LETTER LVII.

I have received, from the author, M. Émile de Lavelaye, his

pamphlet,—“Protestantism and Catholicism in their bearing upon the

Liberty and Prosperity of Nations, with an introductory Letter by Mr.

Gladstone.” I do not know why M. de Lavelaye sent me this pamphlet. I

thank him for the courtesy; but he has evidently read none of my books,

or must have been aware that he could not have written anything more

contrary to the positions which I am politically maintaining. On the

other hand, I have read none of his books, and I gather from passages

in his pamphlet that there may be much in them to which I should be

able to express entire adhesion.

But of the pamphlet in question, and its preface, he will, I trust,

pardon my speaking in the same frank terms which I should have used had

it accidentally come under my notice, instead of by the author’s gift.

The pamphlet is especially displeasing to me, because it speaks of

‘Liberty’ under the common assumption of its desirableness; whereas my

own teaching has been, and is, that Liberty, whether in the body, soul,

or political estate of men, is only another word for Death, and the

final issue of Death, putrefaction: the body, spirit, and political

estate being alike healthy only by their bonds and laws; and by Liberty

being instantly disengaged into mephitic vapour.

But the matter of this pamphlet, no less than the assumption it is

based on, is hateful to me; reviving, as it does, the miserable

question of the schism between Catholic and Protestant, which is

entirely ridiculous and immaterial; and taking no note whatever of the

true and eternal schism, cloven by the very sword of Michael, between

him that serveth God, and him that serveth Him not.

(The passage now and henceforward omitted in this place, contained an

attack on Mr. Gladstone written under a complete misconception of his

character. See, for explanation of it, the beginning of the third

letter in the second series of Fors. The blank space is left partly in

order not to confuse the Index references, partly in due memorial of

rash judgment.)

The fact being that I am, at this central time of my life’s work, at

pause because I cannot set down any form of religious creed so simple,

but that the requirement of its faithful signature by persons desiring

to become Companions of St. George, would exclude some of the noblest

champions of justice and charity now labouring for men; while, on the

other hand, I cannot set down the first principles of children’s noble

education without finding myself in collision with an almost resistless

infidel mob, which is incapable of conceiving—how much less of

obeying—the first laws of human decency, order, and honour. So that

indeed I am fain to ask, with my Leeds correspondent, in last Fors,

page 234, what is to be done for young folks to whom “music has little

attraction, except in the form of dance, and pictures are nothing”?

With her pardon, pictures are much to this class of young people. The

woodcuts of halfpenny novels representing scenes of fashionable

life,—those representing men murdering their wives, in the ‘Police

News,’—and, finally, those which are to be bought only in the

back-shop,—have enormous educational influence on the young British

public: which its clergymen, alike ignorant of human nature and human

art, think to counteract—by decorating their own churches,

forsooth,—and by coloured prints of the story of Joseph; while the

lower tribes of them—Moodys and Sankeys—think to turn modern musical

taste to account by fitting negro melodies to hymns.

And yet, my correspondent may be thankful that some remnant of delight

is still taken in dance-music. It is the last protest of the human

spirit, in the poor fallen creatures, against the reign of the absolute

Devil, Pandemonium with Mammon on the throne, instead of Lucifer,—the

Son of the Earth, Lord of Hell, instead of the Son of the Morning.

Let her stand in the midst of the main railroad station at Birmingham;

and think—what music, or dancing, or other entertainment fit for

prodigal sons, could be possible in that pious and little prodigal

locality. [55] Let her read the account of our modern pastoral music,

at page 15 of my fifth letter,—of modern Venetian “Barcarolle,” page 14

of Letter XIX. and 12 of Letter XX.,—and of our modern Campanile, and

Muezzin call to prayer, at page 262 of this Fors.

“Work is prayer”—thinks your Wakefield Mahometan;—his vociferous

minaret, in the name, and by the name, of the Devil, shall summon

English votaries to such worship for five miles round; that is to say,

over one hundred square miles of English land, the Pandemoniacal voice

of the Archangel-trumpet thus arouses men out of their sleep; and

Wakefield becomes Wakeful-field, over that blessed space of acre-age.

