for their own pride.

Even with that entirely selfish end, the natural instinct of human

creatures for obedience, when in any wholesome relations with their

superiors, has enabled the masters to powder their coachmen’s wigs, and

polish their footmen’s legs with silk stockings; and the mistresses to

limit their lady’s maids, when in attendance, to certain styles of cap.

Now as the dress regulations of the St. George’s Company will be quite

as much for the pride of the maid as the mistress, and of the man as

the master, I have no fear but they will be found acceptable, and

require no strictness of enforcement. The children of peasants, though

able to maintain their own families, will be required to be as clean as

if they were charity-boys or girls; nobody will be allowed to wear the

cast clothes of other people, to sell or pawn their own, or to appear

on duty, agricultural or whatever other it may be, in rags, any more

than the Horse Guards or the Queen’s dairy-maids are now; also on

certain occasions, and within such limits as are needful for good

fellowship, they will be urged to as much various splendour as they can

contrive. The wealth of the peasant women will be chiefly in hereditary

golden ornaments of the finest workmanship; and in jewellery of uncut

gems—agates only, or other stones of magnitude, being allowed to be

cut, and gems of large size, which are worth the pains, for their

beauty; but these will be chiefly used in decorative architecture or

furniture, not in dress. The dress of the officers of the Company will

be on all occasions plainer than that of its peasants; but hereditary

nobles will retain all the insignia of their rank, the one only

condition of change required on their entering the St. George’s Company

being the use of uncut jewels, and therefore—seldom of diamonds. [66]

The next main staple of the Company’s store will be its literature.

A chosen series of classical books will be placed in every village

library, in number of copies enough to supply all readers; these

classics will be perfectly printed and perfectly bound, and all in one

size of volume, unless where engravings need larger space: besides

these village libraries, there will be a museum in every district,

containing all good ancient books obtainable: gradually, as the design

expands itself, and as time passes on, absorbing, by gift, or purchase,

the contents of private libraries, and connecting themselves with

similarly expanding museums of natural history. In all schools, the

books necessary for their work will be given to the pupils; and one of

their earliest lessons will be the keeping of them clean and orderly.

By ordering of Fors, I went only this last month to see the school in

which Wordsworth was educated. It remains, as it was then, a school for

peasant lads only; and the doors of its little library, therefore, hang

loose on their decayed hinges; and one side of the schoolroom is

utterly dark—the window on that side having been long ago walled up,

either ‘because of the window tax, or perhaps it had got broken,’

suggested the guardian of the place.

Now it is true that this state of things cannot last long; but the cure

will be worse than the disease. A fit of reactionary vanity and folly

is sure to seize the village authorities; that old schoolroom, with its

sacred associations, will be swept from the hillside, and a grand piece

of Birmingham Gothic put up, with a master from Kensington, and

enforced weekly competitive examination in Sanscrit, and the Binomial

Theorem.

All that the school wants is, hinges to its library doors as good as

every shop in the street has to its shutters; the window knocked

through again where it was originally; the books whose bindings are

worn out, rebound, and a few given (in addition to those on the

subjects of arithmetic and grammar), which the boys may rather ask

leave to read, than take opportunity to throw into corners.

But the ten or twenty pounds needed for this simple reformation could,

I suppose, at present, by no persuasion nor argument be extracted from

the united pockets of the gentlemen of the neighbourhood. Meantime,

while the library doors flap useless on their hinges, the old country

churchyard is grim with parallelograms of iron palisade, enforced

partly to get some sacred market for the wares of the rich ironmongers

who are buying up the country; and partly to protect their valuable

carcases in their purtrefying pride. Of such iron stores the men of St.

George’s Company, dead, will need none, and living, permit none. But

they will strictly enforce the proper complement of hinges to their

school-library doors.

The resuscitation of the, at present extinct, art of writing being

insisted upon in the school exercises of the higher classes, the

libraries will be gradually enriched with manuscripts of extreme

preciousness. A well-written book is as much pleasanter and more

beautiful than a printed one as a picture is than an engraving; and

there are many forms of the art of illumination which were only in

their infancy at the time when the wooden blocks of Germany abolished

the art of scripture, and of which the revival will be a necessary

result of a proper study of natural history.

In next Fors, I shall occupy myself wholly with the subject of our Art

education and property; and in that for December, I hope to publish the

legal form of our constitution revised and complete. The terminal

clauses respecting the Companions’ right of possession in the lands

will be found modified, or in great part omitted, in the recast deed;

but I am neither careful nor fearful respecting the terms of this

instrument, which is to be regarded merely as a mechanical means of

presently getting to work and having land legally secured to us. The

ultimate success or failure of the design will not in the least depend

on the terms of our constitution, but on the quantity of living honesty

and pity which can be found, to be constituted. If there is not

material enough out of which to choose Companions, or energy enough in

the Companions chosen to fill the chain-mail of all terms and forms

with living power, the scheme will be choked by its first practical

difficulties; and it matters little what becomes of the very small

property its promoters are ever likely to handle. If, on the contrary,

as I believe, there be yet honesty and sense enough left in England to

nourish the effort, from its narrow source there will soon develop

itself a vast Policy, of which neither I nor any one else can foresee

the issue, far less verbally or legally limit it; but in which,

broadly, by the carrying out of the primally accepted laws of Obedience

and Economy, the Master and Marshalls will become the Ministry of the

State, answerable for the employment of its revenues, for its relations

with external powers, and for such change of its laws as from time to

time may be found needful: the Landlords will be the resident

administrators of its lands, and immediate directors of all labour,—its

captains in war, and magistrates in peace: the tenants will constitute

its agricultural and military force, having such domestic and

acquisitive independence as may be consistent with patriotic and kindly

fellowship: and the artists, schoolmen, tradesmen, and inferior

labourers, will form a body of honourably paid retainers, undisturbed

in their duty by any chance or care relating to their means of

subsistence.

Fors Clavigera (Volume 5 of 8) Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain · 第 46 / 56 题