Yes; my correspondent may be thankful that still some feeble lust for

dancing on the green,—still some dim acknowledgment, by besotted and

stupefied brains, of the laws of tune and time known to their fathers

and mothers—remains possible to the poor wretches discharged by the

excursion trains for a gasp of breath, and a gleam of light, amidst

what is left to them, and us, of English earth and heaven. Waltzing,

drunk, in the country roads by our villages; yet innocently drunk, and

sleepy at sunset; not like their born masters and teachers, dancing,

wilfully, the cancan of hell, with harlots, at seven in the morning.

[56]

Music and dancing! They are quite the two primal instruments of

education. Make them licentious; let Mr. John Stuart Mill have the

dis-ordering of them, so that—(see page 18 of Letter XII.)—“no one

shall be guided, or governed, or directed in the way they should

go,”—and they sink to lower and lower depth—till the dance becomes

Death’s; and the music—a shriek of death by strychnine. But let Miriam

and David, and the Virgins of Israel, have the ordering of them, and

the music becomes at last the Eternal choir; and the Dance, the

Karol-dance of Christmas, evermore. [57]

Virgins of Israel, or of England, richly clad by your kings, and

“rejoicing in the dance,” how is it you do not divide this sacred,—if

sacred,—joy of yours with the poor? If it can ever be said of you, as

birds of God,

“Oh beauteous birds, methinks ye measure

Your movements to some heavenly tune,”

can you not show wherein the heavenliness of it consists,

to—suppose—your Sunday-school classes? At present, you keep the dancing

to yourselves, and graciously teach them the catechism. Suppose you

were to try, for a little while, learning the catechism yourselves; and

teaching them—to dance?

Howbeit, in St. George’s schools, this, the most ‘decorous,’ rightly

taught, of all exercises, shall not fail of its due discipline to any

class whatsoever:—reading, writing, and accounts may all be spared

where pupils show no turn to any of those scholarships, but music and

dancing, never. [58] Generally, however, it will be the best singers

and dancers who ask for teaching also in literature and art; for all,

there shall at least be the way open to these; and for none, danger or

corruption possible in these. For in their libraries there shall be

none but noble books, and in their sight none but noble art.

There is no real difficulty or occasion for dispute in choosing these.

Admit the principle of selection, and the practice is easy enough;

only, like all practical matters, the work must be done by one man,

sufficiently qualified for it; and not by a council. If he err, the

error may be represented by any one cognizant of it, and by council

corrected. But the main work must be done single-handed.

Thus, for the use of the St. George’s Company, I shall myself, if my

life is spared, write out a list of books which without any question

will be found serviceable in their libraries; [59]—a system of art

instruction which will be secure so far as it reaches; and a list of

purchaseable works of art, which it will be desirable to place in the

national schools and museums of the company. With this list of

purchaseable works, I shall name, as I have time, those in the museums

of Europe which ought to be studied, to the exclusion of those on which

time would be wasted.

I have no doubt that this work, though done at first for the St.

George’s Company, will be found generally useful, and especially that

the system of drawing arranged for them will in many respects supersede

that of Kensington. I had intended to write it separately for the use

of schools; but after repeated endeavours to arrange it in a popular

form, find that it will not so shape itself availably, but must consist

of such broad statements of principle as my now enlarged experience

enables me to make; with references to the parts of my other books in

which they are defended or illustrated: and of directions for practice

given as I can get illustrations of them prepared; leaving the

systematization of them to be made by the master of each drawing

school, according to the requirements of his scholars. (See page 19 of

Letter IX.)

For example of the impossibility of publishing on a system. It happens

to be now fine weather here in Lancashire;—I am able, therefore, to

draw out of doors; and am painting a piece of foreground vegetation,

which I don’t want to be used by students till after at least fifty

other exercises have been gone through. But I must do this one while

light and life serve; and not wait till I am sixty, to do work which my

eyes are not good enough for at fifty-five.

And if the readers of Fors think my letters too desultory, let them

consider what this chief work, specified in page 20 of Letter IX.,

involves. No one has the least notion of the quantity of manual labour

I have to go through, to discharge my duty as a teacher of Art. Look at

the frontispiece to Letter XX., which is photographed from one of my

architectural sketches; and if you can draw, copy a bit of it;—try

merely the bead moulding with its dentils, in the flat arch over the

three small ones, lowest on the left. Then examine those three small

ones themselves. You think I have drawn them distorted, carelessly, I

suppose. No. That distortion is essential to the Gothic of the Pisan

school; and I measured every one of the curves of those cusps on the

spot, to the tenth of an inch; and I ought to be engraving and

publishing those drawings, by rights; but, meantime, your Pisan

Republicans dash the chapel down, for a job in rebuilding it;—and the

French Emperor dashes every cathedral in France to pieces, to find his

masons work,—and gets for result, Reuter’s telegram, (page 21 of Letter

VI.); and I, with my eyes full of dust and driven smoke, am obliged to

leave my own work, and write Fors, more and more necessarily becoming

principal, as I find all my other work rendered vain.

Nevertheless, in the course of Fors itself, I shall try to give, as

aforesaid, art instruction enough for all need, if any one cares to

obey it. How little any one is likely to care, the closing paragraphs

of the letter from Wakefield show so clearly that I think it desirable

to print them here consecutively, as part of the text of Fors itself.

“Yet people tell me that those were very benighted Tory days I am

regretting. Wakefield was always held to be a Tory place, given up hand

and foot to the magnates who owned the great estate round. I know how

when a small thing in frilled slops, but with my bosom full of

patriotic pride in our town, I used to feel bitterly depressed at

hearing a rising Radical Leeds clothier, who came to see us, sometimes

denounce Wakefield as a ‘one-eyed hoil,’ his emphatic way of indicating

our want of sweep of vision. I remember he generally capped his

arguments by demanding, in sonorous tones, if any men worthy of the

name of Britons would put up with that ‘obsolete monopoly’ of the soke

mills.

“To tell truth, I am afraid that we felt a good deal of mean-spirited

admiration for the neighbouring squires and lords on the occasions when

they showed themselves and their handsome carriages in our streets: but

at least the Wentworths and Pilkingtons and Squire Waterton were

gentlemen and scholars; our new magnates have nothing to boast but

their money. It seems to me better that people should boast of the old

oaks of Walton, and the old pictures of —— Priory, than tell how many

thousands an iron lord made by the last rise in iron: and that is what

they talk of now. And if the iron kings have supplanted the landlords,

they are not any more free. The old farmers might vote blindly out of

blind respect for the old landlords; but is it not better than the

newly-enfranchised puddlers and strikers selling votes openly for the

price of a gallon of whisky? We have lost a good deal, although we are

long rid of the soke monopoly, which used to be a standing reproach to

us. I think that the town bought off the soke just after the Corn Law

agitation, when the great railways began to enclose the wide meadows

about the town with their ugly ramparts and arches, where the trains

keep up a continual scream.

“But the wool and corn magnates of the place held to their old

traditions long after that; and when Titus Salt asked for a footing in

the town that he might build there his great alpaca factories, he was

rejected. I had gone abroad then, but my heart was in the old place,

and I caught up eagerly all concerning it. Sometimes I heard doleful

accounts of its decadence—how the big houses were empty altogether, how

the inns were closed, the coaches stopped, the river traffic

diminished, and the great corn warehouses by the bridge falling to

ruin. There was no trace left of the gaieties that once gave the town

the name of ‘Merrie Wakefield.’ All the smart young men were leaving it

to push their way in Leeds or Manchester, and the girls left behind

were growing up into a population of old maids.

“So the doleful story went on for many a year. But insensibly the key

changed. Mills were springing up, and shops; and the houses had gone up

in rent. The sleepy streets were thronged with workers; in short, the

town seemed new-born altogether. And the ——s,—I knew the ——s,—nobody

would have thought it, such a simple kind of man as old —— seemed; yet

the tale ran that he could buy up all Wakefield, and young Bill was

going to live in —— Hall!! Young Bill in —— Hall! one of the most

sacred spots my memory cherished.

“I remembered him well,—an audacious boy, with a gift for wry faces,

and always up to some street prank. I remembered the well-worn jacket

and battered cap that his father’s thrift imposed on him. And he was to

be one of new rulers of the bright new time! and lord it in those

venerable oaken chambers sacred to Lady ——‘s ghost! It seemed

incredible; but twenty years had changed everything. Old ——, the

father—a man of the true old English grain, had, in my young days, a

foundry at the lower end of the town, and was said even then to be

worth a ‘mint of money.’ Worthy folks were he and his; but still people

of whom the loftier town’s-folk took no cognizance socially, for was

not the wife’s father old Robin the Pedlar? A good old soul he was, who

peddled to frugal farm wives the best thread and needles that could be

got,—and took no alms from his kinsfolk, and lived and died in

blameless humble honesty. And his grandson now rules in the hall where

old Robin, perchance, took a humble bit and sup at the back door. He

has a Scotch estate besides, and only failed of Parliament last year

because he bribed his way a little too openly. My enlightened friends

look upon his rise as one of the grandest signs of the grand new time;

but I cannot rejoice with them. When I see how he and his like are

doing their worst to foul the air and blacken the fields about the

town, I cannot help wishing the squires back in —— Hall.

“Men say, too, that he is a stronger Tory than the bluest of the old

squires. He has forgotten old Robin of the bobbins, and rules the

people from whom he sprang, with an iron hand, as such often do.

Naturally, his success has attracted others, and the town will soon be

surrounded with forges. On the once green Calder bank, where I used to

see garlands of brown pears ripening in the sweet sunshine, there is a

desert of dross and ashes, and twenty black throats vomiting fire and

fumes into the summer sky; and under the big sheds you see hundreds of

the liberated Britons of these improved days, toiling, half-naked, in

sweltering heat and din, from morning to evening. This, however, is

‘the activity and spread of the iron trade,’ which our local paper

tells us ‘are the most satisfactory pledge of the future progress and

prosperity of our town.’

“I wish that I could believe it; but it vexes me beyond comfort to see

the first landscape I knew and loved blighted by the smoke of the

forges, and to find one sweet association after another swept away.

“Even Sunday brings no respite to the eye. The forges are fired up

shortly after noonday, and many of the long chimneys follow suit. And

in the town the noise is so constant, you can scarcely hear the church

chimes unless you are close to the tower.

“Did you ever hear Wakefield chimes? We were very proud of them in the

old time. They had a round of pleasant sleepy tunes, that never failed

us through summer suns and winter frost; and came to be bound up

indelibly with the early memories of us children. How I loved to hear

them as I bounded, full of morning gladness, across the green Vicar’s

Croft to school; or at night when lying an unwilling prisoner in bed,

before the warm summer evening was ended. To my childish fancy there

was a strange wizardry bound up with that dark church steeple, frosted

and crumbling with age, which would break out overhead into mysterious

music when I was far afield, but expecting it.

“Years after, when poor and lonely in a great foreign city, I came, one

bitter winter’s day, upon an obscure cloister church standing by a

frozen river. It was a city without bells, and I had often longed for

the familiar sound. I was dreadfully homesick that day, and stood upon

the bridge, hapless, and listless; looking at the strange spire, the

strange houses and frozen-up boats, in a kind of dream. Suddenly the

cloister tower struck the hour,—four o’clock of a dark December day,

and presently it broke into a chime.

“It was a very simple ditty; but what a passion of longing it wakened

for England and the old chimes of that little English town! I felt as

if my heart could bear no more. I must go home; I must see the old

places again, cost what it might. But morning brought fresh counsels,

and many a year passed before I revisited the old place.

“At last I was there again, after many disappointments, and laid my

head to rest once more beneath the shadow of the old steeple.

“I woke with an expectant heart. It was a bright May day, such as I

remembered twenty years before. The big church bell tolled nine: then

came a pause, and my thirsty ears were strained to catch the first

sounds of the dear old chimes. ‘Ding’ went a treble bell high in the

air, the first note of ‘Tara’s Halls,’ and then!—a hideous sound I

cannot describe, a prolonged malignant yell, broke from the sky and

seemed to fill the earth. I stopped my ears and ran indoors, but the

sound followed to the innermost chambers. It gathered strength and

malignancy every moment, and seemed to blast all within its reach. It

lasted near two minutes, and ended with a kind of spasm and howl that

made every nerve shudder. I do not exaggerate. I cannot adequately

describe the hideous sound. When I had recovered my wits, I asked the

meaning of this horrible noise. My informant, a rising young townsman

of the new stamp, told me that it was the new steam-whistle at the

foundry, commonly called the ‘American Devil;’ that it was the most

powerful in the West Riding, and could be heard five miles off.

“It was only at half-power then, calling the workmen from breakfast;

but at six in the morning I could hear it in double force. I asked if

it was possible that people would quietly put up with such a hideous

disturbance. He owned that the old inhabitants did not like it; but

then, he said, they were a sleepy set, and wanted stirring up.

“Indeed, I actually found that the town was infected by four other

similar whistles, profaning dawn and eve with their heaven-defying

screech.

“The nuisance has been abolished since, I hear. They say it actually

killed one old lady by starting her up just at the only moment when it

was possible for her weary nerves to get sleep. She happened to have a

relation in the town council: a stir was made about it, and the

whistles were suppressed.

“But the peaceful, half town, half rural life of Wakefield is gone for

ever, I fear.

“Silk-mills and dye-works are encroaching on the corn-fields and

pastures; rows of jerry-built cottages are creeping up Pinder’s Fields,

where I used to pull orchises; greasy mill-girls elbow ladies in the

Westgate, and laugh and jeer at passing young men in a way that would

have horrified the old inhabitants. And everywhere there is an

indescribable smokiness and dirtiness more demoralizing than any tongue

can tell, or mind conceive.

“Well, it is the ‘march of the times.’ It will go on, I suppose, as in

other quiet pleasant English towns, until all the sweet Calder valley

is swallowed up in the smoke of Tophet. They will cut the snowdrop wood

down, and cover Heath Common with cheap villas, and make the old hall

into an ‘institution.’ You know how it will be. A river black with

filth and stagnant with foulness, a wilderness of toiling suburbs such

as you saw at Bradford; and where the cowslips and the corn grew, the

earth will be thick with ‘institutions.’ There will be a Blind

Institution, and an Eye and Ear Institution, an Orthopædic Institution,

and a Magdalen Institution, and Mechanics’ Institutions; and we shall

hear a great deal of the liberality and beneficence of the cotton and

iron kings of the place. But will all this compensate one little child

for robbing it of its God-given birthright of earth and sky?

“I cannot believe it.

“Poor little martyrs! There will be no ‘swallow twittering from the

straw-built shed’ for them,—only the American Devil calling father to

his hot, hard day’s labour. What can they make of it all? What kind of

outlook will they have in coming years from the bridge of my early

recollections? What I saw on the Medlock yesterday—such a hideous

sight!—yet my husband remembers catching fish there. The gases would

kill a fish like a lightning-stroke, now.

“And the poor children! It makes me so sad, having some of my own, to

think of those who will be born there, with hearts as hungry for nature

and truth as mine was; who will never see God’s heaven, save through

grimy panes and smoke; who will have no sweet cowslip-fields to walk

in,—only the defiled pavement; who will grow hard and sour before

childhood is over, with the riddle of their joyless lives.

“How I have drifted on.

“Your allusion to Wakefield Bridge in the Fors of February (?) unloosed

a flood of long-buried recollections.

“This is what you draw on yourself by opening your heart to others.

Pray forgive the trespass on your time.

“Yours gratefully,

“E. L.”

Fors Clavigera (Volume 5 of 8) Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain · 第 42 / 56 